Hi, Daniel,
This patch itself is OK.
But I also think MIN_XEN_GUEST_SIZE should be defined in xen_unified.h
not src/internal.h. Since this variable is Xen specific.
How do you think?
Thanks
Atsushi SAKAI
"S.Sakamoto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I make the patch.
> This patch adds the check of memory size in xenXMDriver,
> to handle the xenStoreDriver error when the set value
> by setmem(setmaxmem) is 4096-65535 definitely.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Shigeki Sakamoto.
>
>
> Index: src/xm_internal.c
> ===
> RCS file: /data/cvs/libvirt/src/xm_internal.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.95
> diff -u -p -r1.95 xm_internal.c
> --- src/xm_internal.c 24 Oct 2008 11:20:08 - 1.95
> +++ src/xm_internal.c 31 Oct 2008 05:52:27 -
> @@ -1273,6 +1273,8 @@ int xenXMDomainSetMemory(virDomainPtr do
> return (-1);
> if (domain->id != -1)
> return (-1);
> +if (memory < 1024 * MIN_XEN_GUEST_SIZE);
> +return (-1);
>
> if (!(filename = virHashLookup(nameConfigMap, domain->name)))
> return (-1);
>
>
>
> > At first, libvirt.c should not check VMM-arch specific value.
> > In this meaning, xs_internal.c do the right thing.
> > The problem is error handling on libvirt.c(Xen Store error is not handled
> > properly).
> > Do you investigate it?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Atsushi SAKAI
> >
> >
> >
> > "S.Sakamoto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have a question.
> > > Why does libvirt check size of memory in xenStoreDomainSetMemory of
> > > xs_internal.c?
> > >
> > > In the xen not exclude lifecycle,
> > > when I do the following command for the domain that is shutoff,
> > > error message is output and return value is 0 and the definition
> > > file(=/etc/xen/XXX) is updated.
> > >
> > >
> > > # virsh setmem(or setmaxmem) guestdom 65535(4096-65535)
> > > libvir: Xen Store error : invalid argument in xenStoreDomainSetMemory
> > >
> > > # echo $?
> > > 0
> > >
> > >
> > > As a result that I research this,
> > > this error message is output by the check of the memory size in
> > > xenStoreDriver.
> > > Because libvirt checks the memory size of under 4096 in libvirt.c,
> > > I think that libvirt should check memory size range of 4096-65535 in
> > > libvirt.c.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Shigeki Sakamoto.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Libvir-list mailing list
> > > Libvir-list@redhat.com
> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Libvir-list mailing list
> Libvir-list@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list