Re: [j-nsp] OSPF between Juniper and systems

2013-07-26 Thread Mark Tinka
On Friday, July 26, 2013 04:37:34 PM Vincent De Keyzer 
wrote:

> for what I know, MTU is part of the OSPF negotiation, so
> if they are not the same on both sides, adjacency will
> not come up.

Unless you set both sides to ignore it like you can do with 
some other vendor equipment.

Mark.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] OSPF between Juniper and systems

2013-07-26 Thread Vincent De Keyzer
Hi,

for what I know, MTU is part of the OSPF negotiation, so if they are not
the same on both sides, adjacency will not come up.

Vincent


On 26 July 2013 15:21, R S  wrote:

>
>
> In a
> broadcast interface (GE) I’ve to run OSPF between my MX and some systems
> running OSPF.
>
>
> What about
> L2 and L3 MTU ?
>
>
> Can I fix
> greater MTU on MX and the OSPF adj will come up or not ?
> Pls advise
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] OSPF between Juniper and systems

2013-07-26 Thread Payam Chychi
You should always match mtu if you want to avoid having problems down 
the line, specially with protocols such as ospf and bgp





On 2013-07-26 7:33 AM, OBrien, Will wrote:

You have to match them appropriately.  Take a look at my nexus-srx example.


On Jul 26, 2013, at 9:30 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:


On Friday, July 26, 2013 03:21:32 PM R S wrote:


In a
broadcast interface (GE) I’ve to run OSPF between my MX
and some systems running OSPF.


What about
L2 and L3 MTU ?


Can I fix
greater MTU on MX and the OSPF adj will come up or not ?
Pls advise

Layer 3 MTU must match on link for OSPF adjacencies to come
up.

I know you can ignore MTU mismatch in Cisco (did that when
deploying Quagga), but haven't tried it for Juniper.

Mark.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] OSPF between Juniper and systems

2013-07-26 Thread OBrien, Will
You have to match them appropriately.  Take a look at my nexus-srx example.


On Jul 26, 2013, at 9:30 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:

> On Friday, July 26, 2013 03:21:32 PM R S wrote:
> 
>> In a
>> broadcast interface (GE) I’ve to run OSPF between my MX
>> and some systems running OSPF.
>> 
>> 
>> What about
>> L2 and L3 MTU ?
>> 
>> 
>> Can I fix
>> greater MTU on MX and the OSPF adj will come up or not ?
>> Pls advise
> 
> Layer 3 MTU must match on link for OSPF adjacencies to come 
> up.
> 
> I know you can ignore MTU mismatch in Cisco (did that when 
> deploying Quagga), but haven't tried it for Juniper.
> 
> Mark.
> ___
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] OSPF between Juniper and systems

2013-07-26 Thread Mark Tinka
On Friday, July 26, 2013 03:21:32 PM R S wrote:

> In a
> broadcast interface (GE) I’ve to run OSPF between my MX
> and some systems running OSPF.
> 
> 
> What about
> L2 and L3 MTU ?
> 
> 
> Can I fix
> greater MTU on MX and the OSPF adj will come up or not ?
> Pls advise

Layer 3 MTU must match on link for OSPF adjacencies to come 
up.

I know you can ignore MTU mismatch in Cisco (did that when 
deploying Quagga), but haven't tried it for Juniper.

Mark.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] OSPF between Juniper and systems

2013-07-26 Thread R S


In a
broadcast interface (GE) I’ve to run OSPF between my MX and some systems
running OSPF.


What about
L2 and L3 MTU ?


Can I fix
greater MTU on MX and the OSPF adj will come up or not ?
Pls advise





  
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp