2/12/70

2005-01-20 Thread Mark Sherrick
info courtesy of :
http://www.philzone.org/discus/messages/7473/105601.html

Grateful Dead - 02/12/70 
1 disk audio 
Ungano's Night Club 
New York City, NY 
Set 1 
Cold Rain & Snow, 
Beat It On Down The Line (5 beats), 
Good Lovin'-> 
Drums-> 
Good Lovin', 
Mama Tried-> 
Black Peter, 
Hard To Handle, 
Saint Stephen-> 
Not Fade Away, 
Casey Jones 

Comment Contrasting comments from deadlists.com: "An
ad for this gig appears in the Village Voice. The 16
minute tape fragment sometimes circulated with this
label is actually Fleetwood Mac w/ Peter Green,
Clapton & Jr. Wells, Tea Party, Boston 2/12/70, the
encore of Fleetwood Mac's set. Also, the 45 AUD tape
excerpt from the 2/13/70 Early Show sometimes
circulates mislabeled '2/12/70 Ungano's;' for more on
this tape see 2/13/70a." 

SBD:MR>PCM>?>Dat>SSSB>EAC>WAV>SHN 

Source: SBD > 2-track RTR @ 15 i.p.s. > PCM > ? > D >
SSSB 
Thanks to Jay Serafin for the disks! 
Audio Rating: AR-2 
Any/all editing, fades, NR, hiss elimination, phase
shifting/"time smear" correction, jitter elimination,
and +/-2 dB max. EQ were performed using 100%
digital-only processing (24-bit/96 kHz data stream) at
Serafin Station Studio B 

EAC (High, Secure) > WAV > SHNv3 by Patrick Murphy 

>From Jay Serafin: 
All of the information about this show was
obtained/confirmed by my Marin County source. This
person is as close to being "inside the organization
itself" as anyone can be, and this person has NEVER
given me bad or erroneous information for the past 5
years! 

And what a show this is, too! It was actually an
unannounced impromptu show in the middle of the Dead's
Fillmore East run. The venue only held approximately
500 people, and it was a first-come, first-served
show. Most of the seats were removed to allow some
additional "SRO" concertgoers. The NYC Fire Department
was on hand to enforce the "maximum number of patrons"

restrictions, just to play it safe. 

"We" were lucky that the Dead's audio people brought
along one of the spare 2-track RTR decks. "We" were
also lucky from the standpoint of having a 95%
hiss-free recording to begin with, as the deck was
running at twice the normal "regular show" taping
speed. This translates into lower levels of analog
tape hiss, as well as having more high frequency
recording 
capabilities. This show, for being set up in a hurry,
was very well mixed. Jerry and Bobby each had their
own channel for their guitars, and listening to how
well Weir blended into the entire mix is very well
"documented" with this recording. About the only
negative I can say about this show's audio quality was
that being in the small club, and most likely with the
time frame the audio people had to set up, the drums
are just a little buried in the mix, especially the
cymbals. But, you still are going to get blown away by
the audio quality of the show. 

DeadBase states a few things about this show that are
inaccurate, such as "actual date and location
unknown". This is not true, according to my source.
This show did happen on this date at this venue. 

Sadly, because of the license and insurance the night
club held, the show only lasted a little over an hour
an 30 minutes. There are no "breaks" or "tape flips",
as the band simply was given a "signal" to cut a song
off, so that the RTR could have a new tape put on. All
the songs are complete and unedited. The only
"exception" to this was my decision to cut off the
very 
opening 20 seconds of the first song, "Cold Rain &
Snow", simply because of the fade-in of the copy I
received wasn't right. Since the volume levels on the
recording I received were very low, when I went to
bring everything up to the correct level, the CR&S
fade-in would have sounded pretty bad. I opted to just
cut off the bare minimum of the opening riff to make
things 
sound "correct". 

I guess the "topper" to this show, besides the
fantastic sound, the good mix, and everything else, is
that Phil was just going off into the ozone on a
couple of the songs. He wasn't "way out there", but he
definitely was trying to travel down that road that
made him such an integral part of the "Sound Of The
Dead". He's got some very good riffs going, especially
during "Good Lovin'" and "Saint Stephen". Garcia and
Weir were playing off each other, and you can tell
they were in their groove this night. Sometimes it's
subtle, sometimes it is quite noticeable, but they
just "clicked". 

The audience, although they weren't "recorded" for
ambience, could be heard in the distance between
songs, and you can tell that they definitely got their
money's worth. I imagine the closeness,
proximity

2/12/70

2003-11-30 Thread Jim Powell
I take it that Mafco meant the Deadlists entry is incorrect in saying they
did not play Ungano's on 2/12/70, but I too would appreciate a clarification
on this point.

Whichever is the case, it is plain that the tapes circulating mislabled
"2/12/70" are no such thing.


>
> Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 19:17:10 -0500
> From: Dave S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: 2/12/70
>
> Hi Marco -
>
> I was wondering what you meant when you said that 2/12/70 is the
> incorrect date.  Do you mean that the Dead played at your father's
> nightclub on another occasion - or that the info about them not playing
> there at all on 2/12/70 was incorrect?
>
> Do you know if this was a one time thing, or did the dead (other bands
> too?) play at Ungano's when they were in town to also play at the
> Fillmore East?
>
>
> Thanks for speaking up on this,
>
> Dave S.
>



Re: 2/12/70

2003-11-29 Thread Dave S
Hi Marco -

I was wondering what you meant when you said that 2/12/70 is the 
incorrect date.  Do you mean that the Dead played at your father's 
nightclub on another occasion - or that the info about them not playing 
there at all on 2/12/70 was incorrect?

Do you know if this was a one time thing, or did the dead (other bands 
too?) play at Ungano's when they were in town to also play at the 
Fillmore East?

Thanks for speaking up on this,

Dave S.




From: Marco Ungano/ADC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 9:07 pm
Subject: 2/12/70

Gentlemen,

Regarding the above date dead show.

Absolutely incorrect.  My father was Nick Ungano, owner of 
Ungano's night
club.  Jerry and the boys, went to Ungano's in between shows at the
Filmmore.  My father worked for Bill Graham as a promoter and booking
agent.  Both my father and mother were at the show.

It did happen.  Just wanted to let you know.couldn't possibly 
come from
a more reliable source.

Thanks,
Marco Ungano





Re: 2/12/70

2003-11-26 Thread alligator69
So what was the date of the show?

- Original Message -
From: Marco Ungano/ADC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 9:07 pm
Subject: 2/12/70

> 
> Gentlemen,
> 
> Regarding the above date dead show.
> 
> Absolutely incorrect.  My father was Nick Ungano, owner of 
> Ungano's night
> club.  Jerry and the boys, went to Ungano's in between shows at the
> Filmmore.  My father worked for Bill Graham as a promoter and booking
> agent.  Both my father and mother were at the show.
> 
> It did happen.  Just wanted to let you know.couldn't possibly 
> come from
> a more reliable source.
> 
> Thanks,
> Marco Ungano
> 
> 



2/12/70

2003-11-26 Thread Marco Ungano/ADC

Gentlemen,

Regarding the above date dead show.

Absolutely incorrect.  My father was Nick Ungano, owner of Ungano's night
club.  Jerry and the boys, went to Ungano's in between shows at the
Filmmore.  My father worked for Bill Graham as a promoter and booking
agent.  Both my father and mother were at the show.

It did happen.  Just wanted to let you know.couldn't possibly come from
a more reliable source.

Thanks,
Marco Ungano



Re: 2/13/70a mislabeled 2/12/70

2003-01-26 Thread Charlie Miller
One of the main reasons this is still going on is due to the fact that
gdlive.com has it on their server listed as 2/12/70...cm



- Original Message -
From: Tim Anderson
To: Jim Powell ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2003 1:51 PM
Subject: Re: 2/13/70a mislabeled 2/12/70



--- Jim Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Tim Anderson &  Serafin & Bear are of course free to
> create as much
> confusion as they want, but I really think the rest
> of us have spent ample
> time on this question.

Jim:

I don't believe I was sticking my nose in this
controversy beyond pointing out that it is an ongoing
phenomena, and the mislabeling will persist due to
Bear's and Serafin's efforts.

Personally, I think that the attribution of the
2/13/70 early show to the tape that goes around is
correct, for what it's worth.

tim


=
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://db.etree.org/t_spaceman

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com





Re: 2/13/70a mislabeled 2/12/70

2003-01-26 Thread Tim Anderson

--- Jim Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Tim Anderson &  Serafin & Bear are of course free to
> create as much
> confusion as they want, but I really think the rest
> of us have spent ample
> time on this question.

Jim:

I don't believe I was sticking my nose in this
controversy beyond pointing out that it is an ongoing
phenomena, and the mislabeling will persist due to
Bear's and Serafin's efforts.

Personally, I think that the attribution of the
2/13/70 early show to the tape that goes around is
correct, for what it's worth.

tim


=
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://db.etree.org/t_spaceman

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com



2/13/70a mislabeled 2/12/70

2003-01-26 Thread Jim Powell
Part of the 2/13/70 Early Show has been in  circulation mislabeled "2/12/70"
for more than 20 years.  We proved that it was mislabeled back in the mid
80s.  We proved it again a few years ago.

Everyone is familiar with Bear's notions about 2/13-14/70.  All the evidence
proves him wrong.  And all the evidence proves that the "2/13/70" tape is in
fact 2/13/70 Early Show.

Tim Anderson &  Serafin & Bear are of course free to create as much
confusion as they want, but I really think the rest of us have spent ample
time on this question.

Here is the current DeadLists entry for 2/12/70.  I bet one of these days
Kevin will have it up on the site.


BAND Grateful Dead
VENUE Ungano's Night Club
CITY New York
STATE NY
DATE 02/12/70
SET1 
SET2 
SET3 
ENCORE 
COMMENTS An ad for this gig appears in the Village Voice.  The 16 minute
tape fragment sometimes circulated with this label is actually Fleetwood Mac
w/ Peter Green, Clapton & Jr. Wells, Tea Party, Boston 2/12/70, the encore
of Fleetwood Mac's set.  Also, the 45 AUD tape excerpt from the 2/13/70
Early Show sometimes circulates mislabeled "2/12/70 Ungano's;" for more on
this tape see 2/13/70a.
RECORDING 
CONTRIBUTORS Jim Powell  Joey Newlander






Re: 2/12/70

2003-01-25 Thread Tim Anderson

Jim, maybe you should put a bit in the 2.13.70a entry
about the ongoing 2.12.70 controversy. It seems that
some people (like Serafin) are siding with Bear's
statements that the Fillmore early shows never
happened. Hence the ongoing circulation of the
"2.12.70" date. No one ever seems to notice, however,
that Bear states the band played no other NYC shows
during that run.

Bear's statement is here:
http://www.thebear.org/albums.html#anchor753229

Dig the 'ol Bear ego in full effect: "From the
feedback I have had, and the tapes I have listened to,
I estimate 30% or more of both audience and 'board'
tapes/CD's are either mislabelled or faked."

Apologies if this has been discussed recently, but
I've been away from the Deadlists list for a while.
Best,

tim




--- Marcus Thunich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm curious about this too. Jay Serafin seeded this
> show and goes on in
> detail provided by his "Marin County Source" about
> this show here:
> 
> http://db.etree.org/shninfo_detail.php?shnid=5932
> 
> 
> Anyone ever talked to Jay about this?
> 
> Marcus
> 
> 
> ***
>  MCSE, MCP, A+
> ***
>  Visit my CD-R trading page at: 
>  http://home.cogeco.ca/~marcust99/home1.html
> ***
>  I can be reached via ICQ # 4116873
> ***
> 
> 
> 


=
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://db.etree.org/t_spaceman

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com



2/12/70

2003-01-25 Thread Marcus Thunich
I'm curious about this too. Jay Serafin seeded this show and goes on in
detail provided by his "Marin County Source" about this show here:

http://db.etree.org/shninfo_detail.php?shnid=5932


Anyone ever talked to Jay about this?

Marcus


***
 MCSE, MCP, A+
***
 Visit my CD-R trading page at: 
 http://home.cogeco.ca/~marcust99/home1.html
***
 I can be reached via ICQ # 4116873
***






Re: 2-12-70

2003-01-24 Thread rich plumb
It's listed there.  Along with an explanation that
it's a bogus date and location.  What you actually
have is 2-13-70 early.

rich
--- Donald Bruschi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a CD Labeled Ungano's NiteClub 2-12-70.  The
> Songs are: Cold Rain & Snow, Beat It On Down The Line
> (5 beats), Good Lovin'-> Drums-> Good Lovin', Mama
> Tried-> Black Peter, Hard To Handle, Saint Stephen->
> Not Fade Away, Casey Jones.
> Is this incorrect?  Why is it not listed in Deadlists?
> Don
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> __
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
> http://mailplus.yahoo.com


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com



2-12-70

2003-01-24 Thread Donald Bruschi
I have a CD Labeled Ungano's NiteClub 2-12-70.  The
Songs are: Cold Rain & Snow, Beat It On Down The Line
(5 beats), Good Lovin'-> Drums-> Good Lovin', Mama
Tried-> Black Peter, Hard To Handle, Saint Stephen->
Not Fade Away, Casey Jones.
Is this incorrect?  Why is it not listed in Deadlists?
Don
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com