Just to be sure, if you want the port to be forced also disable auto-neg
on the combo interface.
Looks like a duplex mismatch at first sight.
Christian
Le 21/10/2010 18:26, Paul Stewart a écrit :
Hi there..
We have a customer we migrated off a Cisco 7600 over to an MX480.
Long story short we're having performance issues and have isolated it down
to some questions ;)
This is a 20GE+2X10GE linecard - customer port is using a copper 10/100/1000
SFP. Port is hard coded to 100/full on both sides.
MAC statistics: Receive Transmit
Total octets 586682576135778876
Total packets 616114 506951
Unicast packets 616114 506616
Broadcast packets0 335
Multicast packets00
CRC/Align errors 98950
FIFO errors 104900
MAC control frames 00
MAC pause frames 00
Oversized frames 0
Jabber frames0
Fragment frames682
VLAN tagged frames 0
Code violations 0
Filter statistics:
Input packet count 616114
Input packet rejects 9895
Input DA rejects 0
Input SA rejects 0
Output packet count 506951
Output packet pad count 0
Output packet error count 0
CAM destination filters: 0, CAM source filters: 0
Opened ticket with JTAC and so far not getting anywhere despite requesting
an escalation - they have been "analyzing" this for over 24 hours now with
no idea.
According to some docs, FIFO errors mean "replace the PIC immediately" which
I find hard to believe - this could be a classic cat5 issue or an SFP issue
but before knocking the customer down would rather get some feedback
please..
Customer side is a watchguard firewall unfortunately
Thanks,
Paul
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
