Re: check status of tsocks on !linux

2016-02-27 Thread Andreas Beckmann 
Thanks for analyzing the problem!

On 2016-02-27 22:12, intrigeri wrote:
> Does this affect any release architecture?

No I doesn't.

I just filed #816136 against tsocks to document this problem, and
#816137 against dpkg for creating the broken package in the first place.

There should be another bug against wanna-build (or whatever else) for
adding yet another state "Rejected", so packages don't stay at
"Uploaded" forever if they cannot move on to "Installed".

Andreas

Re: check status of tsocks on !linux

2016-02-27 Thread intrigeri 
Adam D. Barratt wrote (27 Feb 2016 18:41:41 GMT) :
> CC-ing the NMUer, as this will need fixing in the package.

Received, and read. I'm sorry for having messed up a NMU, and broken
a couple interesting non-release archs.

Does this affect any release architecture?

If it doesn't, then given how my backlog looks like these days, I'm
afraid I'll have to prioritize other matters. I'm not involved in
porting to hurd and kfreebsd.

Cheers,
-- 
intrigeri

Re: check status of tsocks on !linux

2016-02-27 Thread Adam D. Barratt 
On Sat, 2016-02-27 at 19:26 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Andreas Beckmann, on Sat 27 Feb 2016 15:58:29 +0100, wrote:
> > could someone check the status of tsocks on hurd and kfreebsd, the
> > packages are listed as "Uploaded" for "41 days". Something seems to need
> > a little shaking to get them "Installed" :-)
> > 
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=tsocks&suite=unstable
> 
> This is what I get in the REJECT ftpmaster mail:
> 
> > tsocks-dbgsym_1.8beta5-9.3_hurd-i386.deb: APT could not parse Built-Using 
> > field
> 
> I don't know why tsocks is particular here.

According to the hurd-i386 log at
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=tsocks&arch=hurd-i386&ver=1.8beta5-9.3&stamp=1456586414
 :

 Built-Using: libc6 (= )

The changelog says:

   * Document with Built-Using that tsocks ships the saveme binary,
 that is statically linked against libc6 (Closes: #769343).

so I assume the patch is failing to take account of libc having
different names across architectures. Indeed:

EXTRA_PACKAGES="libc6"
echo -n "extra:Built-Using=" >> debian/tsocks.substvars
for package in $EXTRA_PACKAGES; do
  dpkg-query -f '${source:Package} (= ${source:Version}), ' -W $package 
2>/dev/null
done >> debian/tsocks.substvars

CC-ing the NMUer, as this will need fixing in the package.

Regards,

Adam

Re: check status of tsocks on !linux

2016-02-27 Thread Samuel Thibault 
Hello,

Andreas Beckmann, on Sat 27 Feb 2016 15:58:29 +0100, wrote:
> could someone check the status of tsocks on hurd and kfreebsd, the
> packages are listed as "Uploaded" for "41 days". Something seems to need
> a little shaking to get them "Installed" :-)
> 
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=tsocks&suite=unstable

This is what I get in the REJECT ftpmaster mail:

> tsocks-dbgsym_1.8beta5-9.3_hurd-i386.deb: APT could not parse Built-Using 
> field

I don't know why tsocks is particular here.

Samuel

check status of tsocks on !linux

2016-02-27 Thread Andreas Beckmann 
Hi,

could someone check the status of tsocks on hurd and kfreebsd, the
packages are listed as "Uploaded" for "41 days". Something seems to need
a little shaking to get them "Installed" :-)

https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=tsocks&suite=unstable


Andreas