Re: [j-nsp] IPv6 protocol support for SRX ADSL2 PIC
Argh.. On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Dale Shaw wrote: > > The last time this came up on the list[1], almost a year ago, JTAC was > quoted as saying 'family inet6' support isn't coming to JUNOS until > 13.2R1. This is meant to say "..'family inet6' support isn't coming for the ADSL2/2+ mini-PIM (SRX-MP-1ADSL2-A) for SRX2x0 until JUNOS 13.2R1." ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] IPv6 protocol support for SRX ADSL2 PIC
Hi all, The last time this came up on the list[1], almost a year ago, JTAC was quoted as saying 'family inet6' support isn't coming to JUNOS until 13.2R1. In the past ~11 months, has anyone received any different (read: better) advice? cheers, Dale [1] https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/2011-July/020574.html ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] ERP with switches not supporting ERP
Expert, in a ring such as R1-r2-r3-R1 where, R1-r3 is the RPL and R1 is the RPL owner and fully supporting ERP, while r2 and r3 don't understand ERP and just forward transparently the ERP frames which are to mcast mac-address 01:19:a7:00:00:01; from an ERP perspective the ring is just R1-R1. So will ERP works in a way that if R1-r2 goes down, R1 will detect it and bring up the RPL R1-r3? Thanks, bit! ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
