Re: [j-nsp] MX104 with full BGP table problems

2014-05-18 Thread Mark Tinka
On Sunday, May 18, 2014 01:35:17 PM Mark Tinka wrote:

> For all vendors, really; not just Cisco.

%s/Cisco/Juniper.

Mark.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] MX104 with full BGP table problems

2014-05-18 Thread Mark Tinka
On Sunday, May 18, 2014 12:57:59 PM Ben Dale wrote:

> Looking forward to the day when there is a commonish RE
> (eg: intel-based) for all REs across the fleet.  You
> would think this would save a pile of development
> work...

For all vendors, really; not just Cisco.

For all the money we pay to buy routers, it's a shame a 
100Mbps DoS can take out a box rated to push 1Tbps/slot.

Mark.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] MX104 with full BGP table problems

2014-05-18 Thread Ben Dale
> 
> You can cool a Sandy/Ivy Bridge CPU in a laptop at +40C degrees in direct
> sunlight outside (e.g. Panasonic Thoughbook) and they can't cool the same
> type of CPU in a datacenter with ~20-22 degrees ambient temperature and
> very powerful fans that are present in a router? I doubt it that the Xeon
> versions of those CPUs produce much more heat. Factor in the fact that they
> can go all SSD and you can have a very small package that can act as a RE
> (think of a very mini mini version of Intel NUC).

The 104s are rated for use in -40 to +65° C and based on the form-factor are 
designed for use in areas a little less comfortable than your average data 
centre (places where MX80s are not designed to go like de-mountables/cabinets). 

> There has to be another reason for the crappy REs in these routers.

Yeah, I'm kinda surprised the 104s maintained the same CPU, but I guess it 
meant much less code re-spin.  

Looking forward to the day when there is a commonish RE (eg: intel-based) for 
all REs across the fleet.  You would think this would save a pile of 
development work...


___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp