Bug#1034375: ITP: trurl -- command line tool for URL parsing and manipulation
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Michael Ablassmeier X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: trurl Version : 0.4 Upstream Author : Daniel Stenberg, * URL : https://github.com/curl/trurl/ * License : curl Programming Lang: C Description : command line tool for URL parsing and manipulation Parses, manipulates and outputs URLs and parts of URLs. Typically you pass in one or more URLs and decide what of that you want output. Posssibly modifying the URL as well. trurl knows URLs and every URL consists of up to ten separate and independent "components". These components can be extracted, removed and updated with trurl and they are referred to by their respective names: scheme, user, password, options, host, port, path, query, fragment and zoneid.
zabbix: searching for co-maintainers
hi guys, As me and Fabio (kobold) are quite busy with real life Tasks we are searching for co-maintainers for debian's zabbix[3] packages. As it stands the Packages are not in bad shape but we want to react before things go wild :-) Personally i started with the maintenance as my old workplace used Zabbix for Monitoring their Infrastructure, at the moment i even lack a valid Test Setup for testing the Packages in a good way. Fabio still runs it in his environment. The Packages are maintained using the collab-maint repository[1] so it should be possible for everyone to contribute. Especially if someone from the New Maintainer Queue wants to come up: youre welcome. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/src:zabbix [2] http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/collab-maint/deb-maint/zabbix/#_deb-maint_zabbix_ [3] zabbix-agent - software for monitoring of your networks -- agent zabbix-frontend-php - software for monitoring of your servers -- php frontend zabbix-server-mysql - software for monitoring of your networks -- server zabbix-server-pgsql - software for monitoring of your networks -- server bye, - michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Automatic retrieval of information from qa.debian.org
hi David, David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > You're looking at libapache-mod-php5, while alioth is currently running PHP4 > (and libapache-mod-php4 hasn't soap builtin). > > Please, take a look at http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/info.php . You'll > notice this: you could probably use the SOAPClient class from PEAR, which is afaikt a pure PHP implementation and works with php4 aswell (even tho php5 should really be preferred these days). bye, - michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What is the reason glibc is at version 2.3 for etch?
hi Lex, Lex Hider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Hi, > I've been discussing with some #fluendo people about their codecs not being > compatible with etch (requires glibc 2.4+). > > Can anyone give a brief answer to why etch will be shipping the glibc at 2.3. > I couldn't provide an explanation as to why it is only 2.3 being shipped. this has been discussed before (also related to fluendo, though), see: http://www.grep.be/blog/en/computer/debian/glibc_2.3 bye, - michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: More orphaned Perl packages to be removed from the archive
hi Gunnar, On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 05:11:54PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Hi, > > I just filed bug #404896 - I'm copying it here as I hope you have some > comments regarding it: > > The following Perl modules have been orphaned (or have not been > updated) for a long time, have no reverse dependencies, and have quite > low installation count according to popcon: > > libbusiness-ups-perl (O: #279777 nov 2004; last non-QA upload Mar 2002) > Popcon: 18 Rdepends: 0 interchange ships parts of libbusiness-ups-perl and should depend on it, see #404022. bye, - michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Dbconfig-common-devel] mass bugfiling: dbconfig-common-using packages violating policy 7.2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi sean, On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 10:54:06AM -0400, sean finney wrote: > unfortunately, the example packages used as guidelines didn't > make any checks to safeguard this, so i suspect most/all of > the packages using dbconfig-common do not either. since these > are rc-bugs, i don't think the lintian route is the correct path and > plan to file the bugs in the next few days. > > Zabbix Maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >zabbix i just uploaded zabbix 1.1.1-6, which checks for dbconfig-common to be installed during postrm. bye, - michael -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFE542zEFV7g4B8rCURAlYkAJ91+4fLf1hzJy5w+9hwzkT7FG11OwCeJcS4 +1MC4zdUOu3rhLGv9Dij9Ao= =+kBg -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: libvorbis and vorbis-tools
hi, On 2005-11-13, Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > is Christopher L Cheeney submerged? There are new upstreamversions > of libvorbis and vorbis-tools available which fix a lot. Adeodato Simó is looking into this (#339846). bye, - michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#323227: new list: debian-planet to distribute planet.debian.org postings; archive to enable searching
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 06:14:23PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: > Re: Rob Bradford in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > I'd like to have a debian-planet list that would receive blog postings > > > from planet.debian.org. > > > > Please don't introduce any more namespace confusion. > > Agreed. What about debian-planet-feed? debian-planet-archive bye, - michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: remove ruby1.6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi, On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 05:35:35AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > I don't know about aswiki, rsjog, tdiary (tdiary-plugin) > > and tictactoe. (I use tDiary on ruby1.8 and I have no problem.) tictactoe (0.8.1-2) has been uploaded yesterday and now uses ruby1.8/libgtk2-ruby. bye, - michael -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFC/z9dEFV7g4B8rCURAsz0AJ0aPFix82B7lhdtJ6uzAIxsPFFaZwCfYPsv 3Dz/1NqFDmuKGZgu+CDvXhI= =6X/Y -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Example where testing-security was used?
On 2005-05-21, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can anyone point me to an example where testing-security has actually > been used? http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/debian-security-announce-2005/msg00111.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/debian-security-announce-2005/msg00112.html bye, - michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: dpatch and patching debian/rules
hi again, On 2005-03-31, Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > to, 2005-03-31 kello 20:45 +, Michael Ablassmeier kirjoitti: >> On 2005-03-31, Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Any package that uses it is going to have to build-depend on the >> > lsb-release package, which has no dependencies (it is a bash shell >> > script and bash is required, so no explicit dependency needed) and is 88 >> > kilobytes installed. Not too onerous, I think. >> >> what about `/etc/issue' to get this kind of information? > > Given that the sysadmin can and does edit it as they wish, that is > pretty useless. yes, but this might happen to `/etc/lsb-release' too. bye, - michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: dpatch and patching debian/rules
hi, On 2005-03-31, Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Any package that uses it is going to have to build-depend on the > lsb-release package, which has no dependencies (it is a bash shell > script and bash is required, so no explicit dependency needed) and is 88 > kilobytes installed. Not too onerous, I think. what about `/etc/issue' to get this kind of information? bye, - michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Source of LPhoto
hi Andreas, On 2005-03-17, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But there is no link or other sign of a downloadable source. > > Am I to stupid to find the source or do the people at this site have a > different opinion about downloadable source than I. I wanted to issue an > ITP if it is worth but wonder which link to the source I should use. I couldnt find any link, but the .changes file in their archive, so: http://software.linspire.com/emptypool//lindowsos/pool/main/l/lphoto/lphoto_2.0.42-0.0.0.45.lindows0.1.tar.gz bye - michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
On 2005-03-15, Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> How could we know ? We know nothing about Ubuntu, nothing about >>> Canonical, nothing about the goals, nothing about how everything was >>> done to begin with, nothing about who works or doesn't work there. >> >> Details about Ubuntu and its goals can be found on the website. In many >> respects there is more information available about Ubuntu activity, and the >> goals of the project, than about organizations which provide you with the >> essentials of life. Yet, you seem to trust them by default, while you >> assume that Ubuntu seeks to cause you harm. Why? > > Because Ubuntu appeared behind a screen of smoke. And smoke hasn't > dissipated yet. Debian Developers were not informed in an appropriate > manner of what was going on there. Sorry, but i can't see the problem here. Everyone can go ahead and do a value-added Distribution based on Debian. There is no need be verbose about it, though. Also, i dont think the Debian Developers working for Ubuntu have to justify why they are doing so. > By destroying the Project ? Interesting approach. As this is just a _proposal_, you are free to suggest alternative approaches on how to solve the Problems the Project is currently facing. bye, - michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to build libapache-mod
On 2005-01-12, Milan P. Stanic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry if this question answered already or the location of doc's > (policy) is easy to find. apache-dev includes `/usr/share/doc/apache-dev/README.modules' which contains a set of simple guidelines on how to integrate external Apache modules into Debian. Looking at existing libapache-mod-* package-sources should also help, though. bye, - michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: debsums for maintainer scripts (was: Re: Revival of the signed debs discussion)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 01:56:09PM -0500, christophe barbe wrote: > Before mass bug-filling, it would be necessary to make it mandatory > which unfortunately is not the case right now afaik. No, it is not mandatory. However, it would be a nice Wishlist Bug. So the maintainer can decide, if he want to call this Function or not. (was just a suggestion ;-)) bye, - michael -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/y5u0EFV7g4B8rCURAgqcAJ9NYg4T9N8aKsm5i/mVXNnqXGqSqACg7TiR wuxm4wHRY3MQVRHrXcM3Hy0= =hgyX -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: debsums for maintainer scripts (was: Re: Revival of the signed debs discussion)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi Eduard, On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 06:08:28PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: > - current md5sums file in control.tar.gz should contain >checksums of really all files Unfortunately many Maintainers do not use "dh_md5sums" to ship an .md5sums File in their Package(s). This makes it harder to check the already installed Files on a Debian installation. I think, at least Packages like "dpkg" or "gnupg" should call "dh_md5sums". I was wondering, if it would be usefull to make a mass bug-filling against these Packages. Before, it would be nice to have a List of Packages (maybe sorted by Maintainer) which do not call "dh_md5sums". IMHO Lintian should also check if "dh_md5sums" is called and print at least a warning if this is not the case. bye, - michael -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/y4vFEFV7g4B8rCURAg3/AJ9/V2KIlAGrago22dg27YiJxu4IBACdHDne TAYfYnISDbUXRkkHuDTGpoA= =V33R -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: Grsec/PaX and Exec-shield
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 10:56:23AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Now surely, Russell, a "security expert" such as yourself is capable of > copy+pasting that last reject in the file. Doing this took one minute. > I would imagine this was much less time than it took for you to write > your ignorant mails complaining about things you don't understand or > haven't bothered to try yourself. If you get down and you quarrel everyday, You're saying prayers to the devils, I say. Why not help one another on the way? Make it much easier. > It's fun to learn new things! Yes, it is! bye, - michael
Re: Grsec/PaX and Exec-shield
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 12:39:46PM +0100, Peter Busser wrote: > > Why not volunteer to make the .deb, get a sponsor and get it uploaded > > then? > > Good idea! Already did that in fact. So who do I send this new kernel-source > .deb to? You can use the mentors service to exchange your packages with your sponsor. All informations how to (d)upload your packages to the Mentors Server are explained on the homepage[0]. After uploading it to the Server you can seek for an sponsor using debian-mentors@lists.debian.org, this one (debian-devel), or the phpBB forum which is also aviable at the mentors homepage. [0] http://mentors.debian.net bye, - michael
Re: Debian should not modify the kernels!
hi, On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 12:13:51PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote: > Speaking as a user, too, I want something I can compile a kernel from. > I'm no kernel hacker and do not intend to become one. Thus I see > absolutely no reason, why I should want a debian-package with a > unmodified source-tree. Escecially as an unmodified source-tree is in > my experience almost only useful for i386. (Perhaps getting better > in the last time, but anything not a debian kernel used to be even > a larger nightmare than the debian-kernels). i have to say, that an vanilla kernel-source in Debian would be nice, but i never had Problems with compiling the source Packages which are in the Distribution now. I think the Kernel-Source-Package Maintainers know what they are doin, and if the Patches are limited to Security Fixes and things which make the Kernel more stable and secure i don't have Problems with the current situation. People which do not want to take the Debian Sources because, the're patched, have the possibility to use the Kernel Sources from kernel.org, and use make-kpkg to create an Debian Package. bye, - michael
Re: Porting Xconfigurator to Debian!
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 09:44:08AM +0100, Othmar Pasteka wrote: > it's not userfriendly? that's the whole point of it actually. and > X based GUIs are way nicer than text based GUIs. > and it's also not userfriendly to go and say "go read the package > descriptions". Shure its userfriendly, but does this X Configurator also well on my 486 DX that should play my homerouter with Debian ? Does the Dialog Setup ? -> yes it does ! Ever tried installing SuSE or RedHat with its great graphical installer on old machines ? they suck, Debian not, and thats one of the greatest advantage Debian has. (And one of the greatest advantages LINUX has, but this other Distributions Destroy them cause of X only Setups.) If i have to decide between nice graphical installer, and a nice Dialog Setup, i will prefer the Dialg Setup ! -- greetings /*/ michael ablassmeier
