Hi guys, On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 19:56 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > Note: I will abide by whatever decision is reached
The ESC discussed this precise issue in the past; and made a decision not to include the Ubuntu font, and because of that, this is the status quo today. No doubt someone clever could dig out the minutes on that. If we want to re-discuss it - since the issue is a legal / advertising / bikeshed-cum-flame-bait issue. I'd recommend we re-discuss it in an ESC call preferably after 4.0 / FOSDEM. The more concise, accurate and detailed a write-up we have for all the fonts we currently ship the better the decision we can take. Anyone griping about this should build better data: Name, License, coverage, binary-size, hinting etc. One potential solution might be to remove other non-free fonts (if indeed we are bundling them) - OTOH - there is AFAICS no need for a hasty conclusion on this: we can tweak this for 4.0.1 and/or 3.6.<next> as/when necessary. > but let's not pretend that this is not, for all practical purpose, an > advertising clause. ATB, Michael. -- michael.me...@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot _______________________________________________ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise