Bug#390607: gdm: Additions

[Andrei Emeltchenko]

Package: gdm
Version: 2.14.5-1
Followup-For: Bug #390607


The reason why I have submitted bug for GDM is that other WM start
session OK (i.e. wdm)

I can also start session with startx without problem.

Best regards 
Andrei


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#375215: (no subject)

[Sylvain Le Gall]

thanks

Subject: libnss-ldap: This bugs come back
Followup-For: Bug #375215
Package: libnss-ldap
Version: 251-5.2

After an upgrade to 251-5.2, during the boot sequence i have an
increasing timeout during udev initialization (16, 32, 64 seconds).
Downgrading to udev 251-5.1 solve the problem.

Here is a part of nsswitch.conf :

passwd: compat files ldap [UNAVAIL=return]
group:  compat files ldap [UNAVAIL=return]
shadow: compat files ldap [UNAVAIL=return]


Regard
Sylvain Le Gall

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16.19-grand
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages libnss-ldap depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]   1.5.5Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6   2.3.6.ds1-4  GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libkrb531.4.4-3  MIT Kerberos runtime libraries
ii  libldap22.1.30-13+b1 OpenLDAP libraries

Versions of packages libnss-ldap recommends:
ii  libpam-ldap  180-1.1 Pluggable Authentication Module al
ii  nscd 2.3.6.ds1-4 GNU C Library: Name Service Cache 

-- debconf information:
* libnss-ldap/dblogin: false
* shared/ldapns/base-dn: dc=gallu,dc=homelinux,dc=org
  libnss-ldap/binddn: cn=proxyuser,dc=example,dc=net
* libnss-ldap/dbrootlogin: true
  libnss-ldap/override: true
* shared/ldapns/ldap-server: ldap
* libnss-ldap/confperm: false
* libnss-ldap/rootbinddn: cn=admin,dc=gallu,dc=homelinux,dc=org
* shared/ldapns/ldap_version: 3
* libnss-ldap/nsswitch:


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#390773: apparently missing python-gst conflict

[Loïc Minier]

found 390773 0.10.5-4
close 390773 0.10.5-5
stop

Hi,

On Mon, Oct 02, 2006, Joey Hess wrote:
> Version: 0.10.5-5
> Severity: serious
> 
> After upgrading this system from unstable circa 6-9 months ago,
> quodlibet failed as described in #390309.

 Are you 100% sure you tried with 0.10.5-5?  I fixed this particular bug
 in 0.10.5-5, and it works now (at least on my system I could reproduce
 the bug in the past, and I now have both bindings installed, and
 quodlibet starts).

 I'm closing the bug as I think you reported against the wrong version,
 but please reopen if you still get the bug with 0.10.5-5 and send me
 the output of:
import pygst
pygst.require("0.10")
import gst
print gst.gst_version, gst.pygst_version

  Thanks,
-- 
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Bug#390800: marked as done (cupsys depends on libdbus-1-2, which is no longer in the archive)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 2 Oct 2006 23:27:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Never mind, corrected upload done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: cupsys
Version: 1.2.4-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Cupsys 1.2.4-1 has an unversioned depends on libdbus-1-3, while 1.2.4-2 depends 
on libdbus-1-2 >= 0.62. This is a 
serious regression, given that libdbus-1-2 has been removed from the archive. 
The latest version of cupsys is 
uninstallable as a result of this unsatisfiable dependency.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17.11+phil1
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

Sorry, it looks like I duplicated the report of this bug. I didn't
look at the resolved bug list until after I had filed this. Thanks for
the quick fix.

Phil
--- End Message ---

Processed: Re: Bug#390773: apparently missing python-gst conflict

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> found 390773 0.10.5-4
Bug#390773: apparently missing python-gst conflict
Bug marked as found in version 0.10.5-4.

> close 390773 0.10.5-5
Bug#390773: apparently missing python-gst conflict
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 0.10.5-5, send any further explanations to Joey 
Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> stop
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ] reopening bugs

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reopen 375215
Bug#375215: libnss-ldap hangs udev at startup
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#390800: marked as done (cupsys depends on libdbus-1-2, which is no longer in the archive)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 15:27:38 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [Pkg-cups-devel] Bug#390800: cupsys depends on libdbus-1-2,
which is no longer in the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: cupsys
Version: 1.2.4-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Cupsys 1.2.4-1 has an unversioned depends on libdbus-1-3, while 1.2.4-2 depends 
on libdbus-1-2 >= 0.62. This is a 
serious regression, given that libdbus-1-2 has been removed from the archive. 
The latest version of cupsys is 
uninstallable as a result of this unsatisfiable dependency.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17.11+phil1
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.2.4-2+b1
thanks

At Mon, 02 Oct 2006 23:00:06 -0700,
Philip Miller wrote:
> Cupsys 1.2.4-1 has an unversioned depends on libdbus-1-3, while 1.2.4-2 
> depends on libdbus-1-2 >= 0.62. This is a 
> serious regression, given that libdbus-1-2 has been removed from the archive. 
> The latest version of cupsys is 
> uninstallable as a result of this unsatisfiable dependency.

binaryNMU -2.b1 was already uploaded and accepted.
-- 
Kenshi Muto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- End Message ---

Bug#390733: Upgrade from sarge fails (Segmentation fault scrollkeeper-update -q)

[Steve Langasek]

reassign 390733 libxml2
found 390733 2.6.26.dfsg-3
thanks

On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 03:31:07PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.57.11
> Severity: serious

> # dpkg --configure -a
> Setting up synaptic (0.57.11) ...
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/synaptic.postinst: line 6:  4289 Segmentation fault  
> scrollkeeper-update -q
> dpkg: error processing synaptic (--configure):
>  subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 139
> Errors were encountered while processing:
>  synaptic

> This is with scrollkeeper 0.3.14-10 (sarge); installing 0.3.14-11 (etch)
> fixes the problem, maybe there is a missing versioned depends.

> Versions of packages synaptic depends on:
[...]
> ii  libxml2 2.6.26.dfsg-3GNOME XML library

This ends up being the key: scrollkeeper depends on both libxslt1.1 and
libxml2, and the sarge libxslt1.1 seems to be incompatible with the etch
libxml2 but only libxml2 is upgraded as a dependency of synaptic.

Backtrace:

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread -137525568 (LWP 4424)]
0xf7ec38c8 in xmlXPathNewFloat () from /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2
(gdb) bt
#0  0xf7ec38c8 in xmlXPathNewFloat () from /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2
#1  0xf7ecd792 in xmlXPathNsLookup () from /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2
#2  0xf7ece509 in xmlXPathNsLookup () from /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2
#3  0xf7ece6bf in xmlXPathNsLookup () from /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2
#4  0xf7ece84f in xmlXPathNsLookup () from /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2
#5  0xf7ece98f in xmlXPathNsLookup () from /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2
#6  0xf7eceb2f in xmlXPathNsLookup () from /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2
#7  0xf7ecec7f in xmlXPathNsLookup () from /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2
#8  0xf7eceda2 in xmlXPathNsLookup () from /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2
#9  0xf7ed5680 in xmlXPathCtxtCompile () from /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2
#10 0xf7f81879 in xsltXPathCompile () from /usr/lib/libxslt.so.1
#11 0xf7f9383c in xsltDocumentComp () from /usr/lib/libxslt.so.1
#12 0xf7f94867 in xsltStylePreCompute () from /usr/lib/libxslt.so.1
#13 0xf7f7ccd0 in xsltParseStylesheetOutput () from /usr/lib/libxslt.so.1
#14 0xf7f7e214 in xsltParseStylesheetProcess () from /usr/lib/libxslt.so.1
#15 0xf7f7e27d in xsltParseStylesheetImportedDoc () from /usr/lib/libxslt.so.1
#16 0xf7f7e348 in xsltParseStylesheetDoc () from /usr/lib/libxslt.so.1
#17 0xf7f7e401 in xsltParseStylesheetFile () from /usr/lib/libxslt.so.1
#18 0xf7fa86a8 in apply_stylesheets () from /usr/lib/libscrollkeeper.so.0
#19 0xf7fa9743 in install () from /usr/lib/libscrollkeeper.so.0
[...]

Upgrading libxslt1.1 to the etch version makes the problem go away.

So the etch version of libxml2 needs to conflict with the sarge version of
libxslt1.1, since libxslt is known to use internal interfaces of libxml2.

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#390581: marked as done (segfault on amd64)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 3 Oct 2006 07:44:49 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Close the bug as well.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: tightvncserver
Version: 1.2.9-19
Severity: grave

# Xtightvnc -rfbport 5920
MAXSOCKS=1000
02/10/06 00:17:10 Xvnc version 3.3.tight1.2.9
02/10/06 00:17:10 Copyright (C) 1999 AT&T Laboratories Cambridge.
02/10/06 00:17:10 Copyright (C) 2000-2002 Constantin Kaplinsky.
02/10/06 00:17:10 All Rights Reserved.
02/10/06 00:17:10 See http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc for information on VNC
02/10/06 00:17:10 See http://www.tightvnc.com for TightVNC-specific information
02/10/06 00:17:10 Desktop name 'x11' (triton:0)
02/10/06 00:17:10 Protocol version supported 3.3
02/10/06 00:17:10 Listening for VNC connections on TCP port 5920
Font directory '/usr/share/fonts/X11/Speedo/' not found - ignoring
Xvnc: dispatch: MaxClients = 1000
Segmentation fault

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-amd64-k8-smp
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages tightvncserver depends on:
ii  dpkg 1.13.22 package maintenance system for Deb
ii  libc62.3.6.ds1-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libjpeg626b-13   The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  libx11-6 2:1.0.0-9   X11 client-side library
ii  libxext6 1:1.0.1-2   X11 miscellaneous extension librar
ii  perl 5.8.8-6.1   Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  vnc-common   3.3.7-13Virtual network computing server s
ii  x11-common   1:7.0.22X Window System (X.Org) infrastruc
ii  xbase-clients1:7.1.ds-3  miscellaneous X clients
ii  zlib1g   1:1.2.3-13  compression library - runtime

Versions of packages tightvncserver recommends:
ii  xfonts-base   1:1.0.0-3  standard fonts for X

-- no debconf information

-- 
Pelle

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.2.9-20

Forgot to close this bug: #390581.

tightvnc (1.2.9-20) unstable; urgency=low

  * Removed patch to be able to set maxclients to 1000 instead of
default 256. This means that #300858 need to be reopened.

 -- Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Mon,  2 Oct 2006 21:40:25 +0200

Regards,

// Ola

-- 
 - Ola Lundqvist ---
/  [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37  \
|  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD  |
|  +46 (0)54-10 14 30  +46 (0)70-332 1551   |
|  http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\  gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36  4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
 ---
--- End Message ---

Bug#352392: marked as done (rssreader.app: FTBFS due to unmet build-dep libgnustep-gui0.9-dev)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 02 Oct 2006 23:08:24 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#352392: fixed in rssreader.app 0.6.2.dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: rssreader.app
Severity: serious
Version: 0.2.2-1

Hi

Your package FTBFS because libgnustep-gui0.9-dev is not available
(anymore). You might want to update the build dependency to
libgnustep-gui0.10-dev.

Cheers

Luk

-- 
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint:   D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7   F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: rssreader.app
Source-Version: 0.6.2.dfsg-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rssreader.app, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

librsskit0-dev_0.6.2.dfsg-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/rssreader.app/librsskit0-dev_0.6.2.dfsg-2_i386.deb
librsskit0_0.6.2.dfsg-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/rssreader.app/librsskit0_0.6.2.dfsg-2_i386.deb
rsskit.framework_0.6.2.dfsg-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/r/rssreader.app/rsskit.framework_0.6.2.dfsg-2_all.deb
rssreader.app_0.6.2.dfsg-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/r/rssreader.app/rssreader.app_0.6.2.dfsg-2.diff.gz
rssreader.app_0.6.2.dfsg-2.dsc
  to pool/main/r/rssreader.app/rssreader.app_0.6.2.dfsg-2.dsc
rssreader.app_0.6.2.dfsg-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/rssreader.app/rssreader.app_0.6.2.dfsg-2_i386.deb
rssreader.app_0.6.2.dfsg.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/r/rssreader.app/rssreader.app_0.6.2.dfsg.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Yavor Doganov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated rssreader.app package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 17:26:06 +0300
Source: rssreader.app
Binary: rsskit.framework rssreader.app librsskit0-dev librsskit0
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 0.6.2.dfsg-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Gürkan Sengün <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Yavor Doganov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 librsskit0 - GNUstep framework for parsing and manipulating RSS feeds (library
 librsskit0-dev - GNUstep framework for parsing and manipulating RSS feeds 
(develop
 rsskit.framework - GNUstep framework for parsing and manipulating RSS feeds
 rssreader.app - RSS reader for GNUstep
Closes: 310979 352392 352392 356538 385239
Changes: 
 rssreader.app (0.6.2.dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ Remarks and suggestions by James Westby ]
   * Actually bump debian/compat to 5.
   * Switch to ${binary:Version}.
   * Include license header of LGPL in debian/copyright.
   * Rename README.Debian to README.Debian-source.
   * Drop the configure target from debian/rules.
 .
   * Build-depend on dpkg-dev (>= 1.13.19), thanks to Daniel Leidert.
   * List explicitly which files are copyrighted by the two copyright
 holders, thanks to Margarita Manterola.
 .
 rssreader.app (0.6.2.dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release.
 + Doesn't segfault on startup anymore (Closes: #385239).
 + Fixes various hangups when adding a feed (Closes: #310979).
   * Urgency set to low instead of medium since it is a new upstream
 release with a lot of changes.
   * Acknowledge NMU, thanks Luk Claes (Closes: #352392, #356538).
   * Repackage the upstream tarball, removing the RSSKit documentation; it
 currently has no license.  The app was renamed to Grr (Günther's RSS
 Reader), but the Debian source/binary packages remain the same.
   * Split the package and build three more binary packages --
 rsskit.framework, librrskit0 and librsskit0-dev.
   * Add debian/rsskit.framework.README.Debian explaining the reason for the
 repackaging.
   * Build-depend on libgnustep-gui-dev, instead of libgnustep-gui0.10-dev.
   * Upgrade to debhelper v5, adjust the build-dependancy accordingly and bump
 debian/compat.
   * Pass "-LRSSKit/shared_obj" to the linker in order to find the shared
 libs, thanks to Damyan Ivanov for the hint.
   * Append "

Bug#390336: boson-base package will be removed

[Gonéri Le Bouder]

Boson-base package is remplaced by the boson package.

I think i need to ask ftp master to remove this package.

Regards,

Gonéri

Bug#390800: cupsys depends on libdbus-1-2, which is no longer in the archive

[Philip Miller]

Package: cupsys
Version: 1.2.4-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Cupsys 1.2.4-1 has an unversioned depends on libdbus-1-3, while 1.2.4-2 depends 
on libdbus-1-2 >= 0.62. This is a 
serious regression, given that libdbus-1-2 has been removed from the archive. 
The latest version of cupsys is 
uninstallable as a result of this unsatisfiable dependency.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17.11+phil1
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#390733: Upgrade from sarge fails (Segmentation fault scrollkeeper-update -q)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 390733 libxml2
Bug#390733: Upgrade from sarge fails (Segmentation fault scrollkeeper-update -q)
Bug reassigned from package `synaptic' to `libxml2'.

> found 390733 2.6.26.dfsg-3
Bug#390733: Upgrade from sarge fails (Segmentation fault scrollkeeper-update -q)
Bug marked as found in version 2.6.26.dfsg-3.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#385239: marked as done (rssreader.app: does not start)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 02 Oct 2006 23:08:24 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#385239: fixed in rssreader.app 0.6.2.dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: rssreader.app
Version: 0.2.2-1.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Hello,

I just installed rssreader.app amd observed that is unusable since it
crashes(?) at start time:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/usr/src/traduceri/dipo/di/trunk/manual/po/ro $ RSSReader
2006-08-30 03:37:55.532 RSSReader[10460] Warning - mouse/pointer seems to have 
more than 5 buttons - just using one to five
2006-08-30 03:37:55.779 RSSReader[10460] RSSFeeds called.
2006-08-30 03:37:55.779 RSSReader[10460] myFeeds == nil
2006-08-30 03:37:55.781 RSSReader[10460] File NSData.m: 166. In 
readContentsOfFile Open (/home/eddy/.rssreader-data) attempt failed - No such 
file or directory
2006-08-30 03:37:55.781 RSSReader[10460] loaded feed list (nil)
2006-08-30 03:37:55.781 RSSReader[10460] Couldn't load feeds from file, 
creating a new one.
2006-08-30 03:37:55.782 RSSReader[10460] ending rebuildTable with 0
2006-08-30 03:37:55.782 RSSReader[10460] RSSFeeds called.
2006-08-30 03:37:55.782 RSSReader[10460] Fetching using 
Could init NSURLHandle with URL http://slashdot.org/slashdot.rss
Entity: line 1: parser error : Space required after the Public Identifier

 ^
Entity: line 1: parser error : SystemLiteral " or ' expected

 ^
Entity: line 1: parser error : SYSTEM or PUBLIC, the URI is missing

 ^
Entity: line 9: parser error : Opening and ending tag mismatch: HR line 7 and 
BODY

   ^
Entity: line 9: parser error : Opening and ending tag mismatch: P line 6 and 
HTML

  ^
Entity: line 10: parser error : Premature end of data in tag BODY line 4

^
Entity: line 10: parser error : Premature end of data in tag HTML line 2

^
*** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0x10230890 ***
/usr/bin/RSSReader: line 11: 10460 Aborted openapp "$app" "$@"


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (900, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-powerpc
Locale: LANG=ro_RO.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ro_RO.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages rssreader.app depends on:
ii  gnustep-back0.10   0.10.2-1  The GNUstep GUI Backend
ii  libc6  2.3.6.ds1-4   GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libffcall1 1.10-2Foreign Function Call Libraries
ii  libgnustep-base1.111.11.2-3  GNUstep Base library
ii  libgnustep-gui0.10 0.10.2-1  GNUstep Gui Library
ii  libobjc1   1:4.1.1-11Runtime library for GNU Objective-
ii  libxml22.6.26.dfsg-3 GNOME XML library
hi  zlib1g 1:1.2.3-13compression library - runtime

rssreader.app recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: rssreader.app
Source-Version: 0.6.2.dfsg-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rssreader.app, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

librsskit0-dev_0.6.2.dfsg-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/rssreader.app/librsskit0-dev_0.6.2.dfsg-2_i386.deb
librsskit0_0.6.2.dfsg-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/rssreader.app/librsskit0_0.6.2.dfsg-2_i386.deb
rsskit.framework_0.6.2.dfsg-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/r/rssreader.app/rsskit.framework_0.6.2.dfsg-2_all.deb
rssreader.app_0.6.2.dfsg-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/r/rssreader.app/rssreader.app_0.6.2.dfsg-2.diff.gz
rssreader.app_0.6.2.dfsg-2.dsc
  to pool/main/r/rssreader.app/rssreader.app_0.6.2.dfsg-2.dsc
rssreader.app_0.6.2.dfsg-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/rssreader.app/rssreader.app_0.6.2.dfsg-2_i386.deb
rssreader.app_0.6.2.dfsg.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/r/rssreader.app/rssreader.app_0.6.2.dfsg.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Yavor Doganov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated rssreader.app package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe

Processed: Re: libbonoboui2-dev: Linked against libdbus-1.so.2

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 390419 - moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#390419: libbonoboui2-dev: Linked against libdbus-1.so.2
Tags were: unreproducible moreinfo
Tags removed: moreinfo, unreproducible

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#390419: libbonoboui2-dev: Linked against libdbus-1.so.2

[Steve Langasek]

tags 390419 - moreinfo unreproducible
thanks

$ objdump -p /usr/bin/bonobo-browser |grep dbus
  NEEDED  libdbus-1.so.2
$ dpkg -S /usr/bin/bonobo-browser
libbonoboui2-dev: /usr/bin/bonobo-browser
$ dpkg -l libbonoboui2-dev | grep ^ii
ii  libbonoboui2-dev 2.14.0-4   The Bonobo UI library - development files
$

So, this is indeed a bug in libbonoboui2-dev.  The package contains ELF
binaries, but -- as a -dev package -- it isn't pulling in dependencies from
dpkg-shlibdeps.  That needs to be corrected, which will conveniently also
fix the need for libdbus-1-2 itself since on rebuild it will pick up
libdbus-1-3 instead.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#390796: no nvidia-graphics-legacy-modules packages for current nvidia-glx-legacy

[Steve Langasek]

Package: nvidia-graphics-legacy-modules-i386
Version: 1.0.7182+1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid patch

Hi Randall,

The nvidia-glx-legacy package is uninstallable in unstable, and not being
updated in testing, because there are no nvidia-graphics-legacy-modules-i386
packages built for the current version.  As this prevents bug #372252 from
being fixed in testing, this will most probably result in nvidia-glx-legacy
being dropped from etch if new binary packages aren't made available soon.

Does the module/driver ABI really change so frequently that each upstream
version needs its own ABI declaration?  Oh well, assuming for the moment
that this is the case, attached is a simple patch to update for the latest
kernel version and the latest nvidia ABI.  I'm happy to NMU for this if you
don't have time to get to it.

BTW, are there any plans to provide prepackaged modules for the amd64
n-g-d-l packages?

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/
diff -Nru 
/tmp/I90Y7UIFR6/nvidia-graphics-legacy-modules-i386-1.0.7182+1/control.template 
/tmp/ZTDhBaMA7d/nvidia-graphics-legacy-modules-i386-1.0.7184+0/control.template
--- 
/tmp/I90Y7UIFR6/nvidia-graphics-legacy-modules-i386-1.0.7182+1/control.template 
2006-07-31 11:38:44.0 -0700
+++ 
/tmp/ZTDhBaMA7d/nvidia-graphics-legacy-modules-i386-1.0.7184+0/control.template 
2006-10-02 21:33:56.0 -0700
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 
 Package: nvidia-kernel-legacy-#KVERS#
 Architecture: i386 amd64
-Provides: nvidia-kernel-legacy-1.0.7182
+Provides: nvidia-kernel-legacy-1.0.7184
 Depends: nvidia-kernel-common (>= 20050829), linux-image-#KVERS#
 Conflicts: nvidia-kernel-#KVERS#
 Replaces: nvidia-kernel-#KVERS# (<< 1.0.7667-0)
diff -Nru 
/tmp/I90Y7UIFR6/nvidia-graphics-legacy-modules-i386-1.0.7182+1/debian/changelog 
/tmp/ZTDhBaMA7d/nvidia-graphics-legacy-modules-i386-1.0.7184+0/debian/changelog
--- 
/tmp/I90Y7UIFR6/nvidia-graphics-legacy-modules-i386-1.0.7182+1/debian/changelog 
2006-07-31 11:31:37.0 -0700
+++ 
/tmp/ZTDhBaMA7d/nvidia-graphics-legacy-modules-i386-1.0.7184+0/debian/changelog 
2006-10-02 21:33:30.0 -0700
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+nvidia-graphics-legacy-modules-i386 (1.0.7184+0-0.1) unstable; urgency=high
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * High-urgency upload for RC bugfix.
+  * Use nvidia-kernel-legacy-source 1.0.7184-2
+  * Build against 2.6.18-1
+  * Put an upper bound on the n-k-l-s build-dependency, so that no one
+ever accidentally misbuilds a package for the wrong ABI
+
+ -- Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Mon,  2 Oct 2006 21:31:10 -0700
+
 nvidia-graphics-legacy-modules-i386 (1.0.7182+1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * use nvidia-kernel-legacy-source 1.0.7182-1
diff -Nru 
/tmp/I90Y7UIFR6/nvidia-graphics-legacy-modules-i386-1.0.7182+1/debian/control 
/tmp/ZTDhBaMA7d/nvidia-graphics-legacy-modules-i386-1.0.7184+0/debian/control
--- 
/tmp/I90Y7UIFR6/nvidia-graphics-legacy-modules-i386-1.0.7182+1/debian/control   
2006-07-31 11:31:37.0 -0700
+++ 
/tmp/ZTDhBaMA7d/nvidia-graphics-legacy-modules-i386-1.0.7184+0/debian/control   
2006-10-02 21:34:42.0 -0700
@@ -2,24 +2,24 @@
 Section: non-free/x11
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Randall Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
-Build-Depends: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-k7, 
linux-headers-2.6.17-1-686,linux-headers-2.6.17-1-486, debhelper (>= 4.0.0), 
kernel-package, nvidia-kernel-legacy-source (>= 1.0.7182)
+Build-Depends: linux-headers-2.6.18-1-k7, 
linux-headers-2.6.18-1-686,linux-headers-2.6.18-1-486, debhelper (>= 4.0.0), 
kernel-package, nvidia-kernel-legacy-source (>= 1.0.7184), 
nvidia-kernel-legacy-source (<< 1.0.7185)
 Standards-Version: 3.6.2
 
-Package: nvidia-kernel-legacy-2.6.17-1-486
+Package: nvidia-kernel-legacy-2.6.18-1-486
 Architecture: i386
 Description: NVIDIA binary kernel module
 
-Package: nvidia-kernel-legacy-2.6.17-1-686
+Package: nvidia-kernel-legacy-2.6.18-1-686
 Architecture: i386
 Description: NVIDIA binary kernel module
 
-Package: nvidia-kernel-legacy-2.6.17-1-k7
+Package: nvidia-kernel-legacy-2.6.18-1-k7
 Architecture: i386
 Description: NVIDIA binary kernel module
 
 Package: nvidia-kernel-legacy-2.6-486
 Architecture: all
-Depends: nvidia-kernel-legacy-2.6.17-1-486, linux-image-2.6-486
+Depends: nvidia-kernel-legacy-2.6.18-1-486, linux-image-2.6-486
 Description: NVIDIA binary kernel module for 2.6 series compiled for 486
  This is a metapackage to track the NVIDIA kernel module for
  the 2.6 kernel series.
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
  
 Package: nvidia-kernel-legacy-2.6-686
 Architecture: all
-Depends: nvidia-kernel-legacy-2.6.17-1-686, linux-image-2.6-686
+Depends: nvidia-kernel-legacy-2.6.18-1-686, linux-image-2.6-686
 Description: NVIDIA binary kernel module for 2.6 series compiled for 686  
  This is a metapackage to track the NVIDIA kernel module for
  the 2

Bug#390702: openoffice.org: crashes after upgrade to ~rc2-2

[Rudy Godoy]

El día 02/10/2006 a 17:19 Rene Engelhard escribió...

> Hi,
> 
> Rudy Godoy wrote:
> > After upgrading openoffice.org I'm no longer able to use it since it crashes
> > everytime I try to start it.
> > The user case is that it crashed once I upgrade it, and I had two openned 
> > files,
> > now, after upgrade installation, I get to the recover documment window, and 
> > then
> > inmediately it crashes.
> [ snip ]
> 
> Already filed A FEW TIMES. Please look whether a bug already is filed
> before filing a new one (incidentially also with a wrong severity)

I didn't found any related bug to this particular case. #390113 looks
the same but isn't, it didn't eat my CPU to 100%. Feel free to merge
it.

By the way I'm able to open and work on the same files on PowerPC,
same version but no localization packages installed.

regards,
Rudy

-- 
Rudy Godoy | 0x3433BD21 | http://stone-head.org   ,''`.
http://www.apesol.org  -  http://www.debian.org  : :' :
GPG FP: 0D12 8537 607E 2DF5 4EFB  35A7 550F 1A00 3433 BD21   `. `'
   `-


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: Re: non-free license for core.schema

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 361846 important
Bug#361846: non-free license for core.schema
Severity set to `important' from `serious'

> retitle 361846 invalid assertion of copyright on contents of core.schema
Bug#361846: non-free license for core.schema
Changed Bug title.
(By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.)

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#361846: non-free license for core.schema

[Steve Langasek]

severity 361846 important
retitle 361846 invalid assertion of copyright on contents of core.schema
thanks

> Plus, this is an interface specification if I've ever seen one, and
> interface specifications are not copyrightable under US law.

I agree, but was hesitant to assert this without some corroboration.

If this file is a non-copyrightable interface definition, the bug here is
the presence of a copyright notice and license statement where there should
be none.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#390794: apache2-mpm-prefork: /usr/sbin/apache2 not executable

[Jonas Meurer]

Package: apache2-mpm-prefork
Version: 2.2.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

hello,

with the latest apache2-mpm-prefork upgrade, /usr/sbin/apache2 has
become unexecutable. the permissions now are "-rw-r--r--". 
/etc/init.d/apache2 therefore exites silently.

...
 jonas

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-1-amd64-resivo
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages apache2-mpm-prefork depends on:
ii  apache2.2-common2.2.3-1  Next generation, scalable, extenda
ii  libapr1 1.2.7-6  The Apache Portable Runtime Librar
ii  libaprutil1 1.2.7+dfsg-2 The Apache Portable Runtime Utilit
ii  libc6   2.3.6.ds1-5  GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libdb4.34.3.29-6 Berkeley v4.3 Database Libraries [
ii  libdb4.44.4.20-8 Berkeley v4.4 Database Libraries [
ii  libexpat1   1.95.8-3.3   XML parsing C library - runtime li
ii  libldap22.1.30-13+b1 OpenLDAP libraries
ii  libpcre36.7-1Perl 5 Compatible Regular Expressi
ii  libpq4  8.1.4-7  PostgreSQL C client library
ii  libsqlite3-03.3.7-1  SQLite 3 shared library
ii  libuuid11.39-1.1 universally unique id library

apache2-mpm-prefork recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#387185: marked as done (picprog: Fails to detect programmer in amd64)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 02 Oct 2006 20:17:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#387185: fixed in picprog 1.8.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: picprog
Version: 1.8.1-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


picprog does not detect the chip in the programmer in my amd64 unstable
box. I'm using the programmer from the package docs.


homero:~# picprog --pic /dev/ttyS0 --output o.hex
Picprog version 1.8.1, Copyright © 2006 Jaakko Hyvätti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Picprog comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details
type `picprog --warranty'.  This is free software,
and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions;
type `picprog --copying' for details.

CPU clock speed: 1800 MHz
/dev/ttyS0:PIC programmer missing or chip fault
/dev/ttyS0:2006:unable to read pic device id

In another box running 32bit unstable picprog works fine:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ picprog --output o.hex --pic /dev/ttyS0
Picprog version 1.8.1, Copyright ? 2006 Jaakko Hyv?tti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Picprog comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details
type `picprog --warranty'.  This is free software,
and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions;
type `picprog --copying' for details.

CPU clock speed: 908 MHz
/dev/ttyS0: id 0x0560: detected pic16f84a version 0x00
Device pic16f84a, program memory: 1024, data memory: 64.
Reading program memory,
reading data memory,
reading id words,
reading fuses,
done.

Can anyone check this?
Thanks,

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-fer
Locale: LANG=es_AR, LC_CTYPE=es_AR (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages picprog depends on:
ii  libc62.3.6.ds1-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libgcc1  1:4.1.1-13  GCC support library
ii  libstdc++6   4.1.1-13The GNU Standard C++ Library v3

picprog recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: picprog
Source-Version: 1.8.3-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
picprog, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

picprog_1.8.3-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/picprog/picprog_1.8.3-1.diff.gz
picprog_1.8.3-1.dsc
  to pool/main/p/picprog/picprog_1.8.3-1.dsc
picprog_1.8.3-1_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/p/picprog/picprog_1.8.3-1_amd64.deb
picprog_1.8.3-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/picprog/picprog_1.8.3-1_i386.deb
picprog_1.8.3-1_sparc.deb
  to pool/main/p/picprog/picprog_1.8.3-1_sparc.deb
picprog_1.8.3.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/picprog/picprog_1.8.3.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Jan Wagemakers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated picprog package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 11:17:35 +0200
Source: picprog
Binary: picprog
Architecture: source i386 sparc amd64
Version: 1.8.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jan Wagemakers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Jan Wagemakers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 picprog- Microchip PIC serial programmer software
Closes: 387185
Changes: 
 picprog (1.8.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release
 .
 picprog (1.8.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release
 - This release has two new options --nordtsc and --slow,
   (closes: #387185)
   * Changed section to "electronics".
Files: 
 4c91804276581c5db1ddaa2e7d3e419a 578 electronics optional picprog_1.8.3-1.dsc
 0effa1a565df2d0c86060fd0d59650f9 58506 electronics optional 
picprog_1.8.3.orig.tar.gz
 6b291c8d0ee79242310e25c41905b20e 2202 electronics optional 
picprog_1.8.3-1.diff.gz
 b285066193259ae8e94470248cf90d89 59910 electronics optional 
picprog_1.8.3-1_i386.deb
 fff077721ac2653b96a9adc54d5fbae1 59570 electronics optional 
picprog_1.8.3-1_amd64.deb
 a94fed4e7c1331676319feaada06a4ca 58118 electronics option

Bug#390583: marked as done (cupsys build against nonexistent libdbus-1-2)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 12:07:12 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390583: cupsys build against nonexistent libdbus-1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: cupsys
Version: 1.2.4-2
Severity: grave

cupsys-1.2.4-2 was compiled against libdbus-1-2 which is not available
in the archive anymore. This makes the package uninstallable.
Scheduling binNMUs for i386 should be sufficient.

Cheers,
Michael

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (300, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages cupsys depends on:
ii  adduser  3.97Add and remove users and groups
ii  cupsys-common1.2.4-1 Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - 
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]1.5.5   Debian configuration management sy
ii  gs-esp   8.15.3.dfsg.1-1 The Ghostscript PostScript interpr
ii  libc62.3.6.ds1-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libcupsimage21.2.4-1 Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - 
ii  libcupsys2   1.2.4-1 Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - 
ii  libdbus-1-3  0.93-1  simple interprocess messaging syst
ii  libgnutls13  1.4.4-1 the GNU TLS library - runtime libr
ii  libldap2 2.1.30-13+b1OpenLDAP libraries
ii  libpam0g 0.79-3.2Pluggable Authentication Modules l
ii  libpaper11.1.20  Library for handling paper charact
ii  libslp1  1.2.1-6 OpenSLP libraries
ii  lsb-base 3.1-17  Linux Standard Base 3.1 init scrip
ii  patch2.5.9-4 Apply a diff file to an original
ii  perl-modules 5.8.8-6.1   Core Perl modules
ii  procps   1:3.2.7-3   /proc file system utilities
ii  xpdf-utils [poppler-util 3.01-9  Portable Document Format (PDF) sui
ii  zlib1g   1:1.2.3-13  compression library - runtime

Versions of packages cupsys recommends:
ii  cupsys-client   1.2.4-1  Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - 
ii  foomatic-filters3.0.2-20060712-3 linuxprinting.org printer support 
ii  smbclient   3.0.23c-1a LanManager-like simple client fo

-- debconf information excluded

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
At Mon, 02 Oct 2006 09:20:59 +0900,
Kenshi Muto wrote:
> At Mon, 02 Oct 2006 01:22:40 +0200,
> Michael Biebl wrote:
> > cupsys-1.2.4-2 was compiled against libdbus-1-2 which is not available
> > in the archive anymore. This makes the package uninstallable.
> > Scheduling binNMUs for i386 should be sufficient.
> 
> Oh my... (I forgot to build it with pbuilder even I had been using it for
> every previous versions.)
> 
> Release team/buildd managers, could you queue BinNMU for cupsys 1.2.4-2 on
> i386?

I uploaded binNMU'd cupsys 1.2.4-2+b1_i386 made by my own sbuild
to solve soon.
Sorry for making noise, but I believe this problem is solved.

Thanks,
-- 
Kenshi Muto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- End Message ---

Bug#389720: util-vserver stops working after 0.30.204->0.30.210 upgrade

[Micah Anderson]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Dariusz Pietrzak wrote:
>> quite a large number of debian servers, all running 2.6 fine. However,
>  If you're uninterested and uneffected by the bug #389720( which by the way,
> has already been fixed) why are you trolling and wasting my and Ola's
> time? 

I actually was interested in your bug, as a co-maintainer for the
util-vserver package I am interested in resolving all bugs as quickly as
possible. However, your hostile tone, and accusations of me being a
troll, when it appears I was just pointing out something you didn't want
to hear -- had a highly demotivating affect on my desire to help you.

Micah
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFIc6r9n4qXRzy1ioRAjbLAJsEhwzpI1oLb0h7HHX7KM7wTBZ71QCfTgk9
HTlBj/1mjBa3tV5Z7ni/JwQ=
=gNfP
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#354622: Using Firefox as the app name without official branding is still a trademark violation

[Mike Connor]

On 2-Oct-06, at 1:39 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:


Backporting security fixes from newer releases is not really "extra"
in my mind.  It'd be fixing stuff that isn't fixed elsewhere without
discussing it with us.

The argument for fixing upstream is that by taking a fix for a bug
that's unpatched upstream, you will call attention to that potential
exploit, and thus put non-Debian users at risk.


Are you suggesting we don't patch the branches you don't support any
more ?


Not sure why you got that impression.   I think it'd be better,  
assuming anyone aside from Debian still cares about 1.0.x, to patch  
mozilla.org CVS and share the goodness.  But that's going offtopic,  
and I've fallen into that trap too much in this thread.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#368559: Current status

[Nathanael Nerode]

FYI, the involved files are:

SGI Free Software License B:
glcore.h
glxmd.h
glxproto.h
glxtokens.h

GLX Public License:
glxint.h

Those five header files are the only ones in x11proto-gl which
have the problem licenses.

-- 
Nathanael Nerode  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[Insert famous quote here]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#368562: mesa: material under GLX Public License and SGI Free Software License B is not DFSG-free

[Nathanael Nerode]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Henning, Nathanael,
> 
> I'm working on an NMU of mesa this weekend, and was going to take care of
> bug #368562 ("debian/copyright does not contain all licenses") even though I
> obviously can't take care of bug #368560 concerning what licenses the code
> is under.  In the sources of mesa 6.5 CVS (the version in experimental), I'm
> unable to find any references to the "GLX Public License" at all.  Does that
> mean we should consider this particular license issue resolved, or do either
> of you have evidence that the license statements included upstream are
> incorrect?

The "GLX Public License" appears to be gone from the Mesa sources: all
the files which contained it are simply gone.

I've summarized the status in the other two bugs (368559 and 368564)
which resulted from the Xorg package split.  It's still present in those
packages, albeit in one file each.  It may be easier to rewrite those
two files than to get the code relicensed.

The SGI Free Software License B is still present in all three packages,
and in substantial quantities.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFIdD0RGZ0aC4lkIIRAhBJAJsHUvhp8xC28G9TfShbZcoIWuys7wCfUjXy
igBGkk3+KL4iQqZGi0w1+Og=
=rKxq
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#390787: marked as done (Unusable: "ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol ")

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 2 Oct 2006 19:45:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390787: Unusable: "ath_pci: disagrees about version of 
symbol "
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: madwifi-source
Version: 1:0.9.2+r1710.20060914-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

The drivers seem to build OK for kernel 2.6.16-2-686, but when I try to
actually use them, I get a raft of "disagrees about version of symbol"
reports, and some of the modules in the package refuse to load.  To wit:

Oct  2 18:35:54 kernel: pccard: CardBus card inserted into slot 0
Oct  2 18:35:54 kernel: ath_hal: 0.9.17.2 (AR5210, AR5211, AR5212, RF5111, 
RF5112, RF2413, RF5413)
Oct  2 18:35:54 kernel: wlan: 0.8.4.2 (0.9.3)
Oct  2 18:35:54 kernel: ath_rate_sample: 1.2 (0.9.3)
Oct  2 18:35:54 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol 
ath_rate_tx_complete
Oct  2 18:35:54 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ath_rate_tx_complete
Oct  2 18:35:54 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol 
ieee80211_encap
Oct  2 18:35:54 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ieee80211_encap
Oct  2 18:35:54 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol 
ieee80211_input
Oct  2 18:35:54 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ieee80211_input
Oct  2 18:35:54 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol 
ieee80211_ifattach
Oct  2 18:35:54 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ieee80211_ifattach
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol 
ieee80211_beacon_update
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ieee80211_beacon_update
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol 
ieee80211_find_channel
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ieee80211_find_channel
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol 
ieee80211_find_rxnode
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ieee80211_find_rxnode
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol 
ath_rate_attach
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ath_rate_attach
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol 
ieee80211_vap_setup
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ieee80211_vap_setup
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol 
ieee80211_ifdetach
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ieee80211_ifdetach
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol 
ieee80211_free_node
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ieee80211_free_node
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol 
ieee80211_input_monitor
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ieee80211_input_monitor
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol 
ath_rate_newassoc
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ath_rate_newassoc
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol 
ieee80211_crypto_newkey
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ieee80211_crypto_newkey
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol 
ieee80211_crypto_setkey
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ieee80211_crypto_setkey
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol 
ath_rate_dynamic_proc_register
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ath_rate_dynamic_proc_register
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol 
ieee80211_dump_pkt
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ieee80211_dump_pkt
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol 
ieee80211_ioctl_create_vap
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ieee80211_ioctl_create_vap
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol 
ieee80211_dfs_test_return
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ieee80211_dfs_test_return
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol 
ieee80211_stop_running
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ieee80211_stop_running
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol 
ieee80211_cipher_none

... and so on.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages madwifi-source depends on:
ii  bzip2 1.0.3-6high-quality block-sorting file co
ii  debhelper  

Bug#368564: Bug status report

[Nathanael Nerode]

FYI, the files affected by the problem licenses in this package are:

GLX Public License:
 hw/dmx/glxProxy/glxext.c

It may be easier to rewrite the file affected by the GLX Public License
than to get it relicensed.

SGI Free Software License B:
 lots of files, all under hw/dmx/glxProxy/ or GL/glx/

-- 
Nathanael Nerode  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Bush admitted to violating FISA and said he was proud of it.
So why isn't he in prison yet?...


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#390787: Unusable: "ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol "

[Kel Modderman]

On Tuesday 03 October 2006 11:46, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> Package: madwifi-source
> Version: 1:0.9.2+r1710.20060914-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> The drivers seem to build OK for kernel 2.6.16-2-686, but when I try to
> actually use them, I get a raft of "disagrees about version of symbol"
> reports, and some of the modules in the package refuse to load.  To wit:
>
> Oct  2 18:35:54 kernel: pccard: CardBus card inserted into slot 0
> Oct  2 18:35:54 kernel: ath_hal: 0.9.17.2 (AR5210, AR5211, AR5212, RF5111,
> RF5112, RF2413, RF5413) Oct  2 18:35:54 kernel: wlan: 0.8.4.2 (0.9.3)
> Oct  2 18:35:54 kernel: ath_rate_sample: 1.2 (0.9.3)
> Oct  2 18:35:54 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol
> ath_rate_tx_complete Oct  2 18:35:54 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol
> ath_rate_tx_complete Oct  2 18:35:54 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about
> version of symbol ieee80211_encap Oct  2 18:35:54 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown
> symbol ieee80211_encap
> Oct  2 18:35:54 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol
> ieee80211_input Oct  2 18:35:54 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol
> ieee80211_input
> Oct  2 18:35:54 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol
> ieee80211_ifattach Oct  2 18:35:54 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol
> ieee80211_ifattach Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version
> of symbol ieee80211_beacon_update Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown
> symbol ieee80211_beacon_update Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees
> about version of symbol ieee80211_find_channel Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel:
> ath_pci: Unknown symbol ieee80211_find_channel Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel:
> ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol ieee80211_find_rxnode Oct  2
> 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ieee80211_find_rxnode Oct  2
> 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol ath_rate_attach
> Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ath_rate_attach
> Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol
> ieee80211_vap_setup Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol
> ieee80211_vap_setup Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about
> version of symbol ieee80211_ifdetach Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci:
> Unknown symbol ieee80211_ifdetach Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci:
> disagrees about version of symbol ieee80211_free_node Oct  2 18:35:55
> kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ieee80211_free_node Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel:
> ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol ieee80211_input_monitor Oct  2
> 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ieee80211_input_monitor Oct  2
> 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol
> ath_rate_newassoc Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol
> ath_rate_newassoc
> Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol
> ieee80211_crypto_newkey Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol
> ieee80211_crypto_newkey Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about
> version of symbol ieee80211_crypto_setkey Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci:
> Unknown symbol ieee80211_crypto_setkey Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci:
> disagrees about version of symbol ath_rate_dynamic_proc_register Oct  2
> 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ath_rate_dynamic_proc_register Oct
>  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol
> ieee80211_dump_pkt Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol
> ieee80211_dump_pkt Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version
> of symbol ieee80211_ioctl_create_vap Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci:
> Unknown symbol ieee80211_ioctl_create_vap Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci:
> disagrees about version of symbol ieee80211_dfs_test_return Oct  2 18:35:55
> kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ieee80211_dfs_test_return Oct  2 18:35:55
> kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol ieee80211_stop_running
> Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ieee80211_stop_running Oct 
> 2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol
> ieee80211_cipher_none

Perhaps you have handbuilt modules littering your kernel's module libdir, or 
you did not first remove all previous modules from kernel space before 
loading new modules?

Kel.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#389681: 389681is reproducible here

[Nelson A. de Oliveira]

Reproducible here too:

# LC_ALL=C aptitude install reportbug
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading extended state information
Initializing package states... Done
Building tag database... Done
The following packages have been kept back:
 cupsys openoffice.org-calc openoffice.org-common openoffice.org-core
 openoffice.org-draw openoffice.org-impress openoffice.org-l10n-pt-br
 openoffice.org-math openoffice.org-writer python-uno x11-common
 xfonts-100dpi xfonts-75dpi xfonts-base xfonts-scalable xkb-data
 xserver-xorg xserver-xorg-core xserver-xorg-input-evdev
 xserver-xorg-input-kbd xserver-xorg-input-mouse xserver-xorg-video-i810
 xserver-xorg-video-vesa
The following packages will be upgraded:
 reportbug
The following packages are RECOMMENDED but will NOT be installed:
 python-cjkcodecs python-iconvcodec
1 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 23 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/138kB of archives. After unpacking 4096B will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?]
Writing extended state information... Done
Reading package fields... Done
Reading package status... Done
Retrieving bug reports... 0% ... E: undefined local variable or method
`pkg' for Factory::BugsFactory:Module
E: Sub-process if dpkg -s apt-listbugs | grep -q '^Status: .* ok
installed'; then /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || ( test $? -ne 10 ||
exit 10; echo 'Warning: apt-listbugs exited abnormally, hit enter key
to continue.' 1>&2 ; read a < /dev/tty ); fi returned an error code
(10)
E: Failure running script if dpkg -s apt-listbugs | grep -q '^Status:
.* ok installed'; then /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || ( test $? -ne 10
|| exit 10; echo 'Warning: apt-listbugs exited abnormally, hit enter
key to continue.' 1>&2 ; read a < /dev/tty ); fi
A package failed to install.  Trying to recover:
dpkg: error processing reportbug (--configure):
Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should
reinstall it before attempting configuration.
Errors were encountered while processing:
reportbug

Thank you!

Nelson


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#390786: apache2.2-common: cannot touch /var/log/apache2/error.log

[Russ Allbery]

Package: apache2.2-common
Version: 2.2.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

apache2.2-common won't install, at least within a pbuilder chroot.
The postinst aborts with the following error:

touch: cannot touch `/var/log/apache2/error.log': No such file or directory
touch: cannot touch `/var/log/apache2/access.log': No such file or directory
dpkg: error processing apache2.2-common (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1

This prevents building packages against Apache 2.2, since
apache2-threaded-dev depends on apache2.2-common.

A missing directory in the package or mkdir in the postinst, maybe?

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#390787: Unusable: "ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol "

[Chip Salzenberg]

Package: madwifi-source
Version: 1:0.9.2+r1710.20060914-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

The drivers seem to build OK for kernel 2.6.16-2-686, but when I try to
actually use them, I get a raft of "disagrees about version of symbol"
reports, and some of the modules in the package refuse to load.  To wit:

Oct  2 18:35:54 kernel: pccard: CardBus card inserted into slot 0
Oct  2 18:35:54 kernel: ath_hal: 0.9.17.2 (AR5210, AR5211, AR5212, RF5111, 
RF5112, RF2413, RF5413)
Oct  2 18:35:54 kernel: wlan: 0.8.4.2 (0.9.3)
Oct  2 18:35:54 kernel: ath_rate_sample: 1.2 (0.9.3)
Oct  2 18:35:54 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol 
ath_rate_tx_complete
Oct  2 18:35:54 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ath_rate_tx_complete
Oct  2 18:35:54 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol 
ieee80211_encap
Oct  2 18:35:54 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ieee80211_encap
Oct  2 18:35:54 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol 
ieee80211_input
Oct  2 18:35:54 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ieee80211_input
Oct  2 18:35:54 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol 
ieee80211_ifattach
Oct  2 18:35:54 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ieee80211_ifattach
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol 
ieee80211_beacon_update
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ieee80211_beacon_update
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol 
ieee80211_find_channel
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ieee80211_find_channel
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol 
ieee80211_find_rxnode
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ieee80211_find_rxnode
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol 
ath_rate_attach
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ath_rate_attach
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol 
ieee80211_vap_setup
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ieee80211_vap_setup
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol 
ieee80211_ifdetach
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ieee80211_ifdetach
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol 
ieee80211_free_node
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ieee80211_free_node
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol 
ieee80211_input_monitor
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ieee80211_input_monitor
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol 
ath_rate_newassoc
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ath_rate_newassoc
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol 
ieee80211_crypto_newkey
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ieee80211_crypto_newkey
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol 
ieee80211_crypto_setkey
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ieee80211_crypto_setkey
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol 
ath_rate_dynamic_proc_register
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ath_rate_dynamic_proc_register
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol 
ieee80211_dump_pkt
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ieee80211_dump_pkt
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol 
ieee80211_ioctl_create_vap
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ieee80211_ioctl_create_vap
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol 
ieee80211_dfs_test_return
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ieee80211_dfs_test_return
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol 
ieee80211_stop_running
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: Unknown symbol ieee80211_stop_running
Oct  2 18:35:55 kernel: ath_pci: disagrees about version of symbol 
ieee80211_cipher_none

... and so on.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages madwifi-source depends on:
ii  bzip2 1.0.3-6high-quality block-sorting file co
ii  debhelper 5.0.37.3   helper programs for debian/rules
ii  module-assistant  0.10.6 tool to make module package creati

madwifi-source recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#390779: marked as done (mpd_0.12.0-2(unstable/sparc/spontini): missing build-depends)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 02 Oct 2006 18:47:03 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390779: fixed in mpd 0.12.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: mpd
Version: 0.12.0-2
Severity: serious

You appear to be missing a build-depends on quilt.

| Automatic build of mpd_0.12.0-2 on spontini by sbuild/sparc 85
| Build started at 20061002-1652
| **

[...]

| ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
| Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.1.0), cdbs, libaudiofile-dev, libflac-dev (>= 
1.1.1-3), libogg-dev, libshout3-dev, libvorbis-dev, libspeex-dev, 
libasound2-dev [!kfreebsd-i386 !hurd-i386], libao-dev (>= 0.8.3-1), 
libmad0-dev, libid3tag0-dev, libmikmod2-dev, libmpcdec-dev, zlib1g-dev

[...]

| debian/rules:10: /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/patchsys-quilt.mk: No such file or 
directory
| make: *** No rule to make target `/usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/patchsys-quilt.mk'. 
 Stop.

A complete build log can be found at
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=sparc&pkg=mpd&ver=0.12.0-2

-- 
James

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: mpd
Source-Version: 0.12.0-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
mpd, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

mpd_0.12.0-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/m/mpd/mpd_0.12.0-3.diff.gz
mpd_0.12.0-3.dsc
  to pool/main/m/mpd/mpd_0.12.0-3.dsc
mpd_0.12.0-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/m/mpd/mpd_0.12.0-3_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Decklin Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated mpd package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon,  2 Oct 2006 21:32:27 -0400
Source: mpd
Binary: mpd
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.12.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Decklin Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Decklin Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 mpd- Music Player Daemon
Closes: 390779
Changes: 
 mpd (0.12.0-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Fix missing build-depends (Closes: #390779)
Files: 
 605641552726af337393092bfeb3ce6b 806 sound optional mpd_0.12.0-3.dsc
 056a1388bd5411ab8f28c77b5d3ee575 10717 sound optional mpd_0.12.0-3.diff.gz
 056d38ac78ead8b09c30ba687c6a6c15 127060 sound optional mpd_0.12.0-3_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFIb/GuIJGh/GWjRsRAnPTAJ47ZTysLhf1xcMvE4N7bU6AHADt5ACcCtW9
dw5YLGBKXoipt9C3zlFHtU4=
=F/Fi
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#389277: nonexistent /etc/inetd.conf breaks update-inetd script

[Marco d'Itri]

severity 389277 normal
thanks

On Sep 24, Stephen Liebbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 11.2
But hurd is not a releasable architecture, so bugs are not RC.

> hurd K11 install with updates does not create /etc/inetd.conf.
> update-inetd script cannot add entries without file already present.
> works OK if /etc/inetd.conf created manually, but this violates Policy.
> 
> Sorry if already aware of this. Hoped to file report on old netbase package,
> but things are changing too quickly.
/etc/inetd.conf is currently created by netbase, if hurd does not use
the netbase package then its replacement too should create inetd.conf.
Or at least it should do this until a better solution is designed.
So far it's not obvious which package should create inetd.conf, so I
think that we can safely continue ignoring the issue for a few more
months since it does not affect real systems anyway.

Adding a dependency on netbase to update-inetd would create a dependency
loop, which I understand is a bad thing. But this does not really matter
because post-etch netbase will become an essential package for unrelated
reasons.

-- 
ciao,
Marco


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: tagging bugs that are closed by packages in NEW as pending

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 293257 pending
Bug#293257: ITP: hobix -- flexible generator of static blogs
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

> tags 353750 pending
Bug#353750: singularity: crash in cheat mode "give money" option
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

> tags 353886 pending
Bug#353886: Always uses CPU even when stopped
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

> tags 355216 pending
Bug#355216: singularity: minor errors in text
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending

> tags 357684 pending
Bug#357684: should be "arch: all"
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending

> tags 374088 pending
Bug#374088: ITP: openmovieeditor -- a simple non-linear video editor
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

> tags 380950 pending
Bug#380950: Python transition (#2): you are building a private python module !
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending

> tags 383429 pending
Bug#383429: libadasockets-dev: Ada spec and ali files in wrong directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

> tags 383430 pending
Bug#383430: adasockets: must bump soname due to ABI change in compiler
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

> tags 386187 pending
Bug#386187: simultaneous win and loss results in both
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

> tags 389075 pending
Bug#389075: invariant sections removed from the man pages
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

> tags 389076 pending
Bug#389076: documentation incomplete / wrong
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

> tags 390413 pending
Bug#390413: singularity: Includes a non-free font
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

> tags 390614 pending
Bug#390614: libavahi-compat-libdnssd1: please change "Depends" on libnss-mdns 
into "Recomends"
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#390133: openoffice.org: Very annoying crash...

[Nicolas]

Package: openoffice.org
Version: 2.0.4~rc2-2
Followup-For: Bug #390133


Hello,

That bug is very annoying. I use OpenOffice for very important tasks, and now I
can't open any document... =/

I eargly await for that bug to be solved.

Thanks.
Nicolas.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages openoffice.org depends on:
ii  openoffice.org-base  2.0.4~rc2-2 OpenOffice.org office suite - data
ii  openoffice.org-calc  2.0.4~rc2-2 OpenOffice.org office suite - spre
ii  openoffice.org-core  2.0.4~rc2-2 OpenOffice.org office suite archit
ii  openoffice.org-draw  2.0.4~rc2-2 OpenOffice.org office suite - draw
ii  openoffice.org-impress   2.0.4~rc2-2 OpenOffice.org office suite - pres
ii  openoffice.org-java-common   2.0.4~rc2-2 OpenOffice.org office suite Java s
ii  openoffice.org-math  2.0.4~rc2-2 OpenOffice.org office suite - equa
ii  openoffice.org-writer2.0.4~rc2-2 OpenOffice.org office suite - word

openoffice.org recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#389681: apt-listbugs: Bug still exists in version 0.0.57

[Uwe Storbeck]

If the network connection does matter in any way: I have to use a
http-proxy here, the network has no direct routing to the internet.

Regards,

Uwe



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#380539: marked as done (File format is ambiguous)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 02 Oct 2006 18:03:36 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#380539: fixed in binutils 2.17-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: binutils-multiarch
Version: 2.17-2
Severity: normal
File: /usr/bin/objdump

Hi,

the latest upload of binutils (2.17-2) breaks the objdump in
binutils-multiarch on amd64:

% objdump -a /emul/ia32-linux/lib/libc-2.3.6.so
objdump: /emul/ia32-linux/lib/libc-2.3.6.so: File format is ambiguous
objdump: Matching formats: elf32-i386 elf32-i386-freebsd


Reverting back to 2.17-1 gives:

# objdump -a /emul/ia32-linux/lib/libc-2.3.6.so

/emul/ia32-linux/lib/libc-2.3.6.so: file format elf32-i386
/emul/ia32-linux/lib/libc-2.3.6.so

Ari (irc nick), who initialy notice the bug, mentioned that it also
works on i386 so this looks to be arch specific to amd64.

MfG
Goswin


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-frosties-2
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages binutils-multiarch depends on:
ii  binutils  2.17-2 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii  libc6 2.3.6-16   GNU C Library: Shared libraries

binutils-multiarch recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: binutils
Source-Version: 2.17-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
binutils, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

binutils-dev_2.17-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/b/binutils/binutils-dev_2.17-3_i386.deb
binutils-doc_2.17-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/b/binutils/binutils-doc_2.17-3_all.deb
binutils-multiarch_2.17-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/b/binutils/binutils-multiarch_2.17-3_i386.deb
binutils_2.17-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/b/binutils/binutils_2.17-3.diff.gz
binutils_2.17-3.dsc
  to pool/main/b/binutils/binutils_2.17-3.dsc
binutils_2.17-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/b/binutils/binutils_2.17-3_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated binutils package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue,  3 Oct 2006 00:53:17 +0100
Source: binutils
Binary: binutils-dev binutils-hppa64 binutils-multiarch binutils binutils-doc
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.17-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 binutils   - The GNU assembler, linker and binary utilities
 binutils-dev - The GNU binary utilities (BFD development files)
 binutils-doc - Documentation for the GNU assembler, linker and binary utilities
 binutils-multiarch - Binary utilities that support multi-arch targets
Closes: 380539
Changes: 
 binutils (2.17-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * debian/rules (configure-multi-stamp): drop i486-kfreebsd-gnu again as
 it breaks objdump for i386 on amd64.  Closes: #380539
Files: 
 59f16a8c028e8108a6620c17e90f838f 1474 devel standard binutils_2.17-3.dsc
 ca022712f35a89eff8f2a8476da20dd3 42371 devel standard binutils_2.17-3.diff.gz
 6be925510dbb850dc71e7200c15a8b3a 483064 doc optional 
binutils-doc_2.17-3_all.deb
 958c7aa701abbadac5a3b413247a3b3e 2605390 devel standard 
binutils_2.17-3_i386.deb
 fad4933852f9c390c5196beface78e53 2496162 devel extra 
binutils-dev_2.17-3_i386.deb
 f0c190bb09df3ed6509d3a1f97eabb99 7743858 devel extra 
binutils-multiarch_2.17-3_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iQIVAwUBRSGxKtfD8TGrKpH1AQIfmg//VOGOjt+Kzb95YzUtfg+iVs6AciEb9bZ/
wSC6FgWydwRyTROLYHsujxAQpLHLYvaxVd985GBNDCVpWa61eU/ze+i0UMMLaHIJ
RWQvuwbD058udxqUT9PpYSlDJD8vW5pCLCy7CJl4LtZKgYYYvek6bQGHOZxiLtBI
QpZ5VAYaNXEFYpj0TyKWPUr+2gcwjzERpizr9KrZOuMx4suJmjG3ggvBRDu8oCOa
CC5RAQ9ZexUMH9TI1sIaFFmgwYJTAjVfg4zf2A60MtP6iOY+BlCdXu9me9Ms1R65
hCyZqm/xIlqzj7QwMcJI7ypIxivFAG0wGUELWdD4a06n2vK93czY2evNCiNv5HBF
lMpszPDSzb

Bug#389681: Requested case, where the bug occurred

[Daniel Leidert (dale)]

Package: apt-listbugs
Version: 0.0.57
Followup-For: Bug #389681

You requested the case, where the bug occurred (sorry for the German):

apt-get install apache2.2-common
Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut... Fertig
Die folgenden Pakete werden ENTFERNT:
  apache2-common
Die folgenden NEUEN Pakete werden installiert:
  apache2.2-common
0 aktualisiert, 1 neu installiert, 1 zu entfernen und 69 nicht aktualisiert.
Es müssen 917kB Archive geholt werden.
Nach dem Auspacken werden 180kB Plattenplatz zusätzlich benutzt.
Möchten Sie fortfahren [J/n]? j
Hole:1 http://ftp.debian.org sid/main apache2.2-common 2.2.3-1 [917kB]
Es wurden 917kB in 52s geholt (17,4kB/s)
Reading package fields... Done
Reading package status... Done
Retrieving bug reports... 0% ... E: undefined local variable or method `pkg' 
for Factory::BugsFactory:Module
E: Unterprozess if dpkg -s apt-listbugs | grep -q '^Status: .* ok
installed'; then /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || ( test $? -ne 10 || exit
10; echo 'Warning: apt-listbugs exited abnormally, hit enter key to
continue.' 1>&2 ; read a < /dev/tty ); fi ist mit einem Fehlercode
zurückgekehrt (10)
E: Failure running script if dpkg -s apt-listbugs | grep -q '^Status: .*
ok installed'; then /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || ( test $? -ne 10 ||
exit 10; echo 'Warning: apt-listbugs exited abnormally, hit enter key to
continue.' 1>&2 ; read a < /dev/tty ); fi

Daniel Leidert


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (850, 'unstable'), (700, 'testing'), (550, 'stable'), (110, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17.09060920
Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages apt-listbugs depends on:
ii  apt   0.6.46 Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii  libdpkg-ruby1.8   0.3.2  modules/classes for dpkg on ruby 1
ii  libhttp-access2-ruby1.8   2.0.6-1HTTP accessing library for ruby
ii  libintl-gettext-ruby1.8   0.11-8 Gettext wrapper for Ruby 1.8
ii  libruby1.8 [libzlib-ruby1.8]  1.8.5-2Libraries necessary to run Ruby 1.
ii  libxml-parser-ruby1.8 0.6.8-2Interface of expat for the scripti
ii  ruby  1.8.2-1An interpreter of object-oriented 

apt-listbugs recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#390770: marked as done (kernel-package: ruleset/minimal.mk fails to initialize variables)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 02 Oct 2006 19:36:25 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390770: kernel-package: ruleset/minimal.mk fails to 
initialize variables
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: kernel-package
Version: 10.060
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

running unstable
untar linux-source-2.6.18
cd linux
make oldconfig

type command...
tcsh> make-kpkg --append-to-version -tryit kernel-image |& less
gives these results...

exec make -f /usr/share/kernel-package/ruleset/minimal.mk debian
APPEND_TO_VERSION=-tryit
make: --no-print-directory: No such file or directory
make: *** No rule to make target `--no-print-directory'.
make: Failed to remake makefile `--no-print-directory'.
make: *** No rule to make target `debian_VERSION'.
make: --no-print-directory: No such file or directory
make: *** No rule to make target `--no-print-directory'.
make: Failed to remake makefile `--no-print-directory'.
make: *** No rule to make target `debian_VERSION'.
make: --no-print-directory: No such file or directory
make: *** No rule to make target `--no-print-directory'.
make: Failed to remake makefile `--no-print-directory'.
make: *** No rule to make target `debian_PATCHLEVEL'.
make: --no-print-directory: No such file or directory
make: *** No rule to make target `--no-print-directory'.
make: Failed to remake makefile `--no-print-directory'.
make: *** No rule to make target `debian_SUBLEVEL'.
make: --no-print-directory: No such file or directory
make: *** No rule to make target `--no-print-directory'.
make: Failed to remake makefile `--no-print-directory'.
make: *** No rule to make target `debian_EXTRAVERSION'.
make: --no-print-directory: No such file or directory
make: *** No rule to make target `--no-print-directory'.
make: Failed to remake makefile `--no-print-directory'.
make: *** No rule to make target `debian_LOCALVERSION'.
== making target minimal_debian [new prereqs: ]==
This is kernel package version .
test -d debian || mkdir debian
test ! -e stamp-building || rm -f stamp-building
test -f debian/control || sed -e 's/=V/..-tryit/g'\
-e 's/=D/..-tryit-10.00.Custom/g' -e
's/=A/i386/g'  \
...
I stop here because you can see the first sed substitution has the
incorrect version number.  "..-tryit" should be 2.6.18-tryit

As expected, the make ended with these errors (and earlier ones)

tar: -: file name read contains nul character
dpkg-deb: building package `linux-image-..-2.061002-2' in
`../linux-image-..-2.061002-2_..-2.061002-2-10.00.Custom_i386.deb'.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-source-2.6.18'
make: Target `kernel-image' not remade because of errors.

but produced a .deb with the incorrect version.


This is a fresh install and my first kernel build on this system.
I tried 10.059 with the same results. 10.054 worked as expected.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-1-k7
Locale: LANG=en_us, LC_CTYPE=en_us (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to C)

Versions of packages kernel-package depends on:
ii  dpkg  1.13.22package maintenance system for Deb
ii  dpkg-dev  1.13.22package building tools for Debian
ii  file  4.17-4 Determines file type using "magic"
ii  gcc [c-compiler]  4:4.1.1-9  The GNU C compiler
ii  gcc-4.1 [c-compiler]  4.1.1-15   The GNU C compiler
ii  gettext   0.15-2 GNU Internationalization utilities
ii  make  3.81-3 The GNU version of the "make" util
ii  perl  5.8.8-6.1  Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  po-debconf1.0.5  manage translated Debconf template

Versions of packages kernel-package recommends:
ii  bzip21.0.3-6 high-quality block-sorting file co
ii  libc6-dev [libc-dev] 2.3.6.ds1-4 GNU C Library: Development Librari

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun,  1 Oct 2006 15:14:56 -0500
Source: kernel-package
Binary: kernel-package
Architecture: source all
Version: 10.062
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECT

Bug#390779: mpd_0.12.0-2(unstable/sparc/spontini): missing build-depends

[James Troup]

Package: mpd
Version: 0.12.0-2
Severity: serious

You appear to be missing a build-depends on quilt.

| Automatic build of mpd_0.12.0-2 on spontini by sbuild/sparc 85
| Build started at 20061002-1652
| **

[...]

| ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
| Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.1.0), cdbs, libaudiofile-dev, libflac-dev (>= 
1.1.1-3), libogg-dev, libshout3-dev, libvorbis-dev, libspeex-dev, 
libasound2-dev [!kfreebsd-i386 !hurd-i386], libao-dev (>= 0.8.3-1), 
libmad0-dev, libid3tag0-dev, libmikmod2-dev, libmpcdec-dev, zlib1g-dev

[...]

| debian/rules:10: /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/patchsys-quilt.mk: No such file or 
directory
| make: *** No rule to make target `/usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/patchsys-quilt.mk'. 
 Stop.

A complete build log can be found at
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=sparc&pkg=mpd&ver=0.12.0-2

-- 
James


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: nonexistent /etc/inetd.conf breaks update-inetd script

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 389277 normal
Bug#389277: nonexistent /etc/inetd.conf breaks update-inetd script
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#390260: On it

[Michael Terry]

I'm working on it; thanks for the report!

-mt


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#389977: marked as done (gnus: purging the package fails (ucf unavailable))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 02 Oct 2006 16:47:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389977: fixed in gnus 5.11+v0.5.dfsg-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: gnus
Version: 5.11+v0.5.dfsg-2
Severity: serious

Hello James,

There is an error when attempting to purge gnus:
  Removing gnus ...
  Purging configuration files for gnus ...
  /var/lib/dpkg/info/gnus.postrm: line 14: ucf: command not found
  dpkg: error processing gnus (--purge):
   subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 127

The postrm script cannot rely on ucf to be available when purging.

See Policy 7.2:
  Note, however, that the `postrm' cannot rely on any non-essential packages to
  be present during the `purge' phase.

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Imagine a large red swirl here. 

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gnus
Source-Version: 5.11+v0.5.dfsg-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gnus, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

gnus_5.11+v0.5.dfsg-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gnus/gnus_5.11+v0.5.dfsg-3.diff.gz
gnus_5.11+v0.5.dfsg-3.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gnus/gnus_5.11+v0.5.dfsg-3.dsc
gnus_5.11+v0.5.dfsg-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/gnus/gnus_5.11+v0.5.dfsg-3_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated gnus package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue,  3 Oct 2006 00:05:16 +0100
Source: gnus
Binary: gnus
Architecture: source all
Version: 5.11+v0.5.dfsg-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 gnus   - A versatile news and mail reader for Emacsen
Closes: 389977
Changes: 
 gnus (5.11+v0.5.dfsg-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * debian/postrm: wrap call to ucf in a check for it's existence and
 executability.  Closes: #389977
Files: 
 30d3808131094e02ae2732022a2808bf 1201 news optional gnus_5.11+v0.5.dfsg-3.dsc
 fc90024d5c0c533caecf48da360d3d9b 18983 news optional 
gnus_5.11+v0.5.dfsg-3.diff.gz
 cf0196371d4d52bd68ad7720557aa231 1382794 news optional 
gnus_5.11+v0.5.dfsg-3_all.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
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=3ZpN
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#361846: [Pkg-openldap-devel] Bug#361846: reopening 361846, reassign 361846 to slapd

[Russ Allbery]

Steinar H Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Doesn't the copyright in question apply to the RFC only? AFAICS,
> core.schema basically reads:

>   1. Part of OpenLDAP, with the following license:
>   2. OpenLDAP license (see license.html)
>   3. Based on an RFC, with the following license:
>   4. RFC license
>   5. Specific RFC attributions
>   6. The schema itself

> Or are you claiming that anything implementing the schema from a
> copyrighted RFC falls under that license?

Plus, this is an interface specification if I've ever seen one, and
interface specifications are not copyrightable under US law.

-- 
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED])   


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: setting package to libpam-smbpass libsmbclient libsmbclient-dev python-samba samba samba-common samba-dbg samba-doc samba-doc-pdf smbclient smbfs swat winbind ... ... ... ...

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> package libpam-smbpass libsmbclient libsmbclient-dev python-samba samba 
> samba-common samba-dbg samba-doc samba-doc-pdf smbclient smbfs swat winbind
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: smbfs smbclient swat libsmbclient samba-common 
samba-dbg libsmbclient-dev python-samba samba-doc libpam-smbpass winbind samba 
samba-doc-pdf

> tags 370718 + pending
Bug#370718: purging samba deletes files belonging to winbind
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

> tags 386499 + pending
Bug#386499: python-samba doesn't take care of byte-compiled files
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

> tags 386510 + pending
Bug#386510: samba: [INTL:sv] Swedish debconf template translation
Tags were: l10n patch
Tags added: pending

> tags 386691 + pending
Bug#386691: samba: [INTL:it] Italian debconf templates translation
Tags were: l10n patch
Tags added: pending

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#389681: apt-listbugs: Bug still exists in version 0.0.57

[Uwe Storbeck]

Hi

On Oct 03, Junichi Uekawa wrote:

> Could you reproduce a full screen log for the apt session? Which
> package you tried to install, etc.

# apt-get upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
The following packages have been kept back:
   freeguide (0.8.6-1 => 0.10.4-1)
   gdal-bin (1.3.1-6 => 1.3.2-2)
   gedit (2.14.3-1 => 2.14.4-2)
   gedit-common (2.14.3-1 => 2.14.4-2)
   grass (6.0.2-2.1 => 6.0.2-6)
   hugin (0.6.1-0.0 => 0.6.1-1)
   kstars (3.5.4-1 => 3.5.4-2)
   libqgis0 (0.7.4-4.1 => 0.7.4-5)
   linux-image-2.6-k7 (2.6.16+0.2 => 2.6.17+2)
   mozilla-plugin-vlc (0.8.6-svn20060823.debian-3 => 0.8.6-svn20060925.debian-1)
   mpg123 (0.59r-22 => 0.60-2)
   nfs-common (1.0.9-10 => 1.0.10-1)
   nfs-kernel-server (1.0.9-10 => 1.0.10-1)
   nvidia-glx (1.0.8762-2 => 1.0.8774-3)
   qgis (0.7.4-4.1 => 0.7.4-5)
   qgis-plugin-grass (0.7.4-4.1 => 0.7.4-5)
   vlc (0.8.6-svn20060823.debian-3 => 0.8.6-svn20060925.debian-1)
   vlc-plugin-arts (0.8.6-svn20060823.debian-3 => 0.8.6-svn20060925.debian-1)
   vlc-plugin-sdl (0.8.6-svn20060823.debian-3 => 0.8.6-svn20060925.debian-1)
The following packages will be upgraded:
   ecj-bootstrap (3.1.2-6 => 3.2-3)
   java-gcj-compat (1.0.56-2 => 1.0.65-2)
2 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 19 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/1113kB of archives.
After unpacking 123kB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? 
Reading package fields... Done
Reading package status... Done
Retrieving bug reports... 0% ... E: undefined local variable or method `pkg' 
for Factory::BugsFactory:Module
E: Sub-process if dpkg -s apt-listbugs | grep -q '^Status: .* ok installed'; 
then /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || ( test $? -ne 10 || exit 10; echo 'Warning: 
apt-listbugs exited abnormally, hit enter key to continue.' 1>&2 ; read a < 
/dev/tty ); fi returned an error code (10)
E: Failure running script if dpkg -s apt-listbugs | grep -q '^Status: .* ok 
installed'; then /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || ( test $? -ne 10 || exit 10; 
echo 'Warning: apt-listbugs exited abnormally, hit enter key to continue.' 1>&2 
; read a < /dev/tty ); fi


I also tried it with version 0.0.56 and 0.0.55, both with the same error.
Version 0.0.48 works.

Regards,

Uwe


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#390770: kernel-package: ruleset/minimal.mk fails to initialize variables

[stevem]

Package: kernel-package
Version: 10.060
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

running unstable
untar linux-source-2.6.18
cd linux
make oldconfig

type command...
tcsh> make-kpkg --append-to-version -tryit kernel-image |& less
gives these results...

exec make -f /usr/share/kernel-package/ruleset/minimal.mk debian
APPEND_TO_VERSION=-tryit
make: --no-print-directory: No such file or directory
make: *** No rule to make target `--no-print-directory'.
make: Failed to remake makefile `--no-print-directory'.
make: *** No rule to make target `debian_VERSION'.
make: --no-print-directory: No such file or directory
make: *** No rule to make target `--no-print-directory'.
make: Failed to remake makefile `--no-print-directory'.
make: *** No rule to make target `debian_VERSION'.
make: --no-print-directory: No such file or directory
make: *** No rule to make target `--no-print-directory'.
make: Failed to remake makefile `--no-print-directory'.
make: *** No rule to make target `debian_PATCHLEVEL'.
make: --no-print-directory: No such file or directory
make: *** No rule to make target `--no-print-directory'.
make: Failed to remake makefile `--no-print-directory'.
make: *** No rule to make target `debian_SUBLEVEL'.
make: --no-print-directory: No such file or directory
make: *** No rule to make target `--no-print-directory'.
make: Failed to remake makefile `--no-print-directory'.
make: *** No rule to make target `debian_EXTRAVERSION'.
make: --no-print-directory: No such file or directory
make: *** No rule to make target `--no-print-directory'.
make: Failed to remake makefile `--no-print-directory'.
make: *** No rule to make target `debian_LOCALVERSION'.
== making target minimal_debian [new prereqs: ]==
This is kernel package version .
test -d debian || mkdir debian
test ! -e stamp-building || rm -f stamp-building
test -f debian/control || sed -e 's/=V/..-tryit/g'\
-e 's/=D/..-tryit-10.00.Custom/g' -e
's/=A/i386/g'  \
...
I stop here because you can see the first sed substitution has the
incorrect version number.  "..-tryit" should be 2.6.18-tryit

As expected, the make ended with these errors (and earlier ones)

tar: -: file name read contains nul character
dpkg-deb: building package `linux-image-..-2.061002-2' in
`../linux-image-..-2.061002-2_..-2.061002-2-10.00.Custom_i386.deb'.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-source-2.6.18'
make: Target `kernel-image' not remade because of errors.

but produced a .deb with the incorrect version.


This is a fresh install and my first kernel build on this system.
I tried 10.059 with the same results. 10.054 worked as expected.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-1-k7
Locale: LANG=en_us, LC_CTYPE=en_us (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to C)

Versions of packages kernel-package depends on:
ii  dpkg  1.13.22package maintenance system for Deb
ii  dpkg-dev  1.13.22package building tools for Debian
ii  file  4.17-4 Determines file type using "magic"
ii  gcc [c-compiler]  4:4.1.1-9  The GNU C compiler
ii  gcc-4.1 [c-compiler]  4.1.1-15   The GNU C compiler
ii  gettext   0.15-2 GNU Internationalization utilities
ii  make  3.81-3 The GNU version of the "make" util
ii  perl  5.8.8-6.1  Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  po-debconf1.0.5  manage translated Debconf template

Versions of packages kernel-package recommends:
ii  bzip21.0.3-6 high-quality block-sorting file co
ii  libc6-dev [libc-dev] 2.3.6.ds1-4 GNU C Library: Development Librari

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#390774: Conflicts with apache-common: trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man8/suexec.8.gz'

[Daniel Leidert (dale)]

Package: apache2.2-common
Version: 2.2.3-1
Severity: grave

[..]
Unpacking apache2.2-common (from .../apache2.2-common_2.2.3-1_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing 
/var/cache/apt/archives/apache2.2-common_2.2.3-1_i386.deb (--unpack):
 trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man8/suexec.8.gz', which is also in 
package apache-common
dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/apache2.2-common_2.2.3-1_i386.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
$ 

Regards, Daniel


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (850, 'unstable'), (700, 'testing'), (550, 'stable'), (110, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17.09060920
Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#389681: apt-listbugs: Bug still exists in version 0.0.57

[Daniel Leidert (dale)]

Package: apt-listbugs
Version: 0.0.57
Followup-For: Bug #389681

Ditto here:

Retrieving bug reports... 0% ... E: undefined local variable or method
`pkg' for Factory::BugsFactory:Module
E: Unterprozess if dpkg -s apt-listbugs | grep -q '^Status: .* ok
installed'; then /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || ( test $? -ne 10 || exit
10; echo 'Warning: apt-listbugs exited abnormally, hit enter key to
continue.' 1>&2 ; read a < /dev/tty ); fi ist mit einem Fehlercode
zurückgekehrt (10)
E: Failure running script if dpkg -s apt-listbugs | grep -q '^Status: .*
ok installed'; then /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || ( test $? -ne 10 ||
exit 10; echo 'Warning: apt-listbugs exited abnormally, hit enter key to
continue.' 1>&2 ; read a < /dev/tty ); fi

The connection was very slow, so it maybe ran into a timeout. A second
try did work.

Regards, Daniel


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (850, 'unstable'), (700, 'testing'), (550, 'stable'), (110, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17.09060920
Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages apt-listbugs depends on:
ii  apt   0.6.46 Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii  libdpkg-ruby1.8   0.3.2  modules/classes for dpkg on ruby 1
ii  libhttp-access2-ruby1.8   2.0.6-1HTTP accessing library for ruby
ii  libintl-gettext-ruby1.8   0.11-8 Gettext wrapper for Ruby 1.8
ii  libruby1.8 [libzlib-ruby1.8]  1.8.5-2Libraries necessary to run Ruby 1.
ii  libxml-parser-ruby1.8 0.6.8-2Interface of expat for the scripti
ii  ruby  1.8.2-1An interpreter of object-oriented 

apt-listbugs recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#380370: FTBFS: arts on arm due to segmentation fault (program as)

[James Troup]

retitle 380370 as: arm segmentation fault in low memory situations with large 
C++
severity 380370 important
thanks

Christopher Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> /usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnu/4.0.4/../../../../include/c++/4.0.4/bits/basic_string.h:278:
> warning: cast from 'char*' to 'std::basic_string std::char_traits, std::allocator >::_Rep*' increases
> required alignment of target type
> g++: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program as)
> Please submit a full bug report.
> See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
> For Debian GNU/Linux specific bug reporting instructions, see
> .

These errors are all occuring on a machine that only has 64Mb of real
memory.  When retried on another buildd they succeed.  These kind of
(C++) packages shouldn't be building on the low memory buildds anyway,
so I'm going to downgrade the bug for now.

-- 
James


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#361846: [Pkg-openldap-devel] Bug#361846: reopening 361846, reassign 361846 to slapd

[Quanah Gibson-Mount]

--On Tuesday, October 03, 2006 12:14 AM +0200 Peter Eisentraut 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:

Or are you claiming that anything implementing the schema from a
copyrighted RFC falls under that license?


I am talking strictly about the core.schema file as shipped.  The
Internet Society license in the file says: "this document itself may
not be modified in any way".  Which means it's not free.  I don't know
how that got there or to what extent it applies, but that's what it
says, so I have to assume it's true.  If it is not applicable, the text
should be qualified or removed.  The earlier bug thread contains other
suggestions on how to deal with this.


Significant parts of core.schema are hard coded into OpenLDAP.  And I'm 
pretty sure just about all LDAP servers implement core.schema.  And 
amazingly, no license problems.


And, as I read it, it doesn't say the document can't be modified.  In fact, 
it quite clearly says the document *can* be modified:


## Portions Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1997-2003).
## All Rights Reserved.
##
## This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
## others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
## or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
## and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
## kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
## included on all such copies and derivative works.  However, this
## document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
## the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
## Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
## developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
## copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
## followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
## English.
##
## The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
## revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
##
## This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
## "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
## TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
## BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
## HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
## MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.



What it says, is that you cannot modify or remove the license, at least the 
way I read it.


--Quanah

--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Developer
ITS/Shared Application Services
Stanford University
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: merge, 2

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 390106 openoffice.org
Bug#390106: openoffice.org-writer: Hang every time on amd64
Bug reassigned from package `openoffice.org-writer' to `openoffice.org'.

> merge 390136 390562 390702 390113 390106
Bug#390106: openoffice.org-writer: Hang every time on amd64
Bug#390113: openoffice.org freezes with CPU at 100%
Bug#390136: openoffice.org-writer: Oowriter dies after startup
Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged:
Values for `package' don't match:
 #390106 has `openoffice.org';
 #390136 has `openoffice.org-writer'

> Grüße/Regards,
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> René
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> --
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: FTBFS: arts on arm due to segmentation fault (program as)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> retitle 380370 as: arm segmentation fault in low memory situations with large 
> C++
Bug#380370: FTBFS: arts on arm due to segmentation fault (program as)
Changed Bug title.

> severity 380370 important
Bug#380370: as: arm segmentation fault in low memory situations with large C++
Severity set to `important' from `serious'

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Bug 389681 still exists in apt-listbugs 0.0.57

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reopen 389681
Bug#389681: apt-listbugs: Reports undefined variable and fails
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#390772: xserver-xorg-core: Server fails to start after upgrade to 1.1.1-9

[Matthew Wakeling]

Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 2:1.1.1-9
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


The X server fails to start since upgrade from 1.1.1-8 to 1.1.1-9. I have 
attached the relevant logs, but in a nutshell it tries to load the "pcidata" 
and "bitmap" modules, and fails.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-amd64-k8
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages xserver-xorg-core depends on:
ii  libc62.3.6.ds1-5 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libfontenc1  1:1.0.2-2   X11 font encoding library
ii  libxau6  1:1.0.1-2   X11 authorisation library
ii  libxdmcp61:1.0.1-2   X11 Display Manager Control Protoc
ii  libxfont11:1.2.2-1   X11 font rasterisation library
ii  x11-common   1:7.1.0-1   X Window System (X.Org) infrastruc
ii  zlib1g   1:1.2.3-13  compression library - runtime

Versions of packages xserver-xorg-core recommends:
ii  xkb-data  0.8-15 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu

-- no debconf information
Section "ServerLayout"
Identifier "XFree86 Configured"
Screen  0  "Screen0" 0 0
#Screen  1  "Screen1" LeftOf "Screen0"
InputDevice"Mouse0" "CorePointer"
InputDevice"Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard"
EndSection

Section "ServerFlags"
Option "Xinerama" "true"
EndSection

Section "Files"
#RgbPath  "/usr/share/X11/rgb.txt"
ModulePath   "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules"
FontPath"unix/:7100"# local font server
# if the local font server has problems, we can fall back on these
FontPath"/usr/share/fonts/X11/misc"
#FontPath   "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic"
FontPath"/usr/share/fonts/X11/100dpi/:unscaled"
FontPath"/usr/share/fonts/X11/75dpi/:unscaled"
FontPath"/usr/share/fonts/X11/Type1"
FontPath"/usr/share/fonts/X11/Speedo"
FontPath"/usr/share/fonts/X11/100dpi"
FontPath"/usr/share/fonts/X11/75dpi"
EndSection

Section "Module"
Load"GLcore"
Load"bitmap"
Load"dbe"
Load"ddc"
#Load   "dri"
Load"extmod"
Load"freetype"
Load"glx"
#Load   "int10"
Load"record"
Load"speedo"
Load"type1"
Load"vbe"
Load"v4l"
EndSection

Section "InputDevice"
Identifier  "Keyboard0"
Driver  "keyboard"
Option  "CoreKeyboard"
Option  "XkbRules"  "xfree86"
Option  "XkbModel"  "pc104"
Option  "XkbLayout" "uk"
EndSection

Section "InputDevice"
Identifier  "Mouse0"
Driver  "mouse"
Option  "SendCoreEvents""true"
Option  "Device""/dev/input/mice"
Option  "Protocol"  "ImPS/2"
Option  "Buttons"   "5"
Option  "ZAxisMapping"  "4 5"
Option  "CorePointer"
EndSection

Section "Monitor"
Identifier   "Monitor0"
VendorName   "Monitor Vendor"
ModelName"Monitor Model"
HorizSync   30-112
VertRefresh 50-100
Modeline "a" 132.00 1336 1394 1586 1728 1063 1064 1067 1100 -hsync 
-vsync
Option  "DPMS"
EndSection

Section "Monitor"
Identifier   "Monitor1"
VendorName   "Monitor Vendor"
ModelName"Monitor Model"
ModeLine"normal" 157.5 1280 1344 1504 1728 1024 1025 1028 1072
ModeLine"new"169.8 1384 1449 1622 1863 1024 1025 1028 1072
ModeLine"fast"   178.9 1384 1449 1622 1863 1024 1025 1028 1072
HorizSync 72.125-85
VertRefresh 63-77
Modeline "a" 132.00 1336 1394 1586 1728 1063 1064 1067 1100 -hsync -vsync

Modeline "b" 150.00 1525 1584 1802 1964 1063 1064 1067 1100 -hsync -vsync

Modeline "c" 66.00   671  697  793  864  531  532  534  550 -hsync -vsync 
Doublescan
EndSection

Section "Device"
### Available Driver options are:-
### Values: : integer, : float, : "True"/"False",
### : "String", : " Hz/kHz/MHz"
### [arg]: arg optional
#Option "DigitalVibrance"   # 
#Option "NoFlip"# []
#Option "Dac8Bit"   # []
#Option "NoLogo"# []
#Option "UBB"   # []
#Option "Stereo"# 
#Option "SWcursor"  # []
#Option "HWcursor" 

Bug#323626: Fixed?

[Junichi Uekawa]

Hi,

> 
> Version 0.57 still has the problem.
> 

Can you give an example case (package, version, bug #)?

apt-listbugs now parses the version number of the bug report and
resolved versions so that it will display all bugs that is applicable.

regards,
junichi
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp}   Debian Project


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#389681: apt-listbugs: Bug still exists in version 0.0.57

[Junichi Uekawa]

Hi,

> Package: apt-listbugs
> Version: 0.0.57
> Followup-For: Bug #389681
> 
> This bug still exists in version 0.0.57:
> 
>   Retrieving bug reports... 0% ... E: undefined local variable or method 
> `pkg' for Factory::BugsFactory:Module
>   E: Sub-process if dpkg -s apt-listbugs | grep -q '^Status: .* ok 
> installed'; then /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || ( test $? -ne 10 || exit 10; 
> echo 'Warning: apt-listbugs exited abnormally, hit enter key to continue.' 
> 1>&2 ; read a < /dev/tty ); fi returned an error code (10)
>   E: Failure running script if dpkg -s apt-listbugs | grep -q '^Status: .* ok 
> installed'; then /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || ( test $? -ne 10 || exit 10; 
> echo 'Warning: apt-listbugs exited abnormally, hit enter key to continue.' 
> 1>&2 ; read a < /dev/tty ); fi

Could you reproduce a full screen log for the apt session? Which
package you tried to install, etc.

   
> Even worse I get a warning from reportbug about a newer version than
> that in Debian:
> 
>   Checking for newer versions at packages.debian.org...
>   Your version of apt-listbugs (0.0.57) is newer than that in Debian! Do you
>   still want to file a report [y|N|q|?]?

That I think it a problem in reportbug, if you want that handled,
please file a different bug.


regards,
junichi
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp}   Debian Project


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#390773: apparently missing python-gst conflict

[Joey Hess]

Package: python-gst0.10
Version: 0.10.5-5
Severity: serious

After upgrading this system from unstable circa 6-9 months ago,
quodlibet failed as described in #390309.

Turns out that I had python-gst installed, and removing it fixed the
problem.

I don't know if this is really a bug in python-gst or even in quodlibet,
or whether python-gst0.10 should conflict with python-gst.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages python-gst0.10 depends on:
ii  libc6  2.3.6.ds1-4   GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libglib2.0-0   2.12.3-2  The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgstreamer-plugins-base0 0.10.10-1 GStreamer libraries from the "base
ii  libgstreamer0.10-0 0.10.10-1 Core GStreamer libraries and eleme
ii  libxml22.6.26.dfsg-3 GNOME XML library
ii  python 2.4.3-11  An interactive high-level object-o
ii  python-support 0.5.2 automated rebuilding support for p

python-gst0.10 recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#390189: marked as done (Linking with -lapt-pkg is impossible with recent gcc)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 02 Oct 2006 14:48:45 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390189: fixed in apt 0.6.46.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: libapt-pkg-dev
Version: 0.6.46
Severity: grave

Hello,

while building libept at home I noticed that it suddenly and obscurely
cannot link to -lapt-pkg anymore.

mvo told me that the bug has already been found on ubuntu:
https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.1/+bug/62461
and that doko is looking into it.

Just rebuilding apt with the newer gcc fixed the problem for me as well.


Ciao,

Enrico

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686
Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages libapt-pkg-dev depends on:
ii  apt [libapt-pkg-libc6.3-6-3.1 0.6.46 Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii  apt-utils 0.6.46 APT utility programs

libapt-pkg-dev recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: apt
Source-Version: 0.6.46.1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
apt, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

apt-doc_0.6.46.1_all.deb
  to pool/main/a/apt/apt-doc_0.6.46.1_all.deb
apt-utils_0.6.46.1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/apt/apt-utils_0.6.46.1_i386.deb
apt_0.6.46.1.dsc
  to pool/main/a/apt/apt_0.6.46.1.dsc
apt_0.6.46.1.tar.gz
  to pool/main/a/apt/apt_0.6.46.1.tar.gz
apt_0.6.46.1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/apt/apt_0.6.46.1_i386.deb
libapt-pkg-dev_0.6.46.1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/apt/libapt-pkg-dev_0.6.46.1_i386.deb
libapt-pkg-doc_0.6.46.1_all.deb
  to pool/main/a/apt/libapt-pkg-doc_0.6.46.1_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Michael Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated apt package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon,  2 Oct 2006 20:42:20 +0200
Source: apt
Binary: apt-utils libapt-pkg-doc libapt-pkg-dev apt-doc apt
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 0.6.46.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: APT Development Team 
Changed-By: Michael Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 apt- Advanced front-end for dpkg
 apt-doc- Documentation for APT
 apt-utils  - APT utility programs
 libapt-pkg-dev - Development files for APT's libapt-pkg and libapt-inst
 libapt-pkg-doc - Documentation for APT development
Closes: 359634 388555 388708 389261 389725 390149 390189
Changes: 
 apt (0.6.46.1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * methods/gzip.cc:
 - deal with empty files
   * Applied patch from Daniel Schepler to make apt bin-NMU able.
 (closes: bug#359634)
   * rebuild against current g++ because of:
 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29289
 (closes: #390189)
   * fix broken i18n in the dpkg progress reporting, thanks to
 Frans Pop and Steinar Gunderson. (closes: #389261)
   * Merged from Christian Perrier bzr branch:
 * fi.po: Updated to 514t. Closes: #390149
 * eu.po: Updated to 514t. Closes: #389725
 * vi.po: Updated to 514t. Closes: #388555
   * make the internal buffer in pkgTagFile grow dynamically
 (closes: #388708)
Files: 
 ca8667c86fdeb66913bd97fcee696c93 788 admin important apt_0.6.46.1.dsc
 024a861d2c98dc97e352ea5c1d5f516a 1692899 admin important apt_0.6.46.1.tar.gz
 af43c792875246267183156578c05654 89226 doc optional apt-doc_0.6.46.1_all.deb
 ce42207a06c6470f288d8f2005a8636a 112604 doc optional 
libapt-pkg-doc_0.6.46.1_all.deb
 c158103bd0d63584800a6415de5ecacb 1433504 admin important apt_0.6.46.1_i386.deb
 b413c87208074a2d711fbd029e43649e 83340 libdevel optional 
libapt-pkg-dev_0.6.46.1_i386.deb
 f74e0e77ac328c366c8cdd285287966d 196846 admin important 
apt-utils_0.6.46.1_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFIWAWliSD4VZixzQRAisbAJ9PE0JzsqbR38Gwu+QpQNHzsxSqvQCcD7+W
jbuHn/knimKvrCpBl1thQOQ=
=XpTH
-END PGP SI

Bug#361846: reopening 361846, reassign 361846 to slapd

[Peter Eisentraut]

Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> Or are you claiming that anything implementing the schema from a
> copyrighted RFC falls under that license?

I am talking strictly about the core.schema file as shipped.  The 
Internet Society license in the file says: "this document itself may 
not be modified in any way".  Which means it's not free.  I don't know 
how that got there or to what extent it applies, but that's what it 
says, so I have to assume it's true.  If it is not applicable, the text 
should be qualified or removed.  The earlier bug thread contains other 
suggestions on how to deal with this.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#388708: marked as done (apt: Upgrading to this version makes status file unparseable)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 02 Oct 2006 14:48:45 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388708: fixed in apt 0.6.46.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: apt
Version: 0.6.46
Severity: grave

#_> aptitude -u
 ... upgrade ...
#_> aptitude -vvv upgrade
Reading package lists... Error!
E: Unable to parse package file /var/lib/dpkg/status (1)
E: The package lists or status file could not be parsed or opened.
Reading package lists... Error!
E: Unable to parse package file /var/lib/dpkg/status (1)
E: The package lists or status file could not be parsed or opened.
[1]22606 exit 255   aptitude -vvv upgrade

Tested this on two machines. Downgrading to 0.6.45 fixes the
 bug. Look below for a sequence of action:

#_> dpkg -i apt_0.6.46_i386.deb
(Reading database ... 333632 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace apt 0.6.45 (using apt_0.6.46_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement apt ...
Setting up apt (0.6.46) ...

#_> apt-cache policy apt
E: Unable to parse package file /var/lib/dpkg/status (1)
[1]24419 exit 100   apt-cache policy apt
#_> dpkg -i apt_0.6.45_i386.deb
dpkg - warning: downgrading apt from 0.6.46 to 0.6.45.
(Reading database ... 333635 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace apt 0.6.46 (using apt_0.6.45_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement apt ...
Setting up apt (0.6.45) ...

#_> apt-cache policy apt
apt:
  Installed: 0.6.45
  Candidate: 0.6.46
  Version table:
 0.6.46 0
990 http://glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com sid/main Packages
990 http://ftp.debian.org sid/main Packages
 0.6.45exp2 0
  1 http://ftp.debian.org experimental/main Packages
 *** 0.6.45 0
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17.13-mh5-skas3-v9-pre9
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to en_US.UTF-8)


manoj



strace.log
Description: strace log

Versions of packages apt depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.6.ds1-4  GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libgcc1 1:4.2-20060709-1 GCC support library
ii  libstdc++6  4.1.1-13 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3

Versions of packages apt recommends:
ii  debian-archive-keyring2006.01.18 GnuPG archive keys of the Debian a

-- no debconf information

-- 
Sex is like snow... You never know how many inches you're going to get
or how long it will last.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: apt
Source-Version: 0.6.46.1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
apt, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

apt-doc_0.6.46.1_all.deb
  to pool/main/a/apt/apt-doc_0.6.46.1_all.deb
apt-utils_0.6.46.1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/apt/apt-utils_0.6.46.1_i386.deb
apt_0.6.46.1.dsc
  to pool/main/a/apt/apt_0.6.46.1.dsc
apt_0.6.46.1.tar.gz
  to pool/main/a/apt/apt_0.6.46.1.tar.gz
apt_0.6.46.1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/apt/apt_0.6.46.1_i386.deb
libapt-pkg-dev_0.6.46.1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/apt/libapt-pkg-dev_0.6.46.1_i386.deb
libapt-pkg-doc_0.6.46.1_all.deb
  to pool/main/a/apt/libapt-pkg-doc_0.6.46.1_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Michael Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated apt package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon,  2 Oct 2006 20:42:20 +0200
Source: apt
Binary: apt-utils libapt-pkg-doc libapt-pkg-dev apt-doc apt
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 0.6.46.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: APT Development Team 
Changed-By: Michael Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 apt- Advanced front

Bug#388718: marked as done (e2fsprogs: FTBFS: Link error in e2fsck.static)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 02 Oct 2006 14:49:49 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388718: fixed in e2fsprogs 1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: e2fsprogs
Version: 1.39-1
Severity: serious

From my pbuilder build log:

...
CC prof_err.c
LD e2fsck.shared
CP e2fsck
LD e2fsck.static
/usr/lib/libselinux.a(setrans_client.o): In function 
`fini_context_translations':
/tmp/buildd/libselinux-1.30.28/src/setrans_client.c:210: undefined reference to 
`pthread_mutex_lock'
/tmp/buildd/libselinux-1.30.28/src/setrans_client.c:211: undefined reference to 
`pthread_mutex_lock'
/tmp/buildd/libselinux-1.30.28/src/setrans_client.c:216: undefined reference to 
`pthread_mutex_unlock'
...
/tmp/buildd/libselinux-1.30.28/src/setrans_client.c:306: undefined reference to 
`pthread_mutex_lock'
/tmp/buildd/libselinux-1.30.28/src/setrans_client.c:327: undefined reference to 
`pthread_mutex_unlock'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[3]: *** [e2fsck.static] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/e2fsprogs-1.39/debian/BUILD-STD/e2fsck'
make[2]: *** [all-progs-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/e2fsprogs-1.39/debian/BUILD-STD'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/e2fsprogs-1.39/debian/BUILD-STD'
make: *** [debian/stampdir/build-std-stamp] Error 2

Since this was fixed on the libselinux side (#388375), you need to either
use pkg-config to get the proper dependencies, or else insert -lpthread
manually.
-- 
Daniel Schepler

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: e2fsprogs
Source-Version: 1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
e2fsprogs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

comerr-dev_2.1-1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/comerr-dev_2.1-1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
e2fsck-static_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/e2fsck-static_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
e2fslibs-dev_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/e2fslibs-dev_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
e2fslibs_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/e2fslibs_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
e2fsprogs-udeb_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs-udeb_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.udeb
e2fsprogs_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1.diff.gz
e2fsprogs_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1.dsc
  to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1.dsc
e2fsprogs_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
e2fsprogs_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02.orig.tar.gz
libblkid-dev_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/libblkid-dev_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
libblkid1-udeb_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/libblkid1-udeb_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.udeb
libblkid1_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/libblkid1_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
libcomerr2_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/libcomerr2_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
libss2_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/libss2_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
libuuid1-udeb_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/libuuid1-udeb_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.udeb
libuuid1_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/libuuid1_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
ss-dev_2.0-1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/ss-dev_2.0-1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
uuid-dev_1.2-1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/uuid-dev_1.2-1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Theodore Y. Ts'o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated e2fsprogs package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is 

Bug#390667: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-Ds

[Simon Josefsson]

On 2 okt 2006, at 23.05, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:


found 390667 1:7.2.2-2
thanks

On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 07:33:39PM +0200, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:

On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 07:27:54PM +0200, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
Expect it to be fixed at the next upload with version  
1:7.2.2.dsfg-1.


I will modify the source tarball name or version. If you can suggest
me your preference on that, it would help me a bit. :)


I've seen several packages that used 'dfsg' in the version field, but  
none that used a modified package name.  I don't really know, but it  
seems that using the version field would at least be consistent with  
other packages.


Thanks for working so fast on this!

/Simon

Processed: Fix version

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> notfound 390667 0.4.5-1
Bug#390667: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-Ds
Bug marked as not found in version 0.4.5-1.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#389681: apt-listbugs: Bug still exists in version 0.0.57

[Uwe Storbeck]

Package: apt-listbugs
Version: 0.0.57
Followup-For: Bug #389681

This bug still exists in version 0.0.57:

  Retrieving bug reports... 0% ... E: undefined local variable or method `pkg' 
for Factory::BugsFactory:Module
  E: Sub-process if dpkg -s apt-listbugs | grep -q '^Status: .* ok installed'; 
then /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || ( test $? -ne 10 || exit 10; echo 'Warning: 
apt-listbugs exited abnormally, hit enter key to continue.' 1>&2 ; read a < 
/dev/tty ); fi returned an error code (10)
  E: Failure running script if dpkg -s apt-listbugs | grep -q '^Status: .* ok 
installed'; then /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || ( test $? -ne 10 || exit 10; 
echo 'Warning: apt-listbugs exited abnormally, hit enter key to continue.' 1>&2 
; read a < /dev/tty ); fi
  
Even worse I get a warning from reportbug about a newer version than
that in Debian:

  Checking for newer versions at packages.debian.org...
  Your version of apt-listbugs (0.0.57) is newer than that in Debian! Do you
  still want to file a report [y|N|q|?]?

I use mirror.switch.ch:

  # apt-cache policy apt-listbugs
  apt-listbugs:
Installed: 0.0.57
Candidate: 0.0.57
Version table:
   *** 0.0.57 0
  650 http://mirror.switch.ch sid/main Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

A check of the Packages.bz2 file shows the entry for version 0.0.57
(http://mirror.switch.ch/ftp/mirror/debian/dists/sid/main/binary-i386/Packages.bz2):

  Package: apt-listbugs
  Priority: optional
  Section: admin
  Installed-Size: 408
  Maintainer: Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  Architecture: all
  Version: 0.0.57
  Depends: ruby (>= 1.8), libruby1.8 (>= 1.8.1), libdpkg-ruby1.8, apt, 
libzlib-rub
  y1.8, libintl-gettext-ruby1.8, libxml-parser-ruby1.8, libhttp-access2-ruby1.8
  Suggests: reportbug, debianutils (>= 2.0) | www-browser | w3m
  Filename: pool/main/a/apt-listbugs/apt-listbugs_0.0.57_all.deb
  Size: 79844
  MD5sum: 14ee257dce34a12cdfc3bc52c70fa046
  SHA1: 0d0629be4a583bf9a50262470355187225f803ae
  SHA256: 2499c3b75e081347642564c60bd6aad7bd811f4c252a42565de7250084163069
  Description: Lists critical bugs before each apt installation
   apt-listbugs is a tool which retrieves bug reports from the Debian Bug
   Tracking System and lists them. Especially, it is intended to be invoked
   before each upgrade/installation by apt in order to check whether the
   upgrade/installation is safe.
   .
   Many developers and users prefer the unstable version of Debian for its new
   features and packages.  apt, the usual upgrade tool, can break your system by
   installing a buggy package.
   .
   apt-listbugs lists critical bug reports from the Debian Bug Tracking System.
   Run it before apt to see if an upgrade or installation is known to be unsafe.
  Tag: admin::package-management, interface::commandline, made-of::lang:ruby, 
prot
  ocol::http, role::sw:utility, suite::debian, works-with::bugs, 
works-with::softw
  are:package


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (750, 'testing'), (650, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages apt-listbugs depends on:
ii  apt   0.6.46 Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii  libdpkg-ruby1.8   0.3.2  modules/classes for dpkg on ruby 1
ii  libhttp-access2-ruby1.8   2.0.6-1HTTP accessing library for ruby
ii  libintl-gettext-ruby1.8   0.11-8 Gettext wrapper for Ruby 1.8
ii  libruby1.8 [libzlib-ruby1.8]  1.8.5-2Libraries necessary to run Ruby 1.
ii  libxml-parser-ruby1.8 0.6.8-2Interface of expat for the scripti
ii  ruby  1.8.2-1An interpreter of object-oriented 

apt-listbugs recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#390664: marked as done ([NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-Ds)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 02 Oct 2006 14:49:49 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390664: fixed in e2fsprogs 1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: uuid-dev
Version: 1.2-1.39-1.1
Severity: serious

Hi!

It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds:

/usr/share/doc/libuuid1/draft-leach-uuids-guids-01.txt.gz

The license on RFC/I-Ds is not DFSG-free, see:

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810
http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation

I believe the options are:

1) Remove the file from the package (which may include re-packaging
   the source code).

2) Move the files to a non-free package (which may also include
   re-packaging the source code).

If you disagree with this, because this bug is reported for several
packages at once, it seems better to discuss this on debian-legal, in
this thread:

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal/25993

The severity is serious, because this violates the Debian policy
.

I'm sorry if this report is filed in error, I went over many packages
looking for suspicious filenames, and there may be false positives.

Thanks,
Simon

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: e2fsprogs
Source-Version: 1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
e2fsprogs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

comerr-dev_2.1-1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/comerr-dev_2.1-1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
e2fsck-static_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/e2fsck-static_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
e2fslibs-dev_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/e2fslibs-dev_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
e2fslibs_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/e2fslibs_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
e2fsprogs-udeb_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs-udeb_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.udeb
e2fsprogs_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1.diff.gz
e2fsprogs_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1.dsc
  to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1.dsc
e2fsprogs_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
e2fsprogs_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02.orig.tar.gz
libblkid-dev_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/libblkid-dev_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
libblkid1-udeb_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/libblkid1-udeb_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.udeb
libblkid1_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/libblkid1_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
libcomerr2_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/libcomerr2_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
libss2_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/libss2_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
libuuid1-udeb_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/libuuid1-udeb_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.udeb
libuuid1_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/libuuid1_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
ss-dev_2.0-1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/ss-dev_2.0-1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
uuid-dev_1.2-1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/uuid-dev_1.2-1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Theodore Y. Ts'o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated e2fsprogs package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon,  2 Oct 2006 13:04:27 -0400
Source: e2fsprogs
Binary: e2fslibs-dev libblkid1-udeb libblkid1 comerr-dev libuuid1 ss-dev 
uuid-dev e2fslibs e2fsck-static e2fsprogs-

Bug#390596: marked as done (debsecan: Recommend upgrading 'python-apt' from Suggests to Depends)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 02 Oct 2006 14:49:36 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390596: fixed in debsecan 0.4.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: debsecan
Version: 0.4.2
Severity: important

For the last couple of days, I've noticed the 'debsecan' cron
job bombing out, with the following message mailed to me:


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/debsecan", line 753, in ?
rate_system(target, options, fetch_data(options), history)
  File "/usr/bin/debsecan", line 698, in rate_system
pkg_version = Version(contents)
  File "/usr/bin/debsecan", line 92, in __init__
self.__parsed = self.__parse(version)
  File "/usr/bin/debsecan", line 111, in __parse
raise ValueError, "invalid Debian version string"
ValueError: invalid Debian version string


This started happening shortly after I upgraded the system from
Python 2.3 to 2.4.  After running 'debsecan' by hand, I noticed a tiny
diagnostic (not included in the emailed output) suggesting that
installing 'python-apt' would be helpful.  I did, and the problem
immediately went away.

Checking with 'aptitude', I see that 'debsecan' merely Suggests
'python-apt', and does not Depend on it, thus resulting in the unhelpful
output.  Barring other considerations, I would recommend upgrading
'python-apt' to a Dependency and not simply a Suggestion.  Either that,
or fixing 'debsecan' such that it doesn't bomb out completely if
'python-apt' isn't present.

Schwab


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages debsecan depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.5  Debian configuration management sy
ii  python2.4.3-11   An interactive high-level object-o

Versions of packages debsecan recommends:
ii  cron  3.0pl1-93  management of regular background p
ii  exim [mail-transport-agent]   3.36-18An MTA (Mail Transport Agent)

-- debconf information:
  debsecan/report: true
  debsecan/suite: GENERIC

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: debsecan
Source-Version: 0.4.3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
debsecan, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

debsecan_0.4.3.dsc
  to pool/main/d/debsecan/debsecan_0.4.3.dsc
debsecan_0.4.3.tar.gz
  to pool/main/d/debsecan/debsecan_0.4.3.tar.gz
debsecan_0.4.3_all.deb
  to pool/main/d/debsecan/debsecan_0.4.3_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated debsecan package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon,  2 Oct 2006 19:46:10 +0200
Source: debsecan
Binary: debsecan
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.4.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 debsecan   - Debian Security Analyzer
Closes: 368376 369098 376773 387520 390596
Changes: 
 debsecan (0.4.3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Correct spelling error in manpage.  Closes: #368376.
   * Promote python-apt to a full dependency.  Package versions containing
 the ~ characters lack a clear specification, and reusing the existing
 implementation in APT is the best way to deal with this issue.
 Closes: #390596.
   * Document the http_proxy environment variable.  Closes: #376773.
   * Add Czech translation of debconf messages, by Miroslav Kure
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.  Closes: #369098.
   * Add Swedish translation of debconf message, by Daniel Nylander
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.  Closes: #387520.
Files: 
 8b6a29a78df2b4816262ce3795e93904 820 admin optional debsecan_0.4.3.dsc
 fb931f1776685120a07a0de61b20ba8f 285545 adm

Bug#390627: marked as done (vzctl - FTBFS: error: #error "no syscall for this arch")

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 02 Oct 2006 14:54:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390627: fixed in vzctl 3.0.11-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: vzctl
Version: 3.0.11-1
Severity: serious

There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

> Automatic build of vzctl_3.0.11-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 85
[...]
> gcc -c -Wall -g2 -fPIC -I ../include lib/cpu.c -o lib/cpu.lo
> lib/cpu.c:57:2: error: #error "no syscall for this arch"
> lib/cpu.c: In function 'fairsched_vcpus':
> lib/cpu.c:85: error: '__NR_fairsched_vcpus' undeclared (first use in this 
> function)
> lib/cpu.c:85: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> lib/cpu.c:85: error: for each function it appears in.)
> make[2]: *** [lib/cpu.lo] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/vzctl-3.0.11/src'
> make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/vzctl-3.0.11'
> make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
> **
> Build finished at 20061001-1739
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: vzctl
Source-Version: 3.0.11-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
vzctl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

vzctl_3.0.11-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/v/vzctl/vzctl_3.0.11-2.diff.gz
vzctl_3.0.11-2.dsc
  to pool/main/v/vzctl/vzctl_3.0.11-2.dsc
vzctl_3.0.11-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/v/vzctl/vzctl_3.0.11-2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated vzctl package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon,  2 Oct 2006 21:32:21 +0200
Source: vzctl
Binary: vzctl
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.0.11-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 vzctl  - server virtualization solution - control tools
Closes: 390627
Changes: 
 vzctl (3.0.11-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Build only for vzctl, amd64 and ia64, closes: #390627.
Files: 
 851bca676467c8a3a88da777b825c21e 566 admin optional vzctl_3.0.11-2.dsc
 baf83eb9808b0e57de309f9fa1565e04 4735 admin optional vzctl_3.0.11-2.diff.gz
 f91337a0face5fd238ba62fcf5e1e70f 159414 admin optional vzctl_3.0.11-2_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFIWl+GKGxzw/lPdkRAtziAJ4qxkmzN0mJu1iXnnxdOqM/httBGACfTYxz
kZjZV5qV3DCQ2Gv+PUNHUaQ=
=mQy+
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Processed: merge

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 390562 grave
Bug#390562: firefox: CPU eating while waiting for passwd
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'

> reassign 390562 openoffice.org
Bug#390562: firefox: CPU eating while waiting for passwd
Bug reassigned from package `firefox' to `openoffice.org'.

> severity 390702 grave
Bug#390702: openoffice.org: crashes after upgrade to ~rc2-2
Severity set to `grave' from `important'

> severity 390113 grave
Bug#390113: openoffice.org freezes with CPU at 100%
Severity set to `grave' from `important'

> reassign 390128 openoffice.org
Bug#390128: openoffice.org-calc: after typing two characters program freezes 
with 100% CPU
Bug reassigned from package `openoffice.org-calc' to `openoffice.org'.

> merge 390113 390128
Bug#390113: openoffice.org freezes with CPU at 100%
Bug#390128: openoffice.org-calc: after typing two characters program freezes 
with 100% CPU
Merged 390113 390128.

> merge 390136 390562 390702 390113 390106
Bug#390106: openoffice.org-writer: Hang every time on amd64
Bug#390113: openoffice.org freezes with CPU at 100%
Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged:
Values for `package' don't match:
 #390106 has `openoffice.org-writer';
 #390113 has `openoffice.org'

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#390534: marked as done (ffproxy - FTBFS: No rule to make target `binary-arch'. Stop.)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 02 Oct 2006 14:49:56 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390534: fixed in ffproxy 1.6-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: ffproxy
Version: 1.6-1
Severity: serious

There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

> Automatic build of ffproxy_1.6-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 85
[...]
> for i in ffproxy.8 ffproxy.conf.5 ffproxy.quick.7; do \
>   sed -e 's|_BASE_|/etc/ffproxy|g' -e 
> 's|_CFGFILE_|/etc/ffproxy/ffproxy.conf|g' $i.s > $i; \
>   done || for i in ffproxy.8 ffproxy.conf.5 ffproxy.quick.7; do \
>   cp $i $i.s; done
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/ffproxy-1.6'
> touch build
>  /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules binary-arch
> make: *** No rule to make target `binary-arch'.  Stop.
> **
> Build finished at 20061001-0824
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ffproxy
Source-Version: 1.6-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ffproxy, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

ffproxy_1.6-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/f/ffproxy/ffproxy_1.6-2.diff.gz
ffproxy_1.6-2.dsc
  to pool/main/f/ffproxy/ffproxy_1.6-2.dsc
ffproxy_1.6-2_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/f/ffproxy/ffproxy_1.6-2_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Emmanuel Bouthenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated ffproxy package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon,  2 Oct 2006 18:30:46 +0200
Source: ffproxy
Binary: ffproxy
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.6-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Emmanuel Bouthenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Emmanuel Bouthenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 ffproxy- A light and customizable http(s) proxy server with ipv6 support
Closes: 390534
Changes: 
 ffproxy (1.6-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * fix FTBFS (Closes: #390534)
Files: 
 c7cde07c229765da78ebd6178c470d14 580 net optional ffproxy_1.6-2.dsc
 21c46fcbcdefdbc9bf8bd4d527d3226e 31085 net optional ffproxy_1.6-2.diff.gz
 dd1586337983e69ea8b37dda53586c2d 39258 net optional ffproxy_1.6-2_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFIXk1vGr7W6HudhwRAhKKAKCCLM4ovQo8DC2pk0mNu1CjL92hGwCfTuGv
aD2SBnOAzmE2CuN8l24njXA=
=Qk80
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#361846: reopening 361846, reassign 361846 to slapd

[Steinar H. Gunderson]

On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 10:13:36PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> No, seriously. Why are you reopening this bug? openldap2.3 does not
>> ship the RFC in question, and hasn't been doing so the last month:
> But this bug isn't about any RFCs.

Doesn't the copyright in question apply to the RFC only? AFAICS, core.schema
basically reads:

  1. Part of OpenLDAP, with the following license:
  2. OpenLDAP license (see license.html)
  3. Based on an RFC, with the following license:
  4. RFC license
  5. Specific RFC attributions
  6. The schema itself

Or are you claiming that anything implementing the schema from a copyrighted
RFC falls under that license?

/* Steinar */
-- 
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#390357: marked as forwarded (FTBFS: 64-bit specific error in tests?)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 2 Oct 2006 23:01:36 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
has caused the Debian Bug report #390357,
regarding FTBFS: 64-bit specific error in tests?
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) bigloo mailing-list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Hi Manuel,

I recently uploaded a 2.8c package to Debian, and although it builds on
all architectures, it may be that the jvm tests reveal a problem on 64bit
platforms.

OTOH, you may have tested it with Sun's jvm, and I have configured the
package to use gij to run the tests, so it may be a gij problem instead.

Have you seen any similar problem already ?

Best regards,
-- 
Yann.
--- Begin Message ---
Package: bigloo
Severity: serious
Version: 2.8c-1

Hi

Your package fails to build from source for alpha, amd64, hppa and ia64. So it
seems there is a problem for the 64-bit architectures.

The build logs can be found on [1] as usual, though below is a transcript of
the part where the error seems to be:

/build/buildd/bigloo-2.8c/build-tree/bigloo2.8c/bin/bigloo -jvm -jvm-directory
objs_jvm -jvm-classpath "objs_jvm" -no-jvm-jar  -cg -g -O3 -q -Wall -init-lib
-eval "(set! *indent* (= 1 2))" -afile .afile-c  -jvm-bigloo-classpath
/build/buildd/bigloo-2.8c/build-tree/bigloo2.8c/lib/2.8c -o recette-jvm
objs_jvm/vital.class objs_jvm/bps.class objs_jvm/bool.class
objs_jvm/list.class objs_jvm/vector.class objs_jvm/struct.class
objs_jvm/print.class objs_jvm/string.class objs_jvm/kwote.class
objs_jvm/case.class objs_jvm/bexit.class objs_jvm/vararity.class
objs_jvm/apply.class objs_jvm/globalis.class objs_jvm/filtre.class
objs_jvm/rgc-trap.class objs_jvm/rgc-jm.class objs_jvm/port.class
objs_jvm/read.class objs_jvm/tail.class objs_jvm/sqic.class
objs_jvm/eval.class objs_jvm/inline.class objs_jvm/match.class
objs_jvm/letrec.class objs_jvm/macro.class objs_jvm/flonum.class
objs_jvm/number.class objs_jvm/bchar.class objs_jvm/define.class
objs_jvm/error.class objs_jvm/cse.class objs_jvm/kapture.class
objs_jvm/include.class objs_jvm/0cfa.class objs_jvm/alias.class
objs_jvm/alias-aux.class objs_jvm/main.class objs_jvm/rgc-eval.class
objs_jvm/rgc.class objs_jvm/hash.class objs_jvm/module.class
objs_jvm/import1.class objs_jvm/import2.class objs_jvm/cfa2.class
objs_jvm/cell.class objs_jvm/hygien.class objs_jvm/wind.class
objs_jvm/dsssl.class objs_jvm/sua.class objs_jvm/peek.class
objs_jvm/callcc.class objs_jvm/fringe.class objs_jvm/unicode.class
objs_jvm/optim.class objs_jvm/pregexp.class objs_jvm/lalr.class
objs_jvm/system.class objs_jvm/date.class objs_jvm/process.class
objs_jvm/mmap.class objs_jvm/object.class objs_jvm/object1.class
objs_jvm/object2.class objs_jvm/object3.class objs_jvm/object4.class
objs_jvm/object5.class objs_jvm/external.class objs_jvm/Point.class
objs_jvm/ArrayTest.class objs_jvm/Intf.class

*** WARNING:bigloo:link
No Bigloo module found for -- objs_jvm/Point.class

*** WARNING:bigloo:link
No Bigloo module found for -- objs_jvm/ArrayTest.class

*** WARNING:bigloo:link
No Bigloo module found for -- objs_jvm/Intf.class
Recette (JVM) Done...
---
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/build/buildd/bigloo-2.8c/build-tree/bigloo2.8c/recette'
vital.scm:
bps.scm:
cell.scm:
module.scm:
hash.scm:
bool.scm:
number.scm:
187.number(elong.3) fail: provided [#f], wanted [#t]
flonum.scm:
list.scm:
vector.scm:
struct.scm:
print.scm:
char.scm:
string.scm:
kwote.scm:
case.scm:
bind-exit.scm:
vararity.scm:
apply.scm:
globalisation.scm:
kapture.scm:
filtre.scm:
match.scm:
rgc.scm:
rgc-trap.scm:
rgc-jm.scm:
rgc-eval.scm:
lalr.scm:
port.scm:
mmap.scm:
read.scm:
callcc.scm:
wind.scm:
dsssl.scm:
tail.scm:
external.scm:
sqic.scm:
eval.scm:
inline.scm:
letrec.scm:
macro.scm:
define.scm:
cse.scm:
error.scm:
include.scm:
0cfa.scm:
sua.scm:
alias.scm:
object.scm:
object4.scm:
object5.scm:
hygien.scm:
peek.scm:
unicode.scm:
optim.scm:
pregexp.scm:
system.scm:
date.scm:
process.scm:

--
recette failed: 1 error(s) occured.
make[1]: *** [jvm-test] Error 255
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/bigloo-2.8c/build-tree/bigloo2.8c'
make: *** [stampdir/build-arch] Error 2

Cheers

Luk

[1] http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=bigloo

-- 
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint:   D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7   F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- End Message ---

Processed: found 389994 in 0.80

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> found 389994 0.80
Bug#389994: initramfs-tools: NFS timeout on first mount causes looping.
Bug marked as found in version 0.80.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#390357: 64-bit specific error in bigloo, or in gij ?

[Yann Dirson]

Hi gij maintainers,

Since that error the bigloo "jvm tests" show only occurs during, well,
the "jvm tests", I am wondering if it could not be a gij 64bit issue.

For the background, the bigloo scheme compiler, among other target
runtime environements, can generate JVM bytecode, and it is the
testsuite exercising this backend which shows the problem.

Could someone with access to several jvm's on a 64bit machine please
give a try at building the bigloo package with them ?  The build
procedure takes whatever "java" is in its $PATH, only the build-deps
(sort of) make sure that gij is selected.

Best regards,
-- 
Yann.
--- Begin Message ---
Package: bigloo
Severity: serious
Version: 2.8c-1

Hi

Your package fails to build from source for alpha, amd64, hppa and ia64. So it
seems there is a problem for the 64-bit architectures.

The build logs can be found on [1] as usual, though below is a transcript of
the part where the error seems to be:

/build/buildd/bigloo-2.8c/build-tree/bigloo2.8c/bin/bigloo -jvm -jvm-directory
objs_jvm -jvm-classpath "objs_jvm" -no-jvm-jar  -cg -g -O3 -q -Wall -init-lib
-eval "(set! *indent* (= 1 2))" -afile .afile-c  -jvm-bigloo-classpath
/build/buildd/bigloo-2.8c/build-tree/bigloo2.8c/lib/2.8c -o recette-jvm
objs_jvm/vital.class objs_jvm/bps.class objs_jvm/bool.class
objs_jvm/list.class objs_jvm/vector.class objs_jvm/struct.class
objs_jvm/print.class objs_jvm/string.class objs_jvm/kwote.class
objs_jvm/case.class objs_jvm/bexit.class objs_jvm/vararity.class
objs_jvm/apply.class objs_jvm/globalis.class objs_jvm/filtre.class
objs_jvm/rgc-trap.class objs_jvm/rgc-jm.class objs_jvm/port.class
objs_jvm/read.class objs_jvm/tail.class objs_jvm/sqic.class
objs_jvm/eval.class objs_jvm/inline.class objs_jvm/match.class
objs_jvm/letrec.class objs_jvm/macro.class objs_jvm/flonum.class
objs_jvm/number.class objs_jvm/bchar.class objs_jvm/define.class
objs_jvm/error.class objs_jvm/cse.class objs_jvm/kapture.class
objs_jvm/include.class objs_jvm/0cfa.class objs_jvm/alias.class
objs_jvm/alias-aux.class objs_jvm/main.class objs_jvm/rgc-eval.class
objs_jvm/rgc.class objs_jvm/hash.class objs_jvm/module.class
objs_jvm/import1.class objs_jvm/import2.class objs_jvm/cfa2.class
objs_jvm/cell.class objs_jvm/hygien.class objs_jvm/wind.class
objs_jvm/dsssl.class objs_jvm/sua.class objs_jvm/peek.class
objs_jvm/callcc.class objs_jvm/fringe.class objs_jvm/unicode.class
objs_jvm/optim.class objs_jvm/pregexp.class objs_jvm/lalr.class
objs_jvm/system.class objs_jvm/date.class objs_jvm/process.class
objs_jvm/mmap.class objs_jvm/object.class objs_jvm/object1.class
objs_jvm/object2.class objs_jvm/object3.class objs_jvm/object4.class
objs_jvm/object5.class objs_jvm/external.class objs_jvm/Point.class
objs_jvm/ArrayTest.class objs_jvm/Intf.class

*** WARNING:bigloo:link
No Bigloo module found for -- objs_jvm/Point.class

*** WARNING:bigloo:link
No Bigloo module found for -- objs_jvm/ArrayTest.class

*** WARNING:bigloo:link
No Bigloo module found for -- objs_jvm/Intf.class
Recette (JVM) Done...
---
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/build/buildd/bigloo-2.8c/build-tree/bigloo2.8c/recette'
vital.scm:
bps.scm:
cell.scm:
module.scm:
hash.scm:
bool.scm:
number.scm:
187.number(elong.3) fail: provided [#f], wanted [#t]
flonum.scm:
list.scm:
vector.scm:
struct.scm:
print.scm:
char.scm:
string.scm:
kwote.scm:
case.scm:
bind-exit.scm:
vararity.scm:
apply.scm:
globalisation.scm:
kapture.scm:
filtre.scm:
match.scm:
rgc.scm:
rgc-trap.scm:
rgc-jm.scm:
rgc-eval.scm:
lalr.scm:
port.scm:
mmap.scm:
read.scm:
callcc.scm:
wind.scm:
dsssl.scm:
tail.scm:
external.scm:
sqic.scm:
eval.scm:
inline.scm:
letrec.scm:
macro.scm:
define.scm:
cse.scm:
error.scm:
include.scm:
0cfa.scm:
sua.scm:
alias.scm:
object.scm:
object4.scm:
object5.scm:
hygien.scm:
peek.scm:
unicode.scm:
optim.scm:
pregexp.scm:
system.scm:
date.scm:
process.scm:

--
recette failed: 1 error(s) occured.
make[1]: *** [jvm-test] Error 255
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/bigloo-2.8c/build-tree/bigloo2.8c'
make: *** [stampdir/build-arch] Error 2

Cheers

Luk

[1] http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=bigloo

-- 
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint:   D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7   F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#390667: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-Ds

[Aurélien GÉRÔME]

found 390667 1:7.2.2-2
thanks

On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 07:33:39PM +0200, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 07:27:54PM +0200, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> > Expect it to be fixed at the next upload with version 1:7.2.2.dsfg-1.

I will modify the source tarball name or version. If you can suggest
me your preference on that, it would help me a bit. :)

Cheers,
-- 
 .''`.   Aurélien GÉRÔME
: :'  :
`. `'`   Free Software Developer
  `- Unix Sys & Net Admin


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#390648: FTBFS: will not create hard link

[Russell Coker]

On Monday 02 October 2006 23:06, "Steinar H. Gunderson" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shouldn't a bug be filed against ftp.debian.org asking for its removal,
> then?

Yes, but let's get the replacement finished first.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: notfound 389994 in 0.81

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> notfound 389994 0.81
Bug#389994: initramfs-tools: NFS timeout on first mount causes looping.
Bug marked as not found in version 0.81.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#390667: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-Ds

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> found 390667 1:7.2.2-2
Bug#390667: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-Ds
Bug marked as found in version 1:7.2.2-2.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Nautilus-sendto unusable because of new gaim

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 390731 grave
Bug#390731: nautilus-sendto: Not compatible with Gaim 2.0
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#390325: Fails to install

[Goswin von Brederlow]

Hi,

jsut some more info for this.

dpkg-reconfigure doesn't work when the package is in this broken state
so one can't even switch from a (non existing) local db to a remote db
to fix the failure.

MfG
Goswin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#361846: reopening 361846, reassign 361846 to slapd

[Peter Eisentraut]

Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> No, seriously. Why are you reopening this bug? openldap2.3 does not
> ship the RFC in question, and hasn't been doing so the last month:

But this bug isn't about any RFCs.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#390419: libbonoboui2-dev: Linked against libdbus-1.so.2

[Vincent Lönngren]

mån 2006-10-02 klockan 20:51 +0200 skrev Loïc Minier:
> On Mon, Oct 02, 2006, Vincent Lönngren wrote:
> > Alright, here it is.
> 
>  Hmm, sorry, this doesn't help a lot to pinpoint the relevant file.
>  Could you please grep -rl libdbus-1.so.2 /usr/lib?
> 
>  Please "dpkg -S" the files returned by the above command.
> 
>Thanks,

Ok.

wine-utils: /usr/lib/wine/explorer.exe.so

erm... that seems to be it, unless I should dpkg -S everything grep
complains about missing (No such file or directory)
-- 
Vincent Lönngren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Bug#390627: vzctl - FTBFS: error: #error "no syscall for this arch"

[Ola Lundqvist]

Hi

Arch line changed and new version uploaded.

Regards,

// Ola

On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 12:26:56PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 12:04:48PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > > It builds only one binary, so the Architecture line is incorrect.
> > No it builds on ia64 and amd64 as well. 
> 
> | Specifying a list of architectures indicates that the source will
> | build an architecture-dependent package, and will only work
> | correctly on the listed architectures.[31]
> 
> | 31 
> | This is a setting used for a minority of cases where the program is not
> | portable. Generally, it should not be used for new packages.
> 
> > But you are right that I could
> > have had listed just the architectures that are officially supported. 
> > However
> > it is much easier for me to let upstream handle that than to do it myself
> > as well. It is detected very early in the build process so it do not take
> > that much resources on the build servers and I do not update the package
> > that often.
> 
> The package will end up in either P-a-s or in not-for-us rather fast and
> will be not longer built without manual intervention.
> 
> > I have filed the bug to ftp.debian.org now in any case. When it has
> > been corrected I'll lower the severity.
> 
> Fix the Architecture line and close it. It does not hit the case where
> this is not possible.
> 
> Bastian
> 
> -- 
> Knowledge, sir, should be free to all!
>   -- Harry Mudd, "I, Mudd", stardate 4513.3
> 

-- 
 --- Ola Lundqvist systemkonsult --- M Sc in IT Engineering 
/  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Annebergsslingan 37\
|  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   654 65 KARLSTAD|
|  http://opalsys.net/   Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
\  gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9  /
 ---


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#390639: marked as done (gfortran configure: failed to upgrade due to Permission denied error)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 2 Oct 2006 21:07:00 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390600: Setting up gfortran (4.1.1-9) ...
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: gfortran
Version: 4:4.1.1-9
Severity: important

Last upgrade of gfortran in sid was prevented due to the following
errors (one for g77 is included, other packages are not referenced):


Setting up g77 (3.4.6-13) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/g77.postinst: line 12: /usr/share/man/man1/g77.1.gz:
No such file or directory
dpkg: error processing g77 (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
..
..
..
Setting up gfortran (4.1.1-9) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/gfortran.postinst: line 5: 
/usr/share/man/man1/gfortran.1.gz: Permission denied
dpkg: error processing gfortran (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
 g77
..
..
..
 gfortran


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (200, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17.11-kanotix-2
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO-8859-15 (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages gfortran depends on:
ii  cpp   4:4.1.1-9  The GNU C preprocessor (cpp)
ii  gcc   4:4.1.1-9  The GNU C compiler
ii  gfortran-4.1  4.1.1-15   The GNU Fortran 95 compiler

gfortran recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 4:4.1.1-10

Fixed.
--- End Message ---

Bug#390600: marked as done (Setting up gfortran (4.1.1-9) ...)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 2 Oct 2006 21:07:00 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390600: Setting up gfortran (4.1.1-9) ...
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: gfortran
Version: 4:4.1.1-9
Severity: normal

Setting up gfortran (4.1.1-9) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/gfortran.postinst: line 5: 
/usr/share/man/man1/gfortran.1.gz: No such file or directory
dpkg: error processing gfortran (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Setting up gok (1.2.0-1) ...


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers oldstable
  APT policy: (500, 'oldstable'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to 
en_US)

Versions of packages gfortran depends on:
ii  cpp   4:4.1.1-9  The GNU C preprocessor (cpp)
ii  gcc   4:4.1.1-9  The GNU C compiler
ii  gfortran-4.1  4.1.1-15   The GNU Fortran 95 compiler

gfortran recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 4:4.1.1-10

Fixed.
--- End Message ---

Bug#390581: segfault on amd64

[Ola Lundqvist]

Hi

Thanks for the help. I have now unapplied that patch and will upload
a new version in a short while.

To Truxton Fulton: Could you revise this patch to determine why
it do not work on amd64. I liked it. I assume that it can have something
to do with the fd_set calls that you mentioned in the mail to me.

Unfortunatly I have to remove it right now in order for it to not
segfault on amd64.

Roland and Per: Please try this new version that is uploaded to
debian today.

Regards,

// Ola

On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 05:02:08PM +0200, Roland Rosenfeld wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Oct 2006, Per Olofsson wrote:
> 
> > What happens, I think, is that the Dispatch() function allocates the
> > array pClientsReady on the stack, with a size of 1000
> > (MaxClients). But WaitForSomething(), for some reason, writes
> > outside the array boundary (which explains why the stack is
> > corrupt).
> 
> Seems that the maxclients patch is part of the problem.  If you remove
> this patch, Xtightvnc doesn't die with a segfault any longer.
> 
> Tscho
> 
> Roland
> 

-- 
 --- Ola Lundqvist systemkonsult --- M Sc in IT Engineering 
/  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Annebergsslingan 37\
|  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   654 65 KARLSTAD|
|  http://opalsys.net/   Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
\  gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9  /
 ---


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#390005: BinNMU request for openser 1.1.0-3 on arm

[Julien BLACHE]

Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi,

> Scheduled, but a package that generates an empty binary in response to a gcc
> failure instead of aborting the build has a (lower-severity) sourceful bug.
> Please take care of this in the source package.

FYI:
 - the build system is fixed in SVN wrt this issue, will be in OpenSER 1.1.0-4
 - #390694 has been filed against gcc-4.1 which fails to build part of
   the jabber module at -O2 (the binNMU rebuild failed too)

JB.

-- 
 Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
 
 Public key available on  - KeyID: F5D6 5169 
 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#390693: gcc-4.1 fails to build the glibc on ia64 (forwarded from Aurelien Jarno)

[Matthias Klose]

gcc-4.1 uses the backport of PR 26208 from the trunk.

--- Begin Message ---
Package: gcc-4.1
Version: 4.1.1-14
Severity: serious

The latest version of the glibc failed to build on ia64 with the 
following error:

gcc-4.1 -nostdlib -nostartfiles -static -o 
/build/buildd/glibc-2.3.6.ds1/build-tree/ia64-nptl/elf/sln   
/build/buildd/glibc-2.3.6.ds1/build-tree/ia64-nptl/csu/crt1.o 
/build/buildd/glibc-2.3.6.ds1/build-tree/ia64-nptl/csu/crti.o `gcc-4.1 
--print-file-name=crtbegin.o` 
/build/buildd/glibc-2.3.6.ds1/build-tree/ia64-nptl/elf/sln.o  
/build/buildd/glibc-2.3.6.ds1/build-tree/ia64-nptl/libc.a -lgcc -lgcc_eh 
-lunwind /build/buildd/glibc-2.3.6.ds1/build-tree/ia64-nptl/libc.a `gcc-4.1 
--print-file-name=crtend.o` 
/build/buildd/glibc-2.3.6.ds1/build-tree/ia64-nptl/csu/crtn.o
/usr/lib/gcc/ia64-linux-gnu/4.1.2/libgcc_eh.a(unwind-c.o): In function 
`__gcc_personality_v0':
(.text+0x812): undefined reference to `_Unwind_GetIPInfo'

For a full build log see: 
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=glibc&ver=2.3.6.ds1-5&arch=ia64&stamp=1159739411&file=log&as=raw

As the only code change from the previous version (if we except the 
changes in the hurd directory) are 6 lines of code in the math library,
my guess is that the bug is in gcc-4.1. This also mean that the previous
version in etch fails to build from source the same way, hence the
severity serious.

The last build has been done with gcc-4.1 version 4.1.1-11.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to fr_FR.UTF-8)

Versions of packages gcc-4.1 depends on:
ii  binutils 2.17-2  The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii  cpp-4.1  4.1.1-14The GNU C preprocessor
ii  gcc-4.1-base 4.1.1-14The GNU Compiler Collection (base 
ii  libc62.3.6.ds1-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libgcc1  1:4.1.1-14  GCC support library
ii  libssp0  4.1.1-14GCC stack smashing protection libr

Versions of packages gcc-4.1 recommends:
ii  libc6-dev2.3.6.ds1-4 GNU C Library: Development Librari
pn  libmudflap0-dev(no description available)

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- End Message ---

Bug#390631: marked as done (slice: does not include executable and manpage)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 02 Oct 2006 11:47:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390631: fixed in slice 1.3.8-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: slice
Version: 1.3.8-7
Severity: grave

Hello,

`dpkg -L slice` said, there's no executable and manpage. At least in
the previous revision (-6), /usr/bin/slice and
/usr/share/man/man1/slice.1.gz were included properly.


Thanks,
--
Nobuhiro IMAI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Key fingerprint = F39E D552 545D 7C64 D690  F644 5A15 746C BD8E 7106


pgpMdxKoR5OiS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: slice
Source-Version: 1.3.8-8

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
slice, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

slice_1.3.8-8.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/slice/slice_1.3.8-8.diff.gz
slice_1.3.8-8.dsc
  to pool/main/s/slice/slice_1.3.8-8.dsc
slice_1.3.8-8_all.deb
  to pool/main/s/slice/slice_1.3.8-8_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated slice package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon,  2 Oct 2006 20:21:54 +0200
Source: slice
Binary: slice
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.3.8-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 slice  - Extract out pre-defined slices of an ASCII file
Closes: 390631
Changes: 
 slice (1.3.8-8) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Fix build process so that everything gets installed (Closes: #390631).
Files: 
 b7b4dd5c3ad6749c7427d5e34970f071 672 text optional slice_1.3.8-8.dsc
 7162523511adc61168ae77c63e7e3a4d 4768 text optional slice_1.3.8-8.diff.gz
 ae71023e7517c5e283ec045a7229025f 24902 text optional slice_1.3.8-8_all.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFIVk25UTeB5t8Mo0RAg0pAKCkwkhkywKihdp163Rx4aWG3mo6YACfS8pU
ZsOmmW/iOqvI0MQFldPpHpU=
=JGhp
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#390419: libbonoboui2-dev: Linked against libdbus-1.so.2

[Loïc Minier]

On Mon, Oct 02, 2006, Vincent Lönngren wrote:
> Alright, here it is.

 Hmm, sorry, this doesn't help a lot to pinpoint the relevant file.
 Could you please grep -rl libdbus-1.so.2 /usr/lib?

 Please "dpkg -S" the files returned by the above command.

   Thanks,
-- 
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Bug#390615: aspell-it: Wrong endianess in it.pws

[Stefano Melchior]

On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 09:41:33AM +0200, Leandro Noferini wrote:
> Package: aspell-it
> Version: 0.60.20060723-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> 
> This is the message:
> 
> Error: The file "/usr/lib/aspell/it.rws" is not in the proper format.
> Wrong endian order.


Dear all,
well I own a PPC machine (Powerbook G4), but at the moment of the pkg
creation I used a x86.
Anyway I tested on my G4 and I realized what you reported: but afterward I
downloaded the sources from debian official repos and I builded from them.
I deinstalled the previous pkg and reinstalled the one just compiled.
From this moment on it has worked fine without error.
Can you test a rebuild please, meanwhile I am going to investigate on this
strange behaviour?
Thanks

SteX

-- 
Stefano Melchior, GPG key = D52DF829 - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.openlabs.it/~stex-- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://etinarcadiaego.dyndns.org  --  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Skype ID "stefanomelchior"


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: Merging these two bugs

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 389404 grave
Bug#389404: [savage] savage DRI driver does not work with X.org 7.1.1
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'

> close 389404 1:2.1.2-1
Bug#389404: [savage] savage DRI driver does not work with X.org 7.1.1
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 1:2.1.2-1, send any further explanations to 
Martin Steigerwald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> merge 389404 389794
Bug#389404: [savage] savage DRI driver does not work with X.org 7.1.1
Bug#389794: libgl1-mesa-dri: upgrade to xorg 7.1 causes savage opengl stop 
working
Merged 389404 389794.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: severity of 390596 is grave

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> severity 390596 grave
Bug#390596: debsecan: Recommend upgrading 'python-apt' from Suggests to Depends
Severity set to `grave' from `important'

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#354622: Using Firefox as the app name without official branding is still a trademark violation

[Eric Dorland]

* Mike Connor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> 
> >>To my knowledge, Debian isn't including "extra" security fixes over
> >>and above what we're shipping.  If they are, that would possibly be
> >>considered an act of bad faith between downstream and upstream,
> >>unless the security bug was Debian specific.  This type of potential
> >>"Firefox from foo is better than Firefox from bar" comparison is
> >>something we have explicitly avoided.
> >
> >As pointed out many times, we've had to backport security fixes
> >ourselves into 1.0.4 because security support has dropped for the 1.0
> >branch. So whether that's "extra" or not, I don't know. Even if we
> >added a security patch that the original version didn't have I don't
> >see how we could act in bad faith. Even if we somehow neglected to
> >file a bug report on it, it's not like we could hide the fact that we
> >had added the patch from you.
> 
> Backporting security fixes from newer releases is not really "extra"  
> in my mind.  It'd be fixing stuff that isn't fixed elsewhere without  
> discussing it with us.
> 
> The argument for fixing upstream is that by taking a fix for a bug  
> that's unpatched upstream, you will call attention to that potential  
> exploit, and thus put non-Debian users at risk. The problem is  
> exponentially worse if we don't know the issue exists and thus don't  
> know we need to fix it.  If that's not malicious, its at least  
> irresponsible, in my opinion.

Well on the one hand if there's a patch available to fix a security
issue that I can get my hands on, I probably won't wait until the
official release from Mozilla to apply the fix. If I can get my hands
on it, that means umpteen many people can too, so I would see no point
in delaying even if it does draw attention to the vulnerability.

On the other hand if somehow I was privy to a vulnerability that
upstream wasn't, of course I would report it. I'm a good citizen in
this community as I'm sure nearly all of Debian is. But my point was
even if I didn't (eg, hit by a bus, had dental surgery, was mad at you
because you ran over my puppy or merely because I forgot) I couldn't
actually hide the fact that I did it effectively. It's all out in the
open, so I don't see how I could be accused of bad faith or
irresponsibility. 

-- 
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C  2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#390733: Upgrade from sarge fails (Segmentation fault scrollkeeper-update -q)

[Anthony DeRobertis]

Package: synaptic
Version: 0.57.11
Severity: serious

# dpkg --configure -a
Setting up synaptic (0.57.11) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/synaptic.postinst: line 6:  4289 Segmentation fault  
scrollkeeper-update -q
dpkg: error processing synaptic (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 139
Errors were encountered while processing:
 synaptic

This is with scrollkeeper 0.3.14-10 (sarge); installing 0.3.14-11 (etch)
fixes the problem, maybe there is a missing versioned depends.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (100, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages synaptic depends on:
ii  apt [libapt-pkg-lib 0.6.46   Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii  apt-utils [libapt-i 0.6.46   APT utility programs
ii  libatk1.0-0 1.12.2-1 The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libc6   2.3.6.ds1-4  GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libcairo2   1.2.4-1  The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra
ii  libfontconfig1  2.4.1-2  generic font configuration library
ii  libgcc1 1:4.1.1-13   GCC support library
ii  libglade2-0 1:2.6.0-2library to load .glade files at ru
ii  libglib2.0-02.12.3-2 The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk2.0-0 2.8.20-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libncurses5 5.5-3Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libpango1.0-0   1.14.4-2 Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libstdc++6  4.1.1-13 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libvte4 1:0.12.2-4   Terminal emulator widget for GTK+ 
ii  libx11-66.9.0.dfsg.1-6~bpo.4 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxcursor1 1.1.3-1  X cursor management library
ii  libxext66.9.0.dfsg.1-6~bpo.4 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxfixes3  6.9.0.dfsg.1-6~bpo.4 X Window System miscellaneous 'fix
ii  libxft2 2.1.7-1  FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxi6  6.9.0.dfsg.1-6~bpo.4 X Window System Input extension li
ii  libxinerama16.9.0.dfsg.1-6~bpo.4 X Window System multi-head display
ii  libxml2 2.6.26.dfsg-3GNOME XML library
ii  libxrandr2  6.9.0.dfsg.1-6~bpo.4 X Window System Resize, Rotate and
ii  libxrender1 1:0.9.0.2-0bpo1  X Rendering Extension client libra
ii  scrollkeeper0.3.14-10A free electronic cataloging syste

Versions of packages synaptic recommends:
ii  deborphan 1.7.15 Find orphaned libraries
ii  gksu  1.2.5-3graphical frontend to su
ii  libgnome2-perl1.021-1Perl interface to the GNOME librar

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: severity of 390419 is serious

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> #Apparently it's missing dependencies, a split is probably the way to go.
> severity 390419 serious
Bug#390419: libbonoboui2-dev: Linked against libdbus-1.so.2
Severity set to `serious' from `serious'

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#354622: Renaming Mozilla applications

[Eric Dorland]

* Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 03:33:15AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > Well having transition packages would definitely be part of the plan,
> > > so that shouldn't be an issue.
> > 
> > FWIW, I don't see any substantial difference between a package named
> > "firefox" that is a transition package, and one that contains the browser
> > software.  If one is determined to infringe a trademark, why would the other
> > not?
> 
> The trademark infringement is when providing something that is called firefox
> but that is not quite firefox, but still calls itself firefox.
> Providing a transition package so that users are able to get what we want to
> provide them as an alternative to firefox is a different situation : it is
> providing something that is called firefox, that is empty and installs
> something else that is called iceweasel and calls itself iceweasel. Where is
> the trademark infringement ? I can still write "firefox is shit" and not
> infringe any trademark.

Exactly. If the package is called firefox then it can be perceived as
claiming it is firefox. If we provide an empty package called firefox
to ease the upgrade to iceweasel or what have you, it just looks like
we're providing an upgrade path from firefox to the new package. 

-- 
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C  2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: Re: Setting up gfortran (4.1.1-9) ...

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 390600 serious
Bug#390600: Setting up gfortran (4.1.1-9) ...
Bug#390639: gfortran configure: failed to upgrade due to Permission denied error
Severity set to `serious' from `serious'

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]