Re: cc1plus.exe not included in GCC 3.3.1-3?

2003-11-13 Thread Robert Collins 
On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 09:26, Brian Ford wrote:
> > Setup will do per-version dependencies, but it does so *for the target
> > version*.
> >
> I didn't think version specific dependencies would be needed here.  I'm
> obviously not well versed in setup, but I thought that replacing the old
> monolithic gcc package with an empty one and ajdusting that empty one's
> dependencies to require the new equivalent packages would have done the
> trick.  I guess I was wrong here?

No, that will work. I'd say that hasn't been done though.

Rob

-- 
GPG key available at: .


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: cc1plus.exe not included in GCC 3.3.1-3?

2003-11-13 Thread Brian Ford 
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Robert Collins wrote:

> On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 08:21, Brian Ford wrote:
> > However, if you already had the old monolithic gcc package when updating
> > to the new separate front end packages, then it is a setup/gcc dependency
> > bug and you should have gotten gcc-g++.
>
> What did you put in the setup.hint that makes you think setup would do
> version specific dependencies for the *old version* ?
>
I didn't create the hint, the gcc maintainer did.  I was just describing
how it should work for minmal user confusion.

> Setup will do per-version dependencies, but it does so *for the target
> version*.
>
I didn't think version specific dependencies would be needed here.  I'm
obviously not well versed in setup, but I thought that replacing the old
monolithic gcc package with an empty one and ajdusting that empty one's
dependencies to require the new equivalent packages would have done the
trick.  I guess I was wrong here?

-- 
Brian Ford
Senior Realtime Software Engineer
VITAL - Visual Simulation Systems
FlightSafety International
Phone: 314-551-8460
Fax:   314-551-8444

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: cc1plus.exe not included in GCC 3.3.1-3?

2003-11-13 Thread Robert Collins 
On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 08:21, Brian Ford wrote:
> However, if you already had the old monolithic gcc package when updating
> to the new separate front end packages, then it is a setup/gcc dependency
> bug and you should have gotten gcc-g++.

What did you put in the setup.hint that makes you think setup would do
version specific dependencies for the *old version* ?

Setup will do per-version dependencies, but it does so *for the target
version*.

Rob
-- 
GPG key available at: .


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: cc1plus.exe not included in GCC 3.3.1-3?

2003-11-13 Thread Brian Ford 
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Patrick Eisenacher wrote:

> I faced the same problem. Upgrading from the old monolithic gcc to the
> new separate front end packaged ones only gave me gcc-c. I had to
> separately select gcc-c++.
>
> I'm not sure whether this can be classified as a setup dependency bug,
> since you always face this kind of problem when you split up a
> monolithic package into separate smaller ones. Which one(s) do you
> classifiy as the default successor(s)?
>
Logically, I'd say all that were in the previous monolithic package, and
none that were not.  That's easy.

-- 
Brian Ford
Senior Realtime Software Engineer
VITAL - Visual Simulation Systems
FlightSafety International
Phone: 314-551-8460
Fax:   314-551-8444

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: cc1plus.exe not included in GCC 3.3.1-3?

2003-11-13 Thread Patrick Eisenacher 
I faced the same problem. Upgrading from the old monolithic gcc to the 
new separate front end packaged ones only gave me gcc-c. I had to 
separately select gcc-c++.

I'm not sure whether this can be classified as a setup dependency bug, 
since you always face this kind of problem when you split up a 
monolithic package into separate smaller ones. Which one(s) do you 
classifiy as the default successor(s)?

Patrick

Brian Ford schrieb:

On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Brian P Kasper wrote:
 
However, if you already had the old monolithic gcc package when updating
to the new separate front end packages, then it is a setup/gcc dependency
bug and you should have gotten gcc-g++.



--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: cc1plus.exe not included in GCC 3.3.1-3?

2003-11-13 Thread Brian Ford 
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Brian P Kasper wrote:

> Thanks, Brian.  Your suggestion to look for gcc-g++ pointed me at the answer.
>
> I didn't realize that the backends for GCC don't show up in the
> "partial" view of Cygwin Setup, only the "Not Installed" view.
>
Well, the "partial" view tells you what would be updated/installed based
on your selections.  The "default" selection means to only update what you
already have.  Since you didn't already have gcc-g++, it obviously
wouldn't show up there.

However, if you already had the old monolithic gcc package when updating
to the new separate front end packages, then it is a setup/gcc dependency
bug and you should have gotten gcc-g++.

-- 
Brian Ford
Senior Realtime Software Engineer
VITAL - Visual Simulation Systems
FlightSafety International
Phone: 314-551-8460
Fax:   314-551-8444

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: cc1plus.exe not included in GCC 3.3.1-3?

2003-11-13 Thread Brian P Kasper 




Thanks, Brian.  Your suggestion to look for gcc-g++ pointed me at the answer.

I didn't realize that the backends for GCC don't show up in the "partial" view of 
Cygwin Setup, only the "Not Installed" view.

I installed gcc-g++ and all is well.

-Brian



   
   

  Brian Ford   
   

  <[EMAIL PROTECTED] To:  Brian P Kasper <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>
  
  m>   cc:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
   

  Sent by:         Subject: Re: cc1plus.exe not included 
in GCC 3.3.1-3?
  
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
 
  win.com  
   

   
   

   
   

  11/13/2003 12:41 
   

  PM   
   

   
   

   
   





On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Brian P Kasper wrote:

> cc1plus.exe appears to be missing from gcc 3.3.1-3.  I'd been running
> 3.2-3, and all was well.  I upgraded to 3.3.1-3 and began experiencing
> the "cannot exec `cc1plus' error.  I downgraded to 3.2 and the problem
> ceased.  At the end of this message I've attached the output of two
> compile attempts, the first with 3.2 and the second with 3.3.1.
>
http://www.cygwin.com/problems.html

WAGs: What does ls -l and
getfacl on /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/3.3.1/cc1plus.exe show?  Also,
check the output of cygcheck -c | grep gcc for gcc-g++ and see:

http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-10/msg01792.html

--
Brian Ford
Senior Realtime Software Engineer
VITAL - Visual Simulation Systems
FlightSafety International
Phone: 314-551-8460
Fax:   314-551-8444

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/





--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: cc1plus.exe not included in GCC 3.3.1-3?

2003-11-13 Thread Brian Ford 
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Brian P Kasper wrote:

> cc1plus.exe appears to be missing from gcc 3.3.1-3.  I'd been running
> 3.2-3, and all was well.  I upgraded to 3.3.1-3 and began experiencing
> the "cannot exec `cc1plus' error.  I downgraded to 3.2 and the problem
> ceased.  At the end of this message I've attached the output of two
> compile attempts, the first with 3.2 and the second with 3.3.1.
>
http://www.cygwin.com/problems.html

WAGs: What does ls -l and
getfacl on /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/3.3.1/cc1plus.exe show?  Also,
check the output of cygcheck -c | grep gcc for gcc-g++ and see:

http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-10/msg01792.html

-- 
Brian Ford
Senior Realtime Software Engineer
VITAL - Visual Simulation Systems
FlightSafety International
Phone: 314-551-8460
Fax:   314-551-8444

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/

cc1plus.exe not included in GCC 3.3.1-3?

2003-11-13 Thread Brian P Kasper 




Folks --

I apologize deeply if this has already been fixed, but I see nothing about it in the 
Cygwin list archives or the main Cygwin web page, and there isn't a later version of 
gcc-3.3.1 on mirrors.rcn.net yet.  I had to unsubscribe from this list for a while to
keep my email S/N down, so if this has been fixed in the last few days I missed that.

cc1plus.exe appears to be missing from gcc 3.3.1-3.  I'd been running 3.2-3, and all 
was well.  I upgraded to 3.3.1-3 and began experiencing the "cannot exec `cc1plus' 
error.  I downgraded to 3.2 and the problem ceased.  At the end of this message I've
attached the output of two compile attempts, the first with 3.2 and the second with 
3.3.1.

-Brian
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

xtest 580 $ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 3.2 20020927 (prerelease)
Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

xtest 581 $ make clean
rm cygwin/*
xtest 582 $ make
Compiling cygwin/xtest.o
Compiling cygwin/bkXImageDisplay.o
Compiling cygwin/mkimg.o
Linking cygwin/mkimg
Linking cygwin/xtest
Done
xtest 583 $

  (upgrade to gcc 3.3.1-3 using Cygwin Setup and return to bash prompt)

xtest 583 $ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 3.3.1 (cygming special)
Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

xtest 584 $ make clean
rm cygwin/*
xtest 585 $ make
Compiling cygwin/xtest.o
Compiling cygwin/bkXImageDisplay.o
Compiling cygwin/mkimg.o
gcc: installation problem, cannot exec `cc1plus': No such file or directory
make: *** [cygwin/mkimg.o] Error 1
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
gcc: installation problem, cannot exec `cc1plus': No such file or directory
make: *** [cygwin/xtest.o] Error 1
gcc: installation problem, cannot exec `cc1plus': No such file or directory
make: *** [cygwin/bkXImageDisplay.o] Error 1
xtest 586 $ find / -name "cc1plus.exe" -print
xtest 587 $



--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/