Re: zVM 5.4, OS/390 2.10 and OSA

2010-07-30 Thread Mark Pace 
Sounds like a question for your IBM CE.  He should be able to tell you
exactly what was in the microcode upgrade.


On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Daniel Allen  wrote:

> We have a OS/390 2.10 guest machine running under zVM 5.4 on z9BC .
>
>
>
> The OSA addresses are natively attached to the OS/390 2.10 guest.
>
>
>
> Last week before the weekend upgrade, there was not a problem getting to
> the OS/390 2.10 guest.
>
>
>
> However, during the weekend upgrade, we went from 16G to 32G and a
> microcode upgrade.
>
>
>
> Now it takes about 5 minutes from the time I launch the PCOM session to
> when I receive the TN3270 screen.
>
>
>
> Did the microcode upgrade mess with the OSA ? I don’t know what the
> microcode upgrade was.
>



-- 
Mark D Pace
Senior Systems Engineer
Mainline Information Systems

zVM 5.4, OS/390 2.10 and OSA

2010-07-29 Thread Daniel Allen 
We have a OS/390 2.10 guest machine running under zVM 5.4 on z9BC .

The OSA addresses are natively attached to the OS/390 2.10 guest.

Last week before the weekend upgrade, there was not a problem getting to the 
OS/390 2.10 guest.

However, during the weekend upgrade, we went from 16G to 32G and a microcode 
upgrade.

Now it takes about 5 minutes from the time I launch the PCOM session to when I 
receive the TN3270 screen.

Did the microcode upgrade mess with the OSA ? I don't know what the microcode 
upgrade was.