Re: irc.debian.org
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jorgen Schaefer wrote: >> So, here it goes. Data was collected on 2006-05-03 at around 18:40 >> CEST: > > Hmm, you seem to have missed #debian-boot, which is on freenode with > some 70 in channel. Also, you missed #debian-security and #debian-release, > which are, IIRC, on OFTC. Thanks for pointing these out - as I said, the lists do not include secret channels (channel mode +s), and all three of them do have that mode set. The list was generated with the LIST command, which does not include secret channels. Regards, -- Jorgen -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.forcix.cx/ pgp2OKs3A0uRE.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: irc.debian.org
Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You also forgot #debian-women on oftc which currently has 79. As I said, this list does not include private or secret channels, and #debian-women has +s set. Greetings, -- Jorgen -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.forcix.cx/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: irc.debian.org
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Right now I'm on those Debian related channels on OFTC: > [...] > And on Freenode: > [...] I'm not advocating Freenode really (I couldn't care less about where any #*debian* channel buffer points, really), but if we list channels on the networks, we should use complete lists. What follows is a full list of channels with the string "debian" in them, together with user numbers, on both networks. Beware. Users DO overlap, so take the numbers with a grain of salt. Also this does not include private or secret channels, and this will probably change tremendously if irc.debian.org points to oftc. If anyone feels so inclined, ey can provide a similar list for Jabber, too. So, here it goes. Data was collected on 2006-05-03 at around 18:40 CEST: * Freenode 789 #debian 168 #debian.de 103 #debian-fr 89 #debian-es 82 #debian-amd64 73 #debian-russian 69 #debian.se 69 #debian-mentors 46 #debian-kde 43 #debian.hu 43 #debian-bugs 40 #debian-edu 34 #debian-offtopic 29 #debian-zh 28 #debian-java 25 #debian-arm 24 #debian-devel-fr 24 #debian_ 23 #debian-it 23 #debian-glibc 23 #debianfr 22 #emdebian 17 #debian-pr 16 #debian-x 16 #debian-ve 15 #debian-mono 15 #debian-bots 14 #debianmexico 14 #debian-br-cdd 13 #debian-xfce 13 #debian-uy 13 #debian-co 13 #debian-ar 12 #debian-custom 11 #debian-ruby 10 #debian-sparc 10 #debian-peru 10 #debian-muc 10 #debian-france 10 #debian-de 10 #debian-catalan 9 #debian.dk 9 #debian-bleh 8 #debian-user-french 8 #debian-sp 8 #debian-mg 8 #debian-ipv6 7 #debian-oo 7 #debian-mentors-ops 7 #debian-ia64 6 #debian-women 6 #debian-qa 6 #debian-overflow 6 #debian-hurd 5 #debian.tr 5 #debian-rj 5 #debian-nonfree 5 #debianitas 5 #debian-cr 4 #debian-rs 4 #debian-pt 4 #debian-np 4 #debian-mentors-es 4 #debian-jr 4 #debian.gr 4 #debian-ce 4 #debian-anarchy * OFTC: 69 #debian-uk 65 #debian 44 #debian-kernel 36 #debian-devel-fr 28 #debian-bugs 19 #debian.or.at 16 #debian-amd64 15 #debian-mirrors 15 #debian-fr 14 #debian-lists 14 #debian-i18n 13 #debian-xen 11 #debian-python 11 #debian-l10n-fr 9 #debian-soc 7 #debian-apache 6 #debian-cd 5 #debian-live 4 #debian-webapps 3 #debian-gis 2 #debian-svn 2 #debian-social 2 #debian-mujeres 2 #debian-br 2 #debian-boot 1 #debian-xfce 1 #debian.se 1 #debian-ops 1 #debian-l10n-spanish 1 #debian-edu 1 #debian-bots 1 #debian-alsa 1 #alsa-debian Greetings, -- Jorgen -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.forcix.cx/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: irc.debian.org
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 03:52:33PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: >> On Tuesday 02 May 2006 08:40, Cord Beermann wrote: >> > >Why not move it to Jabber? More people use and know what Jabber is these >> > > days than IRC. >> > >> > Jabber doesn't have any useable non-graphic Clients. >> >> So write one or grab one of the existing ones and make it not suck. > > As it is, IRC *does* have non-sucking non-graphic clients. If you think > people should switch to Jabber, I think you ought to write such a > client, not someone who's not interested in using Jabber in the first > place. Because IRC clients are really, really nice, and Jabber clients are not (I don't know of any Jabber client I consider usable, the same for ICQ and the other IM services - I dislike licq, for example), the best option to get us incorrigible IRC freaks onto Jabber would be to improve bitlbee so it works with all features of Jabber. Oh, wait. I use bitlbee already. And it does have Jabber support (thought not optimal). But I never bothered to get a Jabber account. Let me think of why. *ponder* Oh, right, I never met anyone with a Jabber account that wasn't on IRC most of the time. But that's probably just because we IRC geeks form a single Jabber-hostile group. Greetings, -- Jorgen -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.forcix.cx/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Third call for votes for the debian project leader election 2006
Helen Faulkner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It seems to me that we are already in a situation where only the > people who are really interested in, or informed about, a > particular question are voting on it. And that's bad because ...? Greetings, -- Jorgen -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.forcix.cx/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Screenshots
Anders Breindahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Debian is a distribution, and as such delivers its package repositories and > its packaging system. In my humble opinion, one really can't brag about the > work of others. How about the installer? :-) Greetings, -- Jorgen -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.forcix.cx/ pgp3XBcM7lmrb.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Debian sponsoring Chinese companies?
Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 23:10 +0100, Jorgen Schaefer wrote: >> WikiSpam is a known problem [0, 1] and there have been various >> discussions on how to deal with it. You might want to participate >> by helping to remove the spam from the wiki :-) > > I have already removed spam from hundreds of wiki pages, but the rate of > defacement keeps increasing. Thanks! wiki.debian.net should probably join the BannedContentNetwork [0]... > Just look[0] at how many pages the asshole at 221.219.51.17 has > hit in the past 24 hours. Also, although it is possible to > remove spam, one can't easily restore material that the asshole > has deleted. Kwiki doesn't allow to edit old page revisions? That's VERY disturbing. All major wiki engines do that. :-( [0] http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/emacs-en/BannedContentDiscussion Greetings, -- Jorgen -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.forcix.cx/
Re: Debian sponsoring Chinese companies?
Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It seems that Debian has chosen to provide space (e.g., [0]) where a > number of fine Chinese companies can post links to their websites. The > RecentChanges page[1] shows that one IP address has modified scores of > pages in the past 24 hours. Is this really something that Debian should > be doing? > > [0]http://wiki.debian.net/index.cgi?KwikiTodo > [1]http://wiki.debian.net/index.cgi?RecentChanges WikiSpam is a known problem [0, 1] and there have been various discussions on how to deal with it. You might want to participate by helping to remove the spam from the wiki :-) Greetings, -- Jorgen [0] http://www.usemod.com/cgi-bin/mb.pl?WikiSpam [1] http://www.emacswiki.org/cw/WikiSpam -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.forcix.cx/
