[Histonet] FW: Ventana vs. Leica

2010-09-07 Thread Maria Katleba
This is how professional histotechs treat each other? A very sad commentary in 
a country where people are afforded free speech.

Maria Katleba MS HT(ASCP)
Pathology Dept. Mgr
Queen of the Valley Medical Center
1000 Trancas Street
Napa CA 94558
(707) 252-4411 x3689 direct
(707) 226-4385 pager
(707) 294-9229 cell- anytime

From: Joe Jones [mailto:joe_j_jone...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 4:28 PM
To: Maria Katleba
Subject: Ventana vs. Leica

Maria,

Please stop embarassing those of us who know you and have to work with you. You 
are clueless about Ventana's business, let alone anyone elses. Your postings on 
Histonet scream "idiot", so please stop. Ventana paying for a company's waste 
has nothing to do with a business plan, you dim ass. They pay it after some 
customer's bring up the additional cost when weighing their options. Fix the 
"machine" (it's not a machine you stupid tool)? If you knew anything about how 
instrument's are designed, you'd realize a company doesn't go back and redo an 
instrument. Now shut up and do us all a favor.




Toni brings up a very good point you know it's pretty bad when a company is 
willing to pay your waste costs... Not a good business plan. Why not 'fix' the 
machine so that it's more "green"

Maria Katleba MS HT(ASCP)



Notice from St. Joseph Health System:
Please note that the information contained in this message may be privileged 
and confidential and protected from disclosure.
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


RE: [Histonet] Silver

2010-09-07 Thread Ingles Claire
I thought Histotechs were supposed to have purple thumbs. :) 
(You know, gardeners have green thumbs...)
Claire



From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu on behalf of O'Donnell, Bill
Sent: Tue 9/7/2010 4:15 PM
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] Silver




I know... I should wear gloves when doing a GMS.I... know... that.
(sorry, I thought this was Facebook for a second) Have a great week!

- Sir Bill of the Blackened Thumb


___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet



___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


[Histonet] Silver

2010-09-07 Thread O'Donnell, Bill
 
I know... I should wear gloves when doing a GMS.I... know... that.
(sorry, I thought this was Facebook for a second) Have a great week! 

- Sir Bill of the Blackened Thumb


___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


RE: [Histonet] caris and genoptix experience

2010-09-07 Thread Ingles Claire
Gee... It's not like WE have work to do or anything. Thanks for the heads up 
about these companies. 
Claire



From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu on behalf of 
kim.dona...@bhcpns.org
Sent: Sat 9/4/2010 10:55 AM
To: histot...@imagesbyhopper.com
Cc: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu; histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: RE: [Histonet] caris and genoptix experience



I had exactly the same experience with the same company.

It's a bad mark right off the bat with me if vendors just walk in the door
and expect me to drop what I am doing.






Kim Donadio
Pathology Supervisor
Baptist Hospital
1000 W Moreno St.
Pensacola FL 32501
Phone (850) 469-7718
Fax (850) 434-4996




Sent by: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
09/03/2010 09:51 PM

To
"'Tench, Bill'" , 
cc

Subject
RE: [Histonet] caris and genoptix experience






Very interesting.  I recently had a very pushy Genoptix rep at my
facility.
Wanted to take a LOT of my time, but as I was walking out the door (the
rep
came unannounced), they only got about 10 minutes.  They were quick to
point
out that wasn't enough time ... well, um ...  make an appointment!!




-Original Message-
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Tench,
Bill
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 4:13 PM
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] caris and genoptix experience


We have had almost identical experiences with both organizations. Caris
has
been informed that it is not welcome; genoptix is on the same list Bill
Tench Associate Dir. Laboratory Services Chief, Cytology Services Palomar
Medical Center 555 E. Valley Parkway Escondido, California  92025
bill.te...@pph.org
Voice: 760- 739-3037
Fax: 760-739-2604


[None] made the following annotations
-
Confidential E-Mail: This e-mail is intended only for the person or entity
to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. Dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this e-mail or the information herein by
anyone
other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this
e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail, and destroy the
original message and all copies.
-

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.441 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3104 - Release Date: 09/03/10
06:34:00


___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet



-
All electronic data transmissions originating from or sent to
Baptist Health Care Corporation (BHC) are subject to monitoring.
This message along with any attached data, are the confidential and
proprietary communications of BHC and are intended to be received
only by the individual or individuals to whom the message has been
addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, please take notice that any use, copying, printing,
forwarding or distribution of this message, in any form, is
strictly prohibited and may violate State or Federal Law. If you
have received this transmission in error, please delete or destroy
all copies of this message.  For questions, contact the BHC Privacy
Officer at (850) 434-4472.  Rev.10/07.
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet



___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


[Histonet] trephine protocols

2010-09-07 Thread Vickroy, Jim

We are experiencing some problems with our trephine bone marrow biopsies.  
Could anyone share with me the amount of time they are generally using for 
decalcification and what reagents you are using?   We are also experiencing 
fragmentation in some of the slides.  Thanks

James Vickroy BS, HT(ASCP)

Surgical  and Autopsy Pathology Technical Supervisor
Memorial Medical Center
217-788-4046



This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information 
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you 
are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. Any disclosure, 
copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on 
it, is strictly prohibited.
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


[Histonet] Rat tendon processing

2010-09-07 Thread Kristen Lauing
Hi, 
I am processing rat infraspinatus tendons for Masson Trichrome staining.  I've 
had trouble with routine processing protocols and read that adding 4% phenol to 
the 95% alcohol solutions may help soften the tissue to make it easier to cut.

Has anyone ever tried this, or have other suggestions for preventing the tendon 
from getting so brittle it falls out of the paraffin?  Also, should I be 
extending the time that the tendon spends in each alcohol station or shortening 
it?  I am processing manually since we do not have access to an automatic 
processor.
Thanks,
Kristen


___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


[Histonet] Negative Control Tissue - No / Few Macrophages

2010-09-07 Thread Robert Hughes
Hello,
 
Does anyone know of a good control tissue absent of (or with few) macrophages?
 
I have seen a number of postings regarding tissue positive for various 
inflammatory markers (F4/80, MOMA. CD68).
 
I am running F4/80 (Serotec, Rat anti-ms F4/80) on ms. tissue.  I have a number 
of positive control tissues -- liver, spleen, etc.
 
Any suggestions would be very helpful.
 
Thank you.
 
Gustave
 
Gustave T. Hebert
Research Scientist I
Pfizer
Cambridge, MA 02140
 
 



___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


[Histonet] Losing Sections While Dehydrating

2010-09-07 Thread Amanda Madden
Hello Everyone!

I have searched the archives because I am sure this is a problem that has
been encountered before, but I have been unsuccessful in finding the right
thread. I ran an IHC series dilution on a new primary antibody for NeuN. I
am using 35 um rat brain sections that were cut on a cryostat and stored in
Cryoprotectant until ICC began. After finishing the ICC protocol, I mounted
the slides that were floating in phosphate buffered saline onto slides that
I subbed two weeks ago (.5% gelatin subbing). I allowed the slides to dry
from Friday afternoon until Tuesday afternoon. I tried to dehydrate them for
coverslipping and when they went into the dH20 bath, some of the sections
began to fall off of the slides. This continued in the 50% Alcohol bath. All
tissue that made it through those first two baths in the series stayed on
throughout, but I did lose quite a few sections, especially those that had
the lowest concentration of primary antibody. My experience has been that
highly concentrated primaries make the tissue a bit sticky, but the best
staining generally comes from the least concentrated. Does anyone know what
the problem might be? I think it might be a subbing problem but I'm not
sure. Thanks in advance.

Amanda Madden
Research Assistant

P.S. The subbing protocol that I used only called for one "dip" into the
gelatin solution, and didn't call for any type of acid wash. Also, our
cryostat is a Leica CM3050S and I was wondering if any of your labs have
established a working range in terms of humidity. Our lab has been
experiencing very high humidity levels (up to almost 80%), so we were
wondering if anyone has established that cutting cannot be done unless the
humidity is under x%.
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


Re: [Histonet] Problem with liver fixation

2010-09-07 Thread Geoff McAuliffe
Formalin fixes slowly, even more slowly at 4 degrees C. Even though the 
fix may penetrate, fixation will not be complete.

I suggest a formalin+alcohol+acetic acid fix at room temp for 24 hours.
There are many, many variations of this fix. Lillie recommends 85 ml of 
95% EtOH, 10 ml conc. formalin (37-40% formaldehyde), 5 ml glacial 
acetic acid.
I agree with Rene, Bouin will not make a difference. Alchoholic Bouin is 
also worth a try.


Geoff

Itai Moshe wrote:

Dear All,
I'm trying to use liver sections in paraffin blocks for IHC, but get no
signal at all, doesn't matter what antibody i'm using.

I'm using section about 3mm thick (the natural thickness of mouse liver) and
about 5-7mm Width and Length.

My fixation protocol is like this:
1) immediately after killing the mouse i'm putting the sections in a
fixation solution that is made from: 10ml formaldehyde 37%, 5ml PBSx20, 85ml
DDW  - pH 7, 24Hr at 4C.
2) ETOH 70%, ETOH 80%, ETOH 96%, ETOH 100% x2 - each for 1Hr at RT
3) Xylen x2 - each for 1Hr at RT.
4) Paraffin x3 - each at 60C for 1Hr.

Before doing IHC:
1) Xylen x2 - each for 10Min at RT
2) ETOH 100%x2, ETOH 96%, ETOH 80%, ETOH 70% - each for 2Min at RT.
3) IHC protocol...

Will Bouin's solution be better ?

Thank you all very much in advance

Itai M
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


  



--
--
**
Geoff McAuliffe, Ph.D.
Neuroscience and Cell Biology
Robert Wood Johnson Medical School
675 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ 08854
voice: (732)-235-4583 
mcaul...@umdnj.edu

**



___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


[Histonet] Re: Problem with liver fixation

2010-09-07 Thread Itai Moshe
Thank's all,

I'm thinking that my IHC method might be O.K because it is working great
with other paraffin embeddedd tissues like diaphragm and various muscles,
and (sometimes) also in older liver tissues that i have found in our lab
(but i don't know how they were made).

I'm using antigen retrieval with 0.01% Citrate buffer, pH 6.0 heated in
microwave.
but I don't rule out that my IHC method is not optimal for liver tissues,
and that there might be a better one.

Does someone have a proven fixation, or IHC methods that worked with live
tissues ?

Thank you all very much

Itai M



2010/9/7 Andrea Marion 

> Hi Itai,
>
> Liver antigens tend to degrade rapidly, so immediate fixation is
> necessary. It sounds like you are getting the tissue into the solution
> quickly enough. Fixation occurs more slowly at 4 degrees than room
> temperature though - perhaps your antigen is degrading during this
> 'slower' fixation? Are you using a sufficient volume of fixative compared
> to tissue mass?
>
> Another concern is that some antigens require paraformaldehyde fixation
> (ie a 4% solution of buffered formaldehyde prepared directly from solid
> paraformaldehyde). Solutions of formaldehyde marketed as '37%
> formaldehyde' or formalin typically contain ~10% methanol added as a
> stabilizer, which can interfere with some antigens. For
> immunohistochemistry purposes, you may need to prepare your formaldehyde
> solution directly from paraformaldehye. See here for more discussion of
> formaldehyde solutions: http://publish.uwo.ca/~jkiernan/formglut.htm
>
> Finally, you list 'IHC protocol', but why are you sure your problem lies
> in the tissue fixation/processing and not the staining protocol? You
> probably need to do some form of antigen retrieval - what method are you
> using? What is your primary antibody dilution? Has your antibody been
> validated for use with IHC/IF? Many antibodies simply do not work with
> FFPE tissues. There are many other steps that could be causing trouble...
> Here is a good beginner's guide for IHC with FFPE tissues if you need:
> http://www.abcam.com/ps/pdf/protocols/ihc_p.pdf
>
> As a side note, your processing steps may be a little long, but I am not
> an expert. We use only 30 minutes for each dehydration and clearing step,
> and 2 paraffin steps for one hour each with mouse tissue. Good luck!
>
> Andrea Marion
>
> amario3 &at& uic &dot& edu
> Graduate Student
> University of Illinois at Chicago
>
>
> 
>
 Rene J Buesa   histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu ‏,
Itai Moshe


Bouin's will not do better than what you describe. Are you using antigen
retrieval?
René J.

Patsy Ruegg 
Itai Moshe itai.mo...@mail.huji.ac.il ‏,

I would not fix at 4c, do it at rt.  Your fixative looks ok and processing,
actually for animal tissues I process for only 20 min a station not 60 min.,
animal tissues will process quicker because they have less fat, and you can
over process them so they become dryed out and hard.

About not getting a signal no matter what ab you use, there could be several
causes, are you using the proper antigen retrieval technique for that ab, is
your detection system matched to your primary antibody, on and on..?

Patsy Ruegg, HT(ASCP)QIHC
IHCtech
12635 Montview Blvd. Ste.215
Aurora, CO 80045
720-859-4060
fax 720-859-4110
www.ihctech.net
www.ihcrg.org

---

Itai Moshe אל histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu

Dear All,
I'm trying to use liver sections in paraffin blocks for IHC, but get no
signal at all, doesn't matter what antibody i'm using.

I'm using section about 3mm thick (the natural thickness of mouse liver) and
about 5-7mm Width and Length.

My fixation protocol is like this:
1) immediately after killing the mouse i'm putting the sections in a
fixation solution that is made from: 10ml formaldehyde 37%, 5ml PBSx20, 85ml
DDW  - pH 7, 24Hr at 4C.
2) ETOH 70%, ETOH 80%, ETOH 96%, ETOH 100% x2 - each for 1Hr at RT
3) Xylen x2 - each for 1Hr at RT.
4) Paraffin x3 - each at 60C for 1Hr.

Before doing IHC:
1) Xylen x2 - each for 10Min at RT
2) ETOH 100%x2, ETOH 96%, ETOH 80%, ETOH 70% - each for 2Min at RT.
3) IHC protocol...

Will Bouin's solution be better ?

Thank you all very much in advance

Itai M
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet