Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH v2 10/10] drm/msm/dsi: drop modeset sanity checks

2022-09-27 Thread Abhinav Kumar




On 9/27/2022 12:16 AM, Johan Hovold wrote:

On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 11:21:38AM -0700, Abhinav Kumar wrote:



On 9/13/2022 1:53 AM, Johan Hovold wrote:

Drop the overly defensive modeset sanity checks of function parameters
which have already been checked or used by the callers.

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov 
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold 


The change LGTM, hence

Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar 

I think we can use below fixes tag so that we can pick up this entire
series for the fixes cycle.

Fixes: 3f0689e66352 ("drm/msm/dsi: check msm_dsi and dsi pointers before
use")


Same here. I wouldn't add a Fixes tag unless required by some DRM
process.

Johan


Same response as the prev one, we will apply everything except the last 
two patches of this series in the -fixes and take these two for the next 
kernel rev push.


Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH v2 10/10] drm/msm/dsi: drop modeset sanity checks

2022-09-27 Thread Johan Hovold
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 11:21:38AM -0700, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
> 
> 
> On 9/13/2022 1:53 AM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > Drop the overly defensive modeset sanity checks of function parameters
> > which have already been checked or used by the callers.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov 
> > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold 
> 
> The change LGTM, hence
> 
> Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar 
> 
> I think we can use below fixes tag so that we can pick up this entire 
> series for the fixes cycle.
> 
> Fixes: 3f0689e66352 ("drm/msm/dsi: check msm_dsi and dsi pointers before
> use")

Same here. I wouldn't add a Fixes tag unless required by some DRM
process.

Johan


Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH v2 10/10] drm/msm/dsi: drop modeset sanity checks

2022-09-26 Thread Abhinav Kumar




On 9/13/2022 1:53 AM, Johan Hovold wrote:

Drop the overly defensive modeset sanity checks of function parameters
which have already been checked or used by the callers.

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov 
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold 


The change LGTM, hence

Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar 

I think we can use below fixes tag so that we can pick up this entire 
series for the fixes cycle.


Fixes: 3f0689e66352 ("drm/msm/dsi: check msm_dsi and dsi pointers before
use")


---
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.c | 7 +--
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.c
index 8a95c744972a..31fdee2052be 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.c
@@ -211,14 +211,9 @@ void __exit msm_dsi_unregister(void)
  int msm_dsi_modeset_init(struct msm_dsi *msm_dsi, struct drm_device *dev,
 struct drm_encoder *encoder)
  {
-   struct msm_drm_private *priv;
+   struct msm_drm_private *priv = dev->dev_private;
int ret;
  
-	if (WARN_ON(!encoder) || WARN_ON(!msm_dsi) || WARN_ON(!dev))

-   return -EINVAL;
-
-   priv = dev->dev_private;
-
if (priv->num_bridges == ARRAY_SIZE(priv->bridges)) {
DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev->dev, "too many bridges\n");
return -ENOSPC;


Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH v2 10/10] drm/msm/dsi: drop modeset sanity checks

2022-09-22 Thread Kuogee Hsieh



On 9/13/2022 1:53 AM, Johan Hovold wrote:

Drop the overly defensive modeset sanity checks of function parameters
which have already been checked or used by the callers.

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov 
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold 

Tested-by: Kuogee Hsieh 
Reviewed-by: Kuogee Hsieh 

---
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.c | 7 +--
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.c
index 8a95c744972a..31fdee2052be 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.c
@@ -211,14 +211,9 @@ void __exit msm_dsi_unregister(void)
  int msm_dsi_modeset_init(struct msm_dsi *msm_dsi, struct drm_device *dev,
 struct drm_encoder *encoder)
  {
-   struct msm_drm_private *priv;
+   struct msm_drm_private *priv = dev->dev_private;
int ret;
  
-	if (WARN_ON(!encoder) || WARN_ON(!msm_dsi) || WARN_ON(!dev))

-   return -EINVAL;
-
-   priv = dev->dev_private;
-
if (priv->num_bridges == ARRAY_SIZE(priv->bridges)) {
DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev->dev, "too many bridges\n");
return -ENOSPC;