Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Inguz eq installation issues (mac) PLZ HELP
I think Muski posted the document on these forums (search for it) but it could have been over at the Inguz forums while they were still active. Keep searching and you'll find the threads. I don't have a good handle on where they are any more because I gave up on Inguz a few months back. It works great, but I just got tired of tweaking everything in response to software updates - and then trying to figure out (as you'll have to) which thread contains the correct modification to the plugin files is required to keep things working. It just required more effort than I'm willing to put in at this point. Currently considering giving a hardware based solution like the KRK Ergo a try to free up my mind and still get some benefit of DRC. Good luck. -- esbrewer Server: 2.4GHz Intel iMac running Mac OS 10.6.4, SBS 7.5.1, Inguz DRC Sources: SB3 (2), SB Boom, SB Radio, NAD C542, NAD T515 Amplification: NAD C720BEE Loudspeakers: Paradigm Studio 20 (v.1), SVS SB-12 Plus Headphones: Grado SR60, Etymotic ER4P http://www.last.fm/user/esbrewer esbrewer's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12409 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84118 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Does audiophile equal quiet?
pski;600710 Wrote: > In the full digital world (praise be to "Bop 'Til You Drop,"). . . Heh. It's a kick to hang out where someone can write that and not feel it necessary to explain. I think I'll go listen to a little vintage Ry now. R. -- RonM RonM's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17029 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84091 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Popping noises with Transporter firmware 81 and 85
andyg;600663 Wrote: > To test, you want to have scrolling enabled, play a song with long > enough text to cause scrolling, and run the vis. I wouldn't change the > scrolling values, if you push them too high you are going to run into > problems, the default is 30fps and looks pretty good.Hmm, I'd better retest, > scrolling's enabled but I doubt any would've happened during either Koln or Raven. Will set display string to something that will def scroll, retest & revert. -- audiomuze *'Linux finally gets a great audio tagger' (http://www.ubuntugeek.com/linux-finally-gets-a-great-audio-tagger.html): 'puddletag' (http://puddletag.sourceforge.net/)* audiomuze's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=33613 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84133 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Does audiophile equal quiet?
I'll drown here shortly but I'll wade in. Resolution is sample bits (up and down) and time is on the sample frequency line (left to right.) In practice these have no effect on volume. Accuracy then is the combination of both resolution and frequency. Back in the days of half-speed masters, accuracy (the up-and-down resolution) was enhanced was enhanced both by slowing the master cutter (by half) and by using high quality vinyl and pressing techniques. The sample frequency line was determined by the rotation speed and could not be altered. In the full digital world (praise be to "Bop 'Til You Drop,") both of these variables are open to tinkering. Interpretation (by both the equipment and the engineers) is possible and the dynamic range (being the speed and range of frequency response- resolution) and the frequency of sample of the source material is subject to modification. Note the dynamic range of the source material has inviolate limits: limits on how well the original is recorded. This is to say digitally chopping the source more vigorously in either resolution or frequency will not improve each instant digital sample. So then we're back to volume. Accuracy depends on the A/D (or A/A) encoding and it's faithful transfer into the digital space. Volume then depends on where the engineer chooses to place it in the digital space. So long as the waveform is fully represented (and we would hope accurately,) the volume is not an issue. Since quality stereo depends on flat response to input it would make sense to place the full-range digital signal in an optimal range slightly above the lowest volume levels. This would enable well powered amps to drive their speakers with enough amperage to produce desirable SPL (unless you live in a trailer.) P -- pski real stereo doesn't just wake the neighbors, it -enrages- them.. pski's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15574 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84091 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Hifi rack: wood or glass shelves?
konut;598431 Wrote: > ABSOLUTELY! I mount all of my components on old guitars and violins. +1 except that a patina of solid silver is required between each layer of crushed instrument. I find any amount over .42 mm produces unwanted brilliance. Amounts less than .40 produce a clashing sound similar to tossed pewter flatware. -- pski real stereo doesn't just wake the neighbors, it -enrages- them.. pski's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15574 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84313 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Inguz eq installation issues (mac) PLZ HELP
Hi, thanks. I didn't see the Muski instructions. Could you provide a link or hint to find them? -- hybride hybride's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=33872 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84118 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Popping noises with Transporter firmware 81 and 85
andyg;600663 Wrote: > I wouldn't change the scrolling values, if you push them too high you > are going to run into problems, the default is 30fps and looks pretty > good. Right. I suppose one could consider limiting the allowed range [on the settings page] to disallow insane values? -- bhaagensen bhaagensen's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7418 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84133 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Popping noises with Transporter firmware 81 and 85
To test, you want to have scrolling enabled, play a song with long enough text to cause scrolling, and run the vis. I wouldn't change the scrolling values, if you push them too high you are going to run into problems, the default is 30fps and looks pretty good. -- andyg andyg's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3292 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84133 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Popping noises with Transporter firmware 81 and 85
andyg;600577 Wrote: > I don't know which is the most CPU-intensive vis, try them all. I would > say the spectrum analyzer or analog VU are probably the heaviest. > Feedback is great so far though, thanks guys! As I understand, the latest changes involve scrolling. So to stress-test, one might want to set scrolling to some obscurely high (fast) values. -- bhaagensen bhaagensen's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7418 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84133 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What is a Transporter SE?
Mnyb;600649 Wrote: > On this forum ? LOL. Sorry, I forgot. -- aubuti aubuti's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2074 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84281 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What is a Transporter SE?
aubuti;600644 Wrote: > Careful. Somewhere there is a line dividing speculation and delusions > ;o) On this forum ? -- Mnyb Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J MeridianHD621 MeridianG98DH and assorted amps SiriuS, Classe' Primare and Dynadio speakers, Contour 4 Contour Center, and Contour 1.3SE rear ch. Rel Stadium 3 sub. Bedroom/Office: Boom Kitchen: SB3 + powered Fostex PM0.4 Misc use: Radio (with battery) PLEASE FIX BUG 112 http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=112 Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84281 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DACs : unmodded Transporter vs Perfectwave DAC?
darrenyeats;600640 Wrote: > For me, if you want a certain quality to the sound I don't believe the > digital source is the right place to expect that. Use down-stream > equipment to deliver the qualities of sound you like (and that's fine - > see below). For me, it's like complaining an RCA connector is "boring" > because it's transparent. > > But this is interesting because I've come to realise there are two > different ways of looking at hi-fi and both are equally valid. > > One opinion is that the best hi-fi is that which makes the most > recordings sound the best or most real. If you think about it, it's a > very sensible opinion and I won't criticise it - indeed I cannot. > > The other opinion is that the best hi-fi delivers the original > recording as closely as possible. On many recordings, this may be > deliver an experience which is less "real" and perhaps less > "comfortable". However, when done properly this is not an unpleasant > sensation and I would say it's the opposite of boring. You hear the > equipment less and the recordings more and there is a lot variety in > recordings out there, variety that can easily be papered over. Anyway, > I'm just saying this is an another way of looking at things. > > At this point in my audio journey I keep the second view but I respect > completely those dedicated to the first view. Enjoy the music > everyone! > Darren Sensible and reasonable viewpoint! I am of the second opinion as well, relying on the recording / mastering side expertise to bring me the best possible sound for my setup. My current music library has roughly 25% recordings that are exquisitely done, 25% enjoyable, 25% so so for background and the rest is pretty bad, sound quality wise. -- empty99 SB3->Benchmark DAC1HDR->Pass X250->12g Romex->B&W N802 empty99's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3488 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=82155 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What is a Transporter SE?
Mnyb;600475 Wrote: > If we want to speculate and be positive, TP SE could be a stopgap > solution before a delayed TP2 ;) Careful. Somewhere there is a line dividing speculation and delusions ;o) -- aubuti aubuti's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2074 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84281 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DACs : unmodded Transporter vs Perfectwave DAC?
For me, if you want a certain quality to the sound I don't believe the digital source is the right place to expect that. Use down-stream equipment to deliver the qualities of sound you like (and that's fine - see below). For me, it's like complaining an RCA connector is "boring" because it's transparent. But this is interesting because I've come to realise there are two different ways of looking at hi-fi and both are equally valid. One opinion is that the best hi-fi is that which makes the most recordings sound the best or most real. If you think about it, it's a very sensible opinion and I won't criticise it - indeed I cannot. The other opinion is that the best hi-fi delivers the original recording as closely as possible. On many recordings, this may be deliver an experience which is less "real" and perhaps less "comfortable". However, when done properly this is not an unpleasant sensation and I would say it's the opposite of boring. Instead of hearing the equipment you hear the recordings and there is a lot variety out there, variety that can easily be papered over. Anyway, I'm just saying this is an another way of looking at things. At this point in my audio journey I keep the second view but I respect completely those dedicated to the first view. Enjoy the music everyone! Darren -- darrenyeats http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/richpub/listmania/byauthor/A3H57URKQB8AQO/ref=cm_pdp_content_listmania/203-7606506-5721503. (Inguz bass EQ'd) SB3 -> (pre bypassed) Krell KAV-300i -> PMC AB-1 (caps bass EQ'd) Desktop -> Genius Slab SW-flat2.1 700 Sennheiser HD 25-1 II SqueezeControl for Android darrenyeats's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10799 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=82155 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Popping noises with Transporter firmware 81 and 85
I guess I meant 7.5.3 (firmware 82). 7.6 will be a bit later I think. -- andyg andyg's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3292 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84133 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Popping noises with Transporter firmware 81 and 85
andyg;600580 Wrote: > It'll be in the build on Monday.Will it be FW86 on 7.6 or will a manual > firmware update be required? -- audiomuze *'Linux finally gets a great audio tagger' (http://www.ubuntugeek.com/linux-finally-gets-a-great-audio-tagger.html): 'puddletag' (http://puddletag.sourceforge.net/)* audiomuze's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=33613 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84133 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Anyone tried Gator mods for Beresford Caiman DAC?
Gazjam;599053 Wrote: > I did the passive mod on mine (which has a similar effect to the Gator > board - apart from -3db gain and losing the headphone facility - and > its a very worthwhile improvement. > > More of everything and more "hi end" sounding IMHO. > No comparisons of Gator board Vs Passive Mod over on AOS yet, but Stan > B. himself says there is no difference sound quality wise...apart from > what I mentioned earlier. > > Hope this helps. > > Gaz. You were right, Gaz, once I installed the Gator board, everything blossomed into full life. Stan told me that the board needs to get a decent burn-in. In your opinion, how long should I wait for it to burn in properly before I give it my review? One curious thing: despite the fact that everybody's saying how this board increases the output gain, I haven't noticed it. If anything, it fells just a tad bit quieter than the unmoded Caiman. -- magiccarpetride magiccarpetride's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=37863 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84349 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What is a Transporter SE?
ghostrider;600586 Wrote: > Have you heard it or are you speculating as usual? Speculating as usual :) -- michael123 please fix bug 15209 http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=15209 michael123's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=23745 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84281 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DACs : unmodded Transporter vs Perfectwave DAC?
michael123;600578 Wrote: > analytical (== boring) Second that ;-) -- alekz Equipment: Transporter/PS Audio PerfectWave DAC + Bridge - Pass Labs x1 - Pass Labs x250 - Martin Logan Summit (+ PS Audio PowerPlant Premier, MIT Oracle cables, Finite Elemente Master Reference rack, Finite Elemente Cerafeet, Acustica Aplicata DAAD traps). alekz's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13574 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=82155 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What is a Transporter SE?
michael123;600568 Wrote: > This is high-end.. Have you heard it or are you speculating as usual? -- ghostrider ghostrider's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=18959 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84281 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Popping noises with Transporter firmware 81 and 85
It'll be in the build on Monday. -- andyg andyg's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3292 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84133 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Popping noises with Transporter firmware 81 and 85
andyg;600577 Wrote: > I don't know which is the most CPU-intensive vis, try them all. I would > say the spectrum analyzer or analog VU are probably the heaviest. > Feedback is great so far though, thanks guys! We appreciate having you here with us! Please let us know when you get this into the build.. -- michael123 please fix bug 15209 http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=15209 michael123's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=23745 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84133 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Popping noises with Transporter firmware 81 and 85
I don't know which is the most CPU-intensive vis, try them all. I would say the spectrum analyzer or analog VU are probably the heaviest. Feedback is great so far though, thanks guys! -- andyg andyg's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3292 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84133 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DACs : unmodded Transporter vs Perfectwave DAC?
No need to recompare, you have a really great system. Enjoy! :) Original Transporter to my taste also was analytical (== boring), hence I modded it.. -- michael123 please fix bug 15209 http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=15209 michael123's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=23745 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=82155 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Popping noises with Transporter firmware 81 and 85
sbjaerum;600571 Wrote: > But is the VU meters the most CPU intensive visualizer? Transporter would not be a Transporter anymore without VU meters.. -- michael123 please fix bug 15209 http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=15209 michael123's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=23745 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84133 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Popping noises with Transporter firmware 81 and 85
sbjaerum;600571 Wrote: > But is the VU meters the most CPU intensive visualizer? Without them, Transporter would not be a Transporter anymore.. -- michael123 please fix bug 15209 http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=15209 michael123's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=23745 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84133 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Popping noises with Transporter firmware 81 and 85
audiomuze;600566 Wrote: > Both Koln Concert and Raven studio masters compressed at -8 play back > without any clicks/ pops, even with the VU meters going. But is the VU meters the most CPU intensive visualizer? -- sbjaerum sbjaerum's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=237 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84133 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What is a Transporter SE?
cliveb;598831 Wrote: > It's not clear from your description whether the device will have > balanced analogue outputs. If you want it to be taken seriously as a > genuine high-end device, many people (myself included) would demand > balanced outputs. > > Something I'd also like to see would be some sort of DC trigger signal > that is output when the device is switched on, so I can use a relay to > control mains power to the amps. This is high-end.. +---+ |Filename: 5323397984_6f2941fd25_o.jpg | |Download: http://forums.slimdevices.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=11124| +---+ -- michael123 michael123's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=23745 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84281 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Popping noises with Transporter firmware 81 and 85
Is the fix already inside the recent build? -- michael123 michael123's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=23745 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84133 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Popping noises with Transporter firmware 81 and 85
Wombat;600140 Wrote: > Thanks for doing so! > If i remember right there never were complaints about 24/96 at -8 until > someone listened "The Raven" by Rebecca Pidgeon. This one could be a > real stress test.Both Koln Concert and Raven studio masters compressed at -8 > play back without any clicks/ pops, even with the VU meters going. -- audiomuze *'Linux finally gets a great audio tagger' (http://www.ubuntugeek.com/linux-finally-gets-a-great-audio-tagger.html): 'puddletag' (http://puddletag.sourceforge.net/)* audiomuze's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=33613 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84133 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DACs : unmodded Transporter vs Perfectwave DAC?
michael123;600015 Wrote: > Reading from what you wrote above, we basically agree :) > I will probably have to recompare them again. I do not remember the sound of the Transporter anymore. My major complains were resonances and over analytical sound (Summits are more listenable than Ascents in this case). michael123;600015 Wrote: > > Anyway, _I_did_not_test_it_with_the_bridge_, maybe it would be > different experience.. > It must sound different because (at least) of the reclocking. Almost no jitter. michael123;600015 Wrote: > Which filters do you use BTW on PerfectWave? Auto? Currently I use upsampling to 192kHz (more air around the sources) and Filter 2 (more dynamic, sharper transients, more involving, but a bit brighter). -- alekz Equipment: Transporter/PS Audio PerfectWave DAC + Bridge - Pass Labs x1 - Pass Labs x250 - Martin Logan Summit (+ PS Audio PowerPlant Premier, MIT Oracle cables, Finite Elemente Master Reference rack, Finite Elemente Cerafeet, Acustica Aplicata DAAD traps). alekz's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13574 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=82155 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Popping noises with Transporter firmware 81 and 85
It is my understanding that CPU load is highly dependent on the visualizer in use. Andy, what visualizer results in highest probability of audio dropout? -- sbjaerum sbjaerum's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=237 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84133 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
