Re: IBMVM Digest - 10 Aug 2007 to 11 Aug 2007 (#2007-208)
On Aug 11, 2007, at 8:08 PM, Alan Altmark wrote: > The Reedster is a native of PA. He's just, for some unknown reason, a > lifetime Packers fanatic. Go figure. Wow. That's even more frightening... ...phsiii
Re: SHARE - announcing the Linux and VM Program Opening and Worldwide News session
On Aug 11, 2007, at 8:08 PM, Alan Altmark wrote: The Reedster is a native of PA. He's just, for some unknown reason, a lifetime Packers fanatic. Go figure. Hey, Alan, you don't happen to have a fictitious Nova Scotian long- lost shed-dwelling kitty-fancying brother named Bubbles (surname unknown) who steals grocery carts, fixes them up, and sells them back, do you? I was just wondering, since I'm watching _Trailer Park Boys_ Season 4, and I was struck by the uncanny similarities between the Bubbles- Conky relationship and the Alan-Chuckie relationship. Adam P.S. And if you don't know _Trailer Park Boys_ (which is probably like 99% of you) it's a Canadian sitcom about a bunch of dope-growing losers^W^W^Wagricultural entrepreneurs living in Sunnyvale Trailer Park somewhere near Halifax. Netflix will happily send you at least the first four seasons.
Re: Meet up a share?
I'll be doing that as well. ;) > -Original Message- > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Alan Altmark > Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2007 8:04 PM > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: Re: Meet up a share? > > On Saturday, 08/11/2007 at 08:59 EDT, Paul Raulerson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > I?ll be at share Sunday ? Thursday; if anyone wants to meet up for a > few > beers > > (or root beers, as your preference dictates!) I think I owe several > people here > > a few. :) > > Better would be to find the VM & Linux table at SCIDS, uh, "evening > receptions". Just look for Edgar (the bear)! > > See you! > > Alan Altmark > z/VM Development > IBM Endicott
Re: SHARE - announcing the Linux and VM Program Opening and Worldwide News session
On Friday, 08/10/2007 at 08:55 EDT, Phil Smith III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > James Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Think of it like CNN, but ours is RNN - The Reed News Network. :-) All the > >news with more cheese. > > For those who are new, that's not a reference to Reed Mullins' content or > presentation style (both of which are consistently excellent), but rather to > his often-noted Wisconsin Cheesehead origins. The Reedster is a native of PA. He's just, for some unknown reason, a lifetime Packers fanatic. Go figure. Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott
Re: Meet up a share?
On Saturday, 08/11/2007 at 08:59 EDT, Paul Raulerson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I?ll be at share Sunday ? Thursday; if anyone wants to meet up for a few beers > (or root beers, as your preference dictates!) I think I owe several people here > a few. :) Better would be to find the VM & Linux table at SCIDS, uh, "evening receptions". Just look for Edgar (the bear)! See you! Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott
Meet up a share?
I'll be at share Sunday - Thursday; if anyone wants to meet up for a few beers (or root beers, as your preference dictates!) I think I owe several people here a few. :) Drop me an e-mail at [EMAIL PROTECTED] or drop me a cell phone call - 512-630-5759. I would enjoy getting to put faces to you folks! -Paul
Re: Live Virtual Class, Aug 14 - Virtualization Basics (10am NY time)
It does not matter any more It is full when I tried to register on Friday afternoon... Ummm ...Roland Alan Ackerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 8 Aug 2007 16:24:31 -0400, Pamela Christina in warm & sunny Endicott NY wrote: >This 90-minute LVC will be conducted on Tuesday, August 14 starting at >10:00 Eastern U.S./4:00 p.m. CET and recorded for subsequent replay. >The replay will be available 1 week after the live session via a link on >the z/VM website (http://www.vm.ibm.com/) Is this really worth getting up at 7 am Pacific time? >Important: >Enroll for this session by EOD Monday, August 13 with this URL: >https://asp22.centra.com:443/Reg/main/00013c73780113c2f41183002cd1/en_US > > >There is no tuition to participate in this session, however you must >enroll at least 1 business day ahead of the session date to enable your >participation. The LVC will be delivered using the Centra tool that >employs Voice over IP (VoIP) technology to provide both the audio as >well as the visuals to your Windows workstation. Each participant must >enroll individually, ie. no sharing of LVC logins is supported. > >After enrolling in the LVC, you should run a a System Check via the >following URL to verify your workstation meets the following minimum >requirements. >System Check: https://stg.centra.com/SysCheck/main/Customers/ibmstg > Windows 2000 or Windows XP > Internet Explorer 5.01, Netscape 7.2, Firefox 1.0 or later. > 28.8 kbps or faster Internet connection > P350+ MHz, 128+ MB memory > 800x600 16-bit color display or better > sound card and speakers (to hear the audio portion of the LVC) > microphone (required if you want to ask a question during the LVC) What is the "Centra tool"? I don't have a microphone. Will the replay also require the Centra tool? I gather it wants to install something on my PC, and that it will not work on my Mac. Why? I'm not convinced this is worth all the trouble to install a piece of software. Let me know what kind of turnout you get. I think you are setting the bar too high.
Re: TCP/IP problem with hypersockets
On Friday, 08/10/2007 at 05:48 EDT, Antoon Vekeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > DTCPRS007E Error encountered in reading PROFILE TCPIP *: > DTCPAR123I Line 67: Gateway not directly accessible in GATEWAY command > 00057 HOME > 00058 192.168.0.3 ETH_VM431 > 00059 192.168.0.10 QDIO1 > 00060 ; > 00061 GATEWAY > 00062 ; Network First Link MTU SubnetS > 00063 ; Address Hop Name Size Mask V > 00064 ; > 00065 192.168.0 = ETH_VM431 1492 0 > 00066 192.168.0 = QDIO1 1500 255.255.255.0 0 > 00067 DEFAULTNET 192.168.0.4 ETH_VM431 1492 0 You have two interfaces defined with the same subnet (192.168.0/24) that are connected to different networks. It ain't gonna work. The message is probably because you don't have EQUALCOSTMULTIPATH in the AssortedParms, and the first GATEWAY entry was replaced by the second one, excluding ETH_VM431. You MUST put the Guest LAN and the LCS device in separate networks. Also, remove the "PORTNAME" specification for the QDIO device. It isn't required and its presence will, someday in the unforseen future, come back to bite you. Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott
Re: Guest in 31 or 64 bit?
If you have TRACK installed, that'll answer the question on an ad-hoc basis without any further programming effort on your part. Otherwise, if it were me and I were looking for a reliable, "programmable" interface I reckon I'd be starting to think about writing an extension to QUERY ...
Re: Guest in 31 or 64 bit?
Lee Stewart wrote: Is there a way to tell from a CP command if a guest is running in 31 bit or 64 bit mode? Thanks Lee Not directly, but you could issue the DISPLAY PSW command on behalf of the target user (using the FOR command in z/VM 5.3, or via SCIF for earlier releases) and interpret the result, which will be like one of the following: Guest in 31-bit mode: for operator cmd d p OPERATOR : PSW = 030E 8105B570 OPERATOR : HCPFOR069I Command Complete. CP return code = . Guest in 64-bit mode, PSWTRANS OFF: for raylx2 cmd d p RAYLX2 : HCPCDP6150E The option PSW has been specified but is not valid in z/Architecture mode. To enable the use of this option issue the appropriate SET PSWTRANS command or use the PSWG option. RAYLX2 : HCPFOR069I Command Complete. CP return code = 6150. Guest in 64-bit mode, PSWTRANS ALL|DISPLAY|STORE: for raylx2 cmd d p RAYLX2 : PSW = NON TRANSLATABLE PSWG = 07060001 8000 00107E2E RAYLX2 : HCPFOR069I Command Complete. CP return code = . And yes, it would be very easy (code-wise) to provide a QUERY command option to give this information, or you might try the following piece of REXX from a suitably-privileged userid (this, of course, is subject to VMDMMODE remaining at the same offset in the VMDBK - which it has for at least the last four releases): --- /* QMODE: determine whether a guest is in 64-bit mode */ Parse UPPER Arg uid If (uid='*') Then uid = userid() Numeric Digits 20 'PIPE CP LOCATE' uid '| spec w3 1 | var vmdbk' If (rc<>0) Then Do Say 'Error' rc 'from "CP LOCATE' uid'"' Exit rc End vmdmmode = d2x(x2d(vmdbk)+x2d(4c4)) 'PIPE CP DISPLAY HS' || vmdmmode || '.1 | spec w2 1 | var mode' If (rc<>0) Then Do Say 'Error' rc 'from "CP DISPLAY HS' || vmdmmode || '.1"' Exit rc End If bitand(x2c(mode),'40'x)='40'x Then Say uid 'is in 64-bit mode' Else Say uid 'is not in 64-bit mode' --- Or one could write a CP QUERY command extension - isn't that possible? I'll take a look and maybe post something later. Ray
Re: QUERY Guest CPUs
Actually, I believe it would be: CP FOR xxx CMD QUERY VIRT CPUS The FOR command in z/VM 5.3 is a nice addition to managing guests! Jim V On 8/10/07, Huegel, Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If you are z/VM 5.3 you can use FOR CP QUERY VIRT CPUS >