Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Minimal Gentoo install

2003-07-26 Thread Anders Eriksson

[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> * Anders Eriksson (2003-07-26 10:16 +0200)
> I'd like to add a warning here. I (being a longtime Linux and distcc
> 
> user, albeit a gentoo newcommer) tried emerge -e world with distcc. 
> It turned out that zlib did NOT like that. For some reason it,
> during 
> ./configure, decided that my system was not shared-object capable, 
> and skipped building the .so files. Not fun at all. Even distcc with
> 
> just "127.0.0.1" in the group trigged it.

> Is "localhost" the first entry in your DISTCC_HOSTS? According to
> the man page: 'The literal word "localhost" is interpreted specially
> to cause compilations to be directly executed, rather than passed to
> a daemon on the local machine.'

> Thorsten 

I tried both "localhost" "127.0.0.1" and "hostname.domain". No dice. 
I'll dig into it tomorrow (after openoffice compile...)

/A


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-user] Re: Minimal Gentoo install

2003-07-26 Thread Thorsten Kampe
* Anders Eriksson (2003-07-26 10:16 +0200)
> I'd like to add a warning here. I (being a longtime Linux and distcc 
> user, albeit a gentoo newcommer) tried emerge -e world with distcc. 
> It turned out that zlib did NOT like that. For some reason it, during 
> ./configure, decided that my system was not shared-object capable, 
> and skipped building the .so files. Not fun at all. Even distcc with 
> just "127.0.0.1" in the group trigged it.

Is "localhost" the first entry in your DISTCC_HOSTS? According to the
man page: 'The literal word "localhost" is interpreted specially to
cause compilations to be directly executed, rather than passed to a
daemon on the local machine.'

Thorsten


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list