RE: [gentoo-user] emerge -e pam

2003-12-01 Thread Jeffrey Smelser
> I just don't get this then.  Apparently X is an indeirect 
> dependency of PAM and
> PAM is a direct dependency of X.  Why hasn't anyone else had 
> this problem? 
> Anybody here done a _FRESH_ build of gentoo 1.4 with both pam 
> and X flags
> enabled?

I just did, I am switching my desktop over to Linux and it compiled fine.. You can 
always re-emerge it and maybe it got deleted some how.

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -e pam

2003-12-01 Thread POLAX
> On Saturday 29 November 2003 04:30 pm, POLAX wrote:
> > I'm building a new system with X and pam enabled.
> > I get the following error when emerging X:
> > 'security/pam_appl.h': file not found
> > in '/var/tmp/portage/XFree-4.3.0-r3/work/xc/programs/xdm/dm.h' line 105
> >
> > Could these problems be related?
> 
> I dont think so.. 
> 
> /usr/include/security/pam_appl.h
> 
> I am finding it just fine.. BTW, I am still trying to compile spam, You have 
> gotten past me.

I just don't get this then.  Apparently X is an indeirect dependency of PAM and
PAM is a direct dependency of X.  Why hasn't anyone else had this problem? 
Anybody here done a _FRESH_ build of gentoo 1.4 with both pam and X flags
enabled?

Anyone  sending  unwanted  advertising   e-mail
to this address will be charged $25 for network
traffic and computing time.   By  extracting my
address from  this  message or its  header, you
agree to these terms.

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -e pam

2003-11-30 Thread Jeff Smelser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Saturday 29 November 2003 04:30 pm, POLAX wrote:
> I'm building a new system with X and pam enabled.
> I get the following error when emerging X:
> 'security/pam_appl.h': file not found
> in '/var/tmp/portage/XFree-4.3.0-r3/work/xc/programs/xdm/dm.h' line 105
>
> Could these problems be related?

I dont think so.. 

/usr/include/security/pam_appl.h

I am finding it just fine.. BTW, I am still trying to compile spam, You have 
gotten past me.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/yedYld4MRA3gEwYRAv3IAJwMhxWy1PGyJhF70w+9GU/XQm6eSACfVo1k
hE/AGsuXAmjrmvYC7i1r0Zs=
=Kwx7
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -e pam

2003-11-29 Thread POLAX
I'm building a new system with X and pam enabled.
I get the following error when emerging X:
'security/pam_appl.h': file not found
in '/var/tmp/portage/XFree-4.3.0-r3/work/xc/programs/xdm/dm.h' line 105

Could these problems be related?


> I was trying to reemerge  box this morning and noticed:
> 
> make[2]: Leaving directory 
> `/var/tmp/portage/pam-0.75-r11/work/Linux-PAM-0.75/modules/pam_permit'
> make[2]: Entering directory 
> `/var/tmp/portage/pam-0.75-r11/work/Linux-PAM-0.75/modules/pam_pwdb'
> This module will not be compiled on this system
> make[2]: Leaving directory 
> `/var/tmp/portage/pam-0.75-r11/work/Linux-PAM-0.75/modules/pam_pwdb'
> make[2]: Entering directory 
> `/var/tmp/portage/pam-0.75-r11/work/Linux-PAM-0.75/modules/pam_radius'
> This module will not be compiled on this system
> make[2]: Leaving directory 
> `/var/tmp/portage/pam-0.75-r11/work/Linux-PAM-0.75/modules/pam_radius'
> 
> Which of course, produced this:
> 
> make[1]: Leaving directory 
> `/var/tmp/portage/pam-0.75-r11/work/Linux-PAM-0.75/libpam_misc'
>  * Checking if all modules were built...
>  * ERROR: pam_pwdb module did not build.
> 
> 
> I looked at the ebuild, its not telling me that module is changed by a use 
> flag, so why isn't it being built now? It was the first time..
> 
> Thanks,
> Jeff
> 
> 
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Anyone  sending  unwanted  advertising   e-mail
to this address will be charged $25 for network
traffic and computing time.   By  extracting my
address from  this  message or its  header, you
agree to these terms.

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list