Re: Twittering on planet.d.o?
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 08:18:15PM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> I like the planet-kde approach to microblogging.
> It is in a seperate box on planet and not part of the main rss feed.
Sounds like the most reasonable approach.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
z...@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie
sempre uno zaino ...| ..: | Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: Twittering on planet.d.o?
Paul Wise wrote: > Or pluto.debian.org, not quite a planet, not quite a moon. Good one ;^) I like it! Cheers, -- Raf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Twittering on planet.d.o?
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 12:24 PM, John H. Robinson, IV wrote: > Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) wrote: >> >> I was wondering if maybe people would be interested in >> microplanet.debian.org ? > > moon.debian.org > > Or, perhaps, dwarfplanet.debian.org Or pluto.debian.org, not quite a planet, not quite a moon. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Twittering on planet.d.o?
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) wrote: > > I was wondering if maybe people would be interested in > microplanet.debian.org ? moon.debian.org Or, perhaps, dwarfplanet.debian.org -- John H. Robinson, IV jaq...@debian.org http WARNING: I cannot be held responsible for the above, sbih.org ( )(:[ as apparently my cats have learned how to type. spiders.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Twittering on planet.d.o?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07-04-2009 20:03, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le mardi 07 avril 2009 à 21:58 +0200, Luk Claes a écrit : >> I think having a very limited amount of tweets from people that do not >> write long blog posts is ok, though if it's not appreciated I'll remove >> my feed. > > Conceptually it’s not a bother, but it’s clear to me that Planet is not > meant to handle such feeds correctly. > > Either Planet should be made to display them better, or another > aggregation channel could be setup for microblogging. There is already debianproject both in identi.ca and twitter that would work as something like a "microblogging planet" and of course there is twitter.debian.net (which seems to not be proper feeding identi.ca for a few days now). I was wondering if maybe people would be interested in microplanet.debian.org ? :-) Kind regards, - -- Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) "Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom!" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkncIdIACgkQCjAO0JDlykbZUACfXIc1v3BGwFXcvXtdabvNfOLR QNwAnRqB2YOMKBfXFjHGES+ypGaHfRWa =k3Uf -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Twittering on planet.d.o?
On Tuesday 07 April 2009, Luk Claes wrote: > > These messages have already started to annoy me as > > a) there are relatively a lot of them > > There are only a few per day maximum from me. If there were more that > reached you today it's probably because it contained the whole feed up > to now. I ignored the initial dump due to the addition of the feed of course. I'm mainly talking about the two you posted after you added the feed: 19:51 and 19:53. If that's the kind of thing we can expect, I really think it's inappropriate. Planet would very soon become totally unreadable if everyone (or even just a few active people) would start microblogging for e.g. ever package upload or he does. And that _is_ the level at which you are doing your microblogging. I suggest you remove the feed until there is some kind of proper support specifically for microblogging as suggested in other replies. TIA, FJP signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Twittering on planet.d.o?
Le mardi 07 avril 2009 à 21:58 +0200, Luk Claes a écrit : > I think having a very limited amount of tweets from people that do not > write long blog posts is ok, though if it's not appreciated I'll remove > my feed. Conceptually it’s not a bother, but it’s clear to me that Planet is not meant to handle such feeds correctly. Either Planet should be made to display them better, or another aggregation channel could be setup for microblogging. -- .''`. Debian 5.0 "Lenny" has been released! : :' : `. `' Last night, Darth Vader came down from planet Vulcan and told `-me that if you don't install Lenny, he'd melt your brain. signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
Re: Twittering on planet.d.o?
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 09:58:29PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > Well I don't intend to tweet extensively, but only as a replacement for > real blogging as I'm not up to writing long blog posts. > > > Luk: what do you think yourself? > > I think having a very limited amount of tweets from people that do not > write long blog posts is ok, though if it's not appreciated I'll remove > my feed. Maybe it makes sense to enhance planet to collapse microblogging feeds into at most one item per day via some special-handling? Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Twittering on planet.d.o?
On 2009-04-07, Frans Pop wrote: [microblogging on planet] > What do others think? I like the planet-kde approach to microblogging. It is in a seperate box on planet and not part of the main rss feed. /Sune > Cheers, >=46JP > > Some examples: > http://identi.ca/notice/3281464 > http://identi.ca/notice/3281436 > > --nextPart2301591.TPDXCXMdVQ > Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc > Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. > > > --nextPart2301591.TPDXCXMdVQ-- > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Twittering on planet.d.o?
Frans Pop wrote: > (Luk BCCed to make sure he sees the thread.) No need, I read -project. > It appears that today either Luk himself or someone else added a "Status" > feed to planet.d.o with one-liner info messages about what Luk's up to. I did that. > These messages have already started to annoy me as > a) there are relatively a lot of them There are only a few per day maximum from me. If there were more that reached you today it's probably because it contained the whole feed up to now. > b) they don't really provide any information, or at least no context > c) they are very simply not blog posts They are indeed no genuine blog posts, it are microblogging posts. > Although sending out such messages may be interesting to some, I also do > not think they can be a replacement for proper announcements of changes > in services or whatever. We have proper, official communication channels > for that. (But that may not be the intention anyway.) They are not meant as proper announcements as there should not be any proper announcement on a blog (unless it's a copy of something on the lists) IMHO. > Although I don't use Twitter myself, I understand that's a service that > has been set up for such messages. I don't use Twitter btw as that is closed and the company behind it decides whatever it wants, I use an open variant called identi.ca > Personally I'd like to see planet.d.o remain a pure blog aggregator. If > people want to start a Debian twit service/channel/whatever, that's of > course fine, but let's not mix dissimilar things in one service. Well I don't intend to tweet extensively, but only as a replacement for real blogging as I'm not up to writing long blog posts. > Luk: what do you think yourself? I think having a very limited amount of tweets from people that do not write long blog posts is ok, though if it's not appreciated I'll remove my feed. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Twittering on planet.d.o?
(Luk BCCed to make sure he sees the thread.) It appears that today either Luk himself or someone else added a "Status" feed to planet.d.o with one-liner info messages about what Luk's up to. These messages have already started to annoy me as a) there are relatively a lot of them b) they don't really provide any information, or at least no context c) they are very simply not blog posts Although sending out such messages may be interesting to some, I also do not think they can be a replacement for proper announcements of changes in services or whatever. We have proper, official communication channels for that. (But that may not be the intention anyway.) Although I don't use Twitter myself, I understand that's a service that has been set up for such messages. Personally I'd like to see planet.d.o remain a pure blog aggregator. If people want to start a Debian twit service/channel/whatever, that's of course fine, but let's not mix dissimilar things in one service. Luk: what do you think yourself? What do others think? Cheers, FJP Some examples: http://identi.ca/notice/3281464 http://identi.ca/notice/3281436 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
