Re: [gentoo-user] Error in the emerge of gpm-1.20.1

2005-02-17 Thread Jason Cooper
John Myers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) scribbled:
> On Wednesday 16 February 2005 09:32, Jason Cooper wrote:
> > Dave Nebinger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) scribbled:
> > > > My questions are :
> > > > 
> > > > a. Why is this happening (i.e. is this a bug, or a misconfiguration on 
> > > > my
> > > > side)
> > > > b. How should I fix this ?
> > > 
> > > Don't believe it's a bug, but then I'm not running emacs so I don't have
> > > that use flag set.
> > > 
> > > You could try an env-update, which would rebuild the ld cache and might
> > > resolve it.
> > 
> > This is happening because the newest versions of X.org have moved a
> > bunch of files around.  Partly for FHS compliance, and partly other
> > reasons.  
> > 
> > It looks like a path was hard-coded into the package.  Try re-merging
> > gpm while the new X.org is installed.  That should fix it.  
> 
> But re-merge emacs first. Emacs is the one that's broken. I had this problem 
> already.

Yeah, you're right.  I'll chalk that fumble up to a bad case of the flu
:)

Cooper.

--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Error in the emerge of gpm-1.20.1

2005-02-16 Thread Maxim Vexler
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 21:43:01 -0800, John Myers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> But re-merge emacs first. Emacs is the one that's broken. I had this problem 
> already.
> 

[emerge -av emacs] did the trick.

Thank you.

-- 
Cheers, 
Maxim Vexler (hq4ever).

Do u GNU ?

--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Error in the emerge of gpm-1.20.1

2005-02-16 Thread John Myers
On Wednesday 16 February 2005 09:32, Jason Cooper wrote:
> Dave Nebinger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) scribbled:
> > > My questions are :
> > > 
> > > a. Why is this happening (i.e. is this a bug, or a misconfiguration on my
> > > side)
> > > b. How should I fix this ?
> > 
> > Don't believe it's a bug, but then I'm not running emacs so I don't have
> > that use flag set.
> > 
> > You could try an env-update, which would rebuild the ld cache and might
> > resolve it.
> 
> This is happening because the newest versions of X.org have moved a
> bunch of files around.  Partly for FHS compliance, and partly other
> reasons.  
> 
> It looks like a path was hard-coded into the package.  Try re-merging
> gpm while the new X.org is installed.  That should fix it.  

But re-merge emacs first. Emacs is the one that's broken. I had this problem 
already.

-- 
t3h 3l3ctr0n3rd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Supermarket Deli Clerk and Student Programmer

OpenPGP Key Fingerprint:
0A65 EEFA B23A F0AC E6C2 C71C BEA0 E055 BE0E EC25


pgpNemlFXK1oo.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Error in the emerge of gpm-1.20.1

2005-02-16 Thread Jason Cooper
Dave Nebinger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) scribbled:
> > My questions are :
> > 
> > a. Why is this happening (i.e. is this a bug, or a misconfiguration on my
> > side)
> > b. How should I fix this ?
> 
> Don't believe it's a bug, but then I'm not running emacs so I don't have
> that use flag set.
> 
> You could try an env-update, which would rebuild the ld cache and might
> resolve it.

This is happening because the newest versions of X.org have moved a
bunch of files around.  Partly for FHS compliance, and partly other
reasons.  

It looks like a path was hard-coded into the package.  Try re-merging
gpm while the new X.org is installed.  That should fix it.  

hth,

Cooper.

--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] Error in the emerge of gpm-1.20.1

2005-02-16 Thread Dave Nebinger
> My questions are :
> 
> a. Why is this happening (i.e. is this a bug, or a misconfiguration on my
> side)
> b. How should I fix this ?

Don't believe it's a bug, but then I'm not running emacs so I don't have
that use flag set.

You could try an env-update, which would rebuild the ld cache and might
resolve it.

> c. Is gpm a must?, I can't really verify that I use the mouse in the
> console.
> if not how can I remove it(gpm) from [system] so that the [emerge -e]
> can be finished successfully.

You can do an "emerge -C gpm" to remove it, and no it is not necessary.
Although I do a lot of stuff from the console and find gpm to be very handy,
it's totally up to you to keep it or dump it.



--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list