[Bug middle-end/30421] incorrect warning when using firstprivate and lastprivate clauses
--- Comment #8 from kuba at et dot pl 2007-01-28 00:02 --- Subject: Re: incorrect warning when using firstprivate and lastprivate clauses I realised that maybe is just better to set TREE_NO_WARNING (fd->v) = 1; instead of set it (fd->v) to 0. We are sure that fd->v won't be read before is set, so there is no need to add one more instruction. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30421
[Bug middle-end/30421] incorrect warning when using firstprivate and lastprivate clauses
--- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-26 23:46 --- Fixed in SVN. -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30421
[Bug middle-end/30421] incorrect warning when using firstprivate and lastprivate clauses
--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-24 21:02 --- Subject: Bug 30421 Author: jakub Date: Wed Jan 24 21:01:37 2007 New Revision: 121134 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=121134 Log: PR middle-end/30421 * omp-low.c (lower_omp_for_lastprivate): Add dlist argument. If lower_lastprivate_clauses emits some statements, append them to dlist rather than body_p and to body_p append an initializer. (lower_omp_for): Adjust caller. * gcc.dg/gomp/pr30421.c: New test. Added: branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/gomp/pr30421.c Modified: branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/omp-low.c branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30421
[Bug middle-end/30421] incorrect warning when using firstprivate and lastprivate clauses
--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-24 20:53 --- Subject: Bug 30421 Author: jakub Date: Wed Jan 24 20:53:08 2007 New Revision: 121131 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=121131 Log: PR middle-end/30421 * omp-low.c (lower_omp_for_lastprivate): Add dlist argument. If lower_lastprivate_clauses emits some statements, append them to dlist rather than body_p and to body_p append an initializer. (lower_omp_for): Adjust caller. * gcc.dg/gomp/pr30421.c: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/gomp/pr30421.c Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/omp-low.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30421
[Bug middle-end/30421] incorrect warning when using firstprivate and lastprivate clauses
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 18:23 --- Testing a fix. -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-01-18 18:23:03 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30421
[Bug middle-end/30421] incorrect warning when using firstprivate and lastprivate clauses
--- Comment #3 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-15 08:55 --- Thanks for your patch but if you want it to be reviewed, it is better to send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . -- manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30421
[Bug middle-end/30421] incorrect warning when using firstprivate and lastprivate clauses
--- Comment #2 from kuba at et dot pl 2007-01-10 03:08 --- Ok, I've found that my patch doesn't work when we also you schedule clause :> I'll try to correct that, but I would like to know if my first patch is correct. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30421
[Bug middle-end/30421] incorrect warning when using firstprivate and lastprivate clauses
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|minor |normal Keywords||diagnostic http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30421
[Bug middle-end/30421] incorrect warning when using firstprivate and lastprivate clauses
--- Comment #1 from kuba at et dot pl 2007-01-10 02:49 --- Created an attachment (id=12877) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12877&action=view) in 'expand_omp_for_static_nochunk' iterator is set before first condition. This is my first patch for GCC. Please be lenient :) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30421