Re: [j-nsp] MX960 2x MS-MPC-128
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote: > Further info: > > I just requested a restart of the FPC and for once it came online, but > now I'm seeing the following: The oinker there may be "normal" during bringup. As for the power up, check /var/log/chassisd ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MX960 2x MS-MPC-128
The PS are in high power mode ? Position 0 Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 26, 2016, at 17:19, Josh Reynolds wrote: > > 4 High Output AC supplies, only 3 16x10Gbps cards installed with no > optics in them yet > > Power is okay, it's not doing anything yet :P Good idea though! > >> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote: >> Not enough power to power up the card? >> >> show chassis power >> >>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 01:50:44PM -0600, Josh Reynolds wrote: >>> Hi all. >>> >>> Pair of MS-MPC-128's. 1st card boots, second card doesn't. Swapped FPC >>> locations, now the 2nd card boots in the first card's spot, but the >>> 1st card won't boot in the previous spot of the 2nd card. Have tried >>> several other slots for the 2nd card the with same results. >>> >>> show chassis hardware recognizes the MS-MPC-128 is installed, but no >>> power. request chassis fpc online slot X shows: "Online initiated, use >>> "show chassis fpc" to verify", but "show chassis fpc" still shows it's >>> powered off. >>> >>> What gives? >>> >>> Thanks > ___ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MX960 2x MS-MPC-128
4 High Output AC supplies, only 3 16x10Gbps cards installed with no optics in them yet Power is okay, it's not doing anything yet :P Good idea though! On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote: > Not enough power to power up the card? > > show chassis power > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 01:50:44PM -0600, Josh Reynolds wrote: >> Hi all. >> >> Pair of MS-MPC-128's. 1st card boots, second card doesn't. Swapped FPC >> locations, now the 2nd card boots in the first card's spot, but the >> 1st card won't boot in the previous spot of the 2nd card. Have tried >> several other slots for the 2nd card the with same results. >> >> show chassis hardware recognizes the MS-MPC-128 is installed, but no >> power. request chassis fpc online slot X shows: "Online initiated, use >> "show chassis fpc" to verify", but "show chassis fpc" still shows it's >> powered off. >> >> What gives? >> >> Thanks ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MX960 2x MS-MPC-128
Not enough power to power up the card? show chassis power On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 01:50:44PM -0600, Josh Reynolds wrote: > Hi all. > > Pair of MS-MPC-128's. 1st card boots, second card doesn't. Swapped FPC > locations, now the 2nd card boots in the first card's spot, but the > 1st card won't boot in the previous spot of the 2nd card. Have tried > several other slots for the 2nd card the with same results. > > show chassis hardware recognizes the MS-MPC-128 is installed, but no > power. request chassis fpc online slot X shows: "Online initiated, use > "show chassis fpc" to verify", but "show chassis fpc" still shows it's > powered off. > > What gives? > > Thanks ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MX960 2x MS-MPC-128
Further info: I just requested a restart of the FPC and for once it came online, but now I'm seeing the following: Message from syslogd@ at Feb 26 19:53:29 ... fpc11 SCHED: Thread 40 (TNPC CM) ran for 1625 ms without yielding Message from syslogd@ at Feb 26 19:53:29 ... fpc11 Scheduler Oinker Message from syslogd@ at Feb 26 19:53:30 ... fpc11 Frame 00: sp = 0x4450ff08, pc = 0x400393a8 Message from syslogd@ at Feb 26 19:53:30 ... fpc11 Frame 01: sp = 0x4450ff20, pc = 0x40030214 Message from syslogd@ at Feb 26 19:53:30 ... fpc11 Frame 02: sp = 0x4450ff78, pc = 0x40032024 Message from syslogd@ at Feb 26 19:53:30 ... fpc11 Frame 03: sp = 0x4450ffa8, pc = 0x40842320 Message from syslogd@ at Feb 26 19:53:30 ... fpc11 Frame 04: sp = 0x4451, pc = 0x40a26d7c Message from syslogd@ at Feb 26 19:53:31 ... fpc11 Frame 05: sp = 0x44510080, pc = 0x40811ebc Message from syslogd@ at Feb 26 19:53:31 ... fpc11 Frame 06: sp = 0x44510090, pc = 0x40854de0 Message from syslogd@ at Feb 26 19:53:31 ... fpc11 Frame 07: sp = 0x445101c0, pc = 0x4085fca0 Message from syslogd@ at Feb 26 19:53:32 ... fpc11 Frame 08: sp = 0x44510218, pc = 0x408112e8 Message from syslogd@ at Feb 26 19:53:32 ... fpc11 Frame 09: sp = 0x44510588, pc = 0x40844458 Message from syslogd@ at Feb 26 19:53:32 ... fpc11 Frame 10: sp = 0x44510598, pc = 0x402bf998 Message from syslogd@ at Feb 26 19:53:33 ... fpc11 Frame 11: sp = 0x445105f8, pc = 0x400318e0 On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote: > Hi all. > > Pair of MS-MPC-128's. 1st card boots, second card doesn't. Swapped FPC > locations, now the 2nd card boots in the first card's spot, but the > 1st card won't boot in the previous spot of the 2nd card. Have tried > several other slots for the 2nd card the with same results. > > show chassis hardware recognizes the MS-MPC-128 is installed, but no > power. request chassis fpc online slot X shows: "Online initiated, use > "show chassis fpc" to verify", but "show chassis fpc" still shows it's > powered off. > > What gives? > > Thanks ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] MX960 2x MS-MPC-128
Hi all. Pair of MS-MPC-128's. 1st card boots, second card doesn't. Swapped FPC locations, now the 2nd card boots in the first card's spot, but the 1st card won't boot in the previous spot of the 2nd card. Have tried several other slots for the 2nd card the with same results. show chassis hardware recognizes the MS-MPC-128 is installed, but no power. request chassis fpc online slot X shows: "Online initiated, use "show chassis fpc" to verify", but "show chassis fpc" still shows it's powered off. What gives? Thanks ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] "load replace" junoscript login class permissions
Can you please provide an example of what you are saying should work (in text format even)? This is what I was trying in XML (from perl) and it doesn't work with the permissions restricted to "policy-options prefix-list AUTO-.*", but it does work with the permissions widened to "policy-options .*": $jnx->load_configuration( format => "xml", action => "replace", configuration => $replace); Where the contents of the $replace variable is: AUTO-FOO 1.1.1.1/32 I believe I also tried applying the "replace" attribute on the tag like this: AUTO-FOO, but that isn't accepted as valid syntax. I ended up using a configuration group at Phil's suggestion. That way I can restrict the permissions to "groups AUTO-PREFIX-LIST policy-options .*" to allow the replace operation to work but prevent the script from mucking with objects it isn't supposed to touch. Thanks. On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:05:36PM -0500, Chris Spears wrote: > Can you add a replace attribute in the container for the prefix-lists > matching /AUTO-*/, and see if the permissions work? The equivalent > replace: tag in the text format works with a restricted login class when > using netconf. > > http://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos14.2/topics/reference/tag-summary/junos-xml-protocol-replace-attribute.html > > > > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 09:08:04PM -0500, Jared Mauch wrote: > > > > 1. "load replace" config with the new prefix list contents > > > > 2. commit > > > > > > > > > Try ‘load update’ first. > > > > > > That should be much faster than load replace. > > > > Yes, I see it is fast, but I can't figure out the right XML to do the > > equivalent of "load update relative" in the CLI. If I leave off the > > "relative", then the entire configuration is replaced (deleted), not > > just the prefix-list. > > > > "show | compare | display xml" exists in 15.1, but not in 14.2 :-( ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MX960 with two SCBEs and redundancy
All ports will remain active, but the bandwidth that each PFE has available will drop by 50%. I believe on that card, there are 4 PFEs, each with around 78Gbps. If you don't need to use all ports, and you select the ones you use carefully, you will be able to lose an SCBE without dropping any performance. Regards, Dave On 26 February 2016 at 10:55, v wrote: > Hello, > > we would like to build a MX960 with two SCBEs and just two line cards (2x > MPC-3D-16XGE-SFPP-R-B) for the beginning. What happens if one of the SCBEs > fails in such a configuration? > > Will we still have full performance on all ports of our two line cards? > Will the performance drop by 50%? > Or will half of the ports on each line card become inactive? > > Regards > v > ___ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] MX960 with two SCBEs and redundancy
Hello, we would like to build a MX960 with two SCBEs and just two line cards (2x MPC-3D-16XGE-SFPP-R-B) for the beginning. What happens if one of the SCBEs fails in such a configuration? Will we still have full performance on all ports of our two line cards? Will the performance drop by 50%? Or will half of the ports on each line card become inactive? Regards v ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
