[RESULT] Re: [vote] Accept JIRA contribution HARMONY-3 : Archie Cobbs' Contribution of JCVM
This contribution was accepted by the Apache Harmony community with unanimous support, and all documentation is complete. This contribution and it's contribution information has been placed in the contrib archive (where it shall remain untouched) : https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/harmony/enhanced/ contrib_archive/2005/jira/harmony-3 I've taken the liberty of placing in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/harmony/enhanced/trunk/ sandbox/contribs/jchevm so it's available in general, and work can begin. We can rename, move, whatever. So... again "GO!" :) Thanks Archie, and all... geir On Sep 30, 2005, at 5:18 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: Archie Cobbs has offered the JCVM project under the Apache License to Apache Harmony. It can be found here : http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3 [ ] +1 Accept the code into the project sandbox [ ] -1 Don't accept the code. Reason : This vote will close 72 hours from now. geir -- Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [vote] Accept JIRA contribution HARMONY-3 : Archie Cobbs' Contribution of JCVM
On Oct 2, 2005, at 6:38 PM, Leo Simons wrote: On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 05:18:06PM -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: Archie Cobbs has offered the JCVM project under the Apache License to Apache Harmony. It can be found here : http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3 [X] +1 Accept the code into the project sandbox [ ] -1 Don't accept the code. Reason : This vote will close 72 hours from now. Damn, late again! Whoohooh, more code! Leo, who thinks we should have at least an email template for a while that specifies what a vote is and who votes and why, and stuff :-) Agreed. I'm about to go through the acceptance of HARMONY-3 and will write down the simple procedure, and add the template into that. geir -- Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [vote] Accept JIRA contribution HARMONY-3 : Archie Cobbs' Contribution of JCVM
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 05:18:06PM -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > Archie Cobbs has offered the JCVM project under the Apache License to > Apache Harmony. It can be found here : > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3 > > [X] +1 Accept the code into the project sandbox > [ ] -1 Don't accept the code. Reason : > > This vote will close 72 hours from now. Damn, late again! Whoohooh, more code! Leo, who thinks we should have at least an email template for a while that specifies what a vote is and who votes and why, and stuff :-)
Re: [vote] Accept JIRA contribution HARMONY-3 : Archie Cobbs' Contribution of JCVM
On Oct 1, 2005, at 5:34 PM, Tim Ellison wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: On Oct 1, 2005, at 3:42 PM, Tim Ellison wrote: Sorry, I wasn't referring to the mechanics of voting, but rather what was being implied by the response from people on the list. For example, I'd definitely +1 for getting relevant code in as seed for the project, So did you? :D Well, no ;-) because I didn't understand exactly what approval was being solicited. So, to clarify : do you think we should bring Archie's contribution to the sandbox for people to work with? :) [ ] +1 Yes, I think that's great! [ ] -1 No, reason : so hearing about an incoming VM implementation or interface design is excellent. I guess that the PPMC are uniquely in a position to ensure that 'bulk' contributions have the paperwork in order (ref the contribution policy on the website). Yes. (And I'll update the policy docs to reflect better how things are working later this weekend...) I've been looking through SVN, and now that I can see the completed contrib_checklist for these pioneers I have a better understanding of how this works; i.e. the community acceptance comes after the PPMC have done a number of verifications. Actually, no. You were looking at David Tanzer's. (although I do have the docs from Archie as well...) I was thinking that we'd vote before pounding out the paperwork so we don't make people go through the papework if the community doesn't want it, but I'm changing my mind and would happily have the Authorized Contributor Questionnaire as well as the Bulk Contribution Checklist accepted by the PPMC before asking for a vote, because then people will be sure that the basic safeguards we want to have for exposure are in place. Nothing stops someone from posting things to our JIRA, but the [vote] compels the community to download and examine the work to see how it fits, and by having the ACQ and BCC in place, they can be reasonably comfortable that we're doing our collective job on this aspect. geir Regards, Tim Again, not implying that this is wrong or anything, just learning. Regards, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think we should refer people to the authorative source, but that may be a general bias on my part due to a game I played in Kindergarten. :-) I share your opinion on fractional votes...they are annoying and make counting more difficult. However I don't think this warrants discussion yet. Late refactoring is good. Solve problems you have, not the ones you might have. -Andy Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: That's good background. If theres something to be added here http://incubator.apache.org/ harmony/guidelines.html, suggest it. (But I really want to avoid fractional votes. Written comments are much more expressive and avoid assumptions.) geir On Oct 1, 2005, at 12:24 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: See this http://apache.org/foundation/voting.html Tim Ellison wrote: Great to see this stuff coming in. Just for my education, what does +1 mean from people -- is it simply that the code 'fits' within the scope of the project? does it mean that the relevant documentation (authorized contrubutor questionnaire, ICLA, ?) is known to be on file? Your resolved concern below implies that you are also doing a first-pass IP sniff test, though I recognise that the sandboxing safety net is in place too. Regards, Tim Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: +1 from me I was concerned about the provenance given some of the statement found in the contribution, but Archie's explanation and statement of it being his original work based on exposure to only open-source implementations is fine for me. This is going into the sandbox - if we happen to discover an issue about this in the near future, we can simply fix it. On Sep 30, 2005, at 5:18 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: Archie Cobbs has offered the JCVM project under the Apache License to Apache Harmony. It can be found here : http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3 [ ] +1 Accept the code into the project sandbox [ ] -1 Don't accept the code. Reason : This vote will close 72 hours from now. geir -- Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Andrew C. Oliver SuperLink Software, Inc. Java to Excel using POI http://www.superlinksoftware.com/services/poi Commercial support including features added/implemented, bugs fixed. -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK. -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK. -- Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [vote] Accept JIRA contribution HARMONY-3 : Archie Cobbs' Contribution of JCVM
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > > On Oct 1, 2005, at 3:42 PM, Tim Ellison wrote: > >> Sorry, I wasn't referring to the mechanics of voting, but rather what >> was being implied by the response from people on the list. >> >> For example, I'd definitely +1 for getting relevant code in as seed for >> the project, > > > So did you? :D Well, no ;-) because I didn't understand exactly what approval was being solicited. >> so hearing about an incoming VM implementation or interface >> design is excellent. I guess that the PPMC are uniquely in a position >> to ensure that 'bulk' contributions have the paperwork in order (ref the >> contribution policy on the website). > > > Yes. (And I'll update the policy docs to reflect better how things are > working later this weekend...) I've been looking through SVN, and now that I can see the completed contrib_checklist for these pioneers I have a better understanding of how this works; i.e. the community acceptance comes after the PPMC have done a number of verifications. Regards, Tim >> >> Again, not implying that this is wrong or anything, just learning. >> >> Regards, >> Tim >> >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>> I think we should refer people to the authorative source, but that may >>> be a general bias on my part due to a game I played in >>> Kindergarten. :-) >>> >>> I share your opinion on fractional votes...they are annoying and make >>> counting more difficult. However I don't think this warrants >>> discussion >>> yet. Late refactoring is good. Solve problems you have, not the ones >>> you might have. >>> >>> -Andy >>> >>> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: >>> >>> That's good background. If theres something to be added here http://incubator.apache.org/ harmony/guidelines.html, suggest it. (But I really want to avoid fractional votes. Written comments are much more expressive and avoid assumptions.) geir On Oct 1, 2005, at 12:24 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > See this http://apache.org/foundation/voting.html > > Tim Ellison wrote: > > >> Great to see this stuff coming in. Just for my education, what >> does +1 >> mean from people -- is it simply that the code 'fits' within the >> scope >> of the project? does it mean that the relevant documentation >> (authorized contrubutor questionnaire, ICLA, ?) is known to be on >> file? >> Your resolved concern below implies that you are also doing a >> first-pass >> IP sniff test, though I recognise that the sandboxing safety net >> is in >> place too. >> Regards, >> Tim >> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: >> >> >>> +1 from me >>> >>> I was concerned about the provenance given some of the statement >>> found >>> in the contribution, but Archie's explanation and statement of it >>> being >>> his original work based on exposure to only open-source >>> implementations >>> is fine for me. >>> >>> This is going into the sandbox - if we happen to discover an issue >>> about this in the near future, we can simply fix it. >>> >>> On Sep 30, 2005, at 5:18 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Archie Cobbs has offered the JCVM project under the Apache License to Apache Harmony. It can be found here : http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3 [ ] +1 Accept the code into the project sandbox [ ] -1 Don't accept the code. Reason : This vote will close 72 hours from now. geir -- Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >>> > > > -- > Andrew C. Oliver > SuperLink Software, Inc. > > Java to Excel using POI > http://www.superlinksoftware.com/services/poi > Commercial support including features added/implemented, bugs fixed. > > > >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> >> Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) >> IBM Java technology centre, UK. >> >> > -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK.
Re: [vote] Accept JIRA contribution HARMONY-3 : Archie Cobbs' Contribution of JCVM
On Oct 1, 2005, at 3:42 PM, Tim Ellison wrote: Sorry, I wasn't referring to the mechanics of voting, but rather what was being implied by the response from people on the list. For example, I'd definitely +1 for getting relevant code in as seed for the project, So did you? :D so hearing about an incoming VM implementation or interface design is excellent. I guess that the PPMC are uniquely in a position to ensure that 'bulk' contributions have the paperwork in order (ref the contribution policy on the website). Yes. (And I'll update the policy docs to reflect better how things are working later this weekend...) Again, not implying that this is wrong or anything, just learning. Regards, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think we should refer people to the authorative source, but that may be a general bias on my part due to a game I played in Kindergarten. :-) I share your opinion on fractional votes...they are annoying and make counting more difficult. However I don't think this warrants discussion yet. Late refactoring is good. Solve problems you have, not the ones you might have. -Andy Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: That's good background. If theres something to be added here http://incubator.apache.org/ harmony/guidelines.html, suggest it. (But I really want to avoid fractional votes. Written comments are much more expressive and avoid assumptions.) geir On Oct 1, 2005, at 12:24 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: See this http://apache.org/foundation/voting.html Tim Ellison wrote: Great to see this stuff coming in. Just for my education, what does +1 mean from people -- is it simply that the code 'fits' within the scope of the project? does it mean that the relevant documentation (authorized contrubutor questionnaire, ICLA, ?) is known to be on file? Your resolved concern below implies that you are also doing a first-pass IP sniff test, though I recognise that the sandboxing safety net is in place too. Regards, Tim Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: +1 from me I was concerned about the provenance given some of the statement found in the contribution, but Archie's explanation and statement of it being his original work based on exposure to only open-source implementations is fine for me. This is going into the sandbox - if we happen to discover an issue about this in the near future, we can simply fix it. On Sep 30, 2005, at 5:18 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: Archie Cobbs has offered the JCVM project under the Apache License to Apache Harmony. It can be found here : http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3 [ ] +1 Accept the code into the project sandbox [ ] -1 Don't accept the code. Reason : This vote will close 72 hours from now. geir -- Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Andrew C. Oliver SuperLink Software, Inc. Java to Excel using POI http://www.superlinksoftware.com/services/poi Commercial support including features added/implemented, bugs fixed. -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK. -- Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [vote] Accept JIRA contribution HARMONY-3 : Archie Cobbs' Contribution of JCVM
Sorry, I wasn't referring to the mechanics of voting, but rather what was being implied by the response from people on the list. For example, I'd definitely +1 for getting relevant code in as seed for the project, so hearing about an incoming VM implementation or interface design is excellent. I guess that the PPMC are uniquely in a position to ensure that 'bulk' contributions have the paperwork in order (ref the contribution policy on the website). Again, not implying that this is wrong or anything, just learning. Regards, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I think we should refer people to the authorative source, but that may > be a general bias on my part due to a game I played in Kindergarten. :-) > > I share your opinion on fractional votes...they are annoying and make > counting more difficult. However I don't think this warrants discussion > yet. Late refactoring is good. Solve problems you have, not the ones > you might have. > > -Andy > > Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > >> That's good background. >> >> If theres something to be added here http://incubator.apache.org/ >> harmony/guidelines.html, suggest it. >> >> (But I really want to avoid fractional votes. Written comments are >> much more expressive and avoid assumptions.) >> >> geir >> >> On Oct 1, 2005, at 12:24 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>> See this http://apache.org/foundation/voting.html >>> >>> Tim Ellison wrote: >>> Great to see this stuff coming in. Just for my education, what does +1 mean from people -- is it simply that the code 'fits' within the scope of the project? does it mean that the relevant documentation (authorized contrubutor questionnaire, ICLA, ?) is known to be on file? Your resolved concern below implies that you are also doing a first-pass IP sniff test, though I recognise that the sandboxing safety net is in place too. Regards, Tim Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > +1 from me > > I was concerned about the provenance given some of the statement > found > in the contribution, but Archie's explanation and statement of it > being > his original work based on exposure to only open-source > implementations > is fine for me. > > This is going into the sandbox - if we happen to discover an issue > about this in the near future, we can simply fix it. > > On Sep 30, 2005, at 5:18 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > > > >> Archie Cobbs has offered the JCVM project under the Apache >> License to >> Apache Harmony. It can be found here : >> >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3 >> >> [ ] +1 Accept the code into the project sandbox >> [ ] -1 Don't accept the code. Reason : >> >> This vote will close 72 hours from now. >> >> geir >> >> -- >> Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> > > >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Andrew C. Oliver >>> SuperLink Software, Inc. >>> >>> Java to Excel using POI >>> http://www.superlinksoftware.com/services/poi >>> Commercial support including features added/implemented, bugs fixed. >>> >>> >> > > -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK.
Re: [vote] Accept JIRA contribution HARMONY-3 : Archie Cobbs' Contribution of JCVM
On Oct 1, 2005, at 1:08 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: On Oct 1, 2005, at 12:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think we should refer people to the authorative source, but that may be a general bias on my part due to a game I played in Kindergarten. :-) There is no "authoritative source" - projects get to choose the manner in which they run themselves, as that document itself says. Certainly what we do will capture the spirit and for the most part, the letter, of that document, but as I said, it notes that communities have flexibility. Okay. Yeah in the future I'll reply with the link to the "guidelines" document. I suggest that the sandbox be generally commit then review than review then commit with the caveat of "be considerate of others" when making changes. Agreed. I think that even outside of the sandbox, commit then review except when it's something weird, tricky, sensitive, etc - people can use their best judgement. IOW, "don't be a cowboy". I suspect that as we get much much further along (like v1.0), we may want a RthenC like http does for stable tree I share your opinion on fractional votes...they are annoying and make counting more difficult. However I don't think this warrants discussion yet. Late refactoring is good. Solve problems you have, not the ones you might have. Maybe I'm too old school and like a little upfront design to keep you out of trouble ;) BUFD, SDLC and CMM are all cuss words to me. I think that "a little upfront design" isn't quite what CMM is about. geir -andy geir -Andy Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: That's good background. If theres something to be added here http:// incubator.apache.org/ harmony/guidelines.html, suggest it. (But I really want to avoid fractional votes. Written comments are much more expressive and avoid assumptions.) geir On Oct 1, 2005, at 12:24 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: See this http://apache.org/foundation/voting.html Tim Ellison wrote: Great to see this stuff coming in. Just for my education, what does +1 mean from people -- is it simply that the code 'fits' within the scope of the project? does it mean that the relevant documentation (authorized contrubutor questionnaire, ICLA, ?) is known to be on file? Your resolved concern below implies that you are also doing a first-pass IP sniff test, though I recognise that the sandboxing safety net is in place too. Regards, Tim Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: +1 from me I was concerned about the provenance given some of the statement found in the contribution, but Archie's explanation and statement of it being his original work based on exposure to only open-source implementations is fine for me. This is going into the sandbox - if we happen to discover an issue about this in the near future, we can simply fix it. On Sep 30, 2005, at 5:18 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: Archie Cobbs has offered the JCVM project under the Apache License to Apache Harmony. It can be found here : http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3 [ ] +1 Accept the code into the project sandbox [ ] -1 Don't accept the code. Reason : This vote will close 72 hours from now. geir -- Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Andrew C. Oliver SuperLink Software, Inc. Java to Excel using POI http://www.superlinksoftware.com/services/poi Commercial support including features added/implemented, bugs fixed. -- Andrew C. Oliver SuperLink Software, Inc. Java to Excel using POI http://www.superlinksoftware.com/services/poi Commercial support including features added/implemented, bugs fixed. -- Andrew C. Oliver SuperLink Software, Inc. Java to Excel using POI http://www.superlinksoftware.com/services/poi Commercial support including features added/implemented, bugs fixed. -- Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [vote] Accept JIRA contribution HARMONY-3 : Archie Cobbs' Contribution of JCVM
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: On Oct 1, 2005, at 12:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think we should refer people to the authorative source, but that may be a general bias on my part due to a game I played in Kindergarten. :-) There is no "authoritative source" - projects get to choose the manner in which they run themselves, as that document itself says. Certainly what we do will capture the spirit and for the most part, the letter, of that document, but as I said, it notes that communities have flexibility. Okay. Yeah in the future I'll reply with the link to the "guidelines" document. I suggest that the sandbox be generally commit then review than review then commit with the caveat of "be considerate of others" when making changes. I share your opinion on fractional votes...they are annoying and make counting more difficult. However I don't think this warrants discussion yet. Late refactoring is good. Solve problems you have, not the ones you might have. Maybe I'm too old school and like a little upfront design to keep you out of trouble ;) BUFD, SDLC and CMM are all cuss words to me. -andy geir -Andy Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: That's good background. If theres something to be added here http://incubator.apache.org/ harmony/guidelines.html, suggest it. (But I really want to avoid fractional votes. Written comments are much more expressive and avoid assumptions.) geir On Oct 1, 2005, at 12:24 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: See this http://apache.org/foundation/voting.html Tim Ellison wrote: Great to see this stuff coming in. Just for my education, what does +1 mean from people -- is it simply that the code 'fits' within the scope of the project? does it mean that the relevant documentation (authorized contrubutor questionnaire, ICLA, ?) is known to be on file? Your resolved concern below implies that you are also doing a first-pass IP sniff test, though I recognise that the sandboxing safety net is in place too. Regards, Tim Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: +1 from me I was concerned about the provenance given some of the statement found in the contribution, but Archie's explanation and statement of it being his original work based on exposure to only open-source implementations is fine for me. This is going into the sandbox - if we happen to discover an issue about this in the near future, we can simply fix it. On Sep 30, 2005, at 5:18 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: Archie Cobbs has offered the JCVM project under the Apache License to Apache Harmony. It can be found here : http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3 [ ] +1 Accept the code into the project sandbox [ ] -1 Don't accept the code. Reason : This vote will close 72 hours from now. geir -- Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Andrew C. Oliver SuperLink Software, Inc. Java to Excel using POI http://www.superlinksoftware.com/services/poi Commercial support including features added/implemented, bugs fixed. -- Andrew C. Oliver SuperLink Software, Inc. Java to Excel using POI http://www.superlinksoftware.com/services/poi Commercial support including features added/implemented, bugs fixed. -- Andrew C. Oliver SuperLink Software, Inc. Java to Excel using POI http://www.superlinksoftware.com/services/poi Commercial support including features added/implemented, bugs fixed.
Re: [vote] Accept JIRA contribution HARMONY-3 : Archie Cobbs' Contribution of JCVM
On Oct 1, 2005, at 12:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think we should refer people to the authorative source, but that may be a general bias on my part due to a game I played in Kindergarten. :-) There is no "authoritative source" - projects get to choose the manner in which they run themselves, as that document itself says. Certainly what we do will capture the spirit and for the most part, the letter, of that document, but as I said, it notes that communities have flexibility. I share your opinion on fractional votes...they are annoying and make counting more difficult. However I don't think this warrants discussion yet. Late refactoring is good. Solve problems you have, not the ones you might have. Maybe I'm too old school and like a little upfront design to keep you out of trouble ;) geir -Andy Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: That's good background. If theres something to be added here http://incubator.apache.org/ harmony/guidelines.html, suggest it. (But I really want to avoid fractional votes. Written comments are much more expressive and avoid assumptions.) geir On Oct 1, 2005, at 12:24 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: See this http://apache.org/foundation/voting.html Tim Ellison wrote: Great to see this stuff coming in. Just for my education, what does +1 mean from people -- is it simply that the code 'fits' within the scope of the project? does it mean that the relevant documentation (authorized contrubutor questionnaire, ICLA, ?) is known to be on file? Your resolved concern below implies that you are also doing a first-pass IP sniff test, though I recognise that the sandboxing safety net is in place too. Regards, Tim Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: +1 from me I was concerned about the provenance given some of the statement found in the contribution, but Archie's explanation and statement of it being his original work based on exposure to only open-source implementations is fine for me. This is going into the sandbox - if we happen to discover an issue about this in the near future, we can simply fix it. On Sep 30, 2005, at 5:18 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: Archie Cobbs has offered the JCVM project under the Apache License to Apache Harmony. It can be found here : http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3 [ ] +1 Accept the code into the project sandbox [ ] -1 Don't accept the code. Reason : This vote will close 72 hours from now. geir -- Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Andrew C. Oliver SuperLink Software, Inc. Java to Excel using POI http://www.superlinksoftware.com/services/poi Commercial support including features added/implemented, bugs fixed. -- Andrew C. Oliver SuperLink Software, Inc. Java to Excel using POI http://www.superlinksoftware.com/services/poi Commercial support including features added/implemented, bugs fixed. -- Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [vote] Accept JIRA contribution HARMONY-3 : Archie Cobbs' Contribution of JCVM
I think we should refer people to the authorative source, but that may be a general bias on my part due to a game I played in Kindergarten. :-) I share your opinion on fractional votes...they are annoying and make counting more difficult. However I don't think this warrants discussion yet. Late refactoring is good. Solve problems you have, not the ones you might have. -Andy Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: That's good background. If theres something to be added here http://incubator.apache.org/ harmony/guidelines.html, suggest it. (But I really want to avoid fractional votes. Written comments are much more expressive and avoid assumptions.) geir On Oct 1, 2005, at 12:24 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: See this http://apache.org/foundation/voting.html Tim Ellison wrote: Great to see this stuff coming in. Just for my education, what does +1 mean from people -- is it simply that the code 'fits' within the scope of the project? does it mean that the relevant documentation (authorized contrubutor questionnaire, ICLA, ?) is known to be on file? Your resolved concern below implies that you are also doing a first-pass IP sniff test, though I recognise that the sandboxing safety net is in place too. Regards, Tim Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: +1 from me I was concerned about the provenance given some of the statement found in the contribution, but Archie's explanation and statement of it being his original work based on exposure to only open-source implementations is fine for me. This is going into the sandbox - if we happen to discover an issue about this in the near future, we can simply fix it. On Sep 30, 2005, at 5:18 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: Archie Cobbs has offered the JCVM project under the Apache License to Apache Harmony. It can be found here : http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3 [ ] +1 Accept the code into the project sandbox [ ] -1 Don't accept the code. Reason : This vote will close 72 hours from now. geir -- Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Andrew C. Oliver SuperLink Software, Inc. Java to Excel using POI http://www.superlinksoftware.com/services/poi Commercial support including features added/implemented, bugs fixed. -- Andrew C. Oliver SuperLink Software, Inc. Java to Excel using POI http://www.superlinksoftware.com/services/poi Commercial support including features added/implemented, bugs fixed.
Re: [vote] Accept JIRA contribution HARMONY-3 : Archie Cobbs' Contribution of JCVM
That's good background. If theres something to be added here http://incubator.apache.org/ harmony/guidelines.html, suggest it. (But I really want to avoid fractional votes. Written comments are much more expressive and avoid assumptions.) geir On Oct 1, 2005, at 12:24 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: See this http://apache.org/foundation/voting.html Tim Ellison wrote: Great to see this stuff coming in. Just for my education, what does +1 mean from people -- is it simply that the code 'fits' within the scope of the project? does it mean that the relevant documentation (authorized contrubutor questionnaire, ICLA, ?) is known to be on file? Your resolved concern below implies that you are also doing a first-pass IP sniff test, though I recognise that the sandboxing safety net is in place too. Regards, Tim Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: +1 from me I was concerned about the provenance given some of the statement found in the contribution, but Archie's explanation and statement of it being his original work based on exposure to only open-source implementations is fine for me. This is going into the sandbox - if we happen to discover an issue about this in the near future, we can simply fix it. On Sep 30, 2005, at 5:18 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: Archie Cobbs has offered the JCVM project under the Apache License to Apache Harmony. It can be found here : http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3 [ ] +1 Accept the code into the project sandbox [ ] -1 Don't accept the code. Reason : This vote will close 72 hours from now. geir -- Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Andrew C. Oliver SuperLink Software, Inc. Java to Excel using POI http://www.superlinksoftware.com/services/poi Commercial support including features added/implemented, bugs fixed. -- Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [vote] Accept JIRA contribution HARMONY-3 : Archie Cobbs' Contribution of JCVM
See this http://apache.org/foundation/voting.html Tim Ellison wrote: Great to see this stuff coming in. Just for my education, what does +1 mean from people -- is it simply that the code 'fits' within the scope of the project? does it mean that the relevant documentation (authorized contrubutor questionnaire, ICLA, ?) is known to be on file? Your resolved concern below implies that you are also doing a first-pass IP sniff test, though I recognise that the sandboxing safety net is in place too. Regards, Tim Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: +1 from me I was concerned about the provenance given some of the statement found in the contribution, but Archie's explanation and statement of it being his original work based on exposure to only open-source implementations is fine for me. This is going into the sandbox - if we happen to discover an issue about this in the near future, we can simply fix it. On Sep 30, 2005, at 5:18 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: Archie Cobbs has offered the JCVM project under the Apache License to Apache Harmony. It can be found here : http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3 [ ] +1 Accept the code into the project sandbox [ ] -1 Don't accept the code. Reason : This vote will close 72 hours from now. geir -- Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Andrew C. Oliver SuperLink Software, Inc. Java to Excel using POI http://www.superlinksoftware.com/services/poi Commercial support including features added/implemented, bugs fixed.
Re: [vote] Accept JIRA contribution HARMONY-3 : Archie Cobbs' Contribution of JCVM
On Oct 1, 2005, at 8:44 AM, Tim Ellison wrote: Great to see this stuff coming in. Just for my education, what does +1 mean from people -- Generally +1 = yes, -1 = no, 0 = "don't care, but I'm telling you that because I'm paying attention". I hope we can avoid the +0, -0 stuff here. is it simply that the code 'fits' within the scope of the project? does it mean that the relevant documentation (authorized contrubutor questionnaire, ICLA, ?) is known to be on file? No - it means people want to accept the contribution into the project. It's one step, and I think the first step. The rest of the material must be done before bringing in of course, but in general, I don't think there's any point in going through that first if then the project wouldn't want the contribution. So 1) we vote if we want the code 2) if so, it is brought into the SVN when documentation is complete, which is handled by the person from the PMC bringing it in Your resolved concern below implies that you are also doing a first- pass IP sniff test, though I recognise that the sandboxing safety net is in place too. Yes - there was a first pass sniff before the vote, in JIRA. I commented on it, Archie answered, and Andy also looked around a bit, so I feel comfortable moving forward. We have a few pieces of the safety net : 1) basic review in JIRA 2) set of agreements (ICLA, ASQ, BCC, etc) 3) brought into isolation in the contrib_archive for easy review at any point in future 4) in this case, brought into sandbox I don't think we'll be bringing into sandbox always, but maybe that formal "hop" of unpacking in sandbox and then moving it elswhere isn't a bad idea. Dunno. geir Regards, Tim Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: +1 from me I was concerned about the provenance given some of the statement found in the contribution, but Archie's explanation and statement of it being his original work based on exposure to only open-source implementations is fine for me. This is going into the sandbox - if we happen to discover an issue about this in the near future, we can simply fix it. On Sep 30, 2005, at 5:18 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: Archie Cobbs has offered the JCVM project under the Apache License to Apache Harmony. It can be found here : http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3 [ ] +1 Accept the code into the project sandbox [ ] -1 Don't accept the code. Reason : This vote will close 72 hours from now. geir -- Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK. -- Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [vote] Accept JIRA contribution HARMONY-3 : Archie Cobbs' Contribution of JCVM
Great to see this stuff coming in. Just for my education, what does +1 mean from people -- is it simply that the code 'fits' within the scope of the project? does it mean that the relevant documentation (authorized contrubutor questionnaire, ICLA, ?) is known to be on file? Your resolved concern below implies that you are also doing a first-pass IP sniff test, though I recognise that the sandboxing safety net is in place too. Regards, Tim Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > +1 from me > > I was concerned about the provenance given some of the statement found > in the contribution, but Archie's explanation and statement of it being > his original work based on exposure to only open-source implementations > is fine for me. > > This is going into the sandbox - if we happen to discover an issue > about this in the near future, we can simply fix it. > > On Sep 30, 2005, at 5:18 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > >> Archie Cobbs has offered the JCVM project under the Apache License to >> Apache Harmony. It can be found here : >> >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3 >> >> [ ] +1 Accept the code into the project sandbox >> [ ] -1 Don't accept the code. Reason : >> >> This vote will close 72 hours from now. >> >> geir >> >> -- >> Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> > -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK.
Re: [vote] Accept JIRA contribution HARMONY-3 : Archie Cobbs' Contribution of JCVM
+1 (non-binding) On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 17:43 -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > +1 from me > > I was concerned about the provenance given some of the statement > found in the contribution, but Archie's explanation and statement of > it being his original work based on exposure to only open-source > implementations is fine for me. > > This is going into the sandbox - if we happen to discover an issue > about this in the near future, we can simply fix it. > > On Sep 30, 2005, at 5:18 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > > > Archie Cobbs has offered the JCVM project under the Apache License > > to Apache Harmony. It can be found here : > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3 > > > > [ ] +1 Accept the code into the project sandbox > > [ ] -1 Don't accept the code. Reason : > > > > This vote will close 72 hours from now. > > > > geir > > > > -- > > Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > -- David Tanzer, Haghofstr. 29, A-3352 St. Peter/Au, Austria/Europe http://deltalabs.at -- http://dev.guglhupf.net -- http://guglhupf.net My PGP Public Key: http://guglhupf.net/david/david.asc -- A large number of installed systems work by fiat. That is, they work by being declared to work. -- Anatol Holt signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [vote] Accept JIRA contribution HARMONY-3 : Archie Cobbs' Contribution of JCVM
+1 code. Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: +1 from me I was concerned about the provenance given some of the statement found in the contribution, but Archie's explanation and statement of it being his original work based on exposure to only open-source implementations is fine for me. This is going into the sandbox - if we happen to discover an issue about this in the near future, we can simply fix it. On Sep 30, 2005, at 5:18 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: Archie Cobbs has offered the JCVM project under the Apache License to Apache Harmony. It can be found here : http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3 [ ] +1 Accept the code into the project sandbox [ ] -1 Don't accept the code. Reason : This vote will close 72 hours from now. geir -- Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Andrew C. Oliver SuperLink Software, Inc. Java to Excel using POI http://www.superlinksoftware.com/services/poi Commercial support including features added/implemented, bugs fixed.
Re: [vote] Accept JIRA contribution HARMONY-3 : Archie Cobbs' Contribution of JCVM
+1 from me I was concerned about the provenance given some of the statement found in the contribution, but Archie's explanation and statement of it being his original work based on exposure to only open-source implementations is fine for me. This is going into the sandbox - if we happen to discover an issue about this in the near future, we can simply fix it. On Sep 30, 2005, at 5:18 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: Archie Cobbs has offered the JCVM project under the Apache License to Apache Harmony. It can be found here : http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3 [ ] +1 Accept the code into the project sandbox [ ] -1 Don't accept the code. Reason : This vote will close 72 hours from now. geir -- Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [vote] Accept JIRA contribution HARMONY-3 : Archie Cobbs' Contribution of JCVM
+1 (non-binding) Dan Lydick > [Original Message] > From: Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Date: 9/30/05 4:18:14 PM > Subject: [vote] Accept JIRA contribution HARMONY-3 : Archie Cobbs' Contribution of JCVM > > Archie Cobbs has offered the JCVM project under the Apache License to > Apache Harmony. It can be found here : > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3 > > [ ] +1 Accept the code into the project sandbox > [ ] -1 Don't accept the code. Reason : > > This vote will close 72 hours from now. > > geir > > -- > Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
Re: [vote] Accept JIRA contribution HARMONY-3 : Archie Cobbs' Contribution of JCVM
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: Archie Cobbs has offered the JCVM project under the Apache License to Apache Harmony. It can be found here : http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3 [ ] +1 Accept the code into the project sandbox [ ] -1 Don't accept the code. Reason : This vote will close 72 hours from now. geir +1 Regards John
Re: [vote] Accept JIRA contribution HARMONY-3 : Archie Cobbs' Contribution of JCVM
+1 from me. On 9/30/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Archie Cobbs has offered the JCVM project under the Apache License to > Apache Harmony. It can be found here : > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3 > > [ ] +1 Accept the code into the project sandbox > [ ] -1 Don't accept the code. Reason : > > This vote will close 72 hours from now. > > geir > > -- > Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/ - Oxygenating The Web Service Platform
[vote] Accept JIRA contribution HARMONY-3 : Archie Cobbs' Contribution of JCVM
Archie Cobbs has offered the JCVM project under the Apache License to Apache Harmony. It can be found here : http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3 [ ] +1 Accept the code into the project sandbox [ ] -1 Don't accept the code. Reason : This vote will close 72 hours from now. geir -- Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
