Re: Need debian lenny source code
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Venkatesh Pawar wrote: > I am Venkatesh Pawar need a link for debian lenny os source code for > some operation purpose. So can you please tell me from where should i > download source code of debian lenny os. It will be great help if uou help > me. Others have answered your question but I would like to point out that Debian lenny is obsolete and no longer receives security updates. I suggest that you should upgrade to Debian wheezy as soon as possible. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caktje6fouk8s5a44ip9o0xfucenjf9noxdh543dcnrodyym...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Need debian lenny source code
Hi, On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 10:04:29AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Fri, December 13, 2013 09:44, Venkatesh Pawar wrote: > > I am Venkatesh Pawar need a link for debian lenny os source code for > > some operation purpose. > > You can put the following in your sources.list to be able to "apt-get > source " on a Lenny system: > > deb-src http://archive.debian.org/debian lenny main Note you can also search old packages at: http://archive.debian.net/ then use the relevant links to source, binaries etc. -- Simon Paillard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131213213745.gc15...@mraw.org
Debian Maintainers Keyring changes
The following changes to the debian-maintainers keyring have just been activated: su...@sur5r.net Full name: Jakob Haufe Added key: 7BF5F6AC36431F5D40DC137A4CF2B218F54DAE3D Debian distribution maintenance software, on behalf of the Keyring maintainers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vryxa-0007ec...@franck.debian.org
Re: Google contacting (harassing?) new DDs
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 11:20:43AM -0500, Brian Gupta wrote: > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Marc Haber > wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 06:02:27PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote: > >> it looks like as soon as one becomes DD, an email arrives from Google > >> recruiters. > > > > So they basically take our DD selection process as a filter to weed > > out potential candidates. > > > > How flattering. > > > > Greetings > > Marc, who made the experience that Google will stop contacting you if > > you state that you are not willing to move to a Googlecity > > Ironically enough, this thread has taken up more slots in my inbox > than emails by Google recruiters this year by a 900% margin. This happens because you're subscribed. You can easily reverse this margin by unsubscribing. > Hint: write back and say something like "I am flattered, but > absolutely not on the market. Please don't contact me again for at > least 2 years." It seems there's no definitive way to unsubscribe from G's recruiters, unfortunately, but yes, your hint may eventually work. > That said if I was running a company that deployed a lot of Debian > derived Linux systems, I'd certainly expect my hiring managers to be > talking to Debian Developers, and I don't think we should fault them > for it. I think there's no way to change their recruiting process, no matter we consider it good, bad or whatever. Poking people is not illegal and such companies don't care about having annoying/unethical behavior if it gives them a positive balance in the end. > Perhaps when declining their overtures, it might help to point them at > http://lists.debian.org/debian-jobs/ to get them on the right track? I don't think they'll consider it at all. Regards, -- .''`. Tiago VazGPG : 1024D/A504FECA : :' : http://acaia.ca/~tiago XMPP : tiago at jabber.org `. `' tiago at debian.org IRC : tiago at OFTC `-Debian GNU/Linux - The Universal OS http://www.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131213174145.GE4173@x61
Re: Google contacting (harassing?) new DDs
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Marc Haber wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 06:02:27PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote: >> it looks like as soon as one becomes DD, an email arrives from Google >> recruiters. > > So they basically take our DD selection process as a filter to weed > out potential candidates. > > How flattering. > > Greetings > Marc, who made the experience that Google will stop contacting you if > you state that you are not willing to move to a Googlecity Ironically enough, this thread has taken up more slots in my inbox than emails by Google recruiters this year by a 900% margin. Hint: write back and say something like "I am flattered, but absolutely not on the market. Please don't contact me again for at least 2 years." That said if I was running a company that deployed a lot of Debian derived Linux systems, I'd certainly expect my hiring managers to be talking to Debian Developers, and I don't think we should fault them for it. Perhaps when declining their overtures, it might help to point them at http://lists.debian.org/debian-jobs/ to get them on the right track? -Brian > -- > - > Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header > Mannheim, Germany | lose things."Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 31958061 > Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 621 31958062 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CACFaiRx2mjeGpvKmOEx90Ht8f7=qhdywlsgypdazii5_3ye...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Google contacting (harassing?) new DDs
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 06:02:27PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote: > it looks like as soon as one becomes DD, an email arrives from Google > recruiters. So they basically take our DD selection process as a filter to weed out potential candidates. How flattering. Greetings Marc, who made the experience that Google will stop contacting you if you state that you are not willing to move to a Googlecity -- - Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | lose things."Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 31958061 Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 621 31958062 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131213123225.gt12...@torres.zugschlus.de
Re: Copyright arrangements for a web project
Bill Allombert writes ("Re: Copyright arrangements for a web project"):
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 07:45:14PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Perhaps I haven't looked in the right places but either I don't see
> > the same concerns as you do, or I haven't seen them, or I don't think
> > they're relevant for the project I'm thinking of.[1]
>
> I suggest you search in debian-vote. But I do not want to stir old grudge.
I guess you are referring to this
https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2009/11/msg0.html
and the related threads. Thanks for the reference, I had forgotten
that. I will re-read that thread and consider what you and others
have written.
> > Nevertheless your opinion is interesting to me [...]
>
> [explanations]
Thanks for that.
> > > But it is probably not the right venue to discuss the AGPLv3.
> >
> > Perhaps not. But I don't want to use debian-legal whose focus is
> > on DFSG compatibility and whose on-list consensus judgements don't
> > always seem to align with the actual decisions of those responsible
> > for these judgements within Debian.
>
> Why do you assume I do ?
I'm sorry to have apparently offended you. I didn't intend to imply
that you had suggested debian-legal. It seemed to me that
debian-legal was an obvious possible place for this conversation and I
was explaining why I chose not to use it.
Thanks again for your considered responses.
This kind of opposition to the AGPL is certainly not irrelevant to me.
Even though I'm still personally a fan of the AGPL, having seen again
these arguments (and seen that it's still considered a problem by
reasonable people) I'm probably not going to recommend it to the
project I mentioned in my head article.
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/21162.65147.830714.695...@chiark.greenend.org.uk
Re: Need debian lenny source code
Hi Venkatesh, On Fri, December 13, 2013 09:44, Venkatesh Pawar wrote: > I am Venkatesh Pawar need a link for debian lenny os source code for > some operation purpose. So can you please tell me from where should i > download source code of debian lenny os. It will be great help if uou help > me. You can put the following in your sources.list to be able to "apt-get source " on a Lenny system: deb-src http://archive.debian.org/debian lenny main Cheers, Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/97c8df20a90a24a251e3c5a43cae6848.squir...@aphrodite.kinkhorst.nl
Need debian lenny source code
Hi Sir, I am Venkatesh Pawar need a link for debian lenny os source code for some operation purpose. So can you please tell me from where should i download source code of debian lenny os. It will be great help if uou help me. Thanking you, Venkatesh Pawar.
