Bug#606791: Full install/removal/upgrade test results available

2010-12-27 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 11:59:16PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Mike Hommey writes ("Re: Full install/removal/upgrade test results 
> available"):
> > Unfortunately, while some cases were fixed, the original case for which
> > the pre-depends was added fails again :(
> > 
> > (starting from xulrunner-1.9.1 already installed, and installing
> > python-xpcom, case which I forgot to test before my last uploads)
> > Unpacking python-xpcom (from
> > .../python-xpcom_1%3a0.0~hg20100212-3_amd64.deb) ...
> > Processing triggers for xulrunner-1.9.1 ...
> > Obtaining the module object from Python failed.
> > 
> > : No module named xpcom.server
> > Obtaining the module object from Python failed.
> 
> So the problem is that python-xpcom does not work when it has been
> previously installed, and then during an upgrade the new version has
> been unpacked but not configured ?

The remaining problem is that python-xpcom does not work when it was not
previously installed but xulrunner-1.9.1 was.

> If you add a dependency from xulrunner to python-xpcom this problem
> ought to go away (although if that would lead to a circular dependency
> the situation is more complicated as dpkg will need to break the
> cycle).

Plus, xulrunner doesn't need python-xpcom. The problem is that xulrunner
trigger can't work when python-xpcom is only unpacked. It can only work
after python-support trigger has run (or update-python-modules has been
run from python-xpcom postinst, for that matter).

The root of the problem, really, is that python packages can't be used
when only simply unpacked.

Mike



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: tagging 605565

2010-12-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 605565 = pending
Bug #605565 [gnustep-base-runtime] gnustep-base-runtime: unremovable if the 
daemon is not running
Added tag(s) pending; removed tag(s) help.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
605565: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=605565
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#608169: ftp.debian.org: Please clean up queue for NEW libcgi-application-plugin-authentication-perl

2010-12-27 Thread Nicholas Bamber
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source

I am trying to split up the libcgi-application-extra-plugin-bundle-perl package
into (at this time 5) more manageable packages.
Yesterday three of the spin offs were successfully uploaded but this is the
second and unsuccessful attempt for
libcgi-application-plugin-authentication-perl.
The first attempt was supposedly successful but failed to include the 
two subsidiary tarballs. The second correct upload was rejected
because the main tarball was already present.
Please do whatever is needed to either allow the second attempt to go through
or be reattempted. 
In particular I would be very grateful if this could be done BEFORE
any new overrides are written so that all four soin offs could enter unstable
together.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#542915: pbuilder removes data from bind-mounted directories

2010-12-27 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 10:41:36PM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 09:38:30AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 05:04:02PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > do you plan on NMUing pbuilder for this bug?
> > 
> > No, I don't consider it appropriate to NMU for an RC bug that I raised the
> > severity on, withouth the acknowledgement of the maintainer that the
> > severity is justified.  Someone else NMUing is a vote that the severity is
> > justified.
> 
> The original submitter agreed with you on the severity.  That's good 
> enough for me.  
> 
> I can do the upload if you like.

That'd be good.

> However, I'm confused by your
> message of 2010-12-17, where you said "Patch 5 in a series:".  I'm
> confused because I can see only one patch prior to this, and the later
> patch seems to be a patch on the original patch.  Can you
> confirm whether the following is the intended change or whether
> there are 4 other patches I'm missing.  

Sorry about the confusion.  My local branch for this bug, 542915 in
http://github.com/mpalmer/pbuilder, has three other patches in it (to
auto-unmount everything, rename mountproc to mountall, and improve an error
message), and so the other patch I attached to this bug report is #5 in that
series.

To clarify, the two patches that needed to fix this bug are:

0001-Ensure-that-nothing-is-still-mounted-before-deleting.patch
0005-Robustify-the-is-anything-mounted-check.patch

The other three patches in the series are refactorings/improvements, and
should not (IMHO) be made as part of an NMU.

- Matt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#542915: pbuilder removes data from bind-mounted directories

2010-12-27 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 09:38:30AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 05:04:02PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > do you plan on NMUing pbuilder for this bug?
> 
> No, I don't consider it appropriate to NMU for an RC bug that I raised the
> severity on, withouth the acknowledgement of the maintainer that the
> severity is justified.  Someone else NMUing is a vote that the severity is
> justified.

The original submitter agreed with you on the severity.  That's good 
enough for me.  

I can do the upload if you like.  However, I'm confused by your
message of 2010-12-17, where you said "Patch 5 in a series:".  I'm
confused because I can see only one patch prior to this, and the later
patch seems to be a patch on the original patch.  Can you
confirm whether the following is the intended change or whether
there are 4 other patches I'm missing.  

Thanks,
-Steve

diff -u -r orig/pbuilder-0.199//pbuilder-modules 
pbuilder-0.199//pbuilder-modules
--- orig/pbuilder-0.199//pbuilder-modules   2010-06-19 22:55:28.0 
-0500
+++ pbuilder-0.199//pbuilder-modules2010-12-27 22:29:34.803419903 -0600
@@ -319,9 +319,23 @@
log "W: Aborting with an error";
 fi
 if [ "${INTERNAL_BUILD_UML}" != "yes" ]; then
-   if [ -d "$BUILDPLACE" ]; then 
-   log "I: cleaning the build env "
-   clean_subdirectories "$BUILDPLACE"
+if [ -d "$BUILDPLACE" ]; then
+# A directory on the same partition as $BUILDPLACE, bind-mounted
+# into $BUILDPLACE, will be cleaned out by clean_subdirectories
+# (because -xdev doesn't know about bind mounts).  To avoid that
+# potential disaster (and also to avoid ugly error messages from
+# rmdir otherwise), we want to make sure that there is *nothing*
+# mounted under the chroot before we do our bulldozer routine.
+#
+# The readlink -f is a simple way to canonicalize the path for
+# $BUILDPLACE (no dirty double slashes for *us*), so it matches
+# what will be in the output of mount.
+if mount |grep -q -F " $(readlink -f $BUILDPLACE)/"; then
+log "E: Something is still mounted under ${BUILDPLACE}; 
unmount and remove ${BUILDPLACE} manually"
+else
+log "I: cleaning the build env "
+clean_subdirectories "$BUILDPLACE"
+fi
fi;
 fi
 }





signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#605784: nagios-statd: diff for NMU version 3.12-1.1

2010-12-27 Thread Jason Thomas
Hi Jonathan,

I've looked over the changes and they are okay with me, what you have done
is fine.

Thank you.



On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 3:37 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire  wrote:

> tags 605784 + patch
> tags 605784 + pending
> thanks
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for nagios-statd (versioned as 3.12-1.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should delay it longer.
>
> Regards.
>
> --
> Jonathan Wiltshire  j...@debian.org
> Debian Developer 
> http://people.debian.org/~jmw
>
> 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJNF28+AAoJEFOUR53TUkxRY3kP/j/Y7atQ2h2oAc/S7hSdQR/N
> 0mGBqzeZ+E1avNLu2EPStMNehxNj1LcgdZ8FhUo2wTsmfDWMUhobsXbwkC3GF7KW
> jPue0Zoncmj0+WSi1rHEh8nt4gQO3CbQfza3F2CnG769yhhj6h3Pw4dHt5opwE5u
> jjVoRS6R8kG47gpvqioSies7Cs1N/6bgr1EONM+IQy9fsRdlYbB36h3zCIb0iCI7
> U8CIVCKDCZ0pCXGuwbOkdx4W4qG9FOePjl7vaeF7favrxAl9TYZFOhxoEp0TF8Ss
> oaF0efGkUA0dAmWv4lUaCF24FIJ1h78gZeCx7RLgn4gGr949CeBYhnU8Ealh5nPv
> YPrXLF446ZcgJhbL8bgjxMhBZYJlVTJPxpIpwHyRaLzaM6lI0XJqjtDP9oHRlDTT
> EKwBaP9Pv4MUK5rd5dsXG6OPwflIRBBJVw4ryNj/KL6Ud74KjtLkY5NdG8O6Bgw9
> J/8Pbr92hfBXWo66zr09dx4iEZL7R0xXp0zvbruXHm1oJqsIXFYR76EPsi8Yd+yp
> kD7UszdcIG+3aOS48sxGEW6hFRTbWfDy6/uVYks+2/2Vmv6vGelRXzPQ8S3EKpwx
> uWVHTCx7SSMsDvKDt7lmOvxR8u/5Gs3E4y7Eg21yX9pLSBEuh+OijNuVT9o9JXJU
> UKarbJcBdMD/SgENqVyz
> =uyHq
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
>


Bug#607988: what version are you reporting a bug against?

2010-12-27 Thread David Bremner
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 11:28:10 +1100, dave b  wrote:
> On 28 December 2010 04:32, David Bremner  wrote:
> >
> > In your first message, you say 2.6.6-6.
> >
> > In your second message, there is output showing 2.6.6-3+squeeze4
> >
> > Was the bug actually reported on the machine where the problem occurs?
> 
> Clearly it is 2.6.6-3+squeeze4 - sorry for any confusion.
> 

Ah right. python2.6 is version 2.6.6-6 but python-minimal is version
2.6.6-3+squeeze4.

d





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#608160: wraplinux: FTBFS: needs libc6-dev-i386 for gnu/stubs-32.h on amd64

2010-12-27 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
"Aaron M. Ucko"  writes:

> Adding a build dependency on libc6-dev-i386 [amd64] should address

Upon further consideration, I'd instead suggest build-depending on
gcc-multilib, either just on amd64 or unconditionally (as appropriate).

-- 
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?...@monk.mit.edu



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#608160: wraplinux: FTBFS: needs libc6-dev-i386 for gnu/stubs-32.h on amd64

2010-12-27 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Package: wraplinux
Version: 1.7-2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source

AMD64 builds of wraplinux in minimal environments (such as the
autobuilders) are failing with the error

/usr/include/gnu/stubs.h:7:27: error: gnu/stubs-32.h: No such file or directory

Adding a build dependency on libc6-dev-i386 [amd64] should address
that, but I would recommend checking whether any others might be
missing.  Conversely, you might also need a build dependency on
libc6-dev-amd64 [i386] if the tool is fully universal.

Could you please take a look?

Thanks!

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#607737: tagging for squeeze

2010-12-27 Thread Julien Cristau
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 607737 squeeze-will-remove
kthxbye

Hi,

libuninum5 has two reverse dependencies, numconv (same source) and
msort.  Same maintainer, no maintainer upload since Feb 2009 (for msort)
and Apr 2008 (libuninum).  libuninum seems dead upstream (2.7 seems to
be from Dec 2007), msort had a 8.53 release in Jan 2010 which is not
packaged.  So I'm leaning towards removing both of them from squeeze.

As far as the bugfix, somebody should probably check whether msort
actually works on 64bit archs with the current libuninum, and if it does
make sure the fix doesn't break it.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#595701: marked as done (ghostscript: CVE-2010-2055 code loaded from current directory)

2010-12-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 28 Dec 2010 00:32:23 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#584653: fixed in ghostscript 8.71~dfsg2-6.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #584653,
regarding ghostscript: CVE-2010-2055 code loaded from current directory
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
584653: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=584653
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ghostscript
Version: 8.71~dfsg2-6
Severity: serious
Tags: security

Hi,

The following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was
published for ghostscript.  There are a bunch of upstream patches for
this [1]. Marking the bug as serious for now since the issue should be
fixed before squeeze's release since it will be very painful to fix
after that.

CVE-2010-2055[0]:
| Ghostscript 8.71 and earlier reads initialization files from the
| current working directory, which allows local users to execute
| arbitrary PostScript commands via a Trojan horse file, related to
| improper support for the -P- option to the gs program.

If you fix the vulnerability please also make sure to include the
CVE id in your changelog entry.

For further information see:

[0] http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2010-2055
http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2010-2055
[1] http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691350


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ghostscript
Source-Version: 8.71~dfsg2-6.1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ghostscript, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

ghostscript-cups_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_i386.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript-cups_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_i386.deb
ghostscript-doc_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_all.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript-doc_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_all.deb
ghostscript-x_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_i386.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript-x_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_i386.deb
ghostscript_8.71~dfsg2-6.1.debian.tar.gz
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript_8.71~dfsg2-6.1.debian.tar.gz
ghostscript_8.71~dfsg2-6.1.dsc
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript_8.71~dfsg2-6.1.dsc
ghostscript_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_i386.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_i386.deb
gs-common_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_all.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/gs-common_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_all.deb
gs-esp_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_all.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/gs-esp_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_all.deb
gs-gpl_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_all.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/gs-gpl_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_all.deb
libgs-dev_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_i386.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/libgs-dev_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_i386.deb
libgs8_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_i386.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/libgs8_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 584...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Michael Gilbert  (supplier of updated ghostscript 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 21:40:17 -0500
Source: ghostscript
Binary: ghostscript gs-esp gs-gpl gs-common ghostscript-cups ghostscript-x 
ghostscript-doc libgs8 libgs-dev
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 8.71~dfsg2-6.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jonas Smedegaard 
Changed-By: Michael Gilbert 
Description: 
 ghostscript - The GPL Ghostscript PostScript/PDF interpreter
 ghostscript-cups - The GPL Ghostscript PostScript/PDF interpreter - CUPS 
filters
 ghostscript-doc - The GPL Ghostscript PostScript/PDF interpreter - 
Documentation
 ghostscript-x - The GPL Ghostscript PostScript/PDF interpreter - X Display 
suppor
 gs-common  - Dummy package depending on ghostscript
 gs-esp - Transitional package
 gs-gpl - Transitional package
 libgs-dev  - The Ghostscript PostScript Library - Development Files
 libgs8 - The Ghostscript PostScript/PDF interpreter Library
Closes: 584653 584663
Changes: 
 ghostscript (8.71~dfsg2-6.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Fix various aspects of CVE-2010-2055:
 - Honor -P- command-line option (closes: #584653).
 - Set SEARCH_HERE_FIRST=0 by default (closes: #584663).
Checksums-Sha1: 
 7d823b1ad35c908490ef0e61ebb437f8460660cc 1810 ghostscript_8.71~dfsg2-6.1.dsc
 9afb852a093aa615c5f59751e9f6b71dea3

Bug#584663: marked as done (ghostscript: insecure defaults for path searching)

2010-12-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 28 Dec 2010 00:32:23 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#584663: fixed in ghostscript 8.71~dfsg2-6.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #584663,
regarding ghostscript: insecure defaults for path searching
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
584663: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=584663
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ghostscript
Version: 8.62.dfsg.1-3.2
Severity: grave
Tags: security

Ghostscript defaults to -P, that is to look for all files in the
current directory first. As this means that especially gs_init.ps
which is responsible for all security measures like honoring -dSAFER
can be replaced by a file in the local directory, it is relatively
easy to cause harm this way.

One can argue that every gs user should get this right, but given
that most don't (not even gs' helper scripts, I'll file an different
bug report about that), I really think the default should change.

see: http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691339 for upstream's
opinion.

For testing note that due to http://bugs.debian.org/584653
-P- has no effect on gs_init.ps, so programs calling gs will even
be insecure if they are "fixed" to use -P-.

Bernhard R. Link


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ghostscript
Source-Version: 8.71~dfsg2-6.1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ghostscript, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

ghostscript-cups_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_i386.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript-cups_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_i386.deb
ghostscript-doc_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_all.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript-doc_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_all.deb
ghostscript-x_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_i386.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript-x_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_i386.deb
ghostscript_8.71~dfsg2-6.1.debian.tar.gz
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript_8.71~dfsg2-6.1.debian.tar.gz
ghostscript_8.71~dfsg2-6.1.dsc
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript_8.71~dfsg2-6.1.dsc
ghostscript_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_i386.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_i386.deb
gs-common_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_all.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/gs-common_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_all.deb
gs-esp_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_all.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/gs-esp_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_all.deb
gs-gpl_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_all.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/gs-gpl_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_all.deb
libgs-dev_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_i386.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/libgs-dev_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_i386.deb
libgs8_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_i386.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/libgs8_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 584...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Michael Gilbert  (supplier of updated ghostscript 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 21:40:17 -0500
Source: ghostscript
Binary: ghostscript gs-esp gs-gpl gs-common ghostscript-cups ghostscript-x 
ghostscript-doc libgs8 libgs-dev
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 8.71~dfsg2-6.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jonas Smedegaard 
Changed-By: Michael Gilbert 
Description: 
 ghostscript - The GPL Ghostscript PostScript/PDF interpreter
 ghostscript-cups - The GPL Ghostscript PostScript/PDF interpreter - CUPS 
filters
 ghostscript-doc - The GPL Ghostscript PostScript/PDF interpreter - 
Documentation
 ghostscript-x - The GPL Ghostscript PostScript/PDF interpreter - X Display 
suppor
 gs-common  - Dummy package depending on ghostscript
 gs-esp - Transitional package
 gs-gpl - Transitional package
 libgs-dev  - The Ghostscript PostScript Library - Development Files
 libgs8 - The Ghostscript PostScript/PDF interpreter Library
Closes: 584653 584663
Changes: 
 ghostscript (8.71~dfsg2-6.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Fix various aspects of CVE-2010-2055:
 - Honor -P- command-line option (closes: #584653).
 - Set SEARCH_HERE_FIRST=0 by default (closes: #584663).
Checksums-Sha1: 
 7d823b1ad35c908490ef0e61ebb437f8460660cc 1810 ghostscript_8.71~dfsg2-6.1.dsc
 9afb852a093aa615c5f59751e9f6b71dea31c8c6 254916 
ghostscript_8.71~dfsg2-6.1.debian.tar.gz
 70f6735a8bfc63f3aa2e339224e3bb4341d8234f 45804 gs-esp_

Bug#584653: marked as done (ghostscript: does not honor -P- option)

2010-12-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 28 Dec 2010 00:32:23 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#584653: fixed in ghostscript 8.71~dfsg2-6.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #584653,
regarding ghostscript: does not honor -P- option
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
584653: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=584653
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ghostscript
Version: 8.62.dfsg.1-3.2
Severity: grave
Tags: security

This is a different issue than ghostscript defaulting -P and not -P-,
for which I'll file an other bug report.

Ghostscript does not honor -P- for postscript system libraries.

As gs_init.ps is such an file that is also responsible for all -dSAFER
options, having such a file in the current directory means the contents
of that file are executed with full privileges.

$ ls doh
ls: cannot access doh: No such file or directory
$ cat gs_init.ps
862
(doh) (w) file
$ /usr/bin/gs -P- -dSAFER
$ ls doh
doh

(Note that for different versions of gs you need to change the number in
the first line).

See also
http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691350
and
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/05/29/2

Bernhard R. Link


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ghostscript
Source-Version: 8.71~dfsg2-6.1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ghostscript, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

ghostscript-cups_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_i386.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript-cups_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_i386.deb
ghostscript-doc_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_all.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript-doc_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_all.deb
ghostscript-x_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_i386.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript-x_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_i386.deb
ghostscript_8.71~dfsg2-6.1.debian.tar.gz
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript_8.71~dfsg2-6.1.debian.tar.gz
ghostscript_8.71~dfsg2-6.1.dsc
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript_8.71~dfsg2-6.1.dsc
ghostscript_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_i386.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_i386.deb
gs-common_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_all.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/gs-common_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_all.deb
gs-esp_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_all.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/gs-esp_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_all.deb
gs-gpl_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_all.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/gs-gpl_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_all.deb
libgs-dev_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_i386.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/libgs-dev_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_i386.deb
libgs8_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_i386.deb
  to main/g/ghostscript/libgs8_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 584...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Michael Gilbert  (supplier of updated ghostscript 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 21:40:17 -0500
Source: ghostscript
Binary: ghostscript gs-esp gs-gpl gs-common ghostscript-cups ghostscript-x 
ghostscript-doc libgs8 libgs-dev
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 8.71~dfsg2-6.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jonas Smedegaard 
Changed-By: Michael Gilbert 
Description: 
 ghostscript - The GPL Ghostscript PostScript/PDF interpreter
 ghostscript-cups - The GPL Ghostscript PostScript/PDF interpreter - CUPS 
filters
 ghostscript-doc - The GPL Ghostscript PostScript/PDF interpreter - 
Documentation
 ghostscript-x - The GPL Ghostscript PostScript/PDF interpreter - X Display 
suppor
 gs-common  - Dummy package depending on ghostscript
 gs-esp - Transitional package
 gs-gpl - Transitional package
 libgs-dev  - The Ghostscript PostScript Library - Development Files
 libgs8 - The Ghostscript PostScript/PDF interpreter Library
Closes: 584653 584663
Changes: 
 ghostscript (8.71~dfsg2-6.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Fix various aspects of CVE-2010-2055:
 - Honor -P- command-line option (closes: #584653).
 - Set SEARCH_HERE_FIRST=0 by default (closes: #584663).
Checksums-Sha1: 
 7d823b1ad35c908490ef0e61ebb437f8460660cc 1810 ghostscript_8.71~dfsg2-6.1.dsc
 9afb852a093aa615c5f59751e9f6b71dea31c8c6 254916 
ghostscript_8.71~dfsg2-6.1.debian.tar.gz
 70f6735a8bfc63f3aa2e339224e3bb4341d8234f 45804 gs-esp_8.71~dfsg2-6.1_all.deb
 dd0738cf1f3620b1fb166f

Processed: Re: Bug#598234: emacs23.2+1-7 installes on loongson

2010-12-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was 
jcris...@debian.org).
> usertag 598234 squeeze-can-defer
Bug#598234: emacs23-nox: emacs fails to install on mipsel
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: squeeze-can-defer.
> tag 598234 squeeze-ignore
Bug #598234 [emacs23-nox] emacs23-nox: emacs fails to install on mipsel
Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore.
> kthxbye
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
598234: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=598234
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#598234: emacs23.2+1-7 installes on loongson

2010-12-27 Thread Julien Cristau
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 598234 squeeze-can-defer
tag 598234 squeeze-ignore
kthxbye

On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:18:47 +0100, Christoph Egger wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> I've just updated the loongson box again and emacs23 (23.2+1-7) does
> now install (but not emacs23-nox).
> 
This seems to only be an issue for loongson (at least as far as I can
tell from the reports).  They seem to have various hardware issues
anyway, so I'll ignore this for squeeze.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#607988: what version are you reporting a bug against?

2010-12-27 Thread dave b
On 28 December 2010 04:32, David Bremner  wrote:
>
> In your first message, you say 2.6.6-6.
>
> In your second message, there is output showing 2.6.6-3+squeeze4
>
> Was the bug actually reported on the machine where the problem occurs?

Clearly it is 2.6.6-3+squeeze4 - sorry for any confusion.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#606791: Full install/removal/upgrade test results available

2010-12-27 Thread Ian Jackson
Mike Hommey writes ("Re: Full install/removal/upgrade test results available"):
> Unfortunately, while some cases were fixed, the original case for which
> the pre-depends was added fails again :(
> 
> (starting from xulrunner-1.9.1 already installed, and installing
> python-xpcom, case which I forgot to test before my last uploads)
> Unpacking python-xpcom (from
> .../python-xpcom_1%3a0.0~hg20100212-3_amd64.deb) ...
> Processing triggers for xulrunner-1.9.1 ...
> Obtaining the module object from Python failed.
> 
> : No module named xpcom.server
> Obtaining the module object from Python failed.

So the problem is that python-xpcom does not work when it has been
previously installed, and then during an upgrade the new version has
been unpacked but not configured ?

If you add a dependency from xulrunner to python-xpcom this problem
ought to go away (although if that would lead to a circular dependency
the situation is more complicated as dpkg will need to break the
cycle).

Ian.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: user release.debian....@packages.debian.org, usertagging 593083, tagging 593083

2010-12-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was 
jcris...@debian.org).
> usertags 593083 + squeeze-can-defer
Bug#593083: udev - system hangs at login screen
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: squeeze-can-defer.
> tags 593083 + squeeze-ignore
Bug #593083 [udev] udev - system hangs at login screen
Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
593083: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=593083
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#593083: system hangs at graphical login

2010-12-27 Thread Julien Cristau
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 598083 squeeze-can-defer
tag 598083 squeeze-ignore
kthxbye

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 03:22:10 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:

> severity 593083 critical
> thanks
> 
> On Nov 24, Rodrigo Fresneda  wrote:
> 
> > I noticed udev complains of having been started twice, and
> > in fact there were two identical S02udev scripts, one in
> > rcS.d and the other in rc2.d.
> > Removing the one in rc2.d solves the problem.
> Indeed, I missed from the original bug report that the submitter renamed
> the rc2.d script, not the rcS.d one.
> The underlying problem is: what could cause a S02udev symlink to appear
> in rc2.d? udev never requested this, ever.
> Could this have been caused by a update-rc.d bug?
> 
> As I understand, this bug was experienced by multiple users who upgraded
> from squeeze to squeeze so it justifies the original severity.
> 
It seems that this bug is still not understood, and not readily
reproducible, so I don't think we should delay squeeze for it.  If/when
a fix becomes available it can still be considered, either before the
release or for a point update.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#606993: [Python-apps-team] Bug#606993: subdownloader: always fail to download selected subs

2010-12-27 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 15:10:28 +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:

> Even if the bug is annoying, I don't think it deserves an RC severity
> in Debian: anynow against downgrading it to important?
> 
If that means the program is unable to handle non-ascii filenames, then
grave sounds correct to me.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#542915: pbuilder removes data from bind-mounted directories

2010-12-27 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 05:04:02PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> do you plan on NMUing pbuilder for this bug?

No, I don't consider it appropriate to NMU for an RC bug that I raised the
severity on, withouth the acknowledgement of the maintainer that the
severity is justified.  Someone else NMUing is a vote that the severity is
justified.

- Matt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#606706: netams: installation fails

2010-12-27 Thread Alexander GQ Gerasiov
Hello, Julien.

On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 19:41:50 +0100
Julien Cristau  wrote:

> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
> usertag 606706 squeeze-will-remove
> kthxbye
> 
> On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 01:40:04 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> 
> > > Setting up netams (3.4.5-2) ...
> > > + set -e
> > > + . /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
> > > + [ !  ]
> > > + PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1
> > > + export PERL_DL_NONLAZY
> > > + [  ]
> > > +
> > > exec /usr/share/debconf/frontend /var/lib/dpkg/info/netams.postinst
> > > configure dpkg: error processing netams (--configure): subprocess
> > > installed post-installation script returned error exit status 30
> 
> Unless this gets fixed very soon, I'll schedule netams for removal
> from squeeze.
FYI: I'm going to upload the fix in few days.

-- 
Best regards,
 Alexander GQ Gerasiov

 Contacts:
 e-mail:g...@cs.msu.su Jabber:  g...@jabber.ru
 Homepage:  http://gq.net.ru ICQ: 7272757
 PGP fingerprint: 04B5 9D90 DF7C C2AB CD49  BAEA CA87 E9E8 2AAC 33F1



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#607801: marked as done (snort-common: fails to install)

2010-12-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 27 Dec 2010 22:02:24 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#607801: fixed in snort 2.8.5.2-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #607801,
regarding snort-common: fails to install
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
607801: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=607801
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: snort-common
Version: 2.8.5.2-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o

Hi, 

during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As per 
definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for a 
release, thus the severity.

From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):

  Selecting previously deselected package snort-common.
  (Reading database ... 7591 files and directories currently installed.)
  Unpacking snort-common (from .../snort-common_2.8.5.2-3_all.deb) ...
  touch: cannot touch `/etc/snort/database.conf': No such file or directory
  dpkg: error 
processing /var/cache/apt/archives/snort-common_2.8.5.2-3_all.deb (--unpack):
   subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
  configured to not write apport reports
  Errors were encountered while processing:
   /var/cache/apt/archives/snort-common_2.8.5.2-3_all.deb
  E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)


cheers,
Holger
Start: 2010-12-20 20:49:57 UTC

Package: snort-common
Priority: optional
Section: net
Installed-Size: 356
Maintainer: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a 
Architecture: all
Source: snort
Version: 2.8.5.2-3
Replaces: snort (<< 1.8.4beta1-1)
Depends: perl-modules, debconf (>= 0.5) | debconf-2.0, lsb-base
Pre-Depends: adduser (>= 3.11)
Suggests: snort-doc
Conflicts: snort (<< 2.8.5.2-3)
Filename: pool/main/s/snort/snort-common_2.8.5.2-3_all.deb
Size: 164298
MD5sum: 7bba7b2a10425f391a67111b1451037b
SHA1: d2b9df3fa447c3207ff6f8a84673ed3d19b6682d
SHA256: 1b1ecf13cab89c2c749b7c19e2094cbc7f9cb7f679a83f49894a818be4d25169
Description: flexible Network Intrusion Detection System [common files]
 Snort is a libpcap-based packet sniffer/logger which can be used as a
 lightweight network intrusion detection system. It features rules
 based logging and can perform content searching/matching in addition
 to being used to detect a variety of other attacks and probes, such
 as buffer overflows, stealth port scans, CGI attacks, SMB probes, and
 much more. Snort has a real-time alerting capability, with alerts being
 sent to syslog, a separate "alert" file, or even to a Windows computer
 via Samba.
 .
 This is a common package which holds cron jobs, tools and config files used
 by all Snort-based packages.
Homepage: http://www.snort.org/
Tag: admin::logging, admin::monitoring, interface::daemon, role::app-data, security::ids, special::auto-inst-parts, use::monitor

Executing: sudo /org/piuparts.debian.org/sbin/piuparts --warn-symlinks --warn-on-others --skip-logrotatefiles-test --scriptsdir /etc/piuparts/scripts/ --tmpdir /org/piuparts.debian.org/tmp -ad sid -b sid.tar.gz --mirror http://piatti.debian.org/debian/ snort-common
Guessed: debian
0m0.0s INFO: --
0m0.0s INFO: To quickly glance what went wrong, scroll down to the bottom of this logfile.
0m0.0s INFO: FAQ available at http://wiki.debian.org/piuparts/FAQ
0m0.0s INFO: --
0m0.0s INFO: piuparts version 0.39~201012191351 starting up.
0m0.0s INFO: Command line arguments: /org/piuparts.debian.org/sbin/piuparts --warn-symlinks --warn-on-others --skip-logrotatefiles-test --scriptsdir /etc/piuparts/scripts/ --tmpdir /org/piuparts.debian.org/tmp -ad sid -b sid.tar.gz --mirror http://piatti.debian.org/debian/ snort-common
0m0.0s INFO: Running on: Linux piatti 2.6.32.27-dsa-amd64 #1 SMP Mon Dec 13 10:07:36 UTC 2010 x86_64
0m0.0s DEBUG: Created temporary directory /org/piuparts.debian.org/tmp/tmpSUkaxC
0m0.0s DEBUG: Unpacking sid.tar.gz into /org/piuparts.debian.org/tmp/tmpSUkaxC
0m0.0s DEBUG: Starting command: ['tar', '-C', '/org/piuparts.debian.org/tmp/tmpSUkaxC', '-zxf', 'sid.tar.gz']
0m2.0s DEBUG: Command ok: ['tar', '-C', '/org/piuparts.debian.org/tmp/tmpSUkaxC', '-zxf', 'sid.tar.gz']
0m2.0s DEBUG: Created policy-rc.d and chmodded it.
0m2.0s DEBUG: Starting command: ['chroot', '/org/piuparts.debian.org/tmp/tmpSUkaxC', 'apt-get', 'update']
0m4.5s DUMP: 
  Get:1 http://piatti.debian.org sid Release.gpg [835 B]
  Ign http://piatti.debian.org/debian/ si

Bug#540512: Bug#538822: dash and local diversions

2010-12-27 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Adam D. Barratt dixit:

>I put together a proposed patch (attached) for the Release Notes,

Looks good to me, thanks. (Indeed, I should have known the issue,
but forgot that these were its symptoms.)

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
Support mksh as /bin/sh and RoQA dash NOW!
‣ src:bash (241 (259) bugs: 0 RC, 172 (187) I&N, 69 (82) M&W, 0 F&P)
‣ src:dash (74 (82) bugs: 3 (4) RC, 51 (57) I&N, 20 (21) M&W, 0 F&P)
‣ src:mksh (4 bugs: 0 RC, 0 I&N, 4 M&W, 0 F&P)



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#538822: dash and local diversions

2010-12-27 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 18:29 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> the release notes for squeeze will need to mention that any local
> diversions of /bin/sh need to be removed prior to the upgrade.  Any more
> tweaking of this code path to support other shells as /bin/sh, if at all
> necessary, will wait for post-squeeze.

I put together a proposed patch (attached) for the Release Notes,
listing this as a potential problem in the "Issues to be aware of"
section; comments welcome.

Regards,

Adam
commit f5f495cd9ac7f5ca1329321632e18ea3661babcc
Author: Adam D. Barratt 
Date:   Mon Dec 27 21:17:15 2010 +

Add discussion of previous diversions of /bin/sh breaking dash upgrades

See Debian bugs #538822 and #540512

diff --git a/en/issues.dbk b/en/issues.dbk
index 9498399..83f1408 100644
--- a/en/issues.dbk
+++ b/en/issues.dbk
@@ -244,6 +244,34 @@ works for root.
   
 
 
+
+  Potential issues with diversions of /bin/sh
+  
+If you have previously added a local diversion for /bin/sh,
+or modified the /bin/sh symlink to point to somewhere
+other than /bin/bash, then you may encounter problems
+when upgrading the dash or
+bash packages.
+Note that this includes changes made by allowing other packages (for example
+mksh) to become the default system
+shell by taking over /bin/sh.
+  
+  
+If you encounter any such issues, please remove the local diversion and
+ensure that the symlinks for both /bin/sh and its
+manual page point to the files provided by the 
+bash package and then
+dpkg-reconfigure --force dash.
+  
+  
+dpkg-divert --remove /bin/sh
+dpkg-divert --remove /usr/share/man/man1/sh.1.gz
+
+ln -sf bash /bin/sh
+ln -sf bash.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/sh.1.gz
+  
+
+
 
 
 


Bug#607071: Bug #607071 reproducible on testing

2010-12-27 Thread Vivek Dasmohapatra

Reproduced here:

Package: octave-symbolic
Priority: optional
Section: math
Installed-Size: 988
Maintainer: Debian Octave Group 
Architecture: amd64
Source: octave-symbolic (1.0.9-1)
Version: 1.0.9-1+b1

vi...@noise:~$ octave
GNU Octave, version 3.2.4
Copyright (C) 2009 John W. Eaton and others.
This is free software; see the source code for copying conditions.
There is ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  For details, type `warranty'.

Octave was configured for "x86_64-pc-linux-gnu".

Additional information about Octave is available at http://www.octave.org.

Please contribute if you find this software useful.
For more information, visit http://www.octave.org/help-wanted.html

Report bugs to  (but first, please read
http://www.octave.org/bugs.html to learn how to write a helpful report).

For information about changes from previous versions, type `news'.

octave:1> x = sym("x");
octave:2> x+2
error: T& Array::checkelem (0, -1, 2): range error
octave:2> Sin(x)
panic: Segmentation fault -- stopping myself...
attempting to save variables to `octave-core'...
error: octave_base_value::save_binary(): wrong type argument `ex'
save to `octave-core' complete
Segmentation fault




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: notfixed 606781 in 1.1.5-1

2010-12-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> notfixed 606781 1.1.5-1
Bug #606781 {Done: Arthur de Jong } [viewvc] viewvc: 
package fails to upgrade properly from lenny
Bug No longer marked as fixed in versions 1.1.5-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
606781: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606781
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: notfixed 606781 in viewvc/1.1.5-1.1

2010-12-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> notfixed 606781 viewvc/1.1.5-1.1
Bug #606781 {Done: Arthur de Jong } [viewvc] viewvc: 
package fails to upgrade properly from lenny
Bug No longer marked as fixed in versions viewvc/1.1.5-1.1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
606781: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606781
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: fixed 606781 in viewvc/1.1.5-1.1

2010-12-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> fixed 606781 viewvc/1.1.5-1.1
Bug #606781 {Done: Arthur de Jong } [viewvc] viewvc: 
package fails to upgrade properly from lenny
Bug Marked as fixed in versions viewvc/1.1.5-1.1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
606781: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606781
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#607071: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#607071: octave-symbolic: Segfaults, doesn't work at all

2010-12-27 Thread Geoff Gole
fwiw, I can reproduce this.

$ apt-get install octave-symbolic
...
$ octave
GNU Octave, version 3.0.1
Copyright (C) 2008 John W. Eaton and others.
This is free software; see the source code for copying conditions.
There is ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; not even for MERCHANTIBILITY or
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  For details, type `warranty'.

Octave was configured for "i486-pc-linux-gnu".

Additional information about Octave is available at http://www.octave.org.

Please contribute if you find this software useful.
For more information, visit http://www.octave.org/help-wanted.html

Report bugs to  (but first, please read
http://www.octave.org/bugs.html to learn how to write a helpful report).

For information about changes from previous versions, type `news'.

octave:1> x = sym("x")
x =

x
octave:2>  x+2
error: T& Array::checkelem (0, -1, 2): range error
error: binary operator `+' not implemented for `ex' by `scalar' operations
error: evaluating binary operator `+' near line 2, column 3
octave:2> Sin(x)
error: Internal error: statement in file ./real/elem/cl_R_mul.cc, line
93 has been reached!!
Please send the authors of the program a description how you produced
this error!



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#606295: squeeze blocker: Bug#606295: libhibernate3-java: FTBFS: maven-related errors

2010-12-27 Thread Julien Cristau
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 606295 squeeze-is-blocker
kthxbye

On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 00:26:26 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:

> This needs to be fixed for squeeze, we can't support this package if it
> can't be built; and there's a bunch of reverse dependencies so removal
> looks painful.  Adding debian-java to cc, help is needed to fix
> libhibernate3-java's build.
> 
Now tagging as blocker, and adding -devel to cc, hopefully somebody can
look into this.

> On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 13:14:30 -0430, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> 
> > tags 606295 + confirmed help
> > thanks
> > 
> > On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 09:08:48AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > Source: libhibernate3-java
> > > Version: 3.5.4.Final-4
> > > Severity: serious
> > > Tags: squeeze sid
> > > User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> > > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20101207 qa-ftbfs
> > > Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> > > amd64.
> > > 
> > > Relevant part:
> > >
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > > [INFO] Compilation failure
> > > > /build/user-libhibernate3-java_3.5.4.Final-4-amd64-X7BsRy/libhibernate3-java-3.5.4.Final/entitymanager/src/main/java/org/hibernate/ejb/criteria/path/AbstractPathImpl.java:[194,39]
> > > >  invalid inferred types for M; inferred type does not conform to 
> > > > declared bound(s)
> > > > inferred: java.util.Map
> > > > bound(s): java.util.Map
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > The relevant error message is the one shown above.
> > 
> > I suspect this failure is because IcedTea 1.8.2 got more
> > strict with type inference and generics code. I say this
> > since I can rebuild this package without problems with
> > 1.8.1. Thus, this FTBFS is present in sid and squeeze.
> > 
> > This bug seems to be very similar to #602362.
> > The problematic code involves the usage of Java generics and
> > since I'm not very experienced with that kind of code I'm
> > asking for help.
> > 
> > Additionaly, the patch debian-changes-3.5.4.Final-4 included
> > in the last upload seems incorrect to me. It reverts many
> > changes introduced in 3.5.4 to 3.5.2. I think this mistake
> > is due the upstream branch of the git repo where this
> > package is maintained is outdated.
> > 

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#606778: sarg: package fails to upgrade properly from lenny

2010-12-27 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 606778 squeeze-will-remove
kthxbye

On 12/11/2010 06:48 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> 
> While testing the installation of all packages in squeeze, I ran
> into the following problem:
> 

Tagging as candidate for removal, will do that in a few days if no fix
is in sight (including issues pointed out by Sven Hoexter).

Regards,

-- 
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#603827: debdiff for NMU for 603827

2010-12-27 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:

> Attached is the patch i used against runit 2.1.1-6 for NMUing #603827
> (uploaded just now on 2010-12-26).
[...]
> --- a/debian/changelog
> +++ b/debian/changelog
> @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
> +runit (2.1.1-6.1) local; urgency=low

Thanks!  The final debdiff used is attached for reference.
diff -u runit-2.1.1/debian/changelog runit-2.1.1/debian/changelog
--- runit-2.1.1/debian/changelog
+++ runit-2.1.1/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+runit (2.1.1-6.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-Maintainer Upload.
+  * debian/runit.config: skip preconfiguration if ps is not
+installed. (Thanks, Jonathan Nieder )
+  * debian/control: Depends: procps (closes: #603827).
+
+ -- Daniel Kahn Gillmor   Sun, 26 Dec 2010 14:19:53 -0500
+
 runit (2.1.1-6) unstable; urgency=high
 
   * debian/rules: don't set -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 on sparc (fixes
diff -u runit-2.1.1/debian/control runit-2.1.1/debian/control
--- runit-2.1.1/debian/control
+++ runit-2.1.1/debian/control
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 
 Package: runit
 Architecture: any
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}
+Depends: procps, ${shlibs:Depends}
 Recommends: fgetty
 Suggests: runit-run, socklog-run
 Description: system-wide service supervision
diff -u runit-2.1.1/debian/runit.config runit-2.1.1/debian/runit.config
--- runit-2.1.1/debian/runit.config
+++ runit-2.1.1/debian/runit.config
@@ -14,6 +14,8 @@
-if `ps -p 1 >/dev/null`; then
-  db_input low runit/signalinit || :
-else
-  db_input high runit/signalinit || :
+if which ps >/dev/null 2>&1; then
+  if ps -p 1 >/dev/null; then
+db_input low runit/signalinit || :
+  else
+db_input high runit/signalinit || :
+  fi
+  db_go || :
 fi
-db_go || :


Bug#606791: Full install/removal/upgrade test results available

2010-12-27 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 09:08:14PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lundi 27 décembre 2010 à 18:57 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit : 
> > On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 08:36:38PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > You could use dpkg-trigger to force the trigger to be run after
> > > xulrunner-1.9.1 being installed.
> > 
> > Unfortunately, while some cases were fixed, the original case for which
> > the pre-depends was added fails again :(
> 
> > Yes, the xulrunner-1.9.1 trigger happens right after unpack... before
> > python-xpcom's postinst g. I'm starting to hate dpkg triggers.
> 
> Maybe you want dpkg-trigger --no-await ?

Point is, xulrunner is already installed, thus its postinst is not what
triggers.

Mike



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#607071: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#607071: octave-symbolic: Segfaults, doesn't work at all

2010-12-27 Thread Thomas Weber
package octave-symbolic
tags 607071 unreproducible
severity 607071 important
thanks

On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 08:32:27AM -0600, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> On 26 December 2010 17:08, Julien Cristau  wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 07:55:58 -0600, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> >
> >> This report is mostly a reminder to myself to either fix the package,
> >> or to the release managers to remove this package from squeeze if I
> >> don't manage to fix it before then.
> >>
> > Tagging as candidate for removal, will do that in a few days if no fix
> > is in sight.

I'm downgrading this bug. I can't reproduce it neither in an amd64
chroot nor an i386 physical installation.

Jordi, can you check your local installation? Maybe there's some other
package interfering here. 

Thomas



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#606791: Full install/removal/upgrade test results available

2010-12-27 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 27 décembre 2010 à 18:57 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit : 
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 08:36:38PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > You could use dpkg-trigger to force the trigger to be run after
> > xulrunner-1.9.1 being installed.
> 
> Unfortunately, while some cases were fixed, the original case for which
> the pre-depends was added fails again :(

> Yes, the xulrunner-1.9.1 trigger happens right after unpack... before
> python-xpcom's postinst g. I'm starting to hate dpkg triggers.

Maybe you want dpkg-trigger --no-await ?

-- 
 .''`.  Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `'  “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone,
  `-[…] I will see what I can do for you.”  -- Jörg Schilling


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Processed: tagging 603048

2010-12-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 603048 + pending
Bug #603048 [rails] rails: Gives dangerous advice regarding log permissions
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #603048 to the same tags previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
603048: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=603048
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: tagging 606370, tagging 606379, tagging 606995

2010-12-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Already squeeze-can-deferred
> tags 606370 + squeeze-ignore
Bug #606370 [libcgi-pm-perl] CVE-2010-2761 CVE-2010-4410 CVE-2010-4411
Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore.
> tags 606379 + squeeze-ignore
Bug #606379 [libcgi-simple-perl] CVE-2010-2761 CVE-2010-4410
Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore.
> tags 606995 + squeeze-ignore
Bug #606995 [perl-modules] CVE-2010-2761 CVE-2010-4410 CVE-2010-4411
Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
606995: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606995
606379: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606379
606370: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606370
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#605777: Bug#607662: ncurses-base: backspace key deletes forwards on the kFreeBSD console

2010-12-27 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-12-27 19:51 +0100, Petr Salinger wrote:

>>> The cons25-debian seems be fine for me, as it should be only local
>>> change for one release of Debian GNU/kFreeBSD. The next one will not
>>> use it.
>>
>> Any name is fine with me as long as ncurses upstream accepts it.
>
> The next debian release will be based on FreeBSD 9.x kernel, with
> TERM=xterm, so IMHO, this name even do not need to be in upstream.

Would still be nice if it were, so that Squeeze GNU/kFreeBSD users have
at least a chance that remote systems have the terminfo entry.

>>> And there is a third option, mixture of both above.
>>> As a default use the plain cons25 variant. Additionaly provide
>>> cons25-debian entry in ncurses and special debian keymap in freebsd-utils.
>>> By default it will work as variant 1, but there is a possibility
>>> to set TERM to cons25-debian and set keymap which would generate the
>>> correct sequences for cons25-debian.
>>
>> Only one keymap, or several of them?  I would not like having to use US
>> keyboard layout for correct backspace/delete keys.
>
> Or a script, which will change currently loaded keymap to policy
> conforming, roughly
>
>  kbdcontrol -d | sed ... | kbdcontrol -l

When is this script to be run, and where should people set the TERM
environment variable for it?

> So best option for now seems be to prevent
> freebsd-utils 8.1-3 from entering testing and a new upload of
> kfreebsd-8.

For the record, freebsd-utils 8.1-3 will migrate in three days if not
hindered.

Cheers,
   Sven



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#603048: rails: Gives dangerous advice regarding log permissions

2010-12-27 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 12/26/2010 09:01 PM, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> 
> Gunnar: my suggestion is to go ahead and do the upload.  The packaging
> is in collab-maint, after all, so presumably Adam expects
> collaboration :-)
> 

Meh… So, this is my intent to NMU. I'll upload tomorrow to delayed/0 if no
one yells. Not hearing back from the maintainer makes me sad…

Regards,

-- 
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#606281: Unable to launch wavesurfer

2010-12-27 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 606281 squeeze-will-remove
kthxbye

On 12/08/2010 01:36 AM, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> 
> wavesurfer seems failing to run, here is the error message:
> 

I'll get wavesurfer removed from squeeze if this bug isn't addressed in the
next few days. Tagging accordingly.

Regards,

-- 
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: Re: Bug#606708: piwigo: installation fails

2010-12-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> severity 606708 important
Bug #606708 [piwigo] piwigo: installation fails
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'

> tags 606708 + unreproducible
Bug #606708 [piwigo] piwigo: installation fails
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
606708: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606708
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#606708: piwigo: installation fails

2010-12-27 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
severity 606708 important
tags 606708 + unreproducible
thanks

On 12/26/2010 11:38 AM, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>  piwigo recommends db related packages but it seems to be needed for 
>  dbconfig-common script. After changing dependency, dbconfig-common
>  works fine as below.
> 

Well, I wasn't able to reproduce the failure in a clean Squeeze chroot.
So, I'm downgrading this bug's severity and tagging it as non reproducible.

Regards,

-- 
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#605065: ncurses-base: backspace key deletes forwards on the kFreeBSD console

2010-12-27 Thread Petr Salinger

The cons25-debian seems be fine for me, as it should be only local
change for one release of Debian GNU/kFreeBSD. The next one will not
use it.


Any name is fine with me as long as ncurses upstream accepts it.


The next debian release will be based on FreeBSD 9.x kernel, with 
TERM=xterm, so IMHO, this name even do not need to be in upstream.



And there is a third option, mixture of both above.
As a default use the plain cons25 variant. Additionaly provide
cons25-debian entry in ncurses and special debian keymap in freebsd-utils.
By default it will work as variant 1, but there is a possibility
to set TERM to cons25-debian and set keymap which would generate the
correct sequences for cons25-debian.


Only one keymap, or several of them?  I would not like having to use US
keyboard layout for correct backspace/delete keys.


Or a script, which will change currently loaded keymap to policy 
conforming, roughly


 kbdcontrol -d | sed ... | kbdcontrol -l

So best option for now seems be to prevent
freebsd-utils 8.1-3 from entering 
testing and a new upload of kfreebsd-8.


Petr



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#607387: marked as done (capiutils: fails to install: /sbin/MAKEDEV: not found)

2010-12-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 27 Dec 2010 18:17:20 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#607387: fixed in isdnutils 1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #607387,
regarding capiutils: fails to install: /sbin/MAKEDEV: not found
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
607387: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=607387
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: capiutils
Version: 1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-7
Severity: grave

Hi,

Current capiutils fails to install:

Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree   
Reading state information... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
  libcapi20-3
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  capiutils libcapi20-3
0 upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 144 kB of archives.
After this operation, 434 kB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? 
Get:1 http://debian.inode.at/debian/ sid/main libcapi20-3 amd64 
1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-7 [49.6 kB]
Get:2 http://debian.inode.at/debian/ sid/main capiutils amd64 
1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-7 [94.4 kB]
Fetched 144 kB in 0s (531 kB/s)   
Selecting previously deselected package libcapi20-3.
(Reading database ... 109122 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking libcapi20-3 (from 
.../libcapi20-3_1%3a3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-7_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package capiutils.
Unpacking capiutils (from .../capiutils_1%3a3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-7_amd64.deb) ...
Processing triggers for man-db ...
Setting up libcapi20-3 (1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-7) ...
Setting up capiutils (1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-7) ...
Note: running MAKEDEV to create CAPI devices in /dev...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/capiutils.postinst: 25: /sbin/MAKEDEV: not found
dpkg: error processing capiutils (--configure):
 subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127
configured to not write apport reports
Errors were encountered while processing: capiutils
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

Marking this grave as I believe failing to install "makes the package in 
question 
unusable or mostly so".

  Christian

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.36-rc6-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages capiutils depends on:
ii  libc62.11.2-7Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libcapi20-3  1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-7 ISDN utilities - CAPI support libr
ii  lsb-base 3.2-26  Linux Standard Base 3.2 init scrip

capiutils recommends no packages.

capiutils suggests no packages.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: isdnutils
Source-Version: 1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-8

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
isdnutils, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

capiutils_3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-8_amd64.deb
  to main/i/isdnutils/capiutils_3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-8_amd64.deb
ipppd_3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-8_amd64.deb
  to main/i/isdnutils/ipppd_3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-8_amd64.deb
isdnlog-data_3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-8_all.deb
  to main/i/isdnutils/isdnlog-data_3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-8_all.deb
isdnlog_3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-8_amd64.deb
  to main/i/isdnutils/isdnlog_3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-8_amd64.deb
isdnutils-base_3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-8_amd64.deb
  to main/i/isdnutils/isdnutils-base_3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-8_amd64.deb
isdnutils-doc_3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-8_all.deb
  to main/i/isdnutils/isdnutils-doc_3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-8_all.deb
isdnutils-xtools_3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-8_amd64.deb
  to main/i/isdnutils/isdnutils-xtools_3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-8_amd64.deb
isdnutils_3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-8.debian.tar.gz
  to main/i/isdnutils/isdnutils_3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-8.debian.tar.gz
isdnutils_3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-8.dsc
  to main/i/isdnutils/isdnutils_3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-8.dsc
isdnutils_3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-8_amd64.deb
  to main/i/isdnutils/isdnutils_3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-8_amd64.deb
isdnvbox_3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-8_amd64.deb
  to main/i/isdnutils/isdnvbox_3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-8_amd64.deb
isdnvboxclient_3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-8_amd64.deb
  to main/i/isdnutils/isdnvboxclient_3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-8_amd64.deb
isdnvboxserver_3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-8_amd64.deb
  to main/i/isdnutils/isdnvboxserver_3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-8_amd64.deb
libcapi20-3_3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-8_amd64.deb
  to main/i/isdnutils/li

Bug#606791: Full install/removal/upgrade test results available

2010-12-27 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 08:36:38PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mardi 21 décembre 2010 à 20:59 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit : 
> > Adding update-python-modules -p in python-xpcom postinst could make
> > things slightly better, but that would still leave xulrunner-1.9.1's
> > postinst complaining if it's run before python-xpcom's.
> > 
> > What if xulrunner-1.9.1's postinst would do nothing for configure ?
> > would the trigger still kick in when one installs xulrunner-1.9.1 only?
> 
> You could use dpkg-trigger to force the trigger to be run after
> xulrunner-1.9.1 being installed.

Unfortunately, while some cases were fixed, the original case for which
the pre-depends was added fails again :(

(starting from xulrunner-1.9.1 already installed, and installing
python-xpcom, case which I forgot to test before my last uploads)
Unpacking python-xpcom (from
.../python-xpcom_1%3a0.0~hg20100212-3_amd64.deb) ...
Processing triggers for xulrunner-1.9.1 ...
Obtaining the module object from Python failed.

: No module named xpcom.server
Obtaining the module object from Python failed.

: No module named xpcom.server
Setting up libncursesw5 (5.7+20100313-4) ...
Setting up libssl0.9.8 (0.9.8o-4) ...
Setting up mime-support (3.51-1) ...
update-alternatives: using /usr/bin/see to provide /usr/bin/view (view)
in auto mode.
Setting up python2.6-minimal (2.6.6-8+b1) ...
Setting up python2.6 (2.6.6-8+b1) ...
Setting up python-minimal (2.6.6-3+squeeze4) ...
Setting up python (2.6.6-3+squeeze4) ...
Setting up python-support (1.0.11) ...
Setting up libpython2.6 (2.6.6-8+b1) ...
Setting up python-xpcom (1:0.0~hg20100212-3) ...
Processing triggers for python-support ...

Yes, the xulrunner-1.9.1 trigger happens right after unpack... before
python-xpcom's postinst g. I'm starting to hate dpkg triggers.

Mike



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#607857: tex-common: Hard-coded path in proposed patch

2010-12-27 Thread Braun Gábor
Package: tex-common
Followup-For: Bug #607857

AFAIK the paths texlive uses can be freely configured by the sysadmin.
So I think the paths /var/lib/texmf/ etc in the examples are
simplification to clearly state the idea and not meant to appear
in real code.

Therefore I suggest to modify the proposed patch of ponstinst.in to 
obtain the path from the relevant configuration variable
(which I guess is TEXMFSYSVAR as this seems to be the one used by 
updmap-sys).

Best wishes,

Gábor Braun



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#605065: Bug#607662: ncurses-base: backspace key deletes forwards on the kFreeBSD console

2010-12-27 Thread Robert Millan
2010/12/27 Petr Salinger :
>
> I see two basic options:
>
> [...]
> And there is a third option, mixture of both above. [...]

There's a fourth option: backporting TEKEN_XTERM from 9-current.

(I'm not speaking in favour of it, I have no idea whether it'd be
feasible or not)

-- 
Robert Millan



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#607988: what version are you reporting a bug against?

2010-12-27 Thread David Bremner

In your first message, you say 2.6.6-6.

In your second message, there is output showing 2.6.6-3+squeeze4

Was the bug actually reported on the machine where the problem occurs?

d



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: Re: Bug#605240: tenshi: fails to upgrade from lenny

2010-12-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tag 605240 + patch
Bug #605240 [tenshi] tenshi: fails to upgrade from lenny
Bug #606789 [tenshi] tenshi: package fails to upgrade properly from lenny
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #605240 to the same tags previously set
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #606789 to the same tags previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
605240: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=605240
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#605240: tenshi: fails to upgrade from lenny

2010-12-27 Thread gregor herrmann
tag 605240 + patch
thanks

On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:49:18 +0100, Ignace Mouzannar wrote:

> I'll keep it this way, and send a request for the freeze exception
> when the package is uploaded to unstable.

The new version is on mentors.d.n:
http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=tenshi
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tenshi/tenshi_0.11-2.dsc

What keeps me from uploading is that
- Ansgar was dealing with this package already
- I'm not sure if the changes are not a bit too much for a freeze
  exception at that point

Cheers,
gregor

-- 
 .''`.   http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'   Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-NP: Pink Floyd: Us And Them


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: Re: ndoutils-nagios3-mysql upgrade patch

2010-12-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tag 607925 +patch
Bug #607925 [ndoutils-nagios3-mysql] ndoutils-nagios3-mysql: MySQL database 
schema is not updated when upgrading to 1.4b9
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
607925: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=607925
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#607925: ndoutils-nagios3-mysql upgrade patch

2010-12-27 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
tag 607925 +patch
thanks

On Mon, 27 Dec 2010 00:21:45 -0600
"Drew Scott Daniels"  wrote:

> This is presumably a one line fix in the install script for the two
> day old upgrade bug:
> 
> nstall -m 644 db/mysql-mods-1.4b5.sql \
> debian/$@/usr/share/dbconfig-common/data/ndoutils-mysql/upgrade/mysql/1.4b5
> + install -m 644 db/mysql-mods-1.4b8.sql \
> +
> debian/$@/usr/share/dbconfig-common/data/ndoutils-mysql/upgrade/mysql/1.4b9
[...]

Thanks, Drew.
The patch has to be a bit more involved as for some reason there seems
to be two upgrading scripts (-mods- and -upgrade-), and one of then
actually contains an SQL syntax error which we have to fix.
The attached patch fixed my ndoutils instance.
Upgrading 1.4b7 -> 1.4b9 also has been tested in a Squeeze sandbox.

Hendrik, are you OK with me preparing an NMU?
Index: debian/rules
===
--- debian/rules(revision 1917)
+++ debian/rules(working copy)
@@ -192,6 +192,10 @@

debian/$@/usr/share/dbconfig-common/data/ndoutils-mysql/upgrade/mysql/1.4b4
install -m 644 db/mysql-mods-1.4b5.sql \

debian/$@/usr/share/dbconfig-common/data/ndoutils-mysql/upgrade/mysql/1.4b5
+   sed -e 's/`nagios`\.//' < db/mysql-upgrade-1.4b8.sql \
+   > 
debian/$@/usr/share/dbconfig-common/data/ndoutils-mysql/upgrade/mysql/1.4b8
+   sed -e 's/^[[:space:]]*;/--/' < db/mysql-mods-1.4b8.sql \
+   >> 
debian/$@/usr/share/dbconfig-common/data/ndoutils-mysql/upgrade/mysql/1.4b8

# use debhelper
dh_installchangelogs -p$@ -P$(b)/$@


Bug#605065: Bug#607662: Bug#605065: Bug#607662: ncurses-base: backspace key deletes forwards on the kFreeBSD console

2010-12-27 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-12-27 09:52 +0100, Petr Salinger wrote:

> I see two basic options:
>
> 1) plain cons25 variant: current sysvinit, ncurses
>and kfreebsd-8 8.1+dfsg-6, freebsd-utils 8.1-2
>
> It does not conform to debian policy, the backspace/delete key is
> somewhat broken on console and somewhat broken when connection to
> other systems from console
>
> 2) cons25-debian variant: needs patched sysvinit, patched ncurses,
>and kfreebsd-8 8.1+dfsg-7, freebsd-utils 8.1-3
>
> It does conform to debian policy, the backspace/delete key works
> on console, it is needed to set TERM when connection to other systems
> from console and is somewhat broken when connection is made to other
> systems directly from console.

It seems to be a bit more broken than in the situation in 1), though.
For instance, programs that expect ^H to mean "delete previous
character" (this seems to include nano, for instance) work fine in 1),
but most text editors will be broken in 2) when run remotely.

> The cons25-debian seems be fine for me, as it should be only local
> change for one release of Debian GNU/kFreeBSD. The next one will not
> use it.

Any name is fine with me as long as ncurses upstream accepts it.

> And there is a third option, mixture of both above.
> As a default use the plain cons25 variant. Additionaly provide
> cons25-debian entry in ncurses and special debian keymap in freebsd-utils.
> By default it will work as variant 1, but there is a possibility
> to set TERM to cons25-debian and set keymap which would generate the
> correct sequences for cons25-debian.

Only one keymap, or several of them?  I would not like having to use US
keyboard layout for correct backspace/delete keys.

> This variant needs current sysvinit, patched ncurses, patched kfreebsd-8
> and patched freebsd-utils.
>
> My personal order of preferences is 3, 1, 2.
> All seems better compared to current status.

I agree with that.

Cheers,
   Sven



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: Re: Bug#607857: texlive-base: don't put files under /usr/local

2010-12-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was 
jcris...@debian.org).
> usertag 607857 squeeze-can-defer
Bug#607857: creates ls-R file in /u/l/s/texmf (policy violation)
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: squeeze-can-defer.
> tag 607857 squeeze-ignore
Bug #607857 [tex-common] creates ls-R file in /u/l/s/texmf (policy violation)
Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore.
> kthxbye
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
607857: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=607857
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#607857: texlive-base: don't put files under /usr/local

2010-12-27 Thread Julien Cristau
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 607857 squeeze-can-defer
tag 607857 squeeze-ignore
kthxbye

On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:54:10 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:

> package: texlive-base
> version: 2009-11
> severity: serious
> 
> Hi,
> 
>  I've found that texlive-base package creates files in /usr/local.
>  (thanks to piuparts)
> 
Tagging squeeze-ignore as discussed on debian-rele...@ldo.  Let's fix
this for wheezy.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: Re: Bug#579522: tasksel - Removes packages without consent

2010-12-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was 
jcris...@debian.org).
> usertag 579522 squeeze-can-defer
Bug#579522: tasksel - Removes packages without consent
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: squeeze-can-defer.
> tag 579522 squeeze-ignore
Bug #579522 [tasksel] tasksel - Removes packages without consent
Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore.
> kthxbye
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
579522: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=579522
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#579522: tasksel - Removes packages without consent

2010-12-27 Thread Julien Cristau
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 579522 squeeze-can-defer
tag 579522 squeeze-ignore
kthxbye

On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:59:49 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:

> Package: tasksel
> Version: 2.81
> Severity: grave
> 
> On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 11:09:56PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > - Task reinstallation removed packages first.
> 
> The task installation must not remove packages without approval.
> 
Not a blocker for squeeze, IMO.  Tagging accordingly.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#606777: sendfile: package fails to upgrade properly from lenny

2010-12-27 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 17:57:05 +, Chris Butler wrote:

> A patch implementing one possible fix is attached: if 
> /etc/cron.weekly/sendfile is present and its md5sum matches that of the
> original file from 2.1b.20080616-2, then remove it in preinst. dpkg is then
> happy to install the new version without prompting.
> 
Hi Chris,

are you going to NMU with this patch?

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: Re: Bug#587391: pure-ftpd-postgresql: spontanous crash

2010-12-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was 
jcris...@debian.org).
> usertag 587391 squeeze-can-defer
Bug#587391: pure-ftpd-postgresql: spontanous crash
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: squeeze-can-defer.
> tag 587391 squeeze-ignore
Bug #587391 [pure-ftpd-postgresql] pure-ftpd-postgresql: spontanous crash
Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore.
> kthxbye
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
587391: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=587391
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#607878: sbox-dtc: modifies conffiles from postinst

2010-12-27 Thread Julien Cristau
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 607878 squeeze-will-remove
kthxbye

On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 15:12:00 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:

> Package: sbox-dtc
> Version: 1.11.2-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: squeeze rc policy §3
> 
> Quoting from http://release.debian.org/squeeze/rc_policy.txt
> 
> Packages must not modify their own or other packages conffiles
> programmatically. (The only correct way to modify a conffile is
> the user running an editor specifically; if anything more automated
> is required or useful, configuration files must _NOT_ be handled as
> conffiles)
> 
> jcris...@franck:~$ dpkg -I 
> /srv/ftp-master.debian.org/ftp/pool/main/s/sbox-dtc/sbox-dtc_1.11.2-4_amd64.deb
>  conffiles
> /etc/sbox.conf
> /etc/logrotate.d/sbox-dtc
> 
> from sbox-dtc.postinst:
> searchAndReplace /etc/sbox.conf web_user\ www-data web_user\ 
> ${CONF_DTC_SYSTEM_USERNAME}
> searchAndReplace /etc/sbox.conf web_group\ www-data web_group\ 
> ${CONF_DTC_SYSTEM_GROUPNAME}
> sed -i s/www-data/${CONF_DTC_SYSTEM_USERNAME}/ 
> /etc/logrotate.d/sbox-dtc
> sed -i s/www-data/${CONF_DTC_SYSTEM_GROUPNAME}/ 
> /etc/logrotate.d/sbox-dtc
> searchAndReplace /etc/sbox.conf web_user\ ${CONF_DTC_SYSTEM_USERNAME} 
> web_user\ www-data
> searchAndReplace /etc/sbox.conf web_group\ 
> ${CONF_DTC_SYSTEM_GROUPNAME} web_group\ www-data
> sed -i s/${CONF_DTC_SYSTEM_USERNAME}/www-data/ 
> /etc/logrotate.d/sbox-dtc
> sed -i s/${CONF_DTC_SYSTEM_GROUPNAME}/www-data/ 
> /etc/logrotate.d/sbox-dtc
> 
I'll get this package out of squeeze if this isn't fixed in the next few
days.  Tagging accordingly.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#587391: pure-ftpd-postgresql: spontanous crash

2010-12-27 Thread Julien Cristau
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 587391 squeeze-can-defer
tag 587391 squeeze-ignore
kthxbye

On Mon, Aug  2, 2010 at 13:32:43 +0200, Nico Golde wrote:

> Hi,
> can you provide the configuration that is causing this as 
> well as details on how to reproduce?
> 
No reply from the submitter, bug was filed against the lenny version so
there's no evidence this affects squeeze.  As such, tagging
squeeze-ignore until more information is available.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#602975: procmeter3 (3.5c-1) SEGVs upon startup

2010-12-27 Thread Julien Cristau
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 602975 squeeze-will-remove
kthxbye

On Tue, Nov  9, 2010 at 17:48:50 -0500, John E. Davis wrote:

> Package: procmeter3
> Version: 3.5c-1
> Severity: grave
> 
> I am running an up-to-date Debian squeeze 64 system.  procmeter3 SEGVs
> right away upon startup:
> 
>$ procmeter3
>zsh: segmentation fault  procmeter3
> 
> I have no .procmeterrc file.  I suggested a severity of "grave"
> because the SEGV makes it unusable.
> 
I'll remove this package from squeeze if this bug isn't addressed in a
few days.  Tagging accordingly.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#601622: phatch-nautilus: phatch doesn't start?

2010-12-27 Thread Julien Cristau
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 601622 squeeze-will-remove
kthxbye

On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 23:05:00 +0200, Pol Hallen wrote:

> Package: phatch-nautilus
> Version: 0.2.7-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: 
> 
> 
> like subject
> 
I'll get phatch removed from squeeze if this bug isn't addressed in the
next few days.  Tagging accordingly.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#542915: pbuilder removes data from bind-mounted directories

2010-12-27 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 14:21:05 +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:

> tag 542915 +patch
> usertags 542915 -in-progress +patch-in-git
> thanks
> 
> Attached is my minimal patch solving the problem of data loss in
> bind-mounted directories.  It provides a safety net that, in the event that
> *anything* is still mounted inside the chroot, no attempt to delete anything
> will be made.  Whilst this may, in some corner cases, result in failure to
> cleanup a chroot when previously (most) things would have been deleted, it
> should never effect most users.
> 
> I've exercised this patch in every way I can think of (bind-mounting things
> left and right, regular mounts, symlinks to mounts, etc) and I haven't been
> able to get it to actually delete anything any more.
> 
Hi Matt,

do you plan on NMUing pbuilder for this bug?

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: minitube: merge #606670 and #607932

2010-12-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> forcemerge 606670 607932
Bug#606670: [minitube] New upstream release fixes broken API
Bug#607932: minitube doesn't work at all
Forcibly Merged 606670 607932.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
607932: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=607932
606670: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606670
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#606370: squeeze tagging

2010-12-27 Thread Julien Cristau
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 606370 squeeze-can-defer
usertag 606379 squeeze-can-defer
usertag 606995 squeeze-can-defer
kthxbye

These bugs can be fixed through security.d.o if they're not ready by
squeeze release time, tagging accordingly.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#607921: freevo: (unowned) files in /home (after purge (policy 6.8))

2010-12-27 Thread Julien Cristau
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 607921 squeeze-will-remove
kthxbye

On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 12:46:16 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:

> If your package had only left files in /var/log after purge, I would have 
> filed this as important. But as your package creates /home/freevo (WTF?!), 
> I'm filing this as it is.
> 
> See http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#HOMEUSERHOMEDIRECTORIES 
> "/home is a fairly standard concept, but it is clearly a site-specific 
> filesystem. The setup will differ from host to host. Therefore, no program 
> should rely on this location."
> 
I'll remove freevo from squeeze in a few days if this doesn't get fixed.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: retitle 606379 to CVE-2010-2761 CVE-2010-4410

2010-12-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> retitle 606379 CVE-2010-2761 CVE-2010-4410
Bug #606379 [libcgi-simple-perl] CVE-2010-2761 CVE-2010-4410 CVE-2010-4411
Changed Bug title to 'CVE-2010-2761 CVE-2010-4410' from 'CVE-2010-2761 
CVE-2010-4410 CVE-2010-4411'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
606379: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606379
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: Re: Bug#606370: CVE-2010-2761 CVE-2010-4410 CVE-2010-4411

2010-12-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tag 606370 + patch
Bug #606370 [libcgi-pm-perl] CVE-2010-2761 CVE-2010-4410 CVE-2010-4411
Added tag(s) patch.
> tag 606995 + patch
Bug #606995 [perl-modules] CVE-2010-2761 CVE-2010-4410 CVE-2010-4411
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
606995: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606995
606370: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606370
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#606995: Bug#606370: CVE-2010-2761 CVE-2010-4410 CVE-2010-4411

2010-12-27 Thread gregor herrmann
tag 606370 + patch
tag 606995 + patch
thanks

On Mon, 27 Dec 2010 16:23:40 +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:

> > > > > http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2010-2761 
> > > > > http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2010-4410
> > > > > http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2010-4411
> > > > I'm not quite sure yet what CVE-2010-4411 refers to.  It seems that the
> > > > fix for CVE-2010-2761 was not complete, but it is not a different, new
> > > > issue?
> >  
> > https://github.com/markstos/CGI.pm/commit/77b3b2056c003edee034a2a890212edab800900d

Thanks for digging this out; I was looking a few times and never
understood CVE-2010-4411 ...

> Assuming this is the case, I'm attaching preliminary patches for

Thanks!
 
> I haven't looked at libcgi-simple-perl at all.

I think Damyan has started to look at it.


Cheers,
gregor
 
-- 
 .''`.   http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'   Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-NP: Beatles


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#583466: marked as done (gmorgan: FTBFS: *** error: gettext infrastructure mismatch: using a Makefile.in.in from gettext version 0.17 but the autoconf macros are from gettext version 0.18)

2010-12-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 27 Dec 2010 14:32:09 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#583466: fixed in gmorgan 0.27-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #583466,
regarding gmorgan: FTBFS: *** error: gettext infrastructure mismatch: using a 
Makefile.in.in from gettext version 0.17 but the autoconf macros are from 
gettext version 0.18
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
583466: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=583466
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gmorgan
Version: 0.27-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.

Relevant part:
> make[3]: Entering directory 
> `/build/user-gmorgan_0.27-1-amd64-71n1nd/gmorgan-0.27/data'
> make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'.
> make[3]: Leaving directory 
> `/build/user-gmorgan_0.27-1-amd64-71n1nd/gmorgan-0.27/data'
> make[2]: Leaving directory 
> `/build/user-gmorgan_0.27-1-amd64-71n1nd/gmorgan-0.27/data'
> Making all in po
> make[2]: Entering directory 
> `/build/user-gmorgan_0.27-1-amd64-71n1nd/gmorgan-0.27/po'
> *** error: gettext infrastructure mismatch: using a Makefile.in.in from 
> gettext version 0.17 but the autoconf macros are from gettext version 0.18
> make[2]: *** [check-macro-version] Error 1

The full build log is available from:
   
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2010/05/27/gmorgan_0.27-1_lsid64.buildlog

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at 
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot.  Internet was not
accessible from the build systems.

-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gmorgan
Source-Version: 0.27-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gmorgan, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

gmorgan_0.27-2.diff.gz
  to main/g/gmorgan/gmorgan_0.27-2.diff.gz
gmorgan_0.27-2.dsc
  to main/g/gmorgan/gmorgan_0.27-2.dsc
gmorgan_0.27-2_amd64.deb
  to main/g/gmorgan/gmorgan_0.27-2_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 583...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bart Martens  (supplier of updated gmorgan package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 13:55:59 +
Source: gmorgan
Binary: gmorgan
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.27-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bart Martens 
Changed-By: Bart Martens 
Description: 
 gmorgan- MIDI rhythm station emulator software
Closes: 583466
Changes: 
 gmorgan (0.27-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * debian/rules: Replace po/Makefile.in.in.  Closes: #583466.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 072df81fea3a90faadd8d564633c9d04cee211a9 1693 gmorgan_0.27-2.dsc
 e0ce0d1cea61c15aec4e48f018c8b6ea6d8506e1 2797 gmorgan_0.27-2.diff.gz
 15e92daa812e254cd299d930639b20c93f60e238 871234 gmorgan_0.27-2_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 79aaefec3ed58435208db7870e4820f764e199939661d9cba9ab2110014437a1 1693 
gmorgan_0.27-2.dsc
 b97d0f7367fc400e434f54a74c03612dbea6782afce4b151bbb57a7639feaaa5 2797 
gmorgan_0.27-2.diff.gz
 7eed12f93b33dfce64943c3527ee029028443ceb3dcfbe7927b7d7a054051e33 871234 
gmorgan_0.27-2_amd64.deb
Files: 
 c437ffc41eca01cb9f88661861feed60 1693 sound optional gmorgan_0.27-2.dsc
 8a080338af7470cc893a4ad892b55ef3 2797 sound optional gmorgan_0.27-2.diff.gz
 6f59d117eaada002a4e31ceb3ad1ddba 871234 sound optional gmorgan_0.27-2_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNGJ9ZAAoJEDNV9NY7WCHMggUP/jupFg+4jZKDe6vtaxesb6j1
6UBzlDERt56ocBADY+FUA+1zLbDZITJn/k0jhebIgXa1Zhp92alPfCGsEyu/H047
o25looEcJukugDwVMHI0M7V4Gp6CCfCKKd3Y6KUiDYtOsg9trex+16JqRjGY0+qg
0aNVoggfpbWzyRvcpb9DoN8OexGFhaKRMMOqjE27tP6rGndgIxeyZDCdtgYWIbqd
Q22PboHteQQ149hi7LRiCBKxv8PpU1r0bcq2cYsaItgbf

Bug#607071: octave-symbolic: Segfaults, doesn't work at all

2010-12-27 Thread Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
On 26 December 2010 17:08, Julien Cristau  wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 07:55:58 -0600, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
>
>> This report is mostly a reminder to myself to either fix the package,
>> or to the release managers to remove this package from squeeze if I
>> don't manage to fix it before then.
>>
> Tagging as candidate for removal, will do that in a few days if no fix
> is in sight.

Thanks for the reminder. I'll be spending all of my free time this
week on this bug. I say that if by Friday I don't have a fix or
something very close to one, you should remove the package from
squeeze.

- Jordi G. H.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#606370: CVE-2010-2761 CVE-2010-4410 CVE-2010-4411

2010-12-27 Thread Niko Tyni
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 03:33:21PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 08:53:28PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 08:35:47PM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> > > Moritz Muehlenhoff  writes:
> > > > Three security issues have been reported in libcgi-pm-perl:
> > > >
> > > > http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2010-2761 
> > > > http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2010-4410
> > > > http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2010-4411
> 
> > > I'm not quite sure yet what CVE-2010-4411 refers to.  It seems that the
> > > fix for CVE-2010-2761 was not complete, but it is not a different, new
> > > issue?

>  
> https://github.com/markstos/CGI.pm/commit/77b3b2056c003edee034a2a890212edab800900d
> 
> Mark, is this double newline injection fix the new patch referred above? 

Assuming this is the case, I'm attaching preliminary patches for

3.29 (perl-modules   / lenny)
3.38 (libcgi-pm-perl / lenny)
3.43 (perl-modules   / squeeze + sid)
3.49 (libcgi-pm-perl / squeeze)
3.50 (libcgi-pm-perl / sid)

They include relevant test suite additions from the github repository
and a small test fix I sent to [rt.cpan.org #64261].

Eyeballs and testing would be welcome. In particular, I'm not entirely
sure about the //s modifier change in header() around CGI.pm:1500 in
the pre-3.49 patches. The change was introduced upstream with 3.49 along
with the header fixes but it's not covered by the test suite.

I haven't looked at libcgi-simple-perl at all.
-- 
Niko Tyni   nt...@debian.org
diff --git a/lib/CGI.pm b/lib/CGI.pm
index 1bc74a3..191fb54 100644
--- a/lib/CGI.pm
+++ b/lib/CGI.pm
@@ -1379,7 +1379,14 @@ END_OF_FUNC
 sub multipart_init {
 my($self,@p) = self_or_default(@_);
 my($boundary,@other) = rearrange([BOUNDARY],@p);
-$boundary = $boundary || '--- =_aa0';
+if (!$boundary) {
+$boundary = '--- =_';
+my @chrs = ('0'..'9', 'A'..'Z', 'a'..'z');
+for (1..17) {
+$boundary .= $chrs[rand(scalar @chrs)];
+}
+}
+
 $self->{'separator'} = "$CRLF--$boundary$CRLF";
 $self->{'final_separator'} = "$CRLF--$boundary--$CRLF";
 $type = SERVER_PUSH($boundary);
@@ -1464,6 +1471,23 @@ sub header {
 'EXPIRES','NPH','CHARSET',
 'ATTACHMENT','P3P'],@p);
 
+# CR escaping for values, per RFC 822
+for my $header ($type,$status,$cookie,$target,$expires,$nph,$charset,$attachment,$p3p,@other) {
+if (defined $header) {
+# From RFC 822:
+# Unfolding  is  accomplished  by regarding   CRLF   immediately
+# followed  by  a  LWSP-char  as equivalent to the LWSP-char.
+$header =~ s/$CRLF(\s)/$1/g;
+
+# All other uses of newlines are invalid input. 
+if ($header =~ m/$CRLF|\015|\012/) {
+# shorten very long values in the diagnostic
+$header = substr($header,0,72).'...' if (length $header > 72);
+die "Invalid header value contains a newline not followed by whitespace: $header";
+}
+} 
+   }
+
 $nph ||= $NPH;
 
 $type ||= 'text/html' unless defined($type);
@@ -1479,7 +1503,7 @@ sub header {
 # need to fix it up a little.
 foreach (@other) {
 # Don't use \s because of perl bug 21951
-next unless my($header,$value) = /([^ \r\n\t=]+)=\"?(.+?)\"?$/;
+next unless my($header,$value) = /([^ \r\n\t=]+)=\"?(.+?)\"?$/s;
 ($_ = $header) =~ s/^(\w)(.*)/"\u$1\L$2" . ': '.$self->unescapeHTML($value)/e;
 }
 
@@ -5052,6 +5076,18 @@ In either case, the outgoing header will be formatted as:
 
   P3P: policyref="/w3c/p3p.xml" cp="CAO DSP LAW CURa"
 
+Note that if a header value contains a carriage return, a leading space will be
+added to each new line that doesn't already have one as specified by RFC2616
+section 4.2.  For example:
+
+print header( -ingredients => "ham\neggs\nbacon" );
+
+will generate
+
+Ingredients: ham
+ eggs
+ bacon
+
 =head2 GENERATING A REDIRECTION HEADER
 
print redirect('http://somewhere.else/in/movie/land');
diff --git a/lib/CGI/t/headers.t b/lib/CGI/t/headers.t
new file mode 100644
index 000..661b74b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/CGI/t/headers.t
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+
+# Test that header generation is spec compliant.
+# References:
+#   http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616.html
+#   http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc822/3_Lexical.html
+
+use strict;
+use warnings;
+
+use Test::More 'no_plan';
+
+use CGI;
+
+my $cgi = CGI->new;
+
+like $cgi->header( -type => "text/html" ),
+qr#Type: text/html#, 'known header, basic case: type => "text/html"';
+
+eval { $cgi->header( -type => "text/html".$CGI::CRLF."evil: stuff" ) };
+like($@,qr/contains a newline/,'invalid header blows up');
+
+like $cgi->header( -type => "text/html".$CGI::CRLF." evil: stuff " ),
+qr#Content-Type: text/html evil: stuff#, 'known header, with leadin

Bug#606780: zabbix-frontend-php: package fails to upgrade properly from lenny

2010-12-27 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
hi,

On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 12:22:22PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > mysql said: ERROR 2002 (HY000): Can't connect to local MySQL server 
> > > through socket '/var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock' (2)
> > 
> > > dbconfig-common: zabbix-server-mysql configure: aborted.
> > 
> > > dbconfig-common: flushing administrative password
> > 
> > > done.
> > 
> > > dbconfig-common: flushing administrative password
> > 
> 
> Looks like the lenny version didn't get installed properly.  Did this
> error get ignored?

zabbix-server-mysql does not depend on a locally installed mysql-server.  It
can also use an remote Database during the setup (thanks to dbconfig-common).
It however uses its default values if there is no user input.

Thats the reason for mysql-server only beeing in the recommends. 

After having a quick look the run was trying to install the zabbix-server-mysql
package without mysql-server - so installation failed. Then it was installing
mysql-server but still the package was not setup correctly, resulting in also
the update failing.

Lucas: how should we proceed with those two bugs now?

bye,
- michael



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#606370: CVE-2010-2761 CVE-2010-4410 CVE-2010-4411

2010-12-27 Thread Niko Tyni
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 08:53:28PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 08:35:47PM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> > Moritz Muehlenhoff  writes:
> > > Three security issues have been reported in libcgi-pm-perl:
> > >
> > > http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2010-2761 
> > > http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2010-4410
> > > http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2010-4411

> > I'm not quite sure yet what CVE-2010-4411 refers to.  It seems that the
> > fix for CVE-2010-2761 was not complete, but it is not a different, new
> > issue?
> > 
> > We should probably wait until the issue is really fixed:
> > 
> > | > 2. Further improvements to handling of newlines embedded in header
> > | > values.
> > [...]
> > | Yes, it is. However, later testing found that the issue wasn't
> > | completely fixed in 3.50. A new patch has been developed, and is
> > | currently pending review and acceptance by the primary CGI.pm author,
> > | Lincoln Stein. (Now CC'ed).
> >   -- 
> 
> [ I'm adding Lincoln to CC. ]
> 
> Lincoln,
> were're trying to fix CVE-2010-4411 for the upcoming Debian release.
> 
> Is a final patch already available?

I see Mark Stosberg (CC'd as well) recently pushed this into the
CGI.pm github repository:

 
https://github.com/markstos/CGI.pm/commit/77b3b2056c003edee034a2a890212edab800900d

Mark, is this double newline injection fix the new patch referred above? 

Thanks for your work,
-- 
Niko Tyni   nt...@debian.org



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#606282: marked as done (ksplice-objmanip depends on wrong version of libbfd)

2010-12-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 27 Dec 2010 12:47:07 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#606282: fixed in ksplice 0.9.9-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #606282,
regarding ksplice-objmanip depends on wrong version of libbfd
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
606282: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606282
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ksplice
Version: 0.9.9-2
Severity: normal

When using "ksplice-create", it runs for a while and eventually
errors out with:

 /usr/lib/ksplice-objmanip: error while loading shared libraries:
 libbfd-2.19.51.20090827.so: cannot open shared object file: No such
 file or directory

Indeed, ksplice-objmanip uses libbfd-2.19.51.20090827.so, preventing
me from running it manually, either:

 $ ldd /usr/lib/ksplice-objmanip
linux-gate.so.1 =>  (0xb782b000)
libbfd-2.19.51.20090827.so => not found
libc.so.6 => /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (0xb76df000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb782c000)

 $ /usr/lib/ksplice-objmanip
 /usr/lib/ksplice-objmanip: error while loading shared libraries:
 libbfd-2.19.51.20090827.so: cannot open shared object file:
 No such file or directory

Looking at binutils on squeeze, it has a different version of
libbfd:

 $ dpkg -L binutils | egrep libbfd
 /usr/lib/libbfd-2.20.1-system.20100303.so

So it appears that ksplice-objmanip is depending on an unavailable
version of libbfd.

The inability to run ksplice-objmanip makes ksplice not work at all,
at least on my system (I don't know if this breaks it for everyone,
so I'm marking this as a "normal" bug for now).

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages ksplice depends on:
ii  binutils  2.20.1-15  The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii  gcc [c-compiler]  4:4.4.5-1  The GNU C compiler
ii  gcc-4.4 [c-compiler]  4.4.5-8The GNU C compiler
ii  libc6 2.11.2-7   Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  patch 2.6-2  Apply a diff file to an original
ii  perl  5.10.1-16  Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  rsync 3.0.7-2fast remote file copy program (lik

ksplice recommends no packages.

ksplice suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ksplice
Source-Version: 0.9.9-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ksplice, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

ksplice_0.9.9-3.diff.gz
  to main/k/ksplice/ksplice_0.9.9-3.diff.gz
ksplice_0.9.9-3.dsc
  to main/k/ksplice/ksplice_0.9.9-3.dsc
ksplice_0.9.9-3_amd64.deb
  to main/k/ksplice/ksplice_0.9.9-3_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 606...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Bruno  (supplier of updated ksplice package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 11:52:16 +0100
Source: ksplice
Binary: ksplice
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.9.9-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Luca Bruno 
Changed-By: Luca Bruno 
Description: 
 ksplice- Patching live kernel without having to reboot
Closes: 606282
Changes: 
 ksplice (0.9.9-3) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * Statically link against libbfd (Closes: #606282)
   * Ensure compatibility with Debian 2.6.32 stock kernel
Checksums-Sha1: 
 2bb8ea40bcd342ad4ae5b982dd97cb9749fc8375 1206 ksplice_0.9.9-3.dsc
 b7e4d9035237704c04dec10f2da426fd7a90c877 5302 ksplice_0.9.9-3.diff.gz
 ca5d3cbdbeb9640d7705b812d59438f4e0b61c85 1185980 ksplice_0.9.9-3_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 c5522b65babb46cd03fcc924bf4f367526e29932172f9d3f787d4a2329a75fd6 1206 
ksplice_0.9.9-3.dsc
 0a195ad55e9fbd3e4f5211fcb2ddaa775c7f87db6dba6ac1110e8a7ec7a51545 5302 
ksplice_0.9.9-3.diff.gz
 d9a64629cd3198580168e494580541d64de039fa657cecfaa1e9f505e30b6fb1 1185980 
ksplice_0.9.9

Processed: Downgrading

2010-12-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> severity 607568 important
Bug #607568 [tint2] tint2: icons disappeared
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
607568: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=607568
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#604717: marked as done (dietlibc-dev: uint64_t should be 8 bytes)

2010-12-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 27 Dec 2010 12:32:08 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#604717: fixed in dietlibc 0.32-5.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #604717,
regarding dietlibc-dev: uint64_t should be 8 bytes
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
604717: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=604717
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: dietlibc-dev
Version: 0.32-5
Severity: important


i...@luque:~$ diet gcc size.c 
/usr/lib/diet/lib-sparc/libc.a(vprintf.o): In function `vprintf':
vprintf.c:(.text+0x1c): warning: warning: the printf functions add several 
kilobytes of bloat.
i...@luque:~$ ./a.out 
sizeof(uint64_t) = 4
i...@luque:~$ gcc size.c 
i...@luque:~$ ./a.out 
sizeof(uint64_t) = 8
i...@luque:~$ cat size.c 
#include 
#include 

int main() {
printf("sizeof(uint64_t) = %d\n", sizeof(uint64_t));
return 0;
}
i...@luque:~$ 


That is the smallest example I have to reproduce the problem. I'm not 
sure what to mark the severity as, since this bug did prevent the 
initscripts from finishing. The problem is the struct dirent64 does 
not agree with the kernel, so /etc/init.d/util-vserver runs setattr, 
which calls readdir in an infinite loop, since ent->d_reclen = 0. Is 
there a way to say this bug blocks #603882, or do I need to wait for 
a bug number then poke control?

If you want to reproduce the infinite loop, compile this program with
diet gcc -g -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 break.c:

#include 
#include 
int main() {
  DIR *dir = opendir(".");
  struct dirent *ent;
  while (ent = readdir(dir)) {
printf("file: %s\n", ent->d_name);
  }
}


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: sparc (sparc64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-vserver-sparc64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

dietlibc-dev depends on no packages.

Versions of packages dietlibc-dev recommends:
pn  dietlibc   (no description available)

Versions of packages dietlibc-dev suggests:
pn  dietlibc-doc   (no description available)

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: dietlibc
Source-Version: 0.32-5.1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
dietlibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

dietlibc-dev_0.32-5.1_amd64.deb
  to main/d/dietlibc/dietlibc-dev_0.32-5.1_amd64.deb
dietlibc-doc_0.32-5.1_all.deb
  to main/d/dietlibc/dietlibc-doc_0.32-5.1_all.deb
dietlibc_0.32-5.1.diff.gz
  to main/d/dietlibc/dietlibc_0.32-5.1.diff.gz
dietlibc_0.32-5.1.dsc
  to main/d/dietlibc/dietlibc_0.32-5.1.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 604...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Julien Cristau  (supplier of updated dietlibc package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 13:09:27 +0100
Source: dietlibc
Binary: dietlibc-dev dietlibc-doc
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 0.32-5.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Gerrit Pape 
Changed-By: Julien Cristau 
Description: 
 dietlibc-dev - diet libc - a libc optimized for small size
 dietlibc-doc - diet libc documentation - a libc optimized for small size
Closes: 604717
Changes: 
 dietlibc (0.32-5.1) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Fix sparc64 detection, based on a patch by Ivan Jager (closes: #604717).
 Don't use defined(__sparc_v9__) to detect 64bit sparc, use
 defined(__sparcv9) || defined(__arch64__) instead.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 4e41a8482479c0abce8242b57a9735f96366b93d 1647 dietlibc_0.32-5.1.dsc
 6ec95c11befb05115b1a3a71329c08b37a200188 46461 dietlibc_0.32-5.1.diff.gz
 3e9d45fdc4135520e90289a9ed20c66828ddb096 52958 dietlibc-doc_0.32-5.1_all.deb
 8a2d8237e36e3ef1dd80d8e50b5488408246a7a3 459370 dietlibc-dev_0.32-5.1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 7e1347c638ad47e39ccbed28bec58c0266f751568abdc04acdaa265a72ce98bd 1647 
dietlibc_0.32-5.1.dsc
 fcb7eeae012f5014fe34af0c82d51bec8120d1008057065a43fd2ff65e443866 46461 
dietlibc_

Bug#545625: marked as done (ecl: FTBFS: rm: cannot remove `/build/user-ecl_9.8.4-1-amd64-YJh2Lk/ecl-9.8.4/debian/ecl/usr/share/info/dir.old': No such file or directory)

2010-12-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 27 Dec 2010 12:32:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#545625: fixed in ecl 9.6.1-1squeeze1
has caused the Debian Bug report #545625,
regarding ecl: FTBFS: rm: cannot remove 
`/build/user-ecl_9.8.4-1-amd64-YJh2Lk/ecl-9.8.4/debian/ecl/usr/share/info/dir.old':
 No such file or directory
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
545625: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=545625
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ecl
Version: 9.8.4-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20090907 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.

Relevant part:
> make[3]: Entering directory 
> `/build/user-ecl_9.8.4-1-amd64-YJh2Lk/ecl-9.8.4/build/doc'
> /bin/bash /build/user-ecl_9.8.4-1-amd64-YJh2Lk/ecl-9.8.4/src/gc/mkinstalldirs 
> /build/user-ecl_9.8.4-1-amd64-YJh2Lk/ecl-9.8.4/debian/ecl/usr/share/info
> mkdir -p -- 
> /build/user-ecl_9.8.4-1-amd64-YJh2Lk/ecl-9.8.4/debian/ecl/usr/share/info
> for k in ecl.info ecldev.info clx.info; do \
> /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 $k 
> /build/user-ecl_9.8.4-1-amd64-YJh2Lk/ecl-9.8.4/debian/ecl/usr/share/info; \
> if [ -x /usr/sbin/install-info ]; then \
>   /usr/sbin/install-info 
> --info-dir=/build/user-ecl_9.8.4-1-amd64-YJh2Lk/ecl-9.8.4/debian/ecl/usr/share/info
>  $k; \
> fi; \
>   done
> install-info: warning: don't call programs like install-info with an absolute 
> path,
> install-info: warning: /usr/sbin/install-info provided by dpkg is deprecated 
> and will go away soon;
> install-info: warning: its replacement lives in /usr/bin/.
> install-info: warning: nothing done since /usr/bin/install-info doesn't exist,
> install-info: warning: you might want to install an info-browser package.
> install-info: warning: don't call programs like install-info with an absolute 
> path,
> install-info: warning: /usr/sbin/install-info provided by dpkg is deprecated 
> and will go away soon;
> install-info: warning: its replacement lives in /usr/bin/.
> install-info: warning: nothing done since /usr/bin/install-info doesn't exist,
> install-info: warning: you might want to install an info-browser package.
> install-info: warning: don't call programs like install-info with an absolute 
> path,
> install-info: warning: /usr/sbin/install-info provided by dpkg is deprecated 
> and will go away soon;
> install-info: warning: its replacement lives in /usr/bin/.
> install-info: warning: nothing done since /usr/bin/install-info doesn't exist,
> install-info: warning: you might want to install an info-browser package.
> /bin/bash /build/user-ecl_9.8.4-1-amd64-YJh2Lk/ecl-9.8.4/src/gc/mkinstalldirs 
> /build/user-ecl_9.8.4-1-amd64-YJh2Lk/ecl-9.8.4/debian/ecl/usr/share/doc/
> mkdir -p -- 
> /build/user-ecl_9.8.4-1-amd64-YJh2Lk/ecl-9.8.4/debian/ecl/usr/share/doc/
> for i in Copyright LGPL; do \
> /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 
> /build/user-ecl_9.8.4-1-amd64-YJh2Lk/ecl-9.8.4/src/../$i 
> /build/user-ecl_9.8.4-1-amd64-YJh2Lk/ecl-9.8.4/debian/ecl/usr/share/doc/; \
>   done
> /bin/bash /build/user-ecl_9.8.4-1-amd64-YJh2Lk/ecl-9.8.4/src/gc/mkinstalldirs 
> /build/user-ecl_9.8.4-1-amd64-YJh2Lk/ecl-9.8.4/debian/ecl/usr/share/man/man1
> /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 ecl.man 
> /build/user-ecl_9.8.4-1-amd64-YJh2Lk/ecl-9.8.4/debian/ecl/usr/share/man/man1/ecl.1
> /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 ecl-config.man 
> /build/user-ecl_9.8.4-1-amd64-YJh2Lk/ecl-9.8.4/debian/ecl/usr/share/man/man1/ecl-config.1
> make[3]: Leaving directory 
> `/build/user-ecl_9.8.4-1-amd64-YJh2Lk/ecl-9.8.4/build/doc'
> make[2]: Leaving directory 
> `/build/user-ecl_9.8.4-1-amd64-YJh2Lk/ecl-9.8.4/build'
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/user-ecl_9.8.4-1-amd64-YJh2Lk/ecl-9.8.4'
> rm 
> /build/user-ecl_9.8.4-1-amd64-YJh2Lk/ecl-9.8.4/debian/ecl/usr/share/doc/LGPL
> rm 
> /build/user-ecl_9.8.4-1-amd64-YJh2Lk/ecl-9.8.4/debian/ecl/usr/share/doc/Copyright
> rm 
> /build/user-ecl_9.8.4-1-amd64-YJh2Lk/ecl-9.8.4/debian/ecl/usr/share/info/ecl.info
>  \
>  
> /build/user-ecl_9.8.4-1-amd64-YJh2Lk/ecl-9.8.4/debian/ecl/usr/share/info/clx.info
>  \
>  
> /build/user-ecl_9.8.4-1-amd64-YJh2Lk/ecl-9.8.4/debian/ecl/usr/share/info/ecldev.info
> rm 
> /build/user-ecl_9.8.4-1-amd64-YJh2Lk/ecl-9.8.4/debian/ecl/usr/share/info/dir \
>  
> /build/user-ecl_9.8.4-1-amd64-YJh2Lk/ecl-9.8.4/debian/ecl/usr/share/info/dir.old
> rm: cannot remove 
> `/build/user-ecl_9.8.4-1-amd64-YJh2Lk/ecl-9.8.4/debian/ecl/usr/share/in

Processed: tagging 592351, tagging 528222, tagging 557178

2010-12-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 592351 + sid squeeze
Bug #592351 {Done: Laurent Bigonville } [nut] nut: 
/etc/init.d/ups-monitor missing in squeeze
Added tag(s) squeeze and sid.
> tags 528222 + sid squeeze
Bug #528222 {Done: Laurent Bigonville } [nut] nut.conf.5: 
Suggested man page for nut.conf
Added tag(s) squeeze and sid.
> tags 557178 + sid squeeze
Bug #557178 {Done: Laurent Bigonville } [nut] nut: Perms on 
/dev/bus/usb/.../... incorrect upon every upgrade - bad interaction with udev?
Added tag(s) squeeze and sid.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
557178: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=557178
592351: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=592351
528222: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=528222
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: Re: Bug#604717: Proposed patch

2010-12-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tag 604717 pending
Bug #604717 [dietlibc-dev] dietlibc-dev: uint64_t should be 8 bytes
Added tag(s) pending.
> kthxbye
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
604717: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=604717
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#604717: Proposed patch

2010-12-27 Thread Julien Cristau
tag 604717 pending
kthxbye

On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 02:12:54 -0500, Ivan Jager wrote:

> Ok, after reading these FAQ entries, I am more convinnced this is
> the right solution.
> 
> >Q: Can you please port the diet libc to FreeBSD/Solaris/Windows?
> >A: No.
> >
> >Q: Can I compile or use the diet libc with a compiler that is not gcc?
> >A: Compile: no.  Use: yes.
> 
> So worrying about what *BSD/Solaris do would be pointless.
> 
> All this patch does is remove some underscores so that endian.h
> checks __sparcv9 like is done in longlong.h. I only tested with gcc,
> but this should work with the sun compiler too, if it's even
> possible to use the sun compiler on linux.
> 
> Unlike reverting patch 0013, this should work even when compiling
> without -Os.
> 
> I was initially hesitant to give this bug a very high severity,
> since it very indirectly breaks the system, but I suppose I need to
> do that so #603882 can be fixed. I did try recompiling util-vserver
> with this patched dietlibc-dev and it works now.
> 
Thanks, I've applied a similar patch, adding defined(__arch64__) as
alternative since that seems to be defined by gcc -m64 on Debian/sparc,
whereas __sparcv9 isn't, so hopefully this will fix sparc and not break
sparc64.  I'll upload the NMU in a minute, can you check afterwards that
603882 goes away?

Gerrit, please find the NMU diff attached.

Cheers,
Julien
diff -u dietlibc-0.32/debian/changelog dietlibc-0.32/debian/changelog
--- dietlibc-0.32/debian/changelog
+++ dietlibc-0.32/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+dietlibc (0.32-5.1) unstable; urgency=high
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Fix sparc64 detection, based on a patch by Ivan Jager (closes: #604717).
+Don't use defined(__sparc_v9__) to detect 64bit sparc, use
+defined(__sparcv9) || defined(__arch64__) instead.
+
+ -- Julien Cristau   Mon, 27 Dec 2010 13:09:27 +0100
+
 dietlibc (0.32-5) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * debian/diff/0013-mips-divdi3.c-fix-include-path-to-longlong.h.diff:
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- dietlibc-0.32.orig/debian/diff/0014-sparc_v9-does-not-imply-arch64.diff
+++ dietlibc-0.32/debian/diff/0014-sparc_v9-does-not-imply-arch64.diff
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+diff -ru dietlibc-0.32.orig//include/endian.h dietlibc-0.32/include/endian.h
+--- dietlibc-0.32.orig//include/endian.h2005-10-04 13:47:03.0 -0400
 dietlibc-0.32/include/endian.h  2010-12-14 15:12:24.0 -0500
+@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
+ # define __LONG_LONG_PAIR(HI, LO) HI, LO
+ #endif
+ 
+-#if defined(__alpha__) || defined(__mips64__) || defined(__sparc_v9__) || defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__ia64__) || defined(__powerpc64__) || defined(__s390x__)
++#if defined(__alpha__) || defined(__mips64__) || defined(__sparcv9) || defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__ia64__) || defined(__powerpc64__) || defined(__s390x__) || defined(__arch64__)
+ #define __WORDSIZE 64
+ #endif
+ 


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#545625: NMU diff

2010-12-27 Thread David Bremner

I'm about to do a non-maintainer upload of ecl to to
testing-proposed-updates. The diff follows.

diff -u ecl-9.6.1/debian/rules ecl-9.6.1/debian/rules
--- ecl-9.6.1/debian/rules
+++ ecl-9.6.1/debian/rules
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@
   $(CURDIR)/debian/ecl/usr/share/info/clx.info \
   $(CURDIR)/debian/ecl/usr/share/info/ecldev.info
 
-   rm $(CURDIR)/debian/ecl/usr/share/info/dir \
+   -rm $(CURDIR)/debian/ecl/usr/share/info/dir \
   $(CURDIR)/debian/ecl/usr/share/info/dir.old
 
rmdir $(CURDIR)/debian/ecl/usr/share/info
diff -u ecl-9.6.1/debian/changelog ecl-9.6.1/debian/changelog
--- ecl-9.6.1/debian/changelog
+++ ecl-9.6.1/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+ecl (9.6.1-1squeeze1) testing; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Ignore errors from "rm /usr/share/info/dir(.old)" (Closes: #545625)
+
+ -- David Bremner   Sun, 26 Dec 2010 15:43:36 -0400
+
 ecl (9.6.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New upstream release. 


pgp2zdAl7lxmY.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#602148: still present?

2010-12-27 Thread Bdale Garbee
Can you tell me whether this bug seems to be resolved in 3.2.0-1, please?

Bdale



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: Re: Bug#607873: FTBFS: dpkg-gencontrol: error: error occurred while parsing Suggests field

2010-12-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tag 607873 + pending
Bug #607873 [src:openoffice.org] FTBFS: "dpkg-gencontrol: error: error occurred 
 while parsing Suggests field" when more, different libdb-dev existing.
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
607873: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=607873
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#607873: FTBFS: dpkg-gencontrol: error: error occurred while parsing Suggests field

2010-12-27 Thread Rene Engelhard
tag 607873 + pending
thanks

On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 12:25:56PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> ... and the above works unless someone has such a broken mix (what has 
> "stable"
> to do here?!) which results in two different libdb-devs pointing to different
> lidbX.Ys on his system...
> 
> In any case, I am not going to change this.

A quick discussion on #debian-release gives that the RT does think this
is serious despite the broken APT config (*sigh*), so I probably
should replace the apt-cache show with dpkg -s...

Grüße/Regards,

René
-- 
 .''`.  René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
 `. `'  r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70
   `-   Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: ignoring for squeeze

2010-12-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was 
jcris...@debian.org).
> usertag 147832 squeeze-can-defer
Bug#147832: xchat: loses server list if disk fills up
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: squeeze-can-defer.
> tag 147832 squeeze-ignore
Bug #147832 [xchat] xchat: loses server list if disk fills up
Bug #527638 [xchat] xchat: server list file ~/.xchat2/servlist_.conf written 
non-atomically
Bug #605003 [xchat] loss of data
Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore.
Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore.
Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore.
> kthxbye
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
147832: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=147832
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: Re: Bug#607873: FTBFS: dpkg-gencontrol: error: error occurred while parsing Suggests field

2010-12-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> found 607873 1:3.0.1-3
Bug #607873 [src:openoffice.org] FTBFS: dpkg-gencontrol: error: error occurred 
while parsing Suggests field
Bug Marked as found in versions openoffice.org/1:3.0.1-3.
> retitle 607873 FTBFS: "dpkg-gencontrol: error: error occurred  while parsing 
> Suggests field" when more, different libdb-dev existing.
Bug #607873 [src:openoffice.org] FTBFS: dpkg-gencontrol: error: error occurred 
while parsing Suggests field
Changed Bug title to 'FTBFS: "dpkg-gencontrol: error: error occurred  while 
parsing Suggests field" when more, different libdb-dev existing.' from 'FTBFS: 
dpkg-gencontrol: error: error occurred while parsing Suggests field'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
607873: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=607873
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#607873: FTBFS: dpkg-gencontrol: error: error occurred while parsing Suggests field

2010-12-27 Thread Rene Engelhard
found 607873 1:3.0.1-3
retitle 607873 FTBFS: "dpkg-gencontrol: error: error occurred  while parsing 
Suggests field" when more, different libdb-dev existing.
thanks

On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 01:42:31PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> Source: openoffice.org

> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 7.7

The policy doesn't say anything about broken, misconfigured systems. Neither
does it say anything about filing it against sids version when history also
is affected. (since 1:3.0.1-3)

> Version: 1:3.2.1-10

So this is wrong, and you bogusly blocked a important bugfix from entering
testing.

> Package `libavalon-framework-java' is not installed.
> Use dpkg --info (= dpkg-deb --info) to examine archive files,
> and dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list their contents.
> Package `libavalon-framework-java' is not installed.
> Use dpkg --info (= dpkg-deb --info) to examine archive files,
> and dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list their contents.

Not relevant here.

> dpkg-gencontrol: warning: can't parse dependency libdb4.6-dbg libdb4.8-dbg

This is the problem.

What OOo does is the following:

BUILD_DEPS += , libdb-dev
DBG_DBG_SUGGESTS += , $(shell apt-cache show libdb-dev | grep Depends | 
awk '{ print $$2 }' | sed -e s/dev/dbg/)

to find out what db it builds against to add the correct suggests. No,
hardcoding it is no way, and there's no libdb-dbg.

>   APT prefers testing
>   APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (600, 'stable'), (500, 'stable'), (300, 
> 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')

... and the above works unless someone has such a broken mix (what has "stable"
to do here?!) which results in two different libdb-devs pointing to different
lidbX.Ys on his system...

In any case, I am not going to change this.

Grüße/Regards,

René



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#147832: ignoring for squeeze

2010-12-27 Thread Julien Cristau
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 147832 squeeze-can-defer
tag 147832 squeeze-ignore
kthxbye

Hi,

I'm kind of horrified that such an issue has been allowed to stay around
for so long.  Still, I'll ignore this for squeeze, and hopefully it'll
get worked on by the next release now that it has a proper severity.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#606795: zabbix-server-mysql: package fails to upgrade properly from lenny

2010-12-27 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 18:50:41 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:

> > Setting up zabbix-server-mysql (1:1.4.6-1) ...
> > dbconfig-common: writing config to 
> > /etc/dbconfig-common/zabbix-server-mysql.conf
> > *** WARNING: ucf was run from a maintainer script that uses debconf, but
> > the script did not pass --debconf-ok to ucf. The maintainer
> > script should be fixed to not stop debconf before calling ucf,
> > and pass it this parameter. For now, ucf will revert to using
> > old-style, non-debconf prompting. Ugh!
> > 
> > Please inform the package maintainer about this problem.
> > 
> > Creating config file /etc/dbconfig-common/zabbix-server-mysql.conf with new 
> > version
> > 
> > Creating config file /etc/zabbix/zabbix_server.conf with new version
> > chown: invalid user: `zabbix'
> > ERROR 2002 (HY000): Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket 
> > '/var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock' (2).
> > unable to connect to mysql server.
> > error encountered creating user:
> > ERROR 2002 (HY000): Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket 
> > '/var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock' (2)
> > dbconfig-common: zabbix-server-mysql configure: aborted.
> > dbconfig-common: flushing administrative password
> > ERROR 2002 (HY000): Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket 
> > '/var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock' (2).
> > unable to connect to mysql server.
> > error encountered creating database:
> > ERROR 2002 (HY000): Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket 
> > '/var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock' (2)
> > dbconfig-common: zabbix-server-mysql configure: aborted.
> > dbconfig-common: flushing administrative password
> > populating database via sql...  error encountered populating database:
> > mysql said: ERROR 2002 (HY000): Can't connect to local MySQL server through 
> > socket '/var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock' (2)
> > dbconfig-common: zabbix-server-mysql configure: aborted.
> > dbconfig-common: flushing administrative password
> > done.
> > dbconfig-common: flushing administrative password

Same as 606780, there's an error when installing the lenny version.
Would be interesting to know if the upgrade can proceed when the package
is properly installed.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#606780: zabbix-frontend-php: package fails to upgrade properly from lenny

2010-12-27 Thread Julien Cristau
Hi Lucas,

On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 18:50:29 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:

> > Setting up zabbix-server-mysql (1:1.4.6-1) ...
> 
> > dbconfig-common: writing config to 
> > /etc/dbconfig-common/zabbix-server-mysql.conf
> 
> > *** WARNING: ucf was run from a maintainer script that uses debconf, but
> 
> > the script did not pass --debconf-ok to ucf. The maintainer
> 
> > script should be fixed to not stop debconf before calling ucf,
> 
> > and pass it this parameter. For now, ucf will revert to using
> 
> > old-style, non-debconf prompting. Ugh!
> 
> > 
> > Please inform the package maintainer about this problem.
> 
> > 
> > Creating config file /etc/dbconfig-common/zabbix-server-mysql.conf with new 
> > version
> 
> > 
> > Creating config file /etc/zabbix/zabbix_server.conf with new version
> 
> > chown: invalid user: `zabbix'
> 
> > ERROR 2002 (HY000): Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket 
> > '/var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock' (2).
> 
> > unable to connect to mysql server.
> 
> > error encountered creating user:
> 
> > ERROR 2002 (HY000): Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket 
> > '/var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock' (2)
> 
> > dbconfig-common: zabbix-server-mysql configure: aborted.
> 
> > dbconfig-common: flushing administrative password
> 
> > ERROR 2002 (HY000): Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket 
> > '/var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock' (2).
> 
> > unable to connect to mysql server.
> 
> > error encountered creating database:
> 
> > ERROR 2002 (HY000): Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket 
> > '/var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock' (2)
> 
> > dbconfig-common: zabbix-server-mysql configure: aborted.
> 
> > dbconfig-common: flushing administrative password
> 
> > populating database via sql...  error encountered populating database:
> 
> > mysql said: ERROR 2002 (HY000): Can't connect to local MySQL server through 
> > socket '/var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock' (2)
> 
> > dbconfig-common: zabbix-server-mysql configure: aborted.
> 
> > dbconfig-common: flushing administrative password
> 
> > done.
> 
> > dbconfig-common: flushing administrative password
> 

Looks like the lenny version didn't get installed properly.  Did this
error get ignored?

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#575582: marked as done (openssh-server: privsep directory disappeared on upgrade)

2010-12-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 27 Dec 2010 11:17:12 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#575582: fixed in openssh 1:5.5p1-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #575582,
regarding openssh-server: privsep directory disappeared on upgrade
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
575582: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=575582
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: openssh-server
Version: 1:5.3p1-3
Severity: normal

I have just upgraded a system to Debian/Testing and sshd started failing.  The
directory /var/run/sshd had disappeared as part of the upgrade process.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5xen (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages openssh-server depends on:
ii  adduser 3.112add and remove users and groups
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]   1.5.28   Debian configuration management 
sy
ii  dpkg1.15.5.6 Debian package management system
ii  libc6   2.10.2-6 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared 
lib
ii  libcomerr2  1.41.11-1common error description library
pn  libgssapi-krb5-2   (no description available)
pn  libkrb5-3  (no description available)
ii  libpam-modules  1.1.1-2  Pluggable Authentication Modules 
f
ii  libpam-runtime  1.1.1-2  Runtime support for the PAM 
librar
ii  libpam0g1.1.1-2  Pluggable Authentication Modules 
l
ii  libselinux1 2.0.89-4 SELinux runtime shared libraries
pn  libssl0.9.8(no description available)
pn  libwrap0   (no description available)
ii  lsb-base3.2-23   Linux Standard Base 3.2 init 
scrip
ii  openssh-blacklist   0.4.1list of default blacklisted 
OpenSS
pn  openssh-client (no description available)
pn  procps (no description available)
ii  zlib1g  1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3 compression library - runtime

Versions of packages openssh-server recommends:
ii  openssh-blacklist-extra   0.4.1  list of non-default blacklisted 
Op
pn  xauth  (no description available)

Versions of packages openssh-server suggests:
pn  molly-guard(no description available)
pn  rssh   (no description available)
pn  ssh-askpass(no description available)
pn  ufw(no description available)

-- debconf information:
  ssh/vulnerable_host_keys:
  ssh/new_config: true
* ssh/use_old_init_script: true
  ssh/encrypted_host_key_but_no_keygen:
  ssh/disable_cr_auth: false


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: openssh
Source-Version: 1:5.5p1-6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
openssh, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

openssh-client-udeb_5.5p1-6_i386.udeb
  to main/o/openssh/openssh-client-udeb_5.5p1-6_i386.udeb
openssh-client_5.5p1-6_i386.deb
  to main/o/openssh/openssh-client_5.5p1-6_i386.deb
openssh-server-udeb_5.5p1-6_i386.udeb
  to main/o/openssh/openssh-server-udeb_5.5p1-6_i386.udeb
openssh-server_5.5p1-6_i386.deb
  to main/o/openssh/openssh-server_5.5p1-6_i386.deb
openssh_5.5p1-6.debian.tar.gz
  to main/o/openssh/openssh_5.5p1-6.debian.tar.gz
openssh_5.5p1-6.dsc
  to main/o/openssh/openssh_5.5p1-6.dsc
ssh-askpass-gnome_5.5p1-6_i386.deb
  to main/o/openssh/ssh-askpass-gnome_5.5p1-6_i386.deb
ssh-krb5_5.5p1-6_all.deb
  to main/o/openssh/ssh-krb5_5.5p1-6_all.deb
ssh_5.5p1-6_all.deb
  to main/o/openssh/ssh_5.5p1-6_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 575...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Colin Watson  (supplier of updated openssh package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2010 18:

Bug#607988: python2.6: the latest update is totally broken and can't byte compile *modules*

2010-12-27 Thread Philipp Dreimann
@Dave:
is "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/bzrlib/plugins/gtk/merge.py" on
your system also a dangling symlink?
/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/reportlab contains all the dangling
symlinks on my system- I may removed the package a while ago.
You can scan for them using the symlinks program in the same Debian
package or with checking the output of the patch.

@all:
I created a little patch which identifies the symlinks and skips them
in pycompile but beware.. it's a hack. -- Who is 'responsible' for
removing these symlinks?


pycompile.diff
Description: Binary data


Bug#606870: python-openturns: creates a mess in sys.path by adding its own namespace

2010-12-27 Thread Christophe Prud'homme
I just got a fix for this problem
thanks for waiting

On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Julien Cristau  wrote:

> I'll schedule openturns for removal from squeeze if this doesn't get
> fixed in the next few days.
>



-- 
Debian Developer - member of Debian Science
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianScience
Prof. at Univ. Grenoble in Applied Math.
http://ljk.imag.fr/membres/Christophe.Prudhomme/


Bug#605065: Bug#607662: ncurses-base: backspace key deletes forwards on the kFreeBSD console

2010-12-27 Thread Petr Salinger

How long is that going to take?  In the meantime, console users of
GNU/kFreeBSD are screwed whenever they connect to other systems, since
that means they must change their TERM variable _and_ their backspace
key is broken.



I've attached the necessary patches to create the cons25-debian
terminfo entry and the patch for sysvinit, which seem to work for me
in a fresh kfreebsd-amd64 installation in kvm (patching /etc/inittab
is necessary, though).  If they're useful, great; if not, that's okay,
too.


The cons25-debian name might not be a very good one if you want to that
push terminfo entry to other systems.  That may be for Thomas to decide.

Personally I'm leaning towards reverting the changes to the kFreeBSD
kernel and freebsd-utils for Squeeze.  Surely, it means a somewhat
broken console, but at least the problems are about the same as in
FreeBSD proper, and we don't create additional incompatibilities with
other systems.


I see two basic options:

1) plain cons25 variant: current sysvinit, ncurses
   and kfreebsd-8 8.1+dfsg-6, freebsd-utils 8.1-2

It does not conform to debian policy, the backspace/delete key is somewhat 
broken on console and somewhat broken when connection to other systems 
from console


2) cons25-debian variant: needs patched sysvinit, patched ncurses,
   and kfreebsd-8 8.1+dfsg-7, freebsd-utils 8.1-3

It does conform to debian policy, the backspace/delete key works
on console, it is needed to set TERM when connection to other systems
from console and is somewhat broken when connection is made to other 
systems directly from console.


In both cases the connection to other systems from running X is fine.
In both cases there will be change (and fix) for FreeBSD 9.x kernel,
as it already has TEKEN_XTERM as a default.

The cons25-debian seems be fine for me, as it should be only local change 
for one release of Debian GNU/kFreeBSD. The next one will not use it.


And there is a third option, mixture of both above.
As a default use the plain cons25 variant. Additionaly provide
cons25-debian entry in ncurses and special debian keymap in freebsd-utils.
By default it will work as variant 1, but there is a possibility
to set TERM to cons25-debian and set keymap which would generate the 
correct sequences for cons25-debian.


This variant needs current sysvinit, patched ncurses, patched kfreebsd-8
and patched freebsd-utils.

My personal order of preferences is 3, 1, 2.
All seems better compared to current status.

Petr



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: severity of 608056 is important

2010-12-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> severity 608056 important
Bug #608056 [kaffeine] kaffeine: crashes on startup
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
608056: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608056
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org