Re: Issue 1229 in lilypond: Notes may be placed above clef and key signature.

2010-08-27 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Labels: -Priority-Critical Priority-High

Comment #3 on issue 1229 by joeneeman: Notes may be placed above clef and  
key signature.

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1229

Not a regression from 2.12, although I agree that it's very ugly. The  
following example produces the same output on 2.13 and 2.12:


\version "2.12.0"

<<
  {
\key f \major
a'''4 a''' a''' a'''
  }
  \\
  {
\key f \major
c4 c c c
  }


\layout {
  indent = 0
  line-width = 2.2\cm
}



___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1240 in lilypond: Music overflows page: #'((space . N) (stretchability . 0)) and nothing more with spacings

2010-08-27 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Status: Started
Owner: joeneeman

Comment #3 on issue 1240 by joeneeman: Music overflows page: #'((space . N)  
(stretchability . 0)) and nothing more with spacings

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1240

Patch here:
http://codereview.appspot.com/2065041/

There are some pretty ugly hacks (like creating a dummy Paper_column in  
System::get_pure_bound in order to do a binary search on all paper  
columns), so I'm hoping someone has better suggestions...



___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1242 in lilypond: Regtest resgression - page-spacing-tall-headfoot.ly

2010-08-27 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: fixed_2_13_32

Comment #1 on issue 1242 by joeneeman: Regtest resgression -  
page-spacing-tall-headfoot.ly

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1242

(No comment was entered for this change.)


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 894 in lilypond: lilypond-book fails from the command-line in OSX 10.4

2010-08-27 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Status: Fixed

Comment #18 on issue 894 by percival.music.ca: lilypond-book fails from the  
command-line in OSX 10.4

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=894

(No comment was entered for this change.)


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1167 in lilypond: link from 2.13 manuals HTML pages back to website

2010-08-27 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Summary: link from 2.13 manuals HTML pages back to website
Status: Fixed
Labels: fixed_2_13_32

Comment #7 on issue 1167 by percival.music.ca: link from 2.13 manuals HTML  
pages back to website

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1167

The links for 2.12 manuals is now part of 1244.

I believe that the links for the 2.13 manuals will be fixed in 2.13.32 with  
commit 5e040cd922e5cdae777d3a8a16fc9dd80d24a6ef , but this needs  
verification at

  http://lilypond.org/website/development.html
after .32 is out.


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1038 in lilypond: more technical website items

2010-08-27 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Status: Verified

Comment #5 on issue 1038 by percival.music.ca: more technical website items
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1038

Oops, forgot to mention: the changeover is now issue 1244.


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1038 in lilypond: more technical website items

2010-08-27 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Status: Fixed

Comment #4 on issue 1038 by percival.music.ca: more technical website items
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1038

I've just verified that the goals are working in google analytics.  The  
symlink issue can only be done after the changeover.


I'm verifying this myself because the Bug Squad doesn't have access to  
analytics.



___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Issue 1244 in lilypond: Change to the new website

2010-08-27 Thread lilypond

Status: Accepted
Owner: 
Labels: Type-Build Priority-Critical website

New issue 1244 by percival.music.ca: Change to the new website
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1244

A few items can only be done once we finally change over.  This is planned  
to happen with the first "alpha" version of 2.14.


These items can only be done after the switch:

1)
Make sure the short links / .htaccess redirects are good after switching to
/website/ instead of /web/.


2)
On 29 May 2009, francisco reported that the doc redirect pointed to
.../Documentation/index.html, which skips over the automatic language
selection.
Point to .../Documentation/ instead.

In other words, make sure that  
Documentation/web/servers/lilypond.org.htaccess doesn't contain any ".html"  
for normal stuff.



3)
The "back to documentation index" link in the 2.12 docs should end up at  
/website/manuals.html.  This will be done by manually adding a redirect or  
symlink, which will be removed when 2.14 is out.  The exact instructions  
for this will be added to the CG.




___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1182 in lilypond: Website rendering problem with navigation bar in IE 6

2010-08-27 Thread lilypond


Comment #6 on issue 1182 by percival.music.ca: Website rendering problem  
with navigation bar in IE 6

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1182

FWIW, in the last month we had:
- 73% visits from IE 8.x
- 18% visits from IE 7.x
- 9% visits from IE 6.x
- 0% visits from IE 5.x
(rounded to the nearest %)

IE was 16% of our overall views, so 1.5% of our visitors use IE 6.


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 989 in lilypond: ensure that no information about 2.12.3 features is only in the regtests

2010-08-27 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: fixed_2_13_32

Comment #28 on issue 989 by percival.music.ca: ensure that no information  
about 2.12.3 features is only in the regtests

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=989

Neil: technically the "one last look" should be done in the "verifying"  
phase, so there's no problem marking this "fixed".


James: because there were so many people working on this -- and in  
particular, given the confusion at the beginning between Valentin and then  
nobody and then me for a bit and then Phil but he was learning and oops  
apparently LSR snippets need to be tagged with "docs" **and** something  
else and then etc -- I don't think that asking for another "review" is  
casting doubt on any one person's abilities.



... that said, I can't see it being worth spending hours verifying this  
particular issue, given that 1217 is almost the same.  In particular, any  
time spent working on 989 would be better spent on 1217.  So I propose, as  
release manager, that we skip the "verification" for this issue.



___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 989 in lilypond: ensure that no information about 2.12.3 features is only in the regtests

2010-08-27 Thread lilypond


Comment #27 on issue 989 by pkx1...@hotmail.com: ensure that no information  
about 2.12.3 features is only in the regtests

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=989

?

All the reg tests were listed, and as I (and others) docced them the list  
was reviewed by Phil who removed the reg tests from the wiki and left those  
that needed to be done.


It was because no one was looking thoroughly through them that this tracker  
item took so long to do. However I think Phil has done this and can only  
say that waiting until 'someone' else does it is a waste of time. I mean,  
what does it take to get a tracker item approved?



___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 684 in lilypond: Enhancement: MetronomeMark should support break-align-symbols

2010-08-27 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Status: Fixed

Comment #26 on issue 684 by jan.nieuwenhuizen: Enhancement: MetronomeMark  
should support break-align-symbols

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=684

Fixed, as per - http://codereview.appspot.com/1579041

One niggle/=feature request wrt multi-measure-rest placement remains.


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: "content encoding error" in index of Notation

2010-08-27 Thread Federico Bruni
2010/8/26 Graham Percival 

> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:39:50PM +0200, Federico Bruni wrote:
> > And I've just noticed another bigger problem: all the manuals linked in
> > http://lilypond.org/website/manuals.html (the new website)
> > are the stable ones (v2.12, see the link).
>
> That's not a problem; 2.12 is the latest stable.  It took me about
> 10 hours to get all the links to 2.12 working given the change of
> manual names and dirs, and there's still one issue remaining.
>
Ok, I see.

Anyway, now I'm using a different laptop and connection and I don't have the
"content encoding error" anymore. So it was probably something about the bad
internet connection I had yesterday.

Sorry for the noise
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond