Re: [j-nsp] Immediate aging in EX-3200
Well, to clear something up on this I'll just copy my convo with a Juniper person via email verbatim here- - What are the total number of VLANS that can actually exist on a physical port (when configured as trunk)? - What are the total number of RVI's that can be configured on an EX device? 4000 VLANs on a given port (and in a system) and 1000 RVIs. So it's not a VLANs per interface problem, unless you have more than 4k VLANs on the entire system (and you can really only have something like 93 or 94 more than that anyway). Are you seeing anything in your syslog entries? Personally, on my EX's, I'm running JUNOS 10.0S1.1 because it's the recommended release- I looked over the differences in 10.1 and 10.0 and couldn't find anything changed/improved that's relevant to my network. I'd recommend the same for yours. Dan Farrell Applied Innovations Corp. da...@appliedi.net -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Emil Katzarski Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2010 1:31 PM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Immediate aging in EX-3200 Hi, There is no link flap. At the same interface I have about 1000 other VLANS and about 5000 other MAC's and they don't flap. The problem affects only a one or a few MAC's at a time. I should double check for a bridging loop but I don't believe there is one. I use Junos 10.1R1 Regards: Emil On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote: > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 06:13:42PM +0300, Emil Katzarski wrote: >> I have a switch EX3200-48T with quite simple L2 config. Once in a >> while I can see some MAC addresses learned on the correct interface >> and VLAN, but then (less than a second later) the MAC is deleted. >> I can also see the "Immediate aging" counter increasing. > > Are you seeing link flaps or port errors? Is it possible there is a > bridging loop? What JUNOS version are you running? > ___ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 5139 (20100523) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 5140 (20100524) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 5140 (20100524) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Immediate aging in EX-3200
Hi, There is no link flap. At the same interface I have about 1000 other VLANS and about 5000 other MAC's and they don't flap. The problem affects only a one or a few MAC's at a time. I should double check for a bridging loop but I don't believe there is one. I use Junos 10.1R1 Regards: Emil On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote: > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 06:13:42PM +0300, Emil Katzarski wrote: >> I have a switch EX3200-48T with quite simple L2 config. Once in a >> while I can see some MAC addresses learned on the correct interface >> and VLAN, but then (less than a second later) the MAC is deleted. >> I can also see the "Immediate aging" counter increasing. > > Are you seeing link flaps or port errors? Is it possible there is a > bridging loop? What JUNOS version are you running? > ___ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Immediate aging in EX-3200
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 06:13:42PM +0300, Emil Katzarski wrote: > I have a switch EX3200-48T with quite simple L2 config. Once in a > while I can see some MAC addresses learned on the correct interface > and VLAN, but then (less than a second later) the MAC is deleted. > I can also see the "Immediate aging" counter increasing. Are you seeing link flaps or port errors? Is it possible there is a bridging loop? What JUNOS version are you running? ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] Immediate aging in EX-3200
Hello, I have a switch EX3200-48T with quite simple L2 config. Once in a while I can see some MAC addresses learned on the correct interface and VLAN, but then (less than a second later) the MAC is deleted. I can also see the "Immediate aging" counter increasing. Example: u...@switch> show ethernet-switching statistics aging Total age messages received: 4610446 Immediate aging: 3473, MAC address seen: 4336261, MAC address not seen: 270712 Error age messages: 42612 Invalid VLAN: 1030, No such entry: 41582, Static entry: 0 u...@switch> show ethernet-switching mac-learning-log | match 00:19:e0:f8:f1:3b Wed May 19 18:54:58 2010 vlan_name VLAN5 mac 00:19:e0:f8:f1:3b was learned on ae1.0 Wed May 19 18:54:58 2010 vlan_name VLAN5 mac 00:19:e0:f8:f1:3b was deleted on ae1.0 Wed May 19 18:55:01 2010 vlan_name VLAN5 mac 00:19:e0:f8:f1:3b was learned on ae1.0 Wed May 19 18:55:01 2010 vlan_name VLAN5 mac 00:19:e0:f8:f1:3b was deleted on ae1.0 Wed May 19 18:55:04 2010 vlan_name VLAN5 mac 00:19:e0:f8:f1:3b was learned on ae1.0 Wed May 19 18:55:04 2010 vlan_name VLAN5 mac 00:19:e0:f8:f1:3b was deleted on ae1.0 Does anybody know what does "Immediate aging" or "No such entry" mean? ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
