Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] SB3 -> Transporter Minireview
andynormancx;313089 Wrote: > Don't forget that the most expensive part of the SB3 is the screen and > the TP has two of them. Also, that knob must be a pricey bit of kit. Hopefully those cosmetic items do not account for a big chunk of the difference in pricing. My expectation is that the main point of the Transporter is to improve on the sound of the SB3, and the difference in cost should be attributed to sound quality. -- agentsmith System 1: SB2 and a mostly Naim system System 2: SB2 connected digitally to a Meridian F80 agentsmith's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1838 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=49001 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] SB3 -> Transporter Minireview
I have two SB3 and one TP... I use a SB3 for my main stereo setup in my music room, because I have a very nice DAC and currently very few hi-rez files. The few I have, I can play on the computer instead. For the secondary stereo in the living room I use the TP. Why? The answer is simple - why use a SB3 with an external DAC, when the TP's DAC (in my ears) is better than any DAC in its price range! I would love the idea of a Transporter without knobs and display as well. I always use the remote, and a Controller is arriving soon. -- StigErik StigErik's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=16340 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=49001 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] power supply upgrade for duet receiver
Any suggestions for low priced power supply upgrades for the Duet Receiver? Price up to $75, some assembly ok. Thanks! -- p-cubed p-cubed's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15028 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=49041 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter V.43 with knob fix
Why would some units do it and not others? Is there a difference in the hardware? What triggers it? -- wireless200 wireless200's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11887 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=48966 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter V.43 with knob fix
patrija;313305 Wrote: > Hi. I tried the 7.1 nightly on Monday and my transporter would no longer > play music. My duet controller showed the music playing (progress bar > filling), and the transporter display queues the song but it never > starts playing. Down graded to 7.01 night and it works again. I had a similar problem a while back going from 7.0.1 to 7.2. A full reset (hold Add while connecting power) fixed it, a Xilinx reset (which I tried first) did not. Don't know what the underlying issue was. -- radish radish's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=77 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=48966 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter V.43 with knob fix
Hi. I tried the 7.1 nightly on Monday and my transporter would no longer play music. My duet controller showed the music playing (progress bar filling), and the transporter display queues the song but it never starts playing. Down graded to 7.01 night and it works again. -- patrija patrija's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=380 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=48966 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter V.43 with knob fix
cool, I wanted to stick with 7.1 so I could get some 88.1/24 files, but didn't like the degausing noises. but there is no .exe file in the folder now...I'll try tomorrow -- mikel51 mikel51's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=16688 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=48966 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] SB3 -> Transporter Minireview
mswlogo;313277 Wrote: > Can't the duet remote be used with any SqueezeBox/TP? Yes, it can, that's what was used in the initial beta testing. You can even us it with the Slimp3 :) -- SuperQ SuperQ's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2139 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=49001 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] SB3 -> Transporter Minireview
iPhone;313274 Wrote: > Yes, if the better half doesn't like the sofa more then you. All kidding > aside, that is exactly what my post was about. If one needs or is > willing to pay Transporter prices to have 88.2/96 capability, then by > all means buy a TP! If one just likes the way it looks but has no need > for the DAC, fine buy it if one can afford it. If one loves the VFD UV > meters, again buy it if one can afford it. > > But all the wishing in the world is not going to create a Transporter > Duet available tomorrow. Now that the Duet is out, maybe people can > lobby for an audiophile Deluxe Duet or Deluxe Receiver that is a TP > with a blank face plate and no analog section. For audiophiles that > want the TP internal digital features without an analog section (of > course it would have to be 1.75RU of aluminum). Can't the duet remote be used with any SqueezeBox/TP? -- mswlogo Thinkpad XP SS > Cat5 > Transporter > SPDIF-COAX > Meridian G68ADV (Trifield, Room corrected, Upsampled) > DSP6000 Mains, DSP5500HC Center, DSP33 Rears mswlogo's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9090 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=49001 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] SB3 -> Transporter Minireview
mswlogo;313269 Wrote: > I just bought a new sofa that was more expensive than I could get at > some discount furniture store. It's not any more comfortable and has no > more seating capacity. But it looks really really nice. Was I wrong to > buy the sofa that appealed to me more? Yes, if the better half doesn't like the sofa more then you. All kidding aside, that is exactly what my post was about. If one needs or is willing to pay Transporter prices to have 88.2/96 capability, then by all means buy a TP! If one just likes the way it looks but has no need for the DAC, fine buy it if one can afford it. If one loves the VFD UV meters, again buy it if one can afford it. But all the wishing in the world is not going to create a Transporter Duet available tomorrow. Now that the Duet is out, maybe people can lobby for an audiophile Deluxe Duet or Deluxe Receiver that is a TP with a blank face plate and no analog section. For audiophiles that want the TP internal digital features without an analog section (of course it would have to be 1.75RU of aluminum). -- iPhone *iPhone* 'Last.FM' (http://www.last.fm/user/mephone) Media Room: Transporter, VTL TL-6.5 Signature Pre-Amp, Ayre MX-R Mono Blocks, Vandersteen Quatro, VeraStarr 6.4SE 6-channel Amp, VCC-5 Reference Center, four VSM-1 Signatures, Runco RS 900 CineWide AutoScope 2.35:1 Living Room: Duet, ADCOM GTP-870HD, Cinepro 3K6SE III Gold, Vandersteen Model 3A Signature, Two 2Wq subs, VCC-2, Two VSM-1 Bedroom: SB3, NAD C370, Thiel 2.3 Home Office: SB3, Parasound Vamp v.3, VSM-1 Sigs Mobile: SB3, Audioengine A5 iPhone's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13622 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=49001 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] SB3 -> Transporter Minireview
Guys you don't read very well. I said I never expected TP to sound better as a digital transport. It was worth a check though !! I doubt a SB+ sounds any different on digital outputs as well on a good dejittering DAC. But it does have more capabilities that are worth it to me. Mainly 88.2/96K. And if my library only has 5% 24/96 it's worth it to me. As I also said I think we will see more 24/96 as physical media phases out. I see more people spend boatloads of $$$ on snake oil products. At least I get something for it. I love the Vu meters. I love the 19" width. I love being able to shuffle cables around the back without the SB3 dancing around and falling off the shelf. I love the ability to now buy 24/96 music and be able to hear it. I just bought a new sofa that was more expensive than I could get at some discount furniture store. It's not any more comfortable and has no more seating capacity. But it looks really really nice. Was I wrong to buy the sofa that appealed to me more? -- mswlogo Thinkpad XP SS > Cat5 > Transporter > SPDIF-COAX > Meridian G68ADV (Trifield, Room corrected, Upsampled) > DSP6000 Mains, DSP5500HC Center, DSP33 Rears mswlogo's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9090 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=49001 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] SB3 -> Transporter Minireview
ModelCitizen;313236 Wrote: > I think much of the point of the Transporter is that a very high quality > DAC is integrated into the device. Running an external DAC on a > Transporter seems an odd thing to do. > > MC I have to agree with what MC said. The main differences in an SB3 and TP (aside from the front panel controls, knob, meters, case) on the digital output side is a better power supply, better processor, and the fact that the TP can handle 88.2 and 96 KHz formats (since this post is not about using the Slim DACs). If one has a very nice DAC, has no need to play 88.2 or 96 recording, then I really think an SB3/Duet is all one needs. In less of course it is beneath one to have audio equipment that is not 19 inches wide! ;) A Bel Canto DAC 3 and SB3 fit nicely together on a 19-inch shelf and sounds good on the analog side also. So if the speakers one uses have their own DAC, why buy a TP unless one has a huge amount of 88.2 or 96 KHz files? Of course this is assuming the Audiophile inside oneself will allow the SB3/Duet even though its not rack mountable. :} -- iPhone *iPhone* 'Last.FM' (http://www.last.fm/user/mephone) Media Room: Transporter, VTL TL-6.5 Signature Pre-Amp, Ayre MX-R Mono Blocks, Vandersteen Quatro, VeraStarr 6.4SE 6-channel Amp, VCC-5 Reference Center, four VSM-1 Signatures, Runco RS 900 CineWide AutoScope 2.35:1 Living Room: Duet, ADCOM GTP-870HD, Cinepro 3K6SE III Gold, Vandersteen Model 3A Signature, Two 2Wq subs, VCC-2, Two VSM-1 Bedroom: SB3, NAD C370, Thiel 2.3 Home Office: SB3, Parasound Vamp v.3, VSM-1 Sigs Mobile: SB3, Audioengine A5 iPhone's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13622 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=49001 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] SB3 -> Transporter Minireview
I think much of the point of the Transporter is that a very high quality DAC is integrated into the device. Running an external DAC on a Transporter seems an odd thing to do. MC -- ModelCitizen Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. It's the music stupid! http://www.last.fm/user/ModelCitizen ModelCitizen's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=446 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=49001 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] SB3 -> Transporter Minireview
It's probably not surprising that there was little (indeed no) discernable difference. In principle, if a DAC is doing its job properly then it should be pretty well immune to jitter, and since they're the same bits, there's no scope for improvement. Since you have a £5k Meridian device that's receiving your digital data, I'd be very surprised if it didn't deal with jitter very well indeed. In fact, I'd be rather worried about it if there were a big improvement moving to the TP! -- adamslim Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others SB+, EAR V20, Living Voice OBX-R2s plus some other stuff SB3, Charlize, Harbeth HL-P3ES adamslim's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7355 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=49001 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] SB3 -> Transporter Minireview
I also thought that the Transporter was an excellent digital transport, and was disappointed that a 'digital only' version didn't exist. I found it to be better than the unmodified SB3 as a digital transport but it is too long ago to say how it compares against my modified SB3. I wasn't too impressed with the analogue output of the Transporter. For me, the real strength of the Transporter is its power supply sections, the other features not being so important. We should also remember the at-tunes SB+ as an excellent alternative to both the SB3 and Transporter! -- Nuuk Nuuk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4844 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=49001 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Mac Mini, Bootcamp or Parallels, And Inguz
Contemplating the purchase of a Mac Mini for use with my SB3. I went away from Mac when I bought the SB3 3 years ago because of the weak support for OSX. With the ability of Intel Macs to run flavors of Windows, the question now is wheather to run XP(OEM installs ending 6/30), a flavor of Vista, and if either Parallels or Bootcamp will be compatible( I've read Parallels has problems with peripherals) Oh, and does the C2Duo have enough horsepower to use the Inguz plugin for said setup? -- konut konut's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1596 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=49024 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] SB3 -> Transporter Minireview
mswlogo;313104 Wrote: > Front Panel isn't exactly free. > Second Display. > Faster Processor. > Power Supply. > Cabinet. > > The R&D on the analog was probably pretty significant. The added cost > in replicating it, is probably pretty darn cheap. Analog connectors and > labor to connect them are probably the most significant cost of the > analog. Hi MSWlogo, I gather from your review that you were uisng the TP and SB3 only as digital transports - digital output from either and not analog? This would be good to know, Thanks. -- mr_bill mr_bill's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=6737 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=49001 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Behringer DEQ2496 in Transporter digital loop for room correction?
cliveb;313077 Wrote: > A quick question. When using the effects loop, I presume that the TP's > digital inputs can't be used for a different source? > Yep, that's correct. -- Heimiko Transporter -> XLR Attenuators (-20db) -> Electrocompaniet AW100 DMB -> Dynaudio Audience 122 ___ └> BK Monolith Analog modded SB3 -> tube buffer -> Trends Audio TA-10 -> Eltax Monitor III Heimiko's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3462 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=48350 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] SB3 -> Transporter Minireview
agentsmith;313084 Wrote: > I would hope that more than one third of the cost is the analogue output > section and the DAC+circuitry, I would think that these are just about > the only 2 parts that seperates its sound quality from the SB3 which > cost a fraction of the transporter. Front Panel isn't exactly free. Second Display. Faster Processor. Power Supply. Cabinet. The R&D on the analog was probably pretty significant. The added cost in replicating it, is probably pretty darn cheap. Analog connectors and labor to connect them are probably the most significant cost of the analog. -- mswlogo Thinkpad XP SS > Cat5 > Transporter > SPDIF-COAX > Meridian G68ADV (Trifield, Room corrected, Upsampled) > DSP6000 Mains, DSP5500HC Center, DSP33 Rears mswlogo's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9090 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=49001 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] SB3 -> Transporter Minireview
Rodney_Gold;313098 Wrote: > Well , I have had one transporter with a bust knob out the box , soon > after the top 1/2 of the right hand screen went , then I got a new one > out the box and the top 1/2 of the left hand screen hs failed 4 days > later ...so perhaps these pricey bits are more a liability than an > assett. > At any rate - I bought the TP for its dac and the balanced outputs to > feed a pair of ATC's etc , but to be honest , am dissapointed in its > DAC and am more annoyed with the fact the expensive unit has failed yet > again. > I might not even open the new TP but just flog it and get myself > another SB3 for my DSP speakers - If im not using the nalog side of > things , the TP doesnt seem justified to me. > In terms of my Digital output , changing the way files are decoded and > streamed (decode flac on the puter and stream wav) , turning off the > TP's display and the meridian speakers one too (quite a noticeable > difference when turning of the speakers display) made quite nice > differences in the Sonics. Well it's the exact same screen on SB3 and Transporter, you just have two of them. I can perfectly see folks not justifying it if only using SPDIF. To me it's worth it for the price I got it. I want 88.2 and 96Khz capability. I think you may have just had some bad luck because I have not seen many reports of failures on SB or TP. I'll have to play with shutting off displays and see how it sounds. I've heard of that issue before but not specific to Meridian or Slim Devices. -- mswlogo Thinkpad XP SS > Cat5 > Transporter > SPDIF-COAX > Meridian G68ADV (Trifield, Room corrected, Upsampled) > DSP6000 Mains, DSP5500HC Center, DSP33 Rears mswlogo's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9090 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=49001 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] SB3 -> Transporter Minireview
Well , I have had one transporter with a bust knob out the box , soon after the top 1/2 of the right hand screen went , then I got a new one out the box and the top 1/2 of the left hand screen hs failed 4 days later ...so perhaps these pricey bits are more a liability than an assett. At any rate - I bought the TP for its dac and the balanced outputs to feed a pair of ATC's etc , but to be honest , am dissapointed in its DAC and am more annoyed with the fact the expensive unit has failed yet again. I might not even open the new TP but just flog it and get myself another SB3 for my DSP speakers - If im not using the nalog side of things , the TP doesnt seem justified to me. In terms of my Digital output , changing the way files are decoded and streamed (decode flac on the puter and stream wav) , turning off the TP's display and the meridian speakers one too (quite a noticeable difference when turning of the speakers display) made quite nice differences in the Sonics. -- Rodney_Gold Sb3/Z-sys RDP1/meridian DSP5500's TP/X-cans v3/Senns 650's TP/TACT 2.0/SCM 50a's TP/Meridian DSP5000's "The nicest thing about smacking your head against the wall is...the feeling you get when you stop" Rodney_Gold's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=14618 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=49001 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] SB3 -> Transporter Minireview
agentsmith;313084 Wrote: > I would hope that more than one third of the cost is the analogue output > section and the DAC+circuitry, I would think that these are just about > the only 2 parts that seperates its sound quality from the SB3 which > cost a fraction of the transporter. Don't forget that the most expensive part of the SB3 is the screen and the TP has two of them. Also, that knob must be a pricey bit of kit. -- andynormancx Yes, it will. Yes, all of them. Yes, SoftSqueeze as well. What ? I SAID ALL OF THEM ! andynormancx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17417 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=49001 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] SB3 -> Transporter Minireview
mswlogo;313076 Wrote: > I should have mentioned that I had always hoped Slim Devices would have > released a Tranport only (no DAC) Transporter which was another reason > I waited, but it never materialized and don't expect it ever will. > Probably 1/3 the cost of the transporter is it's analog/DAC section > which is a shame it's wasted. > I would hope that more than one third of the cost is the analogue output section and the DAC+circuitry, I would think that these are just about the only 2 parts that seperates its sound quality from the SB3 which cost a fraction of the transporter. -- agentsmith System 1: SB2 and a mostly Naim system System 2: SB2 connected digitally to a Meridian F80 agentsmith's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1838 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=49001 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: roll up! roll up! Get your �350 network patch cable here!
+1 on those Amazon reviews - excellent. I just love the way that every now and then someone pops in one that [I think!!] is meant to be taken seriously. -- ceejay ceejay's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=148 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=48834 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] SB3 -> Transporter Minireview
I should have mentioned that I had always hoped Slim Devices would have released a Tranport only (no DAC) Transporter which was another reason I waited, but it never materialized and don't expect it ever will. Probably 1/3 the cost of the transporter is it's analog/DAC section which is a shame it's wasted. I should also mention that the Meridian has a 3 Stage FIFO so the jitter difference between decent digital sources (e.g. SB and TP) tends to make them all equal sounding. I was thinking of comparing them with the FIFO's turned off. But there are FIFO's in the speakers too that can't be defeated. -- mswlogo Thinkpad XP SS > Cat5 > Transporter > SPDIF-COAX > Meridian G68ADV (Trifield, Room corrected, Upsampled) > DSP6000 Mains, DSP5500HC Center, DSP33 Rears mswlogo's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9090 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=49001 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Behringer DEQ2496 in Transporter digital loop for room correction?
A quick question. When using the effects loop, I presume that the TP's digital inputs can't be used for a different source? For example, consider this setup: DVD player -> TP Toslink input plus: TP AES/EBU output -> DEQ2496 -> TP AES/EBU input I presume you can't play from the DVD player into the TP, then out via the Behringer and back into the TP DAC? -- cliveb Transporter -> ATC SCM100A cliveb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=348 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=48350 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: roll up! roll up! Get your �350 network patch cable here!
This sums it all up... http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=20080618 -- servies There are 10 kinds of people in the world - those who understand binary and those who don't. servies's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9496 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=48834 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] SB3 -> Transporter Minireview
His speakers take a Digital Signal , have inbuilt DACS so analog output is not really an option unless to a headphone amp or something else that requires an analog signal. -- Rodney_Gold Sb3/Z-sys RDP1/meridian DSP5500's TP/X-cans v3/Senns 650's TP/TACT 2.0/SCM 50a's TP/Meridian DSP5000's "The nicest thing about smacking your head against the wall is...the feeling you get when you stop" Rodney_Gold's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=14618 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=49001 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
