Re: hate to harp on SET SHARE but...
Stephen, i think you missed the fact that she does have a performance monitor that shows all this information in great detail. Stephen Frazier wrote: You have many users on your system. Why do you think WVLNX2 is getting more than 50% of one IFL? Maybe it is getting 50% and WVLNX4 is also getting 50% that would cause the HMC System Activity display to show about 100%. Maybe WVLNX4, WVLNX5, WVLNX6, and WVLNX8 are all getting about 25% each and WVLNX2 is getting about 1%. Lots of other possibilities. What evidence do you have that it is WVLNX2 that is the problem? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On the HMC, we have a System Activity display that shows our 2 CPs and the 1 SP. Normally the IFL is really low, but occassionally, like right now, it shows around 100% usage. Anne D. Crabtree System Programmer WV Dept of Administration - OT 304-558-1494 Fax 304-558-1441 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/8/2007 9:53 AM >>> What make you think that WVLNX2 is getting more than 50% of your one IFL?
Re: hate to harp on SET SHARE but...
In original post, the figures reported on ESALNXP for CPU percent showed 95.3 percent for wvlnx2 at 8:39 this morning... Anne D. Crabtree System Programmer WV Dept of Administration - OT 304-558-1494 Fax 304-558-1441 >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/8/2007 10:19 AM >>> You have many users on your system. Why do you think WVLNX2 is getting more than 50% of one IFL? Maybe it is getting 50% and WVLNX4 is also getting 50% that would cause the HMC System Activity display to show about 100%. Maybe WVLNX4, WVLNX5, WVLNX6, and WVLNX8 are all getting about 25% each and WVLNX2 is getting about 1%. Lots of other possibilities. What evidence do you have that it is WVLNX2 that is the problem? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On the HMC, we have a System Activity display that shows our 2 CPs and > the 1 SP. Normally the IFL is really low, but occassionally, like right > now, it shows around 100% usage. > > Anne D. Crabtree > System Programmer > WV Dept of Administration - OT > 304-558-1494 > Fax 304-558-1441 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/8/2007 9:53 AM >>> > What make you think that WVLNX2 is getting more than 50% of your one > IFL? > -- Stephen Frazier Information Technology Unit Oklahoma Department of Corrections 3400 Martin Luther King Oklahoma City, Ok, 73111-4298 Tel.: (405) 425-2549 Fax: (405) 425-2554 Pager: (405) 690-1828 email: stevef%doc.state.ok.us
Re: hate to harp on SET SHARE but...
You have many users on your system. Why do you think WVLNX2 is getting more than 50% of one IFL? Maybe it is getting 50% and WVLNX4 is also getting 50% that would cause the HMC System Activity display to show about 100%. Maybe WVLNX4, WVLNX5, WVLNX6, and WVLNX8 are all getting about 25% each and WVLNX2 is getting about 1%. Lots of other possibilities. What evidence do you have that it is WVLNX2 that is the problem? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On the HMC, we have a System Activity display that shows our 2 CPs and the 1 SP. Normally the IFL is really low, but occassionally, like right now, it shows around 100% usage. Anne D. Crabtree System Programmer WV Dept of Administration - OT 304-558-1494 Fax 304-558-1441 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/8/2007 9:53 AM >>> What make you think that WVLNX2 is getting more than 50% of your one IFL? -- Stephen Frazier Information Technology Unit Oklahoma Department of Corrections 3400 Martin Luther King Oklahoma City, Ok, 73111-4298 Tel.: (405) 425-2549 Fax: (405) 425-2554 Pager: (405) 690-1828 email: stevef%doc.state.ok.us
Re: hate to harp on SET SHARE but...
On the HMC, we have a System Activity display that shows our 2 CPs and the 1 SP. Normally the IFL is really low, but occassionally, like right now, it shows around 100% usage. Anne D. Crabtree System Programmer WV Dept of Administration - OT 304-558-1494 Fax 304-558-1441 >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/8/2007 9:53 AM >>> What make you think that WVLNX2 is getting more than 50% of your one IFL? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On ESAUSRC screen of ESAMON, it shows this: > > <-SHARE---> > > Account ACI Grp <-Maximum> # of VM > Stor > UserID ClassID Code NameRel Abs Type Share Limit CPUs > Mode Mode > -- --- - - > > VMSERVU *Linuxen 1 1500 . Rel 0.0 Soft1 > XC V=V > WVLNX2 *Linuxen WVLNX2 100 . Abs 50.0 Hard1 > ESA V=V > WVLNX4 *Linuxen WVLNX4 100 . Rel 0.0 Soft1 > ESA V=V > WVLNX5 *Linuxen WVLNX5 100 . Rel 0.0 Soft1 > ESA V=V > WVLNX6 *Linuxen WVLNX6 100 . Rel 0.0 Soft1 > ESA V=V > WVLNX8 *Linuxen WVLNX8 100 . Rel 0.0 Soft1 > ESA V=V > - > > ESALNXP screen shows this: > > Screen: ESALNXP State of West Virginia ESAMON 3.7.0 08/08 > 08:26-08:41 > 1 of 3 LINUX VSI Process Statistics Report NODE * LIMIT 500 > 2086 3E1FE > > > <-Process Ident-> <-CPU Percents-> > nice > Time Node Name IDPPID GRP Tot sys user syst usrt > valu > - - - - > > 08:39:00 wvlnx2 oracle19524 1 19524 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 > 0 > oracle19520 1 19520 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 > 0 > oracle19518 1 19518 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 > 0 > oracle19501 1 19501 20.2 15.9 4.3 0.0 0.0 > 0 > oracle19499 1 19499 20.7 17.1 3.6 0.0 0.0 > 0 > oracle19485 1 19485 27.1 21.6 5.5 0.0 0.0 > 0 > oracle19478 1 19478 1.8 1.4 0.5 0.0 0.0 > 0 > oracle19367 1 19367 6.1 4.5 1.7 0.0 0.0 > 0 > oracle19336 1 19336 1.1 0.8 0.3 0.0 0.0 > 0 > snmpd 5460 1 5459 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 > 10 > cron570 1 570 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 > 0 > tnslsnr 505 1 505 1.0 0.6 0.0 0.3 0.0 > 0 > *Totals* 0 0 0 95.3 74.4 20.2 0.6 0.0 > 0 > > My understanding is that the LIMITHARD should prevent it from taking > more than 50% of my one IFL. (We only have 1!) Did I misunderstand? > > Anne D. Crabtree > System Programmer > WV Dept of Administration - OT > 304-558-1494 > Fax 304-558-1441 -- Stephen Frazier Information Technology Unit Oklahoma Department of Corrections 3400 Martin Luther King Oklahoma City, Ok, 73111-4298 Tel.: (405) 425-2549 Fax: (405) 425-2554 Pager: (405) 690-1828 email: stevef%doc.state.ok.us
Re: hate to harp on SET SHARE but...
On 8/8/07, Stephen Frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What make you think that WVLNX2 is getting more than 50% of your one IFL? Actually, Linux thinks it gets more than 50% of a CPU. Adding up all the per-process usage that Linux reports, we get 95.3% of a CPU in this case. This demonstrates nicely that the CPU usage that Linux itself reports is not correct unless corrected for virtualization effects. I followed up with Anne outside the list and identified a configuration problem that prevented ESALPS from correcting the Linux numbers. With that correction, the per-process usage reported by ESALPS is correct. Rob -- Rob van der Heij Velocity Software, Inc http://velocitysoftware.com/
Re: hate to harp on SET SHARE but...
What make you think that WVLNX2 is getting more than 50% of your one IFL?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On ESAUSRC screen of ESAMON, it shows this:
<-SHARE--->
Account ACI Grp <-Maximum> # of VM
Stor
UserID ClassID Code NameRel Abs Type Share Limit CPUs
Mode Mode
-- --- - -
VMSERVU *Linuxen 1 1500 . Rel 0.0 Soft1
XC V=V
WVLNX2 *Linuxen WVLNX2 100 . Abs 50.0 Hard1
ESA V=V
WVLNX4 *Linuxen WVLNX4 100 . Rel 0.0 Soft1
ESA V=V
WVLNX5 *Linuxen WVLNX5 100 . Rel 0.0 Soft1
ESA V=V
WVLNX6 *Linuxen WVLNX6 100 . Rel 0.0 Soft1
ESA V=V
WVLNX8 *Linuxen WVLNX8 100 . Rel 0.0 Soft1
ESA V=V
-
ESALNXP screen shows this:
Screen: ESALNXP State of West Virginia ESAMON 3.7.0 08/08
08:26-08:41
1 of 3 LINUX VSI Process Statistics Report NODE * LIMIT 500
2086 3E1FE
<-Process Ident-> <-CPU Percents->
nice
Time Node Name IDPPID GRP Tot sys user syst usrt
valu
- - - -
08:39:00 wvlnx2 oracle19524 1 19524 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0
0
oracle19520 1 19520 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0
0
oracle19518 1 19518 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
0
oracle19501 1 19501 20.2 15.9 4.3 0.0 0.0
0
oracle19499 1 19499 20.7 17.1 3.6 0.0 0.0
0
oracle19485 1 19485 27.1 21.6 5.5 0.0 0.0
0
oracle19478 1 19478 1.8 1.4 0.5 0.0 0.0
0
oracle19367 1 19367 6.1 4.5 1.7 0.0 0.0
0
oracle19336 1 19336 1.1 0.8 0.3 0.0 0.0
0
snmpd 5460 1 5459 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.0
10
cron570 1 570 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0
0
tnslsnr 505 1 505 1.0 0.6 0.0 0.3 0.0
0
*Totals* 0 0 0 95.3 74.4 20.2 0.6 0.0
0
My understanding is that the LIMITHARD should prevent it from taking
more than 50% of my one IFL. (We only have 1!) Did I misunderstand?
Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Dept of Administration - OT
304-558-1494
Fax 304-558-1441
--
Stephen Frazier
Information Technology Unit
Oklahoma Department of Corrections
3400 Martin Luther King
Oklahoma City, Ok, 73111-4298
Tel.: (405) 425-2549
Fax: (405) 425-2554
Pager: (405) 690-1828
email: stevef%doc.state.ok.us
hate to harp on SET SHARE but...
On ESAUSRC screen of ESAMON, it shows this:
<-SHARE--->
Account ACI Grp <-Maximum> # of VM
Stor
UserID ClassID Code NameRel Abs Type Share Limit CPUs
Mode Mode
-- --- - -
VMSERVU *Linuxen 1 1500 . Rel 0.0 Soft1
XC V=V
WVLNX2 *Linuxen WVLNX2 100 . Abs 50.0 Hard1
ESA V=V
WVLNX4 *Linuxen WVLNX4 100 . Rel 0.0 Soft1
ESA V=V
WVLNX5 *Linuxen WVLNX5 100 . Rel 0.0 Soft1
ESA V=V
WVLNX6 *Linuxen WVLNX6 100 . Rel 0.0 Soft1
ESA V=V
WVLNX8 *Linuxen WVLNX8 100 . Rel 0.0 Soft1
ESA V=V
-
ESALNXP screen shows this:
Screen: ESALNXP State of West Virginia ESAMON 3.7.0 08/08
08:26-08:41
1 of 3 LINUX VSI Process Statistics Report NODE * LIMIT 500
2086 3E1FE
<-Process Ident-> <-CPU Percents->
nice
Time Node Name IDPPID GRP Tot sys user syst usrt
valu
- - - -
08:39:00 wvlnx2 oracle19524 1 19524 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0
0
oracle19520 1 19520 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0
0
oracle19518 1 19518 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
0
oracle19501 1 19501 20.2 15.9 4.3 0.0 0.0
0
oracle19499 1 19499 20.7 17.1 3.6 0.0 0.0
0
oracle19485 1 19485 27.1 21.6 5.5 0.0 0.0
0
oracle19478 1 19478 1.8 1.4 0.5 0.0 0.0
0
oracle19367 1 19367 6.1 4.5 1.7 0.0 0.0
0
oracle19336 1 19336 1.1 0.8 0.3 0.0 0.0
0
snmpd 5460 1 5459 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.0
10
cron570 1 570 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0
0
tnslsnr 505 1 505 1.0 0.6 0.0 0.3 0.0
0
*Totals* 0 0 0 95.3 74.4 20.2 0.6 0.0
0
My understanding is that the LIMITHARD should prevent it from taking
more than 50% of my one IFL. (We only have 1!) Did I misunderstand?
Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Dept of Administration - OT
304-558-1494
Fax 304-558-1441
