Re: Jenkins LTS baseline selection

[Tim Jacomb]

2.289 is selected

On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 at 16:25, Beatriz Munoz  wrote:

> Hi!
>
> So, is selected 2.289 or the discussion is still open?
>
> Thanks!
>
> El 24 abr 2021, a las 17:55, Tim Jacomb  escribió:
>
> Agreed
>
> On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 at 14:25, Oleg Nenashev 
> wrote:
>
>> AFAICT there have been no new regressions reported for 2.289 since the
>> release.
>> I think we can go ahead with choosing this baseline.
>>
>> BR, Oleg
>>
>> On Thursday, April 22, 2021 at 7:12:42 PM UTC+2 bmu...@cloudbees.com
>> wrote:
>>
>>> 2.289 looks good for me
>>>
>>> El 20 abr 2021, a las 12:43, Oleg Nenashev 
>>> escribió:
>>>
>>> 2.289 looks good for me. There are no major changes (e.g. we did not
>>> merge the Jetty 9.4.40 update), and it should be safe to take this versions
>>> as a baseline. If something happens, we still have 6 weeks
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, April 20, 2021 at 11:17:39 AM UTC+2 imon...@cloudbees.com
>>> wrote:
>>>
 2.289 LGTM

 Best,
 Ildefonso

 On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 10:57 AM Raihaan Shouhell 
 wrote:

> Hey Tim,
>
> I'm entirely for 2.289 as 2.289 does not make any major changes and as
> Daniel has pointed out, we can backport any fixes.
>
> Cheers,
> Raihaan
>
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 4:17 PM Baptiste Mathus 
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for raising this Tim.
>> As I've written on IRC, as long as we choose 2.288+, I'm happy :).
>>
>> Can you please confirm the expected timeline, so we can better assess
>> things?
>> Re-reading https://www.jenkins.io/download/lts/ we're looking at a
>> .1 6 weeks from now, i.e. some time around 2021-06-02 right ?
>>
>> If so, I agree even choosing the upcoming 2.289 could be acceptable
>> with such a testing period.
>>
>> -- Baptiste
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Given the expected usua
>>
>>
>>
>> Le mar. 20 avr. 2021 à 08:53, Tim Jacomb  a
>> écrit :
>>
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>> Please voice your opinion on which version should be our next core
>>> baseline.
>>>
>>> For me it looks like either 2.288 or 2.289 are the options
>>>
>>> 2.289 (being released today) includes a change for an upcoming
>>> firefox version so it would be good to get it in, but it hasn't had any
>>> weekly soaking time so we could use 2.288 and then backport it in if we
>>> don't find any issues?
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Tim
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Jenkins Developers" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>> send an email to jenkinsci-de...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAH-3BidOjTQoUe7Y4q7m-9hp_UN6JX9t1xNyQTdhwNk3M1LqVg%40mail.gmail.com
>>> 
>>> .
>>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Jenkins Developers" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>> send an email to jenkinsci-de...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CANWgJS7o6mGZttw4uo2r2RNqHnf7haaSFVmPcUEsphV7ynwkeA%40mail.gmail.com
>> 
>> .
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Jenkins Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to jenkinsci-de...@googlegroups.com.
>
 To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAFoxvgxhKh_v1YRrniinWfJJBx1%3DOqtjEg14aUH3d_EU8VwM7g%40mail.gmail.com
> 
> .
>


 --
 Ildefonso Montero Pérez
 Senior Software Engineer
 CloudBees, Inc



 E: imon...@cloudbees.com

>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Jenkins Developers" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to jenkinsci-de...@googlegroups.com.
>>>
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/e95f04de-43f8-4b66-a68e-23379638d6f3n%40googlegroups.com
>>> 

Re: Jenkins LTS baseline selection

[Beatriz Munoz]

Hi!

So, is selected 2.289 or the discussion is still open?

Thanks!

> El 24 abr 2021, a las 17:55, Tim Jacomb  escribió:
> 
> Agreed
> 
> On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 at 14:25, Oleg Nenashev  > wrote:
> AFAICT there have been no new regressions reported for 2.289 since the 
> release.
> I think we can go ahead with choosing this baseline.
> 
> BR, Oleg
> 
> On Thursday, April 22, 2021 at 7:12:42 PM UTC+2 bmu...@cloudbees.com 
>  wrote:
> 2.289 looks good for me
> 
> 
>> El 20 abr 2021, a las 12:43, Oleg Nenashev > escribió:
>> 
> 
>> 2.289 looks good for me. There are no major changes (e.g. we did not merge 
>> the Jetty 9.4.40 update), and it should be safe to take this versions as a 
>> baseline. If something happens, we still have 6 weeks
>> 
>> On Tuesday, April 20, 2021 at 11:17:39 AM UTC+2 imon...@cloudbees.com 
>>  wrote:
>> 2.289 LGTM
>> 
>> Best,
>> Ildefonso
>> 
>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 10:57 AM Raihaan Shouhell > 
>> wrote:
>> Hey Tim,
>> 
>> I'm entirely for 2.289 as 2.289 does not make any major changes and as 
>> Daniel has pointed out, we can backport any fixes.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Raihaan
>> 
>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 4:17 PM Baptiste Mathus > wrote:
>> Thanks for raising this Tim. 
>> As I've written on IRC, as long as we choose 2.288+, I'm happy :).
>> 
>> Can you please confirm the expected timeline, so we can better assess things?
>> Re-reading https://www.jenkins.io/download/lts/ 
>>  we're looking at a .1 6 weeks from 
>> now, i.e. some time around 2021-06-02 right ?
>> 
>> If so, I agree even choosing the upcoming 2.289 could be acceptable with 
>> such a testing period. 
>> 
>> -- Baptiste
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Given the expected usua
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Le mar. 20 avr. 2021 à 08:53, Tim Jacomb > a écrit :
>> Hello everyone,
>> 
>> Please voice your opinion on which version should be our next core baseline.
>> 
>> For me it looks like either 2.288 or 2.289 are the options
>> 
>> 2.289 (being released today) includes a change for an upcoming firefox 
>> version so it would be good to get it in, but it hasn't had any weekly 
>> soaking time so we could use 2.288 and then backport it in if we don't find 
>> any issues?
>> 
>> What do you think?
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Tim
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Jenkins Developers" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to jenkinsci-de...@googlegroups.com <>.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAH-3BidOjTQoUe7Y4q7m-9hp_UN6JX9t1xNyQTdhwNk3M1LqVg%40mail.gmail.com
>>  
>> .
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Jenkins Developers" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to jenkinsci-de...@googlegroups.com <>.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CANWgJS7o6mGZttw4uo2r2RNqHnf7haaSFVmPcUEsphV7ynwkeA%40mail.gmail.com
>>  
>> .
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Jenkins Developers" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to jenkinsci-de...@googlegroups.com <>.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAFoxvgxhKh_v1YRrniinWfJJBx1%3DOqtjEg14aUH3d_EU8VwM7g%40mail.gmail.com
>>  
>> .
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Ildefonso Montero Pérez
>> Senior Software Engineer
>> CloudBees, Inc
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> E: imon...@cloudbees.com <>
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Jenkins Developers" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to jenkinsci-de...@googlegroups.com <>.
> 
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/e95f04de-43f8-4b66-a68e-23379638d6f3n%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> .
> 
> Beatriz Muñoz Manso
> Sr Software Engineer 
> CloudBees, Inc.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Jenkins Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails fr

Re: Jenkins LTS baseline selection

[Tim Jacomb]

Agreed

On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 at 14:25, Oleg Nenashev  wrote:

> AFAICT there have been no new regressions reported for 2.289 since the
> release.
> I think we can go ahead with choosing this baseline.
>
> BR, Oleg
>
> On Thursday, April 22, 2021 at 7:12:42 PM UTC+2 bmu...@cloudbees.com
> wrote:
>
>> 2.289 looks good for me
>>
>> El 20 abr 2021, a las 12:43, Oleg Nenashev 
>> escribió:
>>
>> 2.289 looks good for me. There are no major changes (e.g. we did not
>> merge the Jetty 9.4.40 update), and it should be safe to take this versions
>> as a baseline. If something happens, we still have 6 weeks
>>
>> On Tuesday, April 20, 2021 at 11:17:39 AM UTC+2 imon...@cloudbees.com
>> wrote:
>>
>>> 2.289 LGTM
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Ildefonso
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 10:57 AM Raihaan Shouhell 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Hey Tim,

 I'm entirely for 2.289 as 2.289 does not make any major changes and as
 Daniel has pointed out, we can backport any fixes.

 Cheers,
 Raihaan

 On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 4:17 PM Baptiste Mathus 
 wrote:

> Thanks for raising this Tim.
> As I've written on IRC, as long as we choose 2.288+, I'm happy :).
>
> Can you please confirm the expected timeline, so we can better assess
> things?
> Re-reading https://www.jenkins.io/download/lts/ we're looking at a .1
> 6 weeks from now, i.e. some time around 2021-06-02 right ?
>
> If so, I agree even choosing the upcoming 2.289 could be acceptable
> with such a testing period.
>
> -- Baptiste
>
>
>
>
> Given the expected usua
>
>
>
> Le mar. 20 avr. 2021 à 08:53, Tim Jacomb  a
> écrit :
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> Please voice your opinion on which version should be our next core
>> baseline.
>>
>> For me it looks like either 2.288 or 2.289 are the options
>>
>> 2.289 (being released today) includes a change for an upcoming
>> firefox version so it would be good to get it in, but it hasn't had any
>> weekly soaking time so we could use 2.288 and then backport it in if we
>> don't find any issues?
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Tim
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Jenkins Developers" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>> send an email to jenkinsci-de...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAH-3BidOjTQoUe7Y4q7m-9hp_UN6JX9t1xNyQTdhwNk3M1LqVg%40mail.gmail.com
>> 
>> .
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Jenkins Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to jenkinsci-de...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CANWgJS7o6mGZttw4uo2r2RNqHnf7haaSFVmPcUEsphV7ynwkeA%40mail.gmail.com
> 
> .
>

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups "Jenkins Developers" group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an email to jenkinsci-de...@googlegroups.com.

>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
 https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAFoxvgxhKh_v1YRrniinWfJJBx1%3DOqtjEg14aUH3d_EU8VwM7g%40mail.gmail.com
 
 .

>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ildefonso Montero Pérez
>>> Senior Software Engineer
>>> CloudBees, Inc
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> E: imon...@cloudbees.com
>>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Jenkins Developers" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to jenkinsci-de...@googlegroups.com.
>>
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/e95f04de-43f8-4b66-a68e-23379638d6f3n%40googlegroups.com
>> 
>> .
>>
>>
>> Beatriz Muñoz Manso
>> Sr Software Engineer
>> CloudBees, Inc.
>>
>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Jenkins Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to jenkinsci-d

Re: Jenkins LTS baseline selection

[Oleg Nenashev]

AFAICT there have been no new regressions reported for 2.289 since the 
release.
I think we can go ahead with choosing this baseline.

BR, Oleg

On Thursday, April 22, 2021 at 7:12:42 PM UTC+2 bmu...@cloudbees.com wrote:

> 2.289 looks good for me
>
> El 20 abr 2021, a las 12:43, Oleg Nenashev  escribió:
>
> 2.289 looks good for me. There are no major changes (e.g. we did not merge 
> the Jetty 9.4.40 update), and it should be safe to take this versions as a 
> baseline. If something happens, we still have 6 weeks
>
> On Tuesday, April 20, 2021 at 11:17:39 AM UTC+2 imon...@cloudbees.com 
> wrote:
>
>> 2.289 LGTM
>>
>> Best,
>> Ildefonso
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 10:57 AM Raihaan Shouhell  
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey Tim,
>>>
>>> I'm entirely for 2.289 as 2.289 does not make any major changes and as 
>>> Daniel has pointed out, we can backport any fixes.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Raihaan
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 4:17 PM Baptiste Mathus  wrote:
>>>
 Thanks for raising this Tim. 
 As I've written on IRC, as long as we choose 2.288+, I'm happy :).

 Can you please confirm the expected timeline, so we can better assess 
 things?
 Re-reading https://www.jenkins.io/download/lts/ we're looking at a .1 
 6 weeks from now, i.e. some time around 2021-06-02 right ?

 If so, I agree even choosing the upcoming 2.289 could be acceptable 
 with such a testing period. 

 -- Baptiste




 Given the expected usua



 Le mar. 20 avr. 2021 à 08:53, Tim Jacomb  a écrit :

> Hello everyone,
>
> Please voice your opinion on which version should be our next core 
> baseline.
>
> For me it looks like either 2.288 or 2.289 are the options
>
> 2.289 (being released today) includes a change for an upcoming firefox 
> version so it would be good to get it in, but it hasn't had any weekly 
> soaking time so we could use 2.288 and then backport it in if we don't 
> find 
> any issues?
>
> What do you think?
>
> Thanks
> Tim
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups "Jenkins Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
> an email to jenkinsci-de...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAH-3BidOjTQoUe7Y4q7m-9hp_UN6JX9t1xNyQTdhwNk3M1LqVg%40mail.gmail.com
>  
> 
> .
>

 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
 Groups "Jenkins Developers" group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
 an email to jenkinsci-de...@googlegroups.com.
 To view this discussion on the web visit 
 https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CANWgJS7o6mGZttw4uo2r2RNqHnf7haaSFVmPcUEsphV7ynwkeA%40mail.gmail.com
  
 
 .

>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "Jenkins Developers" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to jenkinsci-de...@googlegroups.com.
>>>
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAFoxvgxhKh_v1YRrniinWfJJBx1%3DOqtjEg14aUH3d_EU8VwM7g%40mail.gmail.com
>>>  
>>> 
>>> .
>>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Ildefonso Montero Pérez
>> Senior Software Engineer
>> CloudBees, Inc
>>
>>
>>
>> E: imon...@cloudbees.com
>>
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Jenkins Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to jenkinsci-de...@googlegroups.com.
>
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/e95f04de-43f8-4b66-a68e-23379638d6f3n%40googlegroups.com
>  
> 
> .
>
>
> Beatriz Muñoz Manso
> Sr Software Engineer 
> CloudBees, Inc.
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/4e4349f6-3db7-4190-9d92-626ed1ef2ab6n

Re: Jenkins LTS baseline selection

[Beatriz Munoz]

2.289 looks good for me

> El 20 abr 2021, a las 12:43, Oleg Nenashev  escribió:
> 
> 2.289 looks good for me. There are no major changes (e.g. we did not merge 
> the Jetty 9.4.40 update), and it should be safe to take this versions as a 
> baseline. If something happens, we still have 6 weeks
> 
> On Tuesday, April 20, 2021 at 11:17:39 AM UTC+2 imon...@cloudbees.com wrote:
> 2.289 LGTM
> 
> Best,
> Ildefonso
> 
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 10:57 AM Raihaan Shouhell  > wrote:
> Hey Tim,
> 
> I'm entirely for 2.289 as 2.289 does not make any major changes and as Daniel 
> has pointed out, we can backport any fixes.
> 
> Cheers,
> Raihaan
> 
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 4:17 PM Baptiste Mathus  > wrote:
> Thanks for raising this Tim. 
> As I've written on IRC, as long as we choose 2.288+, I'm happy :).
> 
> Can you please confirm the expected timeline, so we can better assess things?
> Re-reading https://www.jenkins.io/download/lts/ 
>  we're looking at a .1 6 weeks from 
> now, i.e. some time around 2021-06-02 right ?
> 
> If so, I agree even choosing the upcoming 2.289 could be acceptable with such 
> a testing period. 
> 
> -- Baptiste
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Given the expected usua
> 
> 
> 
> Le mar. 20 avr. 2021 à 08:53, Tim Jacomb  > a écrit :
> Hello everyone,
> 
> Please voice your opinion on which version should be our next core baseline.
> 
> For me it looks like either 2.288 or 2.289 are the options
> 
> 2.289 (being released today) includes a change for an upcoming firefox 
> version so it would be good to get it in, but it hasn't had any weekly 
> soaking time so we could use 2.288 and then backport it in if we don't find 
> any issues?
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> Thanks
> Tim
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Jenkins Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to jenkinsci-de...@googlegroups.com 
> .
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAH-3BidOjTQoUe7Y4q7m-9hp_UN6JX9t1xNyQTdhwNk3M1LqVg%40mail.gmail.com
>  
> .
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Jenkins Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to jenkinsci-de...@googlegroups.com 
> .
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CANWgJS7o6mGZttw4uo2r2RNqHnf7haaSFVmPcUEsphV7ynwkeA%40mail.gmail.com
>  
> .
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Jenkins Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to jenkinsci-de...@googlegroups.com 
> .
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAFoxvgxhKh_v1YRrniinWfJJBx1%3DOqtjEg14aUH3d_EU8VwM7g%40mail.gmail.com
>  
> .
> 
> 
> -- 
> Ildefonso Montero Pérez
> Senior Software Engineer
> CloudBees, Inc
> 
> 
> 
> E: imon...@cloudbees.com 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Jenkins Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> .
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/e95f04de-43f8-4b66-a68e-23379638d6f3n%40googlegroups.com
>  
> .

Beatriz Muñoz Manso
Sr Software Engineer 
CloudBees, Inc.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/C5C9BF5D-27B4-40FB-99CE-3316ED46D1A5%40cloudbees.com.

Re: Jenkins LTS baseline selection

[Oleg Nenashev]

2.289 looks good for me. There are no major changes (e.g. we did not merge 
the Jetty 9.4.40 update), and it should be safe to take this versions as a 
baseline. If something happens, we still have 6 weeks

On Tuesday, April 20, 2021 at 11:17:39 AM UTC+2 imon...@cloudbees.com wrote:

> 2.289 LGTM
>
> Best,
> Ildefonso
>
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 10:57 AM Raihaan Shouhell  
> wrote:
>
>> Hey Tim,
>>
>> I'm entirely for 2.289 as 2.289 does not make any major changes and as 
>> Daniel has pointed out, we can backport any fixes.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Raihaan
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 4:17 PM Baptiste Mathus  wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for raising this Tim. 
>>> As I've written on IRC, as long as we choose 2.288+, I'm happy :).
>>>
>>> Can you please confirm the expected timeline, so we can better assess 
>>> things?
>>> Re-reading https://www.jenkins.io/download/lts/ we're looking at a .1 6 
>>> weeks from now, i.e. some time around 2021-06-02 right ?
>>>
>>> If so, I agree even choosing the upcoming 2.289 could be acceptable with 
>>> such a testing period. 
>>>
>>> -- Baptiste
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Given the expected usua
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Le mar. 20 avr. 2021 à 08:53, Tim Jacomb  a écrit :
>>>
 Hello everyone,

 Please voice your opinion on which version should be our next core 
 baseline.

 For me it looks like either 2.288 or 2.289 are the options

 2.289 (being released today) includes a change for an upcoming firefox 
 version so it would be good to get it in, but it hasn't had any weekly 
 soaking time so we could use 2.288 and then backport it in if we don't 
 find 
 any issues?

 What do you think?

 Thanks
 Tim

 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
 Groups "Jenkins Developers" group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
 an email to jenkinsci-de...@googlegroups.com.
 To view this discussion on the web visit 
 https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAH-3BidOjTQoUe7Y4q7m-9hp_UN6JX9t1xNyQTdhwNk3M1LqVg%40mail.gmail.com
  
 
 .

>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "Jenkins Developers" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to jenkinsci-de...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CANWgJS7o6mGZttw4uo2r2RNqHnf7haaSFVmPcUEsphV7ynwkeA%40mail.gmail.com
>>>  
>>> 
>>> .
>>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Jenkins Developers" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to jenkinsci-de...@googlegroups.com.
>>
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAFoxvgxhKh_v1YRrniinWfJJBx1%3DOqtjEg14aUH3d_EU8VwM7g%40mail.gmail.com
>>  
>> 
>> .
>>
>
>
> -- 
>
> Ildefonso Montero Pérez
> Senior Software Engineer
>
> CloudBees, Inc
>
>
>
> E: imon...@cloudbees.com
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/e95f04de-43f8-4b66-a68e-23379638d6f3n%40googlegroups.com.

Re: Jenkins LTS baseline selection

[Ildefonso Montero]

2.289 LGTM

Best,
Ildefonso

On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 10:57 AM Raihaan Shouhell 
wrote:

> Hey Tim,
>
> I'm entirely for 2.289 as 2.289 does not make any major changes and as
> Daniel has pointed out, we can backport any fixes.
>
> Cheers,
> Raihaan
>
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 4:17 PM Baptiste Mathus  wrote:
>
>> Thanks for raising this Tim.
>> As I've written on IRC, as long as we choose 2.288+, I'm happy :).
>>
>> Can you please confirm the expected timeline, so we can better assess
>> things?
>> Re-reading https://www.jenkins.io/download/lts/ we're looking at a .1 6
>> weeks from now, i.e. some time around 2021-06-02 right ?
>>
>> If so, I agree even choosing the upcoming 2.289 could be acceptable with
>> such a testing period.
>>
>> -- Baptiste
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Given the expected usua
>>
>>
>>
>> Le mar. 20 avr. 2021 à 08:53, Tim Jacomb  a écrit :
>>
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>> Please voice your opinion on which version should be our next core
>>> baseline.
>>>
>>> For me it looks like either 2.288 or 2.289 are the options
>>>
>>> 2.289 (being released today) includes a change for an upcoming firefox
>>> version so it would be good to get it in, but it hasn't had any weekly
>>> soaking time so we could use 2.288 and then backport it in if we don't find
>>> any issues?
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Tim
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Jenkins Developers" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAH-3BidOjTQoUe7Y4q7m-9hp_UN6JX9t1xNyQTdhwNk3M1LqVg%40mail.gmail.com
>>> 
>>> .
>>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Jenkins Developers" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CANWgJS7o6mGZttw4uo2r2RNqHnf7haaSFVmPcUEsphV7ynwkeA%40mail.gmail.com
>> 
>> .
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Jenkins Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAFoxvgxhKh_v1YRrniinWfJJBx1%3DOqtjEg14aUH3d_EU8VwM7g%40mail.gmail.com
> 
> .
>


-- 

Ildefonso Montero Pérez
Senior Software Engineer

CloudBees, Inc



E: imont...@cloudbees.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CA%2BUGhi_VNXH1RXb3yBoX53KvSsDCXXbKniKYYr6kAY%3DiNWJ0fw%40mail.gmail.com.

Re: Jenkins LTS baseline selection

[Raihaan Shouhell]

Hey Tim,

I'm entirely for 2.289 as 2.289 does not make any major changes and as
Daniel has pointed out, we can backport any fixes.

Cheers,
Raihaan

On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 4:17 PM Baptiste Mathus  wrote:

> Thanks for raising this Tim.
> As I've written on IRC, as long as we choose 2.288+, I'm happy :).
>
> Can you please confirm the expected timeline, so we can better assess
> things?
> Re-reading https://www.jenkins.io/download/lts/ we're looking at a .1 6
> weeks from now, i.e. some time around 2021-06-02 right ?
>
> If so, I agree even choosing the upcoming 2.289 could be acceptable with
> such a testing period.
>
> -- Baptiste
>
>
>
>
> Given the expected usua
>
>
>
> Le mar. 20 avr. 2021 à 08:53, Tim Jacomb  a écrit :
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> Please voice your opinion on which version should be our next core
>> baseline.
>>
>> For me it looks like either 2.288 or 2.289 are the options
>>
>> 2.289 (being released today) includes a change for an upcoming firefox
>> version so it would be good to get it in, but it hasn't had any weekly
>> soaking time so we could use 2.288 and then backport it in if we don't find
>> any issues?
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Tim
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Jenkins Developers" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAH-3BidOjTQoUe7Y4q7m-9hp_UN6JX9t1xNyQTdhwNk3M1LqVg%40mail.gmail.com
>> 
>> .
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Jenkins Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CANWgJS7o6mGZttw4uo2r2RNqHnf7haaSFVmPcUEsphV7ynwkeA%40mail.gmail.com
> 
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAFoxvgxhKh_v1YRrniinWfJJBx1%3DOqtjEg14aUH3d_EU8VwM7g%40mail.gmail.com.

Re: Jenkins LTS baseline selection

[Baptiste Mathus]

Thanks for raising this Tim.
As I've written on IRC, as long as we choose 2.288+, I'm happy :).

Can you please confirm the expected timeline, so we can better assess
things?
Re-reading https://www.jenkins.io/download/lts/ we're looking at a .1 6
weeks from now, i.e. some time around 2021-06-02 right ?

If so, I agree even choosing the upcoming 2.289 could be acceptable with
such a testing period.

-- Baptiste




Given the expected usua



Le mar. 20 avr. 2021 à 08:53, Tim Jacomb  a écrit :

> Hello everyone,
>
> Please voice your opinion on which version should be our next core
> baseline.
>
> For me it looks like either 2.288 or 2.289 are the options
>
> 2.289 (being released today) includes a change for an upcoming firefox
> version so it would be good to get it in, but it hasn't had any weekly
> soaking time so we could use 2.288 and then backport it in if we don't find
> any issues?
>
> What do you think?
>
> Thanks
> Tim
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Jenkins Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAH-3BidOjTQoUe7Y4q7m-9hp_UN6JX9t1xNyQTdhwNk3M1LqVg%40mail.gmail.com
> 
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CANWgJS7o6mGZttw4uo2r2RNqHnf7haaSFVmPcUEsphV7ynwkeA%40mail.gmail.com.

Re: Jenkins LTS baseline selection

[Daniel Beck]

In terms of notable user-facing changes, there is fairly little:

https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/5405 - Submit Event
https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/5411 - File parameter
overwriting, which would be backported anyway (I hope)
https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/5424 - Better slow trigger UI

Otherwise there's been Raihaan's label optimization (5412) and Basil's
Guava cleanup (5421), both of which should be safe enough, plus internal
cleanups and some translations.

As of 0fd55bd, I have a slight preference for 2.289 just because I dislike
the original slow trigger UI so much. We're six weeks out (four to RC)
which should be plenty for any serious problems in these changes to show
and allow us to backport fixes, back out problematic changes, or just go
with 2.288 instead.


On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 8:53 AM Tim Jacomb  wrote:

> Hello everyone,
>
> Please voice your opinion on which version should be our next core
> baseline.
>
> For me it looks like either 2.288 or 2.289 are the options
>
> 2.289 (being released today) includes a change for an upcoming firefox
> version so it would be good to get it in, but it hasn't had any weekly
> soaking time so we could use 2.288 and then backport it in if we don't find
> any issues?
>
> What do you think?
>
> Thanks
> Tim
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Jenkins Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAH-3BidOjTQoUe7Y4q7m-9hp_UN6JX9t1xNyQTdhwNk3M1LqVg%40mail.gmail.com
> 
> .
>


-- 

Daniel Beck
Senior Software Engineer
CloudBees, Inc.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAMo7PtLGPMC3YQJQSW_BCYhZy7d6LmND2mevGmXkh4YAM_Labg%40mail.gmail.com.

Jenkins LTS baseline selection

[Tim Jacomb]

Hello everyone,

Please voice your opinion on which version should be our next core baseline.

For me it looks like either 2.288 or 2.289 are the options

2.289 (being released today) includes a change for an upcoming firefox
version so it would be good to get it in, but it hasn't had any weekly
soaking time so we could use 2.288 and then backport it in if we don't find
any issues?

What do you think?

Thanks
Tim

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAH-3BidOjTQoUe7Y4q7m-9hp_UN6JX9t1xNyQTdhwNk3M1LqVg%40mail.gmail.com.

Re: Jenkins LTS Baseline Selection

[Tim Jacomb]

Hello

Given there have been no objections to 2.277 let's take that one.

The new bom  line has been
prepared and the 2 failures are now sorted,
Acceptance tests are not in the best shape, any help here would be greatly
appreciated.

~68 tests failed on the last run
https://ci.jenkins.io/blue/organizations/jenkins/Core%2Facceptance-test-harness/detail/master/296/tests/

25 failed on the latest LTS
https://ci.jenkins.io/blue/organizations/jenkins/Core%2Fjenkins/detail/stable-2.263/10/tests

Fixes or proposing tests for removal are greatly appreciated, ath test
criteria

.
Thanks Ulli for removing a couple recently


Thanks
Tim

On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 10:59, Daniel Beck  wrote:

>
>
> > On 28. Jan 2021, at 10:49, fque...@cloudbees.com <
> fqueir...@cloudbees.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1 for 2.277
>
> Agree. There's no other reasonable choice at the moment.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Jenkins Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/ABFE6C3A-D4CA-4FB5-9CCA-0C82FA21AC46%40beckweb.net
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAH-3Bif31Bi9irCZhFVAd6drdHhMpiW3bFqmXgUGHd9oqVMXeA%40mail.gmail.com.

Re: Jenkins LTS Baseline Selection

[Daniel Beck]

> On 28. Jan 2021, at 10:49, fque...@cloudbees.com  
> wrote:
> 
> +1 for 2.277

Agree. There's no other reasonable choice at the moment.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/ABFE6C3A-D4CA-4FB5-9CCA-0C82FA21AC46%40beckweb.net.

Re: Jenkins LTS Baseline Selection

[fque...@cloudbees.com]

+1 for 2.277

2.277 includes fixes for major tables to divs issues (JENKINS-64429 and 
JENKINS-64291) that would need to be backported anyway.

On Thursday, January 28, 2021 at 10:12:22 AM UTC+1 Oleg Nenashev wrote:

> Tables to divs is the only real concern in the current state IMHO.
> In the current state it does not really matter which version to take, 
> especially since the diff between 2.276 and 2.277 is pretty smal.
> +1 for 2.277
>
>
> On Thursday, January 28, 2021 at 2:09:43 AM UTC+1 Mark Waite wrote:
>
>> Today is the day for the selection of the baseline version for the March 
>> LTS release.  The Jenkins calendar show the 2.263.4 release on February 10, 
>> 2021, with the next LTS 4 weeks later on March 10, 2021.
>>
>> User feedback on Jenkins 2.276 and 2.277 have improved compared to 
>> previous releases.  I recommend we choose Jenkins 2.277 as the LTS release 
>> baseline.
>>
>> This will be the first LTS release to include:
>>
>>- Tables to divs (as announced in the blog 
>>
>>)
>>- JQuery upgrade
>>- Acegi to Spring Security framework (as announced in Jesse's blog 
>>post )
>>- Xstream unfork (as announced in Jesse's blog post 
>>)
>>
>> Comments and discussion welcomed.
>>
>> Mark Waite
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/f2070d2d-1439-41f9-a6f8-c7d4fadf4605n%40googlegroups.com.

Re: Jenkins LTS Baseline Selection

[Oleg Nenashev]

Tables to divs is the only real concern in the current state IMHO.
In the current state it does not really matter which version to take, 
especially since the diff between 2.276 and 2.277 is pretty smal.
+1 for 2.277


On Thursday, January 28, 2021 at 2:09:43 AM UTC+1 Mark Waite wrote:

> Today is the day for the selection of the baseline version for the March 
> LTS release.  The Jenkins calendar show the 2.263.4 release on February 10, 
> 2021, with the next LTS 4 weeks later on March 10, 2021.
>
> User feedback on Jenkins 2.276 and 2.277 have improved compared to 
> previous releases.  I recommend we choose Jenkins 2.277 as the LTS release 
> baseline.
>
> This will be the first LTS release to include:
>
>- Tables to divs (as announced in the blog 
>
>)
>- JQuery upgrade
>- Acegi to Spring Security framework (as announced in Jesse's blog post 
>)
>- Xstream unfork (as announced in Jesse's blog post 
>)
>
> Comments and discussion welcomed.
>
> Mark Waite
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/2dd74e83-66b6-4a5e-95bc-90c1824241cbn%40googlegroups.com.

Jenkins LTS Baseline Selection

[Mark Waite]

Today is the day for the selection of the baseline version for the March 
LTS release.  The Jenkins calendar show the 2.263.4 release on February 10, 
2021, with the next LTS 4 weeks later on March 10, 2021.

User feedback on Jenkins 2.276 and 2.277 have improved compared to previous 
releases.  I recommend we choose Jenkins 2.277 as the LTS release baseline.

This will be the first LTS release to include:

   - Tables to divs (as announced in the blog 
   
   )
   - JQuery upgrade
   - Acegi to Spring Security framework (as announced in Jesse's blog post 
   )
   - Xstream unfork (as announced in Jesse's blog post 
   )

Comments and discussion welcomed.

Mark Waite

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/3fde3369-48fc-41ef-b3c5-637c2e606b46n%40googlegroups.com.