Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: openssl-0.9.7b-1, openssl-devel-0.9.7b-1
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 01:22:03PM -0300, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote: > > On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 02:50:14PM -0300, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote: > > > > I don't think Links has a maintainer, or one we can contact. > > > > > > What do you mean? Links has a Cygwin maintainer at least. > > > > If you mean one who contributed a package almost 2 years ago, > > doesn't appear to be subscribed to any mailing-list, and whose > > e-mail address may have changed (see > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-07/msg00677.html), > > then yes, it has. > > Hmm, now that you mention it... perhaps we should remove links from > the distro. Probably, but before I'd do a search for "Sami Tikka" on Google and try to get an answer. http://susiraja.lnet.lut.fi/~redneck/ was edited yesterday and has an e-mail. If he doesn't reply, don't wan't to maintain it anymore, or you don't find anyone to take the job, go ahead. Anyway, I suggest anyone to use ELinks, which is IMO much better than Links. And the only advantages Links2 has over it are the graphical part (a must have mainly on Linux, where you can use it on the console with SVGAlib or framebuffer), and some JavaScript support. But I read all these will be added / merged in ELinks (hopefully soon). -- How to contact me - http://www.pervalidus.net/contact.html -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: openssl-0.9.7b-1, openssl-devel-0.9.7b-1
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 01:22:03PM -0300, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote: > On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 02:50:14PM -0300, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote: > > > I don't think Links has a maintainer, or one we can contact. > > > > What do you mean? Links has a Cygwin maintainer at least. > > If you mean one who contributed a package almost 2 years ago, > doesn't appear to be subscribed to any mailing-list, and whose > e-mail address may have changed (see > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-07/msg00677.html), > then yes, it has. Hmm, now that you mention it... perhaps we should remove links from the distro. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: openssl-0.9.7b-1, openssl-devel-0.9.7b-1
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 02:50:14PM -0300, Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote: > > I don't think Links has a maintainer, or one we can contact. > > What do you mean? Links has a Cygwin maintainer at least. If you mean one who contributed a package almost 2 years ago, doesn't appear to be subscribed to any mailing-list, and whose e-mail address may have changed (see http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-07/msg00677.html), then yes, it has. > > And the new releases don't work well with Cygwin. > > Hmm, "don't work well" is not much of information... http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2003-09/msg01430.html Just a correction. "Another problem remains, though. I compiled Links2 with graphical support, and with -g the accents don't work." isn't Cygwin specific. I can reproduce it on Linux. -- How to contact me - http://www.pervalidus.net/contact.html -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: openssl-0.9.7b-1, openssl-devel-0.9.7b-1
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 02:50:14PM -0300, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote: > I don't think Links has a maintainer, or one we can contact. What do you mean? Links has a Cygwin maintainer at least. > And the new releases don't work well with Cygwin. Hmm, "don't work well" is not much of information... > BTW, the Subject is wrong. "Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: > openssl-0.9.7b-1, openssl-devel-0.9.7b-1". Should be 0.9.7c-1. Yes, I missed to change it. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: openssl-0.9.7b-1, openssl-devel-0.9.7b-1
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 11:28:10AM +0200, Patrick Eisenacher wrote: > > Corinna, > > > > is there an easy way to find out whether I still have a package > > installed that needs the openssl 0.9.6x compatibility package? I would > > love to get rid of this thing. > > The packages still using 0.9.6 so far are > > links > apache/mod_php4 > apache/mod_ssl > mutt > wget > > The maintainers are informed. I don't think it will take a lot of time > until the packages are updated. I don't think Links has a maintainer, or one we can contact. And the new releases don't work well with Cygwin. BTW, the Subject is wrong. "Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: openssl-0.9.7b-1, openssl-devel-0.9.7b-1". Should be 0.9.7c-1. -- How to contact me - http://www.pervalidus.net/contact.html -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: openssl-0.9.7b-1, openssl-devel-0.9.7b-1
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 11:28:10AM +0200, Patrick Eisenacher wrote: > Corinna, > > is there an easy way to find out whether I still have a package > installed that needs the openssl 0.9.6x compatibility package? I would > love to get rid of this thing. The packages still using 0.9.6 so far are links apache/mod_php4 apache/mod_ssl mutt wget The maintainers are informed. I don't think it will take a lot of time until the packages are updated. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: openssl-0.9.7b-1, openssl-devel-0.9.7b-1
Corinna, is there an easy way to find out whether I still have a package installed that needs the openssl 0.9.6x compatibility package? I would love to get rid of this thing. Patrick There will be no 0.9.6j compatibility package anymore. The 0.9.6 package is only kept for backward compatibility of packages built for Cygwin 1.3.x. I strongly recommend to upgrade packages to Cygwin 1.5.x and then automatically to OpenSSL-0.9.7c ASAP. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: openssl-0.9.7b-1, openssl-devel-0.9.7b-1
I've updated the version of OpenSSL to 0.9.7c-1. This also includes the
openssl-devel package.
This is a bugfix and security update.
The Cygwin version matches the official source tree except for a minor
tweak in the top level Makefile.
=
IMPORTANT NOTE:
There will be no 0.9.6j compatibility package anymore. The 0.9.6
package is only kept for backward compatibility of packages built
for Cygwin 1.3.x. I strongly recommend to upgrade packages to
Cygwin 1.5.x and then automatically to OpenSSL-0.9.7c ASAP.
THIS APPLIES ESPECIALLY FOR CYGWIN DISTRIBUTION PACKAGE MAINTAINERS!
=
The official release announcement text as of today follows:
OpenSSL version 0.9.7c and 0.9.6k released
==
OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS
http://www.openssl.org/
The OpenSSL project team is pleased to announce the release of
version 0.9.7c of our open source toolkit for SSL/TLS. This new
OpenSSL version is a security and bugfix release and incorporates
changes and bugfixes to the toolkit (for a complete list see
http://www.openssl.org/source/exp/CHANGES ).
We also release 0.9.6k, which contains the same security bugfix as
0.9.7c and a few more small bugfixes compared to 0.9.6j.
For more details of the security issues being fixed in this release
please see http://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20030930.txt
The most significant changes are:
o Security: fix vulnerabilities in ASN.1 parsing
CAN-2003-0543, CAN-2003-0544[0.9.7c & 0.9.6k]
o Security: fix additional vulnerability in ASN.1 parsing
CAN-2003-0545[0.9.7c]
o Only accept a client cert if the server requests one[0.9.7c & 0.9.6k]
o Various S/MIME bug and compatibility fixes [0.9.7c]
We consider OpenSSL 0.9.7c to be the best version of OpenSSL available
and we strongly recommend that users of older versions upgrade as
soon as possible. OpenSSL 0.9.7c is available for download via HTTP
and FTP from the following master locations (you can find the various
FTP mirrors under http://www.openssl.org/source/mirror.html):
o http://www.openssl.org/source/
o ftp://ftp.openssl.org/source/
For those who want or have to stay with the 0.9.6 series of OpenSSL,
we strongly recommend that you upgrade to OpenSSL 0.9.6k as soon as
possible. It's available in the same location as 0.9.7c.
To update your installation, click on the "Install Cygwin now" link on
the http://cygwin.com/ web page. This downloads setup.exe to your
system. Once you've downloaded setup.exe, run it and select "Net"
("Devel" for the openssl-devel package) and then click on the appropriate
field until the above announced version number appears if it is not
displayed already.
If you have questions or comments, please send them to the Cygwin
mailing list at: [EMAIL PROTECTED] . I would appreciate it if you would
use this mailing list rather than emailing me directly. This includes
ideas and comments about the setup utility or Cygwin in general.
If you want to make a point or ask a question, the Cygwin mailing list
is the appropriate place.
*** CYGWIN-ANNOUNCE UNSUBSCRIBE INFO ***
If you want to unsubscribe from the cygwin-announce mailing list, look
at the "List-Unsubscribe: " tag in the email header of this message.
Send email to the address specified there. It will be in the format:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you need more information on unsubscribing, start reading here:
http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#unsubscribe-simple
Please read *all* of the information on unsubscribing that is available
starting at this URL.
I implore you to READ this information before sending email about how
you "tried everything" to unsubscribe. In 100% of the cases where
people were unable to unsubscribe, the problem was that they hadn't
actually read and comprehended the unsubscribe instructions.
If you need to unsubscribe from cygwin-announce or any other mailing
list, reading the instructions at the above URL is guaranteed to
provide you with the info that you need.
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Red Hat, Inc.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
