Re: [j-nsp] IGMP problem
Robert,
Just noticed you actually have "ip pim passive" under the interface...
The "ip igmp join-group" in Cisco IOS generates IGMP joins (and PIM joins
upstream), and packets sent to the group address get sent up to the CPU (the
router would reply back to icmp-echo packets sent to the group address -
convenient for troubleshooting).
On the other hand, the "ip igmp static-group" in Cisco IOS generates IGMP joins
(and PIM joins upstream), but packets sent to the group address do not get sent
up to the CPU.
As Krasi said, in JunOS, you still have the PIM joins upstream, but no IGMP
joins are generated.
Regards,
Vladislav A. VASILEV
On 10 Sep 2013, at 11:24, Krasimir Avramski wrote:
> Hello,
> Actually this config generates PIM (*,G) joins upstream to RP.
> I'm not aware of static igmp joins(generated) or igmp proxies support in
> junos (excluding junosE) - though there is a feature that translates PIM to
> IGMP/MLD
>
> Krasi
>
>
> On 10 September 2013 12:55, Vladislav Vasilev
> wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> What you have below only adds the interface to the OIL for that group. No
> IGMP joins are generated!
>
> Regards,
> Vladislav A. VASILEV
>
>
> On 10 Sep 2013, at 07:51, Robert Hass wrote:
>
> > Hi
> > I would like to setup static IGMP joins between Cisco and Juniper.
> > But it's not working. Juniper is not sending IGMP Joins.
> > Same configuration Cisco + Cisco working without issues. Any clues ?
> >
> > Interface configuration for Juniper at Cisco side:
> >
> > interface GigabitEthernet1/1/1
> > description Juniper
> > no switchport
> > ip address 10.10.10.21 255.255.255.252
> > ip pim passive
> > !
> >
> > Here is output of IGMP membership - none :(
> >
> > cisco#sh ip igmp membership | include GigabitEthernet1/1/1
> > cisco#
> >
> > Here is JunOS configuration:
> >
> > interfaces {
> >ge-0/0/0 {
> >unit 0 {
> >family inet {
> >address 10.10.10.22/30;
> >}
> >}
> >}
> > routing-options {
> >static {
> >route 0.0.0.0/0 next-hop 10.10.10.21;
> >}
> > }
> > protocols {
> >igmp {
> >interface ge-0/0/0.0 {
> >version 2;
> >static {
> >group 231.0.0.3;
> >group 231.0.0.4;
> >}
> >}
> >}
> >pim {
> >rp {
> >static {
> >address 10.10.10.255 {
> >version 2;
> >}
> >}
> >}
> >interface ge-0/0/0.0 {
> >mode sparse;
> >version 2;
> >}
> >join-load-balance;
> >}
> > }
> >
> > Rob
> > ___
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
> ___
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] IGMP problem
Hi Robert,
What you have below only adds the interface to the OIL for that group. No IGMP
joins are generated!
Regards,
Vladislav A. VASILEV
On 10 Sep 2013, at 07:51, Robert Hass wrote:
> Hi
> I would like to setup static IGMP joins between Cisco and Juniper.
> But it's not working. Juniper is not sending IGMP Joins.
> Same configuration Cisco + Cisco working without issues. Any clues ?
>
> Interface configuration for Juniper at Cisco side:
>
> interface GigabitEthernet1/1/1
> description Juniper
> no switchport
> ip address 10.10.10.21 255.255.255.252
> ip pim passive
> !
>
> Here is output of IGMP membership - none :(
>
> cisco#sh ip igmp membership | include GigabitEthernet1/1/1
> cisco#
>
> Here is JunOS configuration:
>
> interfaces {
>ge-0/0/0 {
>unit 0 {
>family inet {
>address 10.10.10.22/30;
>}
>}
>}
> routing-options {
>static {
>route 0.0.0.0/0 next-hop 10.10.10.21;
>}
> }
> protocols {
>igmp {
>interface ge-0/0/0.0 {
>version 2;
>static {
>group 231.0.0.3;
>group 231.0.0.4;
>}
>}
>}
>pim {
>rp {
>static {
>address 10.10.10.255 {
>version 2;
>}
>}
>}
>interface ge-0/0/0.0 {
>mode sparse;
>version 2;
>}
>join-load-balance;
>}
> }
>
> Rob
> ___
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] POLICY: from next-hop
I guess it is logical and I was hoping to be able to make my life easier :-). I did my tests with & without FIB indirect-nexthops. No change in behaviour. Vladi On 2 Sep 2013, at 23:47, Daniel Roesen wrote: > On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 11:26:46PM +0100, Vladislav A. VASILEV wrote: >> Figured it out. My intention was to filter routes by performing matches >> against each protocol next hop. However, this is not supported when the >> policy is applied under "routing-options forwarding-table export". Has >> anyone seen this documented anywhere on juniper.net? > > Isn't this kinda logical? > > You're filtering RIB-to-FIB, so protocol next-hops aren't (in > first-order approximation[1]) not in play anymore, just forwarding > next-hops. So at this point, I would expect "from next-hop" to match > forwarding next-hops, not protocol next-hops. > > Best regards, > Daniel > > [1] unsure wether/how FIB indirect-nexthops might change the picture. > > -- > CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: d...@cluenet.de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0 ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] VPLS issues
You need to use the "strict" keyword when installing the LSP.
Sent from my iPhone
On 30 Nov 2012, at 17:29, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> Does anybody have any experience with forced LSP path selection for VPLS
> circuits? Long story short, when we fire up traffic on one particular
> VPLS instance, we're seeing SOME of the traffic it's carrying being
> blackholed. The pattern is one of certain IP or even TCP port pairs
> being blocked, and it seems to rotate over time, which screams "hashing
> across multiple LSPs where one of them is doing something bad, and it
> changes as the LSPs resignal over time" to me. To try and lock this
> down, I'm trying to force the VPLS traffic to route over a single LSP,
> in the usual manner with a forwarding-table export policy, and a very
> simple extended community regexp against the vrf-target community.
>
> term VPLS {
>from community MATCH_VPLS;
>then {
>install-nexthop lsp-regex .*-SILVER.*;
>load-balance per-packet;
>accept;
>}
> }
>
> But it sure as hell doesn't look like it's narrowing the LSP selection:
>
> ras@re0.router> show route forwarding-table family vpls table blah
> Routing table: blah.vpls
> VPLS:
> DestinationType RtRef Next hop Type Index NhRef Netif
> ...
> 00:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx/48 user 0 indr 1050634 5
> idxd 3223 2
> idx:1 xx.xx.142.132 Push 262153, Push 655412(top)
> 4543 1 xe-7/3/0.0
> idx:1 xx.xx.142.62 Push 262153, Push 752660, Push
> 691439(top) 1315 1 xe-4/1/0.0
> idx:2 xx.xx.142.132 Push 262153, Push 758372(top)
> 1923 1 xe-7/3/0.0
> idx:2 xx.xx.142.62 Push 262153, Push 382341, Push
> 691439(top) 2541 1 xe-4/1/0.0
> idx:3 xx.xx.142.132 Push 262153, Push 758372(top)
> 1923 1 xe-7/3/0.0
> idx:3 xx.xx.142.62 Push 262153, Push 382341, Push
> 691439(top) 2541 1 xe-4/1/0.0
> idx:4 xx.xx.142.30 Push 262153, Push 714676(top)
> 1500 1 xe-4/1/1.0
> idx:4 xx.xx.142.62 Push 262153, Push 619458, Push
> 378636(top) 3864 1 xe-4/1/0.0
> idx:xx xx.xx.142.82 Push 262153, Push 601828(top)
> 989 1 xe-5/0/0.0
> idx:xx xx.xx.142.132 Push 262153, Push 684644(top)
> 3516 1 xe-7/3/0.0
> idx:xx xx.xx.142.62 Push 262153, Push 528898, Push
> 760875(top) 4766 1 xe-4/1/0.0
> idx:xx xx.xx.142.62 Push 262153, Push 792036, Push
> 691439(top) 3473 1 xe-4/1/0.0
>
> Any ideas, about this or about troubleshooting the forwarding plane for
> VPLS in general? Other than that VPLS just sucks... :)
>
> --
> Richard A Steenbergenhttp://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
> GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
> ___
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Multicast Issues with a Logical System
sorry, the whole config on LS1 is:
r1@M5:r1# run show configuration protocols pim
interface fe-0/2/0.129 {
mode dense;
version 2;
}
interface fe-0/2/0.12 {
mode dense;
version 2;
}
I tried to put a static mroute with:
igmp {
interface fe-0/2/0.222 {
static {
group 239.1.2.3;
}
}
}
which did not make it in the mroute table either.
V.Vasilev
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Vladislav Vasilev
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to figure out what is wrong with the following setup:
>
> Streamer (239.1.2.3) ---> fe-0/2/0.129 (Logical System 1) fe-0/2/0.12
> <---> fe-0/2/1.21 (Logical System 2) ---> Receiver
>
> I have the following configuration on LS1:
>
> r1@M5:r1# run show configuration protocols pim
> interface fe-0/2/0.129 {
> mode dense;
> version 2;
> }
>
> The multicast traffic is hitting the fe-0/2/0.129 interface but the
> router is not populating its mroute table:
>
> r1@jncie:r1# run show multicast route
> Family: INET
>
> Family: INET6
>
> Even if I try to put the mcast group as a static group on either LS1
> or LS2 it does not make it in the mroute table.
>
> I am running JunOS 9.3R4.4.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Best Regards,
> V.Vasilev
>
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] Multicast Issues with a Logical System
Hello,
I am trying to figure out what is wrong with the following setup:
Streamer (239.1.2.3) ---> fe-0/2/0.129 (Logical System 1) fe-0/2/0.12
<---> fe-0/2/1.21 (Logical System 2) ---> Receiver
I have the following configuration on LS1:
r1@M5:r1# run show configuration protocols pim
interface fe-0/2/0.129 {
mode dense;
version 2;
}
The multicast traffic is hitting the fe-0/2/0.129 interface but the
router is not populating its mroute table:
r1@jncie:r1# run show multicast route
Family: INET
Family: INET6
Even if I try to put the mcast group as a static group on either LS1
or LS2 it does not make it in the mroute table.
I am running JunOS 9.3R4.4.
Thanks!
Best Regards,
V.Vasilev
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Hard Disk Replacement - M5
I tried that but it did not work either. The "install-media" image did the job. Thanks! Regards, V.Vasilev On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Miroslav Georgiev wrote: > Start a shell and you will have dd there. After that you can do request > system partition. > If you have an export-cf[512|1024] version of junos you can use it too. > > On 11.01.2011 14:19, Vladislav Vasilev wrote: >> >> I guess I am going for the PCMCIA method. >> >> Thanks. >> >> Regards, >> V.Vasilev >> >> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Alex wrote: >> >>> >>> I believe if you reinstall FreeBSD on this disk (minimal install will do) >>> it >>> will be recognised by "request system partition". >>> HTH >>> Regards >>> Alex >>> >>> - Original Message - From: "Vladislav Vasilev" >>> >>> To: >>> Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 1:13 AM >>> Subject: [j-nsp] Hard Disk Replacement - M5 >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I am trying to replace a hard drive on an old M5 running JunOS 6.2. >>>> The RE installs the drive which can be seen from the following output: >>>> >>>> r...@m5> show system boot-messages >>>> >>>> ad0: 91MB [734/8/32] at ata0-master using PIO1 >>>> ad1: 11513MB [23392/16/63] at ata0-slave using UDMA33 >>>> Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a >>>> >>>> The problem is that the RE won't partition it: >>>> >>>> r...@m5> request system partition hard-disk >>>> mount: /dev/ad1s1e: Device not configured >>>> ERROR: Can't access hard disk, aborting partition. >>>> >>>> The hard drive had been erased with dd. >>>> >>>> Has anyone come across this problem? Am I missing something here? >>>> >>>> Thank you! >>>> >>>> Kind Regards, >>>> V. Vasilev >>>> ___ >>>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> ___ >> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >> >> >> > > -- > Regards,,, > Miroslav Georgiev > SpectrumNet Jsc. > +(359 2)4890604 > +(359 2)4890619 > > > ___ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Hard Disk Replacement - M5
I guess I am going for the PCMCIA method. Thanks. Regards, V.Vasilev On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Alex wrote: > I believe if you reinstall FreeBSD on this disk (minimal install will do) it > will be recognised by "request system partition". > HTH > Regards > Alex > > - Original Message - From: "Vladislav Vasilev" > > To: > Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 1:13 AM > Subject: [j-nsp] Hard Disk Replacement - M5 > > >> Hello, >> >> I am trying to replace a hard drive on an old M5 running JunOS 6.2. >> The RE installs the drive which can be seen from the following output: >> >> r...@m5> show system boot-messages >> >> ad0: 91MB [734/8/32] at ata0-master using PIO1 >> ad1: 11513MB [23392/16/63] at ata0-slave using UDMA33 >> Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a >> >> The problem is that the RE won't partition it: >> >> r...@m5> request system partition hard-disk >> mount: /dev/ad1s1e: Device not configured >> ERROR: Can't access hard disk, aborting partition. >> >> The hard drive had been erased with dd. >> >> Has anyone come across this problem? Am I missing something here? >> >> Thank you! >> >> Kind Regards, >> V. Vasilev >> ___ >> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >> > > ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] Hard Disk Replacement - M5
Hello, I am trying to replace a hard drive on an old M5 running JunOS 6.2. The RE installs the drive which can be seen from the following output: r...@m5> show system boot-messages ad0: 91MB [734/8/32] at ata0-master using PIO1 ad1: 11513MB [23392/16/63] at ata0-slave using UDMA33 Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a The problem is that the RE won't partition it: r...@m5> request system partition hard-disk mount: /dev/ad1s1e: Device not configured ERROR: Can't access hard disk, aborting partition. The hard drive had been erased with dd. Has anyone come across this problem? Am I missing something here? Thank you! Kind Regards, V. Vasilev ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] Kompella based L2VPNs over tunnel (lt) interfaces
Are Kompella based L2VPNs supported on logical tunnel interfaces? CE lt<--->lt PE lt<--->lt P lt<--->lt PE lt<--->lt CE The control plane seems to be just fine but I can't get it to pass any traffic between the CEs! Regards, V.Vasilev ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] link colouring on tunnel interfaces
Is link colouring supported on "lt" interfaces? The "admin-group" command seems to be not available under such interfaces? Regards, V. Vasilev ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] PIM neighbors
I have a M7i router that does not report its PIM neighbors - Redback
SE1200 and Cisco 7600. I can see the M7i on both the SE1200 and the
7600.
interface ae0.803 {
mode sparse;
version 2;
}
M7i
x...@xxx-xxx# run show pim neighbors
Instance: PIM.master
[edit]
Redback
[xxx]r1p1#show ip pim ne
PIM Neighbor Table
Neighbor Address Interface Uptime DR Prio GenIDDR SR
Expire hex hex Intvl
10.x.x.x UPLINK 00:08:21 159ccdf7f
00:01:23
Multicast traffic does flow though. Has anyone come across this? I am
running JUNOS 10.0R1.8.
Best Regards,
V. Vasilev
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] Using fxp0 as a routed interface
Hello! I know I can use fxp0 as a routed interface on M7i by setting: sysctl -w net.pfe.transit_re=1 but this seems to be not possible for M160? Has anyone been able to do to it on it? P.S. It is for training purposes, so the CPU will be OK Regards, V.Vasilev ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] CompactFlash Card
I've seen somewhere on Juniper's website that the maximum allowed CF on M7i is 1GB. Regards, V.Vasilev On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Erol KAHRAMAN wrote: > Hello, > > I bought a compactflash card (SanDisk Ultra 2GB) and planned to use it for > my M7i box. However, when i insert it to my pcmci interface i saw that it is > not in my storage device list. In my log file i get the following lines: > > /kernel: ad3: Device does not support APM > /kernel: ad3: 1918MB at ata2-master PIO4 > > I also try to prepare CF disk as a bootable media from my linux box. > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdd1 bs=512 count=1024 > dd if=install-media-10.0R2.10-domestic of=/dev/sdd1 bs=64k > > After rebooting my router nothing happened. > > What could be the problem? Is there a way to use my CF card as storage > device in my router? > ___ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] JunOS upgrade M40
Hello! I have a M40 running JunOS 8.1R4.3 that needs to be upgraded to 9.3. I tried this but the installer suggested that I do install 8.3 first. However according to: http://www.juniper.net/support/eol/junos.html that version is EOL and it is not available for download. What are my options? Thanks! Regards, V.Vasilev ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] logical systems unstability
Hello! I might have run into a bug while trying to get some logical routers up and running. As soon as I configure them the router reboots itself and starts dropping BGP sessions, dropping packets etc. I am running JunOS 9.6R2.1 on a M7i. Has anything like this happened to any of you? Regards, V.Vasilev ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
