Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Re: cygwin/X in the ENTERPRISE environment]]
Christopher Faylor wrote: On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 10:30:31AM -0500, Staf Verhaegen wrote: Do you know why my messages don't appear on the list ? I checked that the subscription address is the same as I use to send the messages from ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) From the logs: Nov 11 17:43:27 sourceware spam: -*blocked: verhaegs-AT-imec-DOT-be 146.103.254.12 -> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (blocked: bad header value X-OriginalArrivalTime) The existence of that field in a header is usually a sign of 1) a spammer or 2) someone doing a blind forward complete with all headers. Since you are not sending email from the account under which you've subscribed, this type of message is blocked. He claimed that he was sending from the subscribed account: >I checked that the >subscription address is the same as I use to send the messages from Oh well. Harold
Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Re: cygwin/X in the ENTERPRISE environment]]
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 10:30:31AM -0500, Staf Verhaegen wrote: >Do you know why my messages don't appear on the list ? I checked that the >subscription address is the same as I use to send the messages from >([EMAIL PROTECTED]) From the logs: Nov 11 17:43:27 sourceware spam: -*blocked: verhaegs-AT-imec-DOT-be 146.103.254.12 -> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (blocked: bad header value X-OriginalArrivalTime) The existence of that field in a header is usually a sign of 1) a spammer or 2) someone doing a blind forward complete with all headers. Since you are not sending email from the account under which you've subscribed, this type of message is blocked. If this is a matter of forwarding email to the xfree list, the simplest solution is to edit your headers prior sending the message -- always a good idea anyway. Or, see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#rbl-sucks for alternative ways around this which do not require your subscribing verhaegs-AT-imec-DOT-be . -- Please use the resources at cygwin.com rather than sending personal email. Special for spam email harvesters: send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and be permanently blocked from mailing lists at sources.redhat.com
[Fwd: [Fwd: Re: cygwin/X in the ENTERPRISE environment]]
Igor, Staf Verhaegen tried to send this but couldn't. Harold Original Message Subject: [Fwd: Re: cygwin/X in the ENTERPRISE environment] Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 07:11:39 +0100 From: Staf Verhaegen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: IMEC vzw To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Harold, My emails to the list don't come through. I have here an answer for a question but it didn't appear on the list. Can you forward it. Do you know why my messages don't appear on the list ? I checked that the subscription address is the same as I use to send the messages from ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) greets, Staf. Original Message Subject: Re: cygwin/X in the ENTERPRISE environment Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 18:43:23 +0100 From: Staf Verhaegen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: IMEC vzw To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Igor wrote: So, my FIRST QUESTION for you is: Can "cygwin/X" run CADENCE tools ? (reminder: it requires 8-bit pseudo color map) I can run CADENCE tools under cygwin/XFree86. I start the X server in full screen (-fullscreen) and with a depth of 8 (-depth 8, this is 8 bit display thus 256 colors) and with XDMCP to one of our UNIX hosts (-query hostname). If you want to run your cadence tools in a window on your Windows desktop I'm afraid you will need to witch your Windows desktop to 256 colors. Staf. -- ++-+ |Staf Verhaegen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) |ADRESS: IMEC vzw. - ASP/LITHO| |tel: 016/ 281 783 |Kapeldreef 75| |fax: 016/ 281 214 |3001 Leuven (Belgium)| ++-+ For every tool there are at least 2 uses: the one it was designed for and the other for which it wasn't.
