Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Dan Lavry, design guru new white paper on the Optimal Sampling Rate for Audio!

[adamdea]

bburroughs wrote: 
> Well, I didn't think it was possible to answer that question in just a
> few paragraphs without resorting to esoteric math and engineering, but
> Adam's description is really excellent. Anyone interested in digital
> audio should read and try to understand what he wrote - it's an
> excellent summary of some difficult-to-understand concepts.
> 
> 
You are very kind. But the last bit (about reading some books) is the
most important bit. I banged my head against a table for ages trying to
get this stuff. But Phil Leigh (who I really do hope will return to this
forum) patiently explained some of it too me along with Werner who posts
on Hifi Wigwam and Pinkfish; eventually I realised that there was
nothing for it but to teach myself using some text books.



adamdea's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=37603
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=95771

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Another Nail in the Golden Eared Audiophile Coffin..

[JJZolx]

SBGK wrote: 
> I would be more persuaded by this torchured logic if the main proponents
> immediately saw the error of their ways and sold off their multi
> thousand $ dacs etc

They wouldn't sell their Rolexes when they discover that a Timex works
just as well. Most high end audio gear is electronic jewelry. Especially
for a certain age-group.

I'd be willing to bet that at least a few of the testers now question
the value of their gear. It often takes a slap in the face like that to
wake someone up.



JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=95757

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles