Re: [freenet-chat] Re: [Tech] Crazy idea: How trust in darknets enables secure democratic censorship
Matthew Toseland wrote: On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 08:58:13PM -0500, OverlordQ wrote: Dont implement this. I dont like CP, but once you start down the slippery slope, there's no going back. Why? Why is censorship by the (overwhelming) majority a bad thing? my $.02 Because it's all too subjective on what is 'acceptable content' and what isn't. If you want a network to trace people and what they insert, go ahead and do it, fork freenet. ___ chat mailing list chat@freenetproject.org Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-chat] Re: [Tech] Crazy idea: How trust in darknets enables secure democratic censorship
Dont implement this. I dont like CP, but once you start down the slippery slope, there's no going back. my $.02 ___ chat mailing list chat@freenetproject.org Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-chat] Slashdot Story.
http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/07/16/1931225&mode=nested&tid=126&tid=158&tid=172&tid=93&tid=99 I noticed we (Freenet Project) didn't get quite exactly an 'good' review by most of the people on there. Alot of it was the 'kiddie porn' defense. Which I thought: http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=71345&cid=6458017 was a good reply to. Also what pisses me off is this: http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=71345&cid=6455920. which was again nicely answered by somebody else (in a different thread though): http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=71345&cid=6456746 Anyways, Personally I said screw the /. crowd, it's a bandwaggon site. One person said "Oh freenet bad!" the rest just assume, and dont look at the facts. Keep up the good work.
