date:20091025

[j-nsp] snapshot partition

2009-10-25 Thread Onam Rubio


Hello experts,

I need to replace the Compact Flash(CF) of my Juniper M10 but when I do the 
"request system snapshot partition" the router can't boot the junos.

Step 1:
o...@m10# run request system snapshot

Step 2:
o...@m10# run request system power-off media disk

Step 3:
I replace the CF and ran the command o...@m10# run request system snapshot 
partition

After I ran this command the router start the snapshot partition then reboot 
and can't find the operating system.

**I receive the follogin message**

o...@m10# run request system snapshot partition
Clearing current label...
Partitioning compact-flash media (ad0) ...
Partitions on snapshot:

  Partition  Mountpoint  SizeSnapshot argument
  a  /   896MB   root-size
ad1 removed from the boot list
ad1: detached
ad0: TIMEOUT - READ retrying (2 retries left) LBA=63
g_vfs_done():ad1s1f[WRITE(offset=3732979712, length=16384)]error = 6
g_vfs_done():ad1s1f[WRITE(offset=3781607424, length=16384)]error = 6
g_vfs_done():ad1s1f[WRITE(offset=6905954304, length=16384)]error = 6
g_vfs_done():ad1s1f[WRITE(offset=6905970688, length=16384)]error = 6
g_vfs_done():ad1s1f[WRITE(offset=8212496384, length=16384)]error = 6
g_vfs_done():ad1s1f[WRITE(offset=8218738688, length=16384)]error = 6
g_vfs_done():ad1s1f[WRITE(offset=3790290944, length=16384)]error = 6
g_vfs_done():ad1s1f[WRITE(offset=8215756800, length=12288)]error = 6
g_vfs_done():ad1s1f[WRITE(offset=2899968, length=2048)]error = 6
g_vfs_done():ad1s1f[WRITE(offset=8192, length=2048)]error = 6
panic: vinvalbuf: dirty bufs
db_log_stack_trace_cmd(c103d000) at db_log_stack_trace_cmd+0x39
panic(c0faad86,c3891c8c,c38ebd00,1,dc648790) at panic+0x128
bufobj_invalbuf(c3891d48,1,c38ebd00,0,0) at bufobj_invalbuf+0x11f
vinvalbuf(c3891c8c,1,c38ebd00,0,0) at vinvalbuf+0x1d
vgonel(c3891c8c) at vgonel+0x97
vgone(c3891c8c,c3891c8c,0,dc64882c,c054a77a) at vgone+0x3d
devfs_delete(c35c2800,c3628af0,0,0,c3628af0) at devfs_delete+0x44
devfs_populate_loop(c35c2800,0) at devfs_populate_loop+0xa0
devfs_populate(c35c2800,dc648864,c05fbb0c,c361a805,0) at devfs_populate+0x1a
devfs_lookupx(dc64898c,c0fee540,dc64898c,0,dc648940) at devfs_lookupx+0x389
devfs_lookup(dc64898c,c3618490,0,dc6489a8,c05fd920) at devfs_lookup+0x48
VOP_LOOKUP_APV(c0fee540,dc64898c) at VOP_LOOKUP_APV+0x40
lookup(dc648bc4,c3418780,c349b000,0,c38ebd00) at lookup+0x4a7
namei(dc648bc4,c0,0,0,c38ebd00) at namei+0x3cf
vn_open_cred(dc648bc4,dc648cc4,0,c33a3ee0,22) at vn_open_cred+0x2a7
vn_open(dc648bc4,dc648cc4,0,22,dc648b5c) at vn_open+0x1e
kern_open(c38ebd00,bfbedb60,0,1,0) at kern_open+0xb6
open(c38ebd00,dc648d04,3,19d,286) at open+0x1a
syscall(c0a6003b,3b,3b,8813000,0) at syscall+0x306
Xint0x80_syscall() at Xint0x80_syscall+0x1f
--- syscall (5, FreeBSD ELF32, open), eip = 0x88affe33, esp = 0xbfbedb1c, ebp = 
0xbfbedb98 ---
Uptime: 7m1s
Cannot dump. No dump device defined.
Automatic reboot in 15 seconds - press a key on the console to abort
Rebooting...

PCMCIA ATA Flash Card...
Compact Flash...
Hard Disk...
Ethernet...

Trying to Boot from Ethernet...

Intel LANDesk (R) Service Agent II, version 0.99k
Copyright (C) 1997,1998  Intel Corporation.  All rights reserved.

DHCP MAC ADDR: 00 A0 A5 28 02 38
PXE-E52: No IP address received from DHCP or BOOTP.
PXE-M0F: Exiting LANDesk (R) Service Agent II

Trying to Boot from PCMCIA ATA Flash Card...
Error: No Drive E...

Trying to Boot from Compact Flash...
Missing operating system

Best regards



  
_
Explore the seven wonders of the world
http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=7+wonders+world&mkt=en-US&form=QBRE
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Logical Interfaces 802.1ad

2009-10-25 Thread Onam Rubio


Hello experts.

About the sub-interfaces on GigaEthernet interface.

I connect two Juniper back-to-back to make this test, and discard that the 
summit were the problem.

M5_A<=>M7i_B

Test 1:
I configure both of them without sub-interfaces and without VLAN, the router's 
see each other.

Test 2:
I configure both router with sub-interfaces encapsulation dot1q(0x8100), the 
router's see each other.

Test 3
I configure both router with sub-interfaces encapsulation 802.1ad(0x88a8), the 
router's don't see each other.
M5_A (Version 8.3R1.5)

ge-0/2/0 {

description "===to M7i Test===";

flexible-vlan-tagging;

gigether-options {

ethernet-switch-profile {

tag-protocol-id 0x88a8;

}

}

unit 50 {

vlan-tags outer 0x88a8.50 inner 10;

family inet {

address 192.168.38.57/30;

}

}

}



M7i_B (Version 8.5R4.3)

interfaces {

ge-0/0/0 {

description "===to M5 Test ===";

flexible-vlan-tagging;

gigether-options {

ethernet-switch-profile {

tag-protocol-id 0x88a8;

}

}

unit 50 {

vlan-tags outer 0x88a8.50 inner 10;

family inet {

address 192.168.38.58/30;

}

}

}

Test 4

I configure both router with sub-interfaces encapsulation QinQ(0x9100), the 
router's don't see each other.

M5_A (Version 8.3R1.5)
ge-0/2/0 {
description "===to M7i Test===";
flexible-vlan-tagging;
gigether-options {
ethernet-switch-profile {
tag-protocol-id 0x9100;
}
}
unit 50 {
vlan-tags outer 0x9100.50 inner 10;
family inet {
address 192.168.38.57/30;
}
}
}


M7i_B (Version 8.5R4.3)
interfaces {
ge-0/0/0 {
description "===to M5 Test ===";
flexible-vlan-tagging;
gigether-options {
ethernet-switch-profile {
tag-protocol-id 0x9100;
}
}
unit 50 {
vlan-tags outer 0x9100.50 inner 10;
family inet {
address 192.168.38.58/30;
}
}
}

In the two las test(3,4) I ran a ping to the IP 192.168.38.58 in the router 
M7i_B, this should response because is in the interface of this router. IMHO, 
but this one doesn't response.

Thaks for your help.

Best regards.

> From: onamru...@hotmail.com
> To: evge...@ip.datagroup.ua; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:50:30 -0600
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Logical Interfaces 802.1ad
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Here, is the information. but the Junipes's don't see each other.
> 
> o...@m10_a> show configuration interfaces ge-0/2/0 
> flexible-vlan-tagging;
> gigether-options {
> ethernet-switch-profile {
> tag-protocol-id 0x88a8;
> }
> }
> unit 50 {
> vlan-tags outer 0x88a8.50 inner 100;
> family inet {
> address 192.168.38.58/30;
> }
> }
> 
> o...@m10_a> show interfaces ge-0/2/0.100 | match Encapsulation 
> 
> o...@m10_ashow interfaces ge-0/2/0 | match Encapsulation 
> Flags: SNMP-Traps VLAN-Tag [ 0x.0 ]  Encapsulation: ENET2
> 
> o...@m5_b> show configuration interfaces ge-0/2/0 
> 
> flexible-vlan-tagging;
> 
> gigether-options {
> 
> ethernet-switch-profile {
> 
> tag-protocol-id 0x88a8;
> 
> }
> 
> }
> 
> unit 50 {
> 
> vlan-tags outer 0x88a8.50 inner 100;
> 
> family inet {
> 
> address 192.168.38.57/30;
> 
> }
> 
> }
> 
> o...@metism5_b> show interfaces ge-0/2/0.100 | match Encapsulation 
> 
> 
> 
> o...@metism5_b> show interfaces ge-0/2/0 | match Encapsulation
>  
> 
> Flags: SNMP-Traps VLAN-Tag [ 0x.0 ]  Encapsulation: ENET2
> 
> Summit
> x450_A# sho vman etherType 
> vman EtherType : 0x88a8  
> 
> x450_A# # SHO vman "Test_Side_A" 
> VMAN Interface with name Test_Side_A created by user
> Admin State:Enabled Tagging:802.1Q Tag 50 
> Virtual router: VR-Default
> **Primary IP: 192.168.175.166/28 **(Administration IP address)**
> IPv6:   None
> STPD:   None
> Protocol:   Match all unfiltered protocols
> Loopback:   Disabled
> NetLogin:   Disabled
> QosProfile: None configured
> Egress Rate Limit Designated Port: None configured
> Ports:   4.   (Number of active ports=3)   
>Tag:   *1(UpLink_x450_B),*46(M10_A_Ge-0/2/0)
> Flags:(*) Active, (!) Disabled, (g) Load Sharing port
>   (b) Port blocked on the vlan, (a) Authenticated NetLogin 
> port
>   (u) Unauthenticated NetLogin port, (m) Mac-Based port
> x450_A# 
> 
> 
> 
> x450_B # sh vman etherType 
> 
> Vman Primary EtherType: 0x88a8  
> 
> x450_B # sh

Re: [j-nsp] BGP policy-options policy-statement

2009-10-25 Thread Onam Rubio


Thanks to everyone for the help.

I'll take your advises.

Best regards.

> Subject: RE: [j-nsp] BGP policy-options policy-statement
> Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:09:44 +0530
> From: ntari...@juniper.net
> To: onamru...@hotmail.com; evge...@ip.datagroup.ua; 
> juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> 
> 
> >>>
> 
> I have an issue, I reject my private prefix-list but my BGP policy keep
> sending my private prefix-list.
> 
> 
> set policy-options policy-statement OutBound-BGP-Routes-to- term
> No-Advertise from route-filter 10.0.0.0/8 orlonger reject
> 
> 
> -
> 
> **I chance the configuration and delete the term Default and my BGP
> policy stop sending the private prefix-list
> 
> term Default {
> then accept;
> }
> 
> 
> I am not at all sure about the intent of this term? What are we trying
> to achieve with this term ?
> 
> 
>  
> Thanks & Regards,
> Tarique A. Nalkhande
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
> [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Onam Rubio
> Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 1:22 PM
> To: evgeniy; Junper J-nsp
> Subject: [j-nsp] BGP policy-options policy-statement
> 
> 
> Hi experts,
> 
> I have an issue, I reject my private prefix-list but my BGP policy keep
> sending my private prefix-list. 
> 
> I made the following configuration.
> 
> show configuration policy-options policy-statement
> OutBound-BGP-Routes-to-x
> 
> term No-Advertise {
> from {
> prefix-list Bogus-Networks;
> }
> then reject;
> }
> term Default {
> then accept;
> }
> 
> o...@metis# show policy-options 
> prefix-list Bogus-Networks {
> 10.0.0.0/8;
> 127.0.0.0/8;
> 172.16.0.0/12;
> 192.168.0.0/16;
> 224.0.0.0/3;
> }
> 
> o...@metis# show protocols bgp group x
> type external;
> local-address x-x-x-x;
> import Inbound-bgp-PRONTO;
> family inet {
> unicast;
> }
> export OutBound-BGP-Routes-to-x;
> peer-as 28088;
> neighbor x-x-x-x;
> 
> [edit]
> o...@metis# 
> 
> **I chance the configuration and delete the term Default and my BGP
> policy stop sending the private prefix-list
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _
> Invite your mail contacts to join your friends list with Windows Live
> Spaces. It's easy!
> http://spaces.live.com/spacesapi.aspx?wx_action=create&wx_url=/friends.a
> spx&mkt=en-us
> ___
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
  
_
News, entertainment and everything you care about at Live.com. Get it now!
http://www.live.com/getstarted.aspx
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Recover/Reset Passwd on juniper netscreen

2009-10-25 Thread George

Hi guys,

Thanks.

Now I have to make a decision. Loose my configs for the control of the
firewall or let it run for some time hopping there shall be no new
configs soon.

Cheers
George

On Sun, 2009-10-25 at 13:17 +0530, Dilip Srivastava wrote:
> Hi George,
>  
> there is no possibility to reset the password without loosing running
> configuration.
>  
>  
> Thanks
> Dilip Kumar
> 9650410022 
> 
> 
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 5:38 PM, George  wrote:
> 
> Hello
> 
> How do i recover/reset the root password on juniper netscreen
> 5gt.
> 
> I need a step by step guide guaranteed of working since I dont
> want to
> lose my configs.
> 
> Regards
> George
> ___
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> 
> 
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] 802.3ad Question

2009-10-25 Thread Paul Stewart

Thanks - I didn't realize til after that the docs were for e-series.  My
question was more geared on MX side of things.

Appreciate it..

Paul

-Original Message-
From: Mark Tinka [mailto:mti...@globaltransit.net] 
Sent: October 25, 2009 1:02 PM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Cc: Paul Stewart
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] 802.3ad Question

On Sunday 25 October 2009 10:23:51 pm Paul Stewart wrote:

> Just a quick question regarding 802.3ad...

Not to be pedantic, but turns out it's now 802.1AX :-).

> Is there a limit on number of members in the LAG bundle?

I notice your reference was to a Juniper ERX platform. I can't tell you much
here as I haven't worked with these before.

But if you're looking at JUNOS-based routers, on the M120, M320, MX-series
and all T-series routing platforms, you can have up to 16 members per LAG
bundle.

Chassis' not mentioned above will only support 8 members per bundle.

Platforms can have up to 128 individual bundles, but you'll probably run out
of ports before you get that far :-).

> Does it matter if its Juniper à Cisco interconnect?

LACP is the common denominator.

Cheers,

Mark.

___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] 802.3ad Question

2009-10-25 Thread Mark Tinka

On Sunday 25 October 2009 10:23:51 pm Paul Stewart wrote:

> Just a quick question regarding 802.3ad...

Not to be pedantic, but turns out it's now 802.1AX :-).

> Is there a limit on number of members in the LAG bundle?

I notice your reference was to a Juniper ERX platform. I 
can't tell you much here as I haven't worked with these 
before.

But if you're looking at JUNOS-based routers, on the M120, 
M320, MX-series and all T-series routing platforms, you can 
have up to 16 members per LAG bundle.

Chassis' not mentioned above will only support 8 members per 
bundle.

Platforms can have up to 128 individual bundles, but you'll 
probably run out of ports before you get that far :-).

> Does it matter if its Juniper à Cisco interconnect?

LACP is the common denominator.

Cheers,

Mark.

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] 802.3ad Question

2009-10-25 Thread Paul Stewart

Hi folks..

 

Just a quick question regarding 802.3ad   working on some potential ideas
for an upcoming project.So Ive been reading through
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/erx/junose90/swconfig-physical/html
/ethernet-config14.html

 

Is there a limit on number of members in the LAG bundle?

Does it matter if its Juniper à Cisco interconnect?

 

Ive been stuck in the etherchannel world for the past 10+ years so bear
with me ;)

 

Paul

 

 

 

___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] juniper trinity

2009-10-25 Thread Derick Winkworth

http://www.amazon.com/Network-Processors-Architecture-Programming-Implementation/dp/0123708915/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1256469141&sr=8-1

Not to stray too off topic, but this book looks interesting...





From: Nahrux M 
To: Richard A Steenbergen 
Cc: Juniper-Nsp 
Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2009 1:00:49 AM
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] juniper trinity

Please have look at the below link
EZchip Talks Juniper

http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=179122




On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Richard A Steenbergen 
wrote:

> On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 06:38:53PM +0200, magno wrote:
> > I repeat, Trinity has nothing to do with ez-chip. My advice is to stop
> > elucubrating around any ez-chip whatever.
> >
> > Ez-chip proved to be quite limited for some qos functions, so I really
> > don't think juniper wants to be qos feature limited by a third-party
> > chip anymore.
>
> I believe the original question was "do the new asics integrate the
> functionality of ezchip, thus eliminating the need for it", and from
> what I've heard I believe the answer is yes. That is why we're talking
> about the ezchip in the first place.
>
> --
> Richard A Steenbergen       http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
> GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
> ___
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Recover/Reset Passwd on juniper netscreen

2009-10-25 Thread Dilip Srivastava

Hi George,

there is no possibility to reset the password without loosing running
configuration.


Thanks
Dilip Kumar
9650410022

On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 5:38 PM, George  wrote:

> Hello
>
> How do i recover/reset the root password on juniper netscreen 5gt.
>
> I need a step by step guide guaranteed of working since I dont want to
> lose my configs.
>
> Regards
> George
> ___
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] snapshot partition

Re: [j-nsp] Logical Interfaces 802.1ad

Re: [j-nsp] BGP policy-options policy-statement

Re: [j-nsp] Recover/Reset Passwd on juniper netscreen

Re: [j-nsp] 802.3ad Question

Re: [j-nsp] 802.3ad Question

[j-nsp] 802.3ad Question

Re: [j-nsp] juniper trinity

Re: [j-nsp] Recover/Reset Passwd on juniper netscreen

9 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information