DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26584] - Support required hidden fields.

2004-02-02 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26584

Support required hidden fields.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-02-03 00:01 ---
Fixed - Added checking for all fields but CreditCard.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26584] - Support required hidden fields.

2004-02-02 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26584

Support required hidden fields.





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-02-02 22:50 ---
I would go on the assumption that any validation which can be used for a text field 
should be 
permissible with a hidden field; people always come up with something you didn't think 
of.  

The reason those field type checks are there is not so much because certain fields 
shouldn't be 
validated, as much as there are different methods for dereferencing the value of 
different form field 
types.  

It might be worth just going through and adding it everywhere that 'field.type == 
'text' ' is 
permitted.  I'm not thinking of any substantial risks to it.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26584] - Support required hidden fields.

2004-02-02 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26584

Support required hidden fields.





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-02-02 22:36 ---
Are there any other types of validations for hidden fields
that would be usefull ?

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26584] - Support required hidden fields.

2004-02-01 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26584

Support required hidden fields.





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-02-02 03:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=10172)
add "field.type == 'hidden'" to list of checks for required validation.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]