Re: Dual license?

2001-10-02 Thread Mark Rauterkus


Hi *,

> which
> is going to do some software development as a government contract.

I think ALL Gov software -- since it is PAID for by PUBLIC funds -- and used
for a PUBLIC purpose, should be with PUBLIC licenses.

The software contractors might need to do some hand-holding for the gov.
agency and managers who may NOT be up to speed on software license stuff. ??

Then the challenge is to PICK the right public license. Do you start from
scratch? Or, do you build upon what is already available -- perhaps GPLed?

I think there should be more "lobbist" efforts to advocate for Free and Open
software -- with public agencies.


Ta.

Mark Rauterkus
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


PS:
> 2. If you are not an educational institution any derived work not be
>public available.

So, the one's who paid for the software in the first place, -- non
educational -- need to NEVER use it? The aim of gov should NOT be to supress
enterprise. Rather, make it work for all equally open. That move would make
the public sector larger at the expense of the private sector. I think that
is bad government. Are you in the USA? I see the .dk -- so I assume not.
Hence, the rant in a PS part of this message.



--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3



license-discuss@opensource.org

2001-09-25 Thread Mark Rauterkus


Hi All,

Heads up listed below. This in from another source. Perhaps there could be
some direct questions and groundwork established?

Thanks for all you do for open ways!

Ta.

Mark R.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

- - -

> Hello,
>
> We are pleased to announce the first installment of the "Ask the Darwin
> Team" Q&A, compiled with the help of scores of Open Source developers
> around the world. This is part of our ongoing effort to improve
> communication with the larger Open Source community. Look for additional
> installments in the coming weeks.
>
> http://www.opensource.apple.com/
>
> The Darwin Team at Apple
> ___
> publicsource-announce mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/publicsource-announce
> 
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3



Looking to learn more about "EXCEPTIONS" -- gnu style

2000-03-07 Thread Mark Rauterkus


Hi All,

I'm trying to get my mind around the ins and outs of the granted GNU
exceptions. I didn't find any list of all the software titles that have been
granted "exceptions".

It makes sense that a "compiler" and even the kernel would be an exception
-- so as to allow that tool to craft "non-free" output.

Are there any pointers where I might look for more info into this?

Plus, what other software titles have "exceptions? I'll then look up the
license-specifics. Or, please consider sending me an off-line email examples
of those license exceptions you have easy access to. I'll summarize and
return.


Thanks!


Mark Rauterkus
[EMAIL PROTECTED]