Re: [gentoo-user] ~x86 emerge: broke emerge

2004-02-05 Thread Frank J. Mattia
i had this problem about a week ago.  emerging gcc for the first time 
after switching to ~x86 resulted in something happening where many of 
the g++ libs that are usually (iirc - im not at my computer right now) 
put in /usr/lib/ were not there.  basically i was getting the exact same 
error message you are.  i did a locate for it (and then subsequently all 
the other libs it couldnt find) and copied them manually to /usr/bin.  i 
didnt think to try ldconfig or anything like that so im not sure.  but 
since then i have upgraded gcc again and everythings worked perfectly.  
one side affect you may notice if you tried starting gnome from the 
command prompt would be that nautilis didnt start even after you fixed 
the problem.  im not sure why but just running it once from a terminal 
and everything went back to normal (normal being that nautilis starts 
with gnome again).

ive been using ~x86 for maybe 2 weeks now and that was my first 
encounter.  just remember.  switching back to x86 isnt the easiest thing 
to do.  and besides - there are too many benifits to living on the 
edge.  constant heart failure is one of them ;)

currently im having problems with openoffice-ximian but i think its 
related to trying to run 5 parallel makes (the changelog says something 
about parallel makes not playing nice) and pwlib wont compile either.  
other than that im much happier in ~x86.

have fun,
Frank J. Mattia
Kurt Guenther wrote:

It broke on a "emerge world".  I haven't deleted anything for some time.

I found the shlib, so I put it on my LD_LIBRARY_PATH.  Much better!

I'll go back to the relative safety of X86.

--Kurt


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] courier-imap / maildir

2004-02-03 Thread Frank J. Mattia
please excuse me if this problems already been solved - or if im 
answering the wrong question.  i have only read the last two posts to 
this thread.

my web host provides courier-imap service to me on a openbsd box and 
recently i decided to take advantage of it.  what i found was that i was 
unable to delete any directories under trash.  i brought it up to them 
and here is what came out of it.

--

Here comes a patch to be included in your Courier IMAP 1.7.2 port. courier-imap cannot delete (empty) folders because it uses unlink() on Maildirs which are not emty (they contain cur/, tmp/ new/). courier-imap checks for a return code EISDIR on unlink and then recurses down to this dir (delsubdir() in maildir/maildirdelfolder.c).

On OpenBSD (3.4-current, at least) unlink returns EPERM, not EISDIR if unlink() is used on a directory.

This small patch changes the folder deletion routine accordingly.

Regards,
Marc
--090009000502030601020708
Content-Type: text/plain; name="patch-maildir_maildirdelfolder_c"
Content-Disposition: inline; filename="patch-maildir_maildirdelfolder_c"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
--- maildir/maildirdelfolder.c.orig Mon Jan 26 16:24:17 2004
+++ maildir/maildirdelfolder.c  Mon Jan 26 16:27:25 2004
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
		strcat(strcat(strcpy(p, s), "/"), de->d_name);

-   if (unlink(p) && errno == EISDIR)
+   if (unlink(p) && errno == EPERM)
{
if (delsubdir(p))
{
--090009000502030601020708--

hope this helps any.

- Frank

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] NPTL help

2004-02-02 Thread Frank J. Mattia
are you using ~x86.  also, what version of glibc did you compile?

Wayne Oliver wrote:

Hi All

I have been running the 2.6.x kernels for sometime now.
I decided to give nptl a try.
The machine is a P3 933 with 256Mb RAM running mm-sources(2.6.1)
I emerged linux-headers... and then emerge glibc but I get an Error stating

You have the nptl use flag set but your kernel or architecture does not
support it.

Do I need to recompile my kernel after emerging the 2.6 headers?

Regards
Wayne
--

This message may contain information which is confidential, private or
privileged in nature.  If you are not the intended recipient , you may not
peruse , use, disseminate, distribute or copy this message or file which is
attached to this message.  If you have received this message in error ,
please notify the sender immediately by e-mail , facsimile or telephone and
thereafter return and /or destroy the original message. Any views of this
communication are those of the sender except where the sender specifically
states them to be those of Tsogo Sun Casino's . Please note that the
recipient must scan this e-mail and any attached files for viruses and the
like.  Tsogo Sun Casino's accept no liability of whatever nature for any
loss, liability, damage or expense resulting directly or indirectly from the
access and/or downloading of any files which are attached to this e-mail
message.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] many apps fail after upgrading gcc

2004-01-22 Thread Frank J. Mattia
thanks for the response,

First read go and very very carefully read:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook.xml?part=2&chap=2#doc_chap4
 

i've read that and basically it explained everthing i needed to know 
beforehand.  which, mostly i did.  however, my questions come after 
making the move to 2.6.1-mm5 - not necessarily ~x86.

Once you've done that, _try_ downgrading gcc again unless your confident that
 

i cant downgrade anything.  emerge right now fails on everything because 
it needs libstdc++.so.5... so ill symlink 6 to 5 and try again.

Also realize that the most "bleeding-edge" thing you can do at the moment is 
to go with the 2.6 headers. Furthermore, they weren't actually required to 
use a 2.6 kernel.

right, they weren't.  but they were required to get nptl support 
compiled into glibc.  now, im noticing that nptl support was stripped 
from the latest build of glibc and if i get portage working, ill have to 
resort to a pre-xxx version.  but even still, shouldnt there be a 
linux-headers-2.6.1 so that i can have matching headers to compile glibc 
against?

thanks again,
Frank
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] many apps fail after upgrading gcc

2004-01-22 Thread Frank J. Mattia
sorry, i was in a rush to leave for work this morning and now that im 
rereading my message i can see that i was lacking in some clarity... so 
heres more of a detailed explanation:

last week i had started my trip to the bleeding edge pretty gently.  i 
had a 2.6.0 kernel and decided to get the linux-headers to match.  got 
the headers, added nptl to my use flags, recompiled kernel, then glibc.  
all is well.  nptl works.  i passed on recompiling my whole system just 
yet because of the problems with X and svgalib.  moving to the end of 
last week i started using the 2.6.0-mm series.  impressed with the mm 
branch this week i moved to the 2.6.1-mm line.  note, since the first 
time i recompiled glibc, i have not done it since.  yesterday i noticed 
a glibc upgrade so i decided to go for it.  however before the build 
process started i got an error about the kernel or headers or something 
being incompatible with nptl.  from here i assumed that it was because 
my headers didnt match my kernel.  to my dimay (or maybe i just dont 
know something that everyone else does) i could not find any 2.6.1 
linux-headers.  after some toying around i decided to go "~x86" and 
started upgrading packages... first portage... then gentoolkit.. then 
binutils... then gcc.. BAM... after gcc upgraded to 3.3.something (the 
lastest inportage as of yesterday).. most apps that i open say they cant 
find libstdc++.so.5  which isnt suprising because it doesnt exist 
anymore...

so is there a sane way for me to go about fixing this problem or do i 
just never upgrade gcc?  or is there a certain way of upgrading gcc as 
to not break things...

thanks again,
Frank
whats the standard way of upgrading gcc?  i just started using ~x86 last
nite and upgrading gcc completed - but is now throwing more errors on
libstdc++.so.5
even emerge throws errors on it.  so i cant emerge anything else.  any
idea whats going on?  im using a 2.6.1-mm5 kernel with 2.6.0
linux-headers (because 2.6.1 headers arent out in portage apparently)
with NPTL in glibc (compiled when my kernel matched my headers, last
week).
thanks.

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


[gentoo-user] many apps fail after upgrading gcc

2004-01-22 Thread Frank J. Mattia
whats the standard way of upgrading gcc?  i just started using ~x86 last
nite and upgrading gcc completed - but is now throwing more errors on
libstdc++.so.5

even emerge throws errors on it.  so i cant emerge anything else.  any
idea whats going on?  im using a 2.6.1-mm5 kernel with 2.6.0
linux-headers (because 2.6.1 headers arent out in portage apparently)
with NPTL in glibc (compiled when my kernel matched my headers, last
week).

thanks.


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] portage-2.0.50_pre19.tar.bz2

2004-01-21 Thread Frank J. Mattia
yeah, and i just noticed that it was only released a little bit ago... 
the package database says it was released today at 21:55 something or
another.  here in NJ, its just about hitting 21:30.

btw, are you the same Ciaran who authored a few of the html-kit plugins?

- Frank J. Mattia
Mattia Industries, Inc.

On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 22:25, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 22:26:04 -0500 "Frank J. Mattia"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | is it me or is that version of portage not on any mirror at all?  ive
> | been trying for over an hour between mirrorselect and whathaveyou..
> | trying to find it... but all ikeep getting are file not found
> | errors...
> 
> Portage _pre versions are generally only kept on Nick's box (this lets
> him get an idea of the number of users). Unfortunately, his ISP is being
> screwy just now, so you may have problems getting hold of it...


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-user] portage-2.0.50_pre19.tar.bz2

2004-01-21 Thread Frank J. Mattia
is it me or is that version of portage not on any mirror at all?  ive
been trying for over an hour between mirrorselect and whathaveyou..
trying to find it... but all ikeep getting are file not found errors...


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] linux-headers-2.6.1?

2004-01-21 Thread Frank J. Mattia
my apologies for starting a new topic in an existing thread.  it was
very unintentional.  (i did a reply-to-list in ximian and didnt realize
i was clicking on the thread i was currently reading).

On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 21:49, Frank J. Mattia wrote:
> last week sometime i compiled a 2.6.0-mm kernel and glibc with NPTL.  i
> had my linux-headers emerged and all.. etc...  worked fine.
> 
> this week ive upgraded to a 2.6.1-mm5 kernel and (im guessing here)
> because i still have 2.6.0 headers glibc complains and says i have a
> problem with compatibility and wont do NPTL...  is there any way around
> this or do i have to wait for 2.6.1 headers to make it to portage...
> 
> btw.. i just probably gave myself more grief than i started with.  i
> just did an ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86".. heh.. now im emerging some
> things... while not emerging glibc... any insight would be appreciated
> 
> -Frank J. Mattia
> Mattia Industries, Inc.
> 
> 
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
> 


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-user] linux-headers-2.6.1?

2004-01-21 Thread Frank J. Mattia
last week sometime i compiled a 2.6.0-mm kernel and glibc with NPTL.  i
had my linux-headers emerged and all.. etc...  worked fine.

this week ive upgraded to a 2.6.1-mm5 kernel and (im guessing here)
because i still have 2.6.0 headers glibc complains and says i have a
problem with compatibility and wont do NPTL...  is there any way around
this or do i have to wait for 2.6.1 headers to make it to portage...

btw.. i just probably gave myself more grief than i started with.  i
just did an ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86".. heh.. now im emerging some
things... while not emerging glibc... any insight would be appreciated

-Frank J. Mattia
Mattia Industries, Inc.


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone interested in a fix compiling XFree86 with headers 2.6.0???

2004-01-15 Thread Frank J. Mattia
I just managed to compile my xfree 4.3.0-r3 with linux-headers 2.6 it needs
i have always been a little unsure about what the purpose was to upgrade your 
linux-headers..  it seems like that should be something you do everytime they're 
upgraded but apparently people still use old ones... what needs to be done after you 
emerge them.. do they overwrite the existing ones or do they get another folder..etc..
-Frank
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] Centralized user authentication

2003-12-30 Thread Frank J. Mattia
In a similar topic on slashdot i posed the same question.  the general 
concensus is NIS but if there is an open alternative i would love to 
hear about it.  my comment on slashdot (and all subsequent replys) are 
at 
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=90828&cid=7827715http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=90828&cid=7827715

cheers,
Frank J. Mattia
i think thats the first time ive ever used cheers in a salutation.  and 
if anyone knows of a better name for the closing part of a letter (other 
than salutation) - please, for the love of rediwhip...  tell me.  i've 
been racking my brain - and google - to no avail.

lucas wrote:

I am wanting to setup some form of Centralized user authentication for 
my home gentoo network and was wondering what ppl here recommend.
I have had a bit of a look at NIS, and OpenLDAP. NIS from what i have 
read seams to be a bit insecure and outdated, and OpenLDAP seams to be 
over kill.

Would really like to hear ppls recommendation and comments, thanks


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] "vga=791" no longer works with 2.6.0

2003-12-19 Thread Frank J. Mattia
therein lies the problem.  im not using an nvidia anything.  im using a 
matrox parhelia (which somehow i doubt is supported by the matroxfb.  
but anyway.. when i get home im going to replace my vga= line with 
video=matrox:vesa:0x1BF to see if that helps.  vga= just looks like its 
asking for problems (in its simplicity.  i mean come on.. who ever heard 
of any option in anything ever just taking a single paramter which 
controls screen res, color depth, and fb.. etc... its just tooo easy..).

i do have all of the proper config options enabled.  thank you for your 
advice though.  if this doesnt work ill go back and rtfm some more.  
maybe find that one kernel opt i missed.

on another note.. would you have any idea about the mouse probs, or what 
driver i should compile for a generic ac97 onboard soundcard?

thanks.
frank
SN wrote:

You have to use certain options for the kernel config, just do a search in
the mailinglist archive for nvidia framebuffer and you will find the correct
options you have to use.
By the way I'm  running 2.6 stable since yesterday, on my box everything is
working X, nvidia drivers, sensors, alsa, sysfs.
I just have one little issue at the moment, one programm while running needs
about 20% of cpu time now with the old kernel it was between 5-10 percent,
I'm just recompiling glibc and xfree to see if that helps.
 

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] "vga=791" no longer works with 2.6.0

2003-12-19 Thread Frank J. Mattia
I have this same issue.  I use 795 i think for 1600x1200 and i get the 
same blank screen.  i know that someone mentioned something about their 
nvidia drivers or something but im using a plain jane matrox parheila 
512 card and have never needed any external drivers..

not only that but when i take away the vga parameter (which im sure you 
must have tried) and gdm starts up.. if i ctl-alt-Fx anything.. i get a 
garbled output...  its like all the vtermals are corrupted after any 
g/xdm starts...

i would love to know a solution to this because its one of the few 
things hanging me up with the 2.6 kernel (that and i cant find the post 
on how to get 2.4 mouse behavior or how to get alsa working on generic 
ac97 onboard soundcard)...

thanks,
frank
sorry for my poor english - im not usually that lazy.  its just that its 
3:30 am and i have work in 2 hours... and still need to sleep.

Sebastian Bergmann wrote:

 I updated my GENTOO/Linux laptop to gentoo-dev-sources-2.6.0 -- and am
 quite happy with it.
 Except for one thing: The "vga=791" boot parameter that I used with the
 2.4 kernel series to have a 1024x768 console during boot no longer
 works. If I pass it to the kernel I get a blank screen until gdm has
 been started.
 Any idea on what the correct parameter would be?

 Thanks in advance,
Sebastian
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] Evolution 1.5 on Gentoo

2003-12-11 Thread Frank J. Mattia
I do not recommend trying evolution's development versions, unless you

have a red-carpet supported system, in my experience it is dependency
hell (some of their test packages break other gnome programs).
 

actually, they say on their site that using any dev version voids you 
right to support... so if thats the case.. i wouldnt use a dev version 
if you DO have a support contract...

i could be wrong.
- Frank
On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 19:54, Goran Kavrecic wrote:
 

I've downloaded Evolution 1.5 and tried to compile it on Gentoo 1.4
Gnome 2.4
Package
Version
Evolution
1.5
Gtkhtml
3.1.4
Gal
2.1.1
Evolution Data Server
0.0.3
Libsoup
2.1.2
It compiled libsoup ok, the configure failed on gtkhtml due missing
enough new gal, but gal stopped due missing XML parser for perl:
configure: error: XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool

Or maybe it misses perl for XML-parser? How do I get it?

Regards,
Goran
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
   



--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] Windows partitions ro

2003-07-16 Thread Frank J. Mattia
check the man pages for mount and fstab...  id say that its a very easy 
thing to do...  that is, unless the windows partitions are on separate 
computers.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Is there any way to let non-root users to read/write to Windows 
partitions? Thanx. :o)

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


[gentoo-user] kde and qt required for gnome?

2003-07-03 Thread Frank J. Mattia
Good day,
i was wondering why kde-base/arts and x11-libs/qt were required for 
gnome?  i have USE ="-qt -kde" in my make.conf file  yet emerge -p gnome 
it lists the aforementioned packages.

Thanks,
Frank
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] ebuild error on ncurses

2003-07-01 Thread Frank J. Mattia
Please forgive me ;)  im an idiot..

I completely forgot to bootstrap the system (the light came on as i was 
trying to cd to the /usr/portage dir and i ls'd and saw the scripts dir... 

- Frank

Frank J. Mattia wrote:

I just started my second installation of a gentoo system and i noticed 
that i picked the right time too (with all of the portage problems 
going on ;) .  However, im not sure if my problem is related directly 
to portage or just this package.

im doing an emerge system and i consistantly get this error.  Does 
anyone know what it could mean?  What i do know is that it happens 
during the configure script for the ncurses library and it happens 
right after it checks for how to run the C++ preprocessor

configure: error: C++ preprocessor /lib/cpp failed sanity check

!!! ERROR: sys-libs/ncurses-5.3-r1 failed.
!!! Function econf, Line 273, Exitcode 1.
!!! econf failed
Any ideas or suggestions anyone?

Thank you,
Frank J. Mattia


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


[gentoo-user] ebuild error on ncurses

2003-07-01 Thread Frank J. Mattia
I just started my second installation of a gentoo system and i noticed 
that i picked the right time too (with all of the portage problems going 
on ;) .  However, im not sure if my problem is related directly to 
portage or just this package.

im doing an emerge system and i consistantly get this error.  Does 
anyone know what it could mean?  What i do know is that it happens 
during the configure script for the ncurses library and it happens right 
after it checks for how to run the C++ preprocessor

configure: error: C++ preprocessor /lib/cpp failed sanity check

!!! ERROR: sys-libs/ncurses-5.3-r1 failed.
!!! Function econf, Line 273, Exitcode 1.
!!! econf failed
Any ideas or suggestions anyone?

Thank you,
Frank J. Mattia
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] HELP installation

2003-06-27 Thread Frank J. Mattia
Jason Gouger wrote:

Code maturity level options --->
~  [*] Prompt for development and/or incomplete code/drivers" 
i cant belive how many times i looked at the word [experimental] and saw 
that option and still didnt make the connection.

Thanks
- Frank


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] HELP installation

2003-06-27 Thread Frank J. Mattia
Jason Gouger wrote:

I've also forgotten to include devfs.
Ive been trying to get my stage1 install to boot but it keeps telling me 
that i didnt enable devfs...  i know what it is but ive checked 
menuconfig MANY times and i cant find devfs as an option.am i 
missing something?  apart from that i may be using the xfs sources 
(havent checked yet)..  is devfs not in the xfs sources  or am im just 
missing something else entirely...  im planning on emerging the vanilla 
sources when i get home from work to see if devfs is an option there...

- Frank

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] Apache errors (/var/log/apache/error_log)

2003-06-27 Thread Frank J. Mattia

[Mon Jun 23 16:46:35 2003] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] File does not 
exist: /home/httpd/htdocs/favicon.ico
To the best of my knowlege, this is just the UA trying to find the 
favorites icon.  However, i dont know if its an automagic thing or if 
something has to actually trigger the UA to look for it.

- Frank

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list