[Bug fortran/68243] QOI: no warning about unused entities in submodules

2015-11-20 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68243

Paul Thomas  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |INVALID

--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas  ---
Dear Martin,

I believe that the testcase in my previous comment shows that this PR is
invalid. If you do not agree, please reopen it and tell me why.

Thanks for the report anyway!

Cheers

Paul

[Bug fortran/68243] QOI: no warning about unused entities in submodules

2015-11-19 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68243

--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas  ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
> Confirmed.

Isn't this testcase a demonstration that unused3 and unused4 can be used
outside of m2?

module m1
  implicit none
  private
  interface
module subroutine s1
end subroutine
  end interface
  public s1
  integer unused1
contains
  subroutine unused2
  end subroutine
end module

submodule (m1) m2
  implicit none
  integer :: unused3 = 9
contains
  subroutine unused4
unused3 = 99
  end subroutine
end submodule

submodule (m1:m2) m3
  implicit none
contains
  module procedure s1
print *, unused3
call unused4
print *, unused3
  end procedure
end submodule

  use m1
  call s1
end

Cheers

Paul

[Bug fortran/68243] QOI: no warning about unused entities in submodules

2015-11-08 Thread paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68243

--- Comment #4 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com  ---
Sorry! Wrong PR.

On 8 November 2015 at 11:18, pault at gcc dot gnu.org
 wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68243
>
> --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas  ---
> (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #2)
>> That's a wierd one! I'll take a look later on.
>
> I presume that I have to lay out the common block with the pointer and the
> string length variable together? It's the only way that I can see to do this.
>
> It works with the "other brand".
>
> Cheers
>
> Paul
>
> --
> You are receiving this mail because:
> You are on the CC list for the bug.
> You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug fortran/68243] QOI: no warning about unused entities in submodules

2015-11-08 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68243

--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas  ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #2)
> That's a wierd one! I'll take a look later on.

I presume that I have to lay out the common block with the pointer and the
string length variable together? It's the only way that I can see to do this.

It works with the "other brand".

Cheers

Paul

[Bug fortran/68243] QOI: no warning about unused entities in submodules

2015-11-07 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68243

Paul Thomas  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org  |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas  ---
That's a wierd one! I'll take a look later on.

Thanks

Paul

[Bug fortran/68243] QOI: no warning about unused entities in submodules

2015-11-07 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68243

Dominique d'Humieres  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Last reconfirmed||2015-11-07
 CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres  ---
Confirmed.