Re: [gentoo-user] db-3.2.9 upgrade in stable world
You are correct. It was marked for upgrade and that is what threw me. It really should be marked as New I think. Tom Veldhouse - Original Message - From: "Chris I" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 11:42 AM Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] db-3.2.9 upgrade in stable world On 2003.09.09 12:34, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: > I noticed this today: > > [ebuild U ] sys-libs/db-4.0.14-r2 [3.2.9-r7] > > This seems strange to me. It seems that these should coexist on the > same > system, not one replace the other. It also seems like this upgrade > could > cause some major compatibility issues. They are slotted and can co-exist. Have a look in the ebuild. -- Chris I Crashing is violent; that's why there are more violent games for Windows - and they'll always work. -- Ewout Stam -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] db-3.2.9 upgrade in stable world
On 2003.09.09 12:34, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: I noticed this today: [ebuild U ] sys-libs/db-4.0.14-r2 [3.2.9-r7] This seems strange to me. It seems that these should coexist on the same system, not one replace the other. It also seems like this upgrade could cause some major compatibility issues. They are slotted and can co-exist. Have a look in the ebuild. -- Chris I Crashing is violent; that's why there are more violent games for Windows - and they'll always work. -- Ewout Stam pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-user] db-3.2.9 upgrade in stable world
I noticed this today: [ebuild U ] sys-libs/db-4.0.14-r2 [3.2.9-r7] This seems strange to me. It seems that these should coexist on the same system, not one replace the other. It also seems like this upgrade could cause some major compatibility issues. Comments? Tom Veldhouse -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
