Re: [Emc-users] Number of available variables
On 12/17/2013 03:33 PM, andy pugh wrote: >> I am trying to create a compiling backend to gcmc and the maximum >> complexity of the program will depend on the available storage. > You could use named variables instead. Not for indirect addressing. A lot of the memory needs to be addressed using #[var] or #[#123] constructs and the target is always a numerical variable. Unless you know of a way to store strings in variables and dereference them. -- Greetings Bertho (disclaimers are disclaimed) -- Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
Re: [Emc-users] Number of available variables
On 17 December 2013 14:09, Bertho Stultiens wrote: > > I am trying to create a compiling backend to gcmc and the maximum > complexity of the program will depend on the available storage. You could use named variables instead. -- atp If you can't fix it, you don't own it. http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto -- Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users