Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter Mods
haunyack;214814 Wrote: > Funny though...even the Slim people were involved in the flamewar. > > It may have become an embarrassment to daddy Logitech. > > . Sigh... here we go with the evil corporate overlords again. I deleted it because several users asked me to. Aside from spam, that is the only reason I have ever deleted anything. -- seanadams seanadams's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36826 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Cheap tweak
tyler_durden;214843 Wrote: > Actually, at subsonic speeds, a layer of dirt would probably improve > aerodynamics by trapping a layer of still air against the body of the > car. Air slides over air more easily than air slides over the car > body. This is the reason why golf balls have a dimpled cover. They > fly farther with the dimpled cover because of reduced drag. > > TD Dimples on a golf ball are symmetrical, therefore the effect of air pressure is predictable. If one could predict the effects of random occurrence (grime on a car finish, for example), that person could play the lotto and win every time. Random occurance is the angst of statistical analysis. . -- haunyack Transporter -> B&K Reference 200.2 -> Vandersteen 3A Signature. RWA (Analog) SB3 -> Rotel RB 1070 -> B&W Matrix 805. Fridgidare -> Mirror Pond pale ale -> easy chair w/remote -> irritated neighbors. haunyack's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9721 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36854 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Cheap tweak
So, you're saying parking lot dings improve overall performance? I dunno; I've been using high-voltage electrical insulator wax on my cars for several years, and they are so slippery if you lean against them you'll slide right off. http://www.amazon.com/845-Liquid-Insulator-Wax/dp/B000AP1JUA -- Pale Blue Ego Pale Blue Ego's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=110 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36854 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Cheap tweak
Actually, at subsonic speeds, a layer of dirt would probably improve aerodynamics by trapping a layer of still air against the body of the car. Air slides over air more easily than air slides over the car body. This is the reason why golf balls have a dimpled cover. They fly farther with the dimpled cover because of reduced drag. TD -- tyler_durden tyler_durden's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2701 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36854 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Cheap tweak
tyler_durden;214838 Wrote: > You know, my car always seems to "drive better" when it's clean. I > wonder if it is the same phenomenon... > > TD It's been proven that a layer of grime does reduce the aerodynamic (laminar flow) properties of a moving object. Vacuum excluded of course. So, I agree that a layer of dust would interfere with the sound pressure emitted from a transducer. . -- haunyack Transporter -> B&K Reference 200.2 -> Vandersteen 3A Signature. RWA (Analog) SB3 -> Rotel RB 1070 -> B&W Matrix 805. Fridgidare -> Mirror Pond pale ale -> easy chair w/remote -> irritated neighbors. haunyack's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9721 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36854 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Cheap tweak
You know, my car always seems to "drive better" when it's clean. I wonder if it is the same phenomenon... TD -- tyler_durden tyler_durden's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2701 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36854 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Cheap tweak
Pat Farrell;214833 Wrote: > haunyack wrote: > > It occurred to me to put the brush on the attachment hose and vacuum > > the grill clothe on my speakers. > > You mean you "removed a veil"? > > > -- > Pat Farrell pfarrell (AT) bioinformatx (DOT) com > www.bioinformatx.com Quite right Pat. A veil of dust. . -- haunyack Transporter -> B&K Reference 200.2 -> Vandersteen 3A Signature. RWA (Analog) SB3 -> Rotel RB 1070 -> B&W Matrix 805. Fridgidare -> Mirror Pond pale ale -> easy chair w/remote -> irritated neighbors. haunyack's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9721 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36854 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Cheap tweak
haunyack wrote: > It occurred to me to put the brush on the attachment hose and vacuum > the grill clothe on my speakers. You mean you "removed a veil"? -- Pat Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.bioinformatx.com ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Cheap tweak
So I decided it was time to vacuum...I'm a bachelor so that is indeed a somewhat rare occasion. It occurred to me to put the brush on the attachment hose and vacuum the grill clothe on my speakers. Well, an improvement (no dbt to verify) in [audiophile adjective] and [audiophile adjective] is immediately apparent. Also the [audiophile adjective] became [audiophile adjective] with greater [audiophile adjective]. Nice! . -- haunyack Transporter -> B&K Reference 200.2 -> Vandersteen 3A Signature. RWA (Analog) SB3 -> Rotel RB 1070 -> B&W Matrix 805. Fridgidare -> Mirror Pond pale ale -> easy chair w/remote -> irritated neighbors. haunyack's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9721 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36854 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter Mods
CPC;214657 Wrote: > What happen to the TP modification thread? Funny though...even the Slim people were involved in the flamewar. It may have become an embarrassment to daddy Logitech. . -- haunyack Transporter -> B&K Reference 200.2 -> Vandersteen 3A Signature. RWA (Analog) SB3 -> Rotel RB 1070 -> B&W Matrix 805. Fridgidare -> Mirror Pond pale ale -> easy chair w/remote -> irritated neighbors. haunyack's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9721 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36826 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] A photo of your Squeezebox setup (please)
A poll associated with this post was created, to vote and see the results, please visit http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=19817 Question: Should there be a new forum for photos? - yes - no - maybe SB3 --> Musical Fidelity X-DAC / Marantz 8300 SACD --> Copland CTA305 --> Classé CA-101 --> Martin Logan Vista / Behringer DSP 1124P / Whise Profounder. +---+ |Filename: IMG_1195a.jpg| |Download: http://forums.slimdevices.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=3056| +---+ -- amey01 amey01's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11274 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=19817 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Design miss in SB3 digital output? or Slimserver problem ?
I just find this very interesting! I personally don't think it is the ADC / DAC either - not that I've made any comparisons, but I can only assume because analogue recordings (that have had no ADC / DAC) also sound completely different to the real thing. My bet (guess) would be that if you played a "live" band through an ADC then DAC and piped them directly into the speakers it would still sound "live". Clearly - something is going on here that we don't understand. -- amey01 amey01's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11274 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36503 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DRC/Inguz and Microphone Calibration
Thanks. My room is very bright (polished conrete floors and glass and plaster), so your observation about brightness makes a lot of sense. Will give it a try this week. Thanks, Muski -- muski SB3->Bryston BP25DA->Bryston 4B-SST->Watt Puppy 7s Transporter->Headrom Max Balanced Amp->Balanced AKG701s & HD650s muski's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3670 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36716 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] s/pdf SB better than s/pdf soundcard pc?
I presume that your mainboard and the SB alike have optical digital outputs. So there should not be any electrical influence ones the signal has passed the optoelectrical converter... Anyway, I THINK it is all voodoo. A word which I come to like since I got myself into the very expensive hobby of being a so called audiophile. ;) Don't worry about digital signal quality worry about the noise (audible) hard disks and coolers in a PC produce! Well, and jitter? Just try the search button and after a long very long time make your mind up about it. It really depends on the receiver. But I can't see why the squeezebox (a very tightly packed package) should induce less electrical noise than a fully grown pc. -- jaysung jaysung's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12375 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36784 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] s/pdf SB better than s/pdf soundcard pc?
No, its not always the same. Although the sequence of 1s and 0s ought to be the same, this has to be represented by an analog electrical or optical signal which can have timing or other imperfections. These imperfections may or may not trouble the device that is receiving the signal: a signal with a lot of noise in it will obviously present more of a challenge to the receiver. Typically this shows up as "jitter" (search the forums for many, many threads on this topic) which can have some subtle distorting effect on the receiver. But a really top class receiving device (presumeably a DAC in this case) might be able to overcome any noise and make all sources sound alike. HTH Ceejay -- ceejay ceejay's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=148 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36784 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] s/pdf SB better than s/pdf soundcard pc?
Thanks Ceejay, So the electrical noise of the computer may disturb the s/pdf signal sent to the DAC. But, is it true that a s/pdf signal itself is always "the same", independant of the source(I'm not technically educated as you might have guessed)? Thanks, Anko -- anko anko's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9983 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36784 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] A photo of your Squeezebox setup (please)
A poll associated with this post was created, to vote and see the results, please visit http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=19817 Question: Should there be a new forum for photos? - yes - no - maybe Hey all Here's my latest setup. Currently, the SB3 is serving duty as an analog pre for my tube amp, as it blew away my previous digital setup! (see link). My new speakres, Douvall Bella Lunas. my previous rig: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?p=140349&highlight=itai#post140349 +---+ |Filename: IMG_5064s.jpg| |Download: http://forums.slimdevices.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=3053| +---+ -- itai itai's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7712 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=19817 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Balanced vs Single ended output from Transporter
johann wrote: > But I think one is missing the point if it just has to do with getting > the bass in control. Diffusing the first reflexion is at least as IMO. Controlling the first reflections are important. They are also a lot easier to do than controlling the below 200hz bass. The first thing to do is to move the speakers away from the walls, get them off the floor, etc. (unless you have Quads or Maggies). Carpet, sofas, and other stuff that the wife wants anyway help a lot with the first reflections. And while skyscape diffusers work great, they have lousey WAF for most. An alternative that works well and has a better WAF is a bookcase/bookshelf with books of varying sizes, not lined up. It can act as a decent approximation of a QRD with much better WAF. Ethan also has plans for his bass traps on his personal site, which is handy for folks who are good with tools and can locate the high density insulation locally. -- Pat http://www.pfarrell.com/music/slimserver/slimsoftware.html ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Balanced vs Single ended output from Transporter
Thanks Pat. In the meantime I googled and had a look at their web site. I agree that acoustic treaments can do wonders for the sound and gives very good bang for the buck. But I think one is missing the point if it just has to do with getting the bass in control. Diffusing the first reflexion is at least as IMO. The RealTraps web site said that shipping to Europe was not so expensive but with 6 MiniTraps to Denmark at $457.07, it's a bit steep I think. -- johann johann's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10177 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36774 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] A photo of your Squeezebox setup (please)
A poll associated with this post was created, to vote and see the results, please visit http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=19817 Question: Should there be a new forum for photos? - yes - no - maybe Arcam Solo with Transporter. A nice match :) +---+ |Filename: 15072007091.jpg | |Download: http://forums.slimdevices.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=3046| +---+ -- amcluesent amcluesent's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10286 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=19817 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any plans on incorporating the AK4397 ?
, it would have been modders dream. I agree there is no point in adding extra pcb in the current model. Lets hope Transporter 2 can take advantages of it. Mr. Adams? -- Kiep Kiep's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=8844 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36823 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Which Interconnect Cable??
Here's an excellent source for cheap, good-quality cables. Most of them are $10 - $20 and very well-made: http://www.cablewholesale.com/prodpages/audiovideoproducts.htm They also offer lots of longer lengths, for not much more money. -- Pale Blue Ego Pale Blue Ego's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=110 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36667 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DRC/Inguz and Microphone Calibration
Muski, "what I would expect" means that I am comparing (by ear) the original uncorrected sound of my system (flac files), that I know by experience to have a lumpy bass due to my particular room, but that is also pretty flat on midrange and highs, to the Inguz-corrected sound (flac/InguzDSP files). I use both test tones and music I know well. You have to compare: 1) the uncorrected sound (as above) to the standard ecm8000.txt-corrected sound; 2) the uncorrected sound (as above) to the calibrated sound. If sounds in 1) are similar on midrange and highs and the brightness only appears in 2), then the problem has to be the calibration, because unless your room is extremely dead or there is a problem with the tweeters, the Watts are pretty flat above the upper bass. I am using the normal.drc from the Inguz site. -- vdorta vdorta's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1446 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36716 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Which Interconnect Cable??
you could try my relatively cheap diy cable recipe...its in the diy section ! if you build using silver there should be some audible gains over the standard [often crappy] digital cables on the market... I prefer coax to optical ..even glass toslink sound thin when compared to even the modest diy cable. But that may be more a reflection of the dac I use. Interstingly I use a toslink from HDrecoder to hifi as the coax creates an untraceable hum loop ...and to be honest is relatively low fi in comparison. -- zanash zanash's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12157 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36667 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Dac connections
Both coax and optical are fine for connecting SB's. Which works better in your system is a matter of trial and error - in 90% of systems there will be no discernable difference and in the remaining 10% one or the other will be very slightly preferred. It will depend on many factors and is impossible to predict. -- Phil Leigh You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it ain't what you'd call minimal... ...SB3+TACT+Altmann+MF DACXV3/Linn tri-amped Aktiv 5.1 system and some very expensive cables ;o) Phil Leigh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=85 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36831 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Dac connections
markwm;214674 Wrote: > I'm looking at buying a dac. Bit confused as to which connection type is > best. Coaxial, Optical, USB & Firewire. > > What is the benefit of Firewire over Coaxial. The Apogee Mini Dac just > added a firewire board for example. What are you tring to connect to? Squeezebox and Transporter dont have USB or Firewire. I would use Coax in preference to optical pesronally. -- anselld anselld's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11703 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36831 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter Mods
Guys - I believe it wasn't deleted but renamed to "random slug-fest". Darren -- darrenyeats darrenyeats's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10799 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36826 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter Mods
I think I missed the last few posts...argh I just need to know :-) -- tomjtx tomjtx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7449 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36826 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter Mods
It got nuked as people were getting a bit hot under the collar, I think. Shame, it disappeared while I was reading it - it was great fun!! -- adamslim Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others http://www.last.fm/user/AdamSlim/ 'Last.fm group: people who don't listen to any of last.fm's top artists' (http://www.last.fm/group/People+who+don%27t+listen+to+any+of+last.fm%27s+top+artists) SB+, EAR 859, Living Voice Auditorium II plus some other stuff SB3, Shek d2, Ming-Da MC84-C, Harbeth HL-P3ES adamslim's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7355 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36826 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Dac connections
I'm looking at buying a dac. Bit confused as to which connection type is best. Coaxial, Optical, USB & Firewire. What is the benefit of Firewire over Coaxial. The Apogee Mini Dac just added a firewire board for example. -- markwm markwm's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12366 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36831 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any plans on incorporating the AK4397 ?
Sadly it's not a direct swap, it comes in a different physical package and requires a different supply voltage on the digital side. It might be possible to make it fit using a little adapter PCB of some kind, but the danger is that doing so would negate the effect of the careful layout on Transporter's main board. I know for a fact that even just a few mm of extra PCB trace in the wrong place can have a severe impact on sound quality, so I'd be surprised to see a genuinely worthwhile improvement by going down this route. Transporter mk II, on the other hand - no reason NOT to change. -- AndyC_772 AndyC_772's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10472 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36823 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DRC/Inguz and Microphone Calibration
vdorta;214539 Wrote: > Wouldn't this suggest the calibration is wrong? No, I think it was 'operator error' on my part -- I don't think that I generated my first set of filters correctly. I have since regenerated everything, and am not hearing the clipping I noticed the first time with the normal filter. The sounds is a little brighter, but that may simply be that I was so accustomed to the old ones. I should do some more side-by-side listening to the calibrated and uncalibrated filters. Turns out that when I plot the 'normal' and 'soft' filters there is almost no difference between the two in terms of freq response correction. My understanding is that the difference between 'soft' and 'normal' has more to do with the degree of phase correction. I also just read that the 'No Correction' filter just does freq filtering, with no phase correction, so I will try listening to that, too. I guess it's also possible that you might have a better instance of an ECM 8000 than mine. As I said before, I would be interested to try the same exercise with a calibrated Earthworks mic. BTW, are you using the 'normal.drc' from the Inguz site or the one included with DRC? Muski P.S. Just curious -- you say 'what I would expect'. Is that based on published measurements of your equipment or something else? -- muski SB3->Bryston BP25DA->Bryston 4B-SST->Watt Puppy 7s Transporter->Headrom Max Balanced Amp->Balanced AKG701s & HD650s muski's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3670 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36716 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter Mods
What happen to the TP modification thread? -- CPC CPC's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12336 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36826 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
