Re: pizzicato problem
On Monday 03 March 2008 02:32:25 hhpmusic wrote: > Hi, There is a small question: can I write Bartok pizzicato in LilyPond? > How to do? Haipeng Take a look at the LSR - if you search for bartok, you'll get: http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=335 Greetings Marc -- www.hohlart.de ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: clefs and positioning
no, here is a scan of the upper left corner that he wrote by hand http://www.arkansascabinetsolutions.com/the_presence.gif Andrew Hawryluk wrote: Are you looking for the octave-transposed treble clef? \clef "treble_8" e.g. http://www.musicbyandrew.ca/data/emmanuel.pdf Andrew On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Timothy C Litwiller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am try to set a piece that a friend wrote recently it is what we call a Mens Quartet vocal piece. The top line of notes above the words is almost right if I use \clef neomensural-c4 or c3 c4 is on the line above the space where we need it and c3 is on the line below where we need it. what ever changes we do should also affect the pitch of the song I've been playing with the different thing in the clef section of the manual but don't understand what I am doing yet. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
pizzicato problem
Hi, There is a small question: can I write Bartok pizzicato in LilyPond? How to do? Haipeng ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: clefs and positioning
Are you looking for the octave-transposed treble clef? \clef "treble_8" e.g. http://www.musicbyandrew.ca/data/emmanuel.pdf Andrew On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Timothy C Litwiller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am try to set a piece that a friend wrote recently > it is what we call a Mens Quartet vocal piece. > > The top line of notes above the words is almost right if I use \clef > neomensural-c4 or c3 c4 is on the line above the space where we need it > and c3 is on the line below where we need it. > > what ever changes we do should also affect the pitch of the song > > I've been playing with the different thing in the clef section of the > manual but don't understand what I am doing yet. > > > > > ___ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
clefs and positioning
I am try to set a piece that a friend wrote recently it is what we call a Mens Quartet vocal piece. The top line of notes above the words is almost right if I use \clef neomensural-c4 or c3 c4 is on the line above the space where we need it and c3 is on the line below where we need it. what ever changes we do should also affect the pitch of the song I've been playing with the different thing in the clef section of the manual but don't understand what I am doing yet. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Snippet/template how to use lilypond-book with xelatex
I've added this. Cheers, - Graham On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 10:03:18 +0200 Till Rettig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > I was writing about this already some time ago, now I prepared a > small file that demonstrates how to use xelatex (and its advanced > font selection features) whith lilypond-book. This is only a > workaround since it pretends to lilypond-book to use pdflatex > instead. But something like this could be nice in the template > section of the LM. I only cannot add it myself to lsr, because it is > not a "lilypond" snippet. How are the lilypond-book templates > handled, are they added also from lsr? > > Greetings > Till > ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Introducing OrchestralLily: A package to easily create complex orchestral scores in lilypond
Op zondag 2 maart 2008, schreef Reinhold Kainhofer: > http://wiki.kainhofer.com/lilypond/orchestallily The link did not work, it should be: http://wiki.kainhofer.com/lilypond/orchestrallily :-) best regards, Wilbert Berendsen -- http://www.wilbertberendsen.nl/ LilyKDE: http://lilykde.googlecode.com/ ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: problem with trills
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Sonntag, 2. März 2008 schrieb Mats Bengtsson: > Graham Percival wrote: > >On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 13:00:55 +0100 > > > >Reinhold Kainhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>If you add \version "2.10.5" to the snippet (yes, I really hate it > >>that the snippets don't say with which version of lilypond they > >>work!!!) and let convert-ly run on it, you'll get the hint: > > > >LSR uses 2.10.12 at the moment. That info is on the LSR web > >pages. > > Yes, but very well hidden. The link to "Contributing" > is not the obvious place to look for this crucial information. > I have said it many times before, but I definitely think that > a \version line should be added at the top of each snippet > when it's shown on the web page (if it's not included in the > database itself). I absolutely agree. Quite often, I save a snippet on disk to have it available online, only to stumble upon it a few weeks/months later. Of course, at that time, I have no idea any more about the lilypond version needed for the snippet (and at that time, the LSR page will not help, either). If I'm online, I can search the LSR again, but if I'm on a train or otherwise offline, I have no way to get a correct version of the snippet. Furthermore, I really think it's counterproductive to tell everyone that each lilypond file should have a \version statement (even the guide on minimal examples says that a \version statement should always be included!), while the "official" source of examples does exactly the opposite! Cheers, Reinhold - -- - -- Reinhold Kainhofer, Vienna University of Technology, Austria email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/ * Financial and Actuarial Mathematics, TU Wien, http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/ * K Desktop Environment, http://www.kde.org, KOrganizer maintainer * Chorvereinigung "Jung-Wien", http://www.jung-wien.at/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHyy4QTqjEwhXvPN0RAlH+AJ9ARD4X4aHEsapdcue2JZOjnD6jsgCfRxTi ROlzbB2qDL3rDxV5Kfm28zQ= =wIdH -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: decrease distance between beams in tremolo?
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
As far as I can see in the source code, it should help to do
\override StemTremolo #'length-fraction = #0.8
(the default value seems to be 1). I haven't tried it though.
I you manage, please send a follow-up to the mailing list
for the record (it also seems that this property is missing
in the documentation for StemTremolo).
This works perfectly. Thanks a lot!
some examples:
-
\version "2.11.38"
{
\override StemTremolo #'beam-thickness = #0.2
\override StemTremolo #'beam-width = #2
\override StemTremolo #'length-fraction = #0.7
\override StemTremolo #'Y-offset = #1.5
\stemUp b'1:16
\override StemTremolo #'beam-thickness = #0.2
\override StemTremolo #'beam-width = #2
\override StemTremolo #'length-fraction = #0.7
\override StemTremolo #'Y-offset = #-0.8
\stemDown g'1:16
\override StemTremolo #'beam-thickness = #0.2
\override StemTremolo #'beam-width = #2
\override StemTremolo #'length-fraction = #0.7
\override StemTremolo #'Y-offset = #-0.4
\stemUp g'4:16
}
-
Adjusting the Y-offset all the time is a bit tedious, but it works.
regards,
Peter van Kranenburg
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: headless notes
If you search in the "LilyPond index", i.e. the index of the user manual, then you will find what you search for if you look for "hiding" or "invisible" or "removing" or "transparent". If you look at the manual for version 2.11, you have to look in the index for the Learning Manual to find these. /Mats James E. Bailey wrote: I'm trying to get headless notes that I can attach a glissando to. I've gotten as far as \once \override Voice.NoteHead #'stencil = ##f dis2.\fermata but that doesn't really work and gives errors. Is there another way to set the note head to invisible? ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user -- = Mats Bengtsson Signal Processing Signals, Sensors and Systems Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Sweden Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe = ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
headless notes
I'm trying to get headless notes that I can attach a glissando to. I've gotten as far as \once \override Voice.NoteHead #'stencil = ##f dis2.\fermata but that doesn't really work and gives errors. Is there another way to set the note head to invisible? ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: decrease distance between beams in tremolo?
As far as I can see in the source code, it should help to do \override StemTremolo #'length-fraction = #0.8 (the default value seems to be 1). I haven't tried it though. I you manage, please send a follow-up to the mailing list for the record (it also seems that this property is missing in the documentation for StemTremolo). /Mats Peter Van Kranenburg wrote: hello list, Is it possible to decrease the distance between the beams of a tremolo? I'm asking because I'm typsetting 17th century organ music which has an ornament of two slashed through the stem all the time. If I decrease the thickness of a tremolo, it looks almost right, except for the distance between the slashes. They should be a bit closer together. regards, Peter van Kranenburg ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user -- = Mats Bengtsson Signal Processing Signals, Sensors and Systems Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Sweden Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe = ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Defining an Ossia context
If you try to explain what you want the new context to
do, it will be much easier to provide accurate help.
In general, I strongly recommend you to take a look at
the file ly/engraver-init.ly, where all the default contexts
are defined. For example, if you look at the definition of
the PianoStaff context, you will see how to base a new
context definition on an already existing one.
/Mats
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Afternoon.
I have been tidying up my lilypond source files and decided to try to
be clever and define an 'ossia' context in one of my layout template
files. I started to regret the decision when I realised I had to list
every single engraver I would need to use (I thought that \alias Staff
would do that - but was wrong.)
What I have done seems to work except for two things. 1) I can't get
the slurs to display. 2) The layout engine does not allocate any
vertical space to the Ossia and allows beams from the staff above and
below to collide. I included the Vertically_spaced_contexts_engraver
and Vertical_align_engraver in a fit of guess-work, but it didn't solve
the problem.
Is there a simple solution,other than manually tweaking the system
positions?
Regards - Dave P.
Example below:
\version "2.11.41"
\include "English.ly"
\layout {
% Define a context for ossia sections
\context {
\name Ossia
\alias Staff
\consists Note_heads_engraver
\consists Text_engraver
\consists Stem_engraver
\consists Accidental_engraver
\consists Staff_symbol_engraver
\consists Rest_engraver
\consists Slur_engraver
\consists Spacing_engraver
\consists Bar_engraver
\consists Script_engraver
\consists Font_size_engraver
\consists Auto_beam_engraver
\consists Key_engraver
\consists Vertical_align_engraver
\consists Vertically_spaced_contexts_engraver
\type "Engraver_group"
fontSize = #-2
\override StaffSymbol #'staff-space = #(magstep -2)
\override KeySignature #'stencil = ##f
}
\context {
\Score
\accepts "Ossia"
}
}
Notes = \relative c'' {
% snip
% Bar 13
cs8. d16 e8 cs a4 e8 a |
d,8. e16 fs8 a d4 cs8 d |
e4 e, e'8. cs16 b8 cs |
<<
{ a4 a8. b16 a4 s }
\new Ossia \with { alignAboveContext = "Main" }
\relative c'' {
\key a \major
a8^\markup \tiny \bold "Last Time"
b16 ( cs ) d e fs gs ( a-. ) r r8 s4 \bar "|."
}
>>
}
\score {
\new Staff = "Main" { \clef treble \key a \major \time 4/4 \Notes }
\layout { }
}
__
Up to 33% off Norton Security from Tiscali - http://www.tiscali.co.uk/securepc/
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
=
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
Signals, Sensors and Systems
Royal Institute of Technology
SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM
Sweden
Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463
Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: problem with trills
Graham Percival wrote: On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 13:00:55 +0100 Reinhold Kainhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If you add \version "2.10.5" to the snippet (yes, I really hate it that the snippets don't say with which version of lilypond they work!!!) and let convert-ly run on it, you'll get the hint: LSR uses 2.10.12 at the moment. That info is on the LSR web pages. Yes, but very well hidden. The link to "Contributing" is not the obvious place to look for this crucial information. I have said it many times before, but I definitely think that a \version line should be added at the top of each snippet when it's shown on the web page (if it's not included in the database itself). This lack of \version lines has not only caused problems for users of LSR but there have even been a number of snippets in LSR that have not been correctly updated using convert-ly. I actually found one such example as late as last week (fixed now). /Mats ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Chord changes under voltas?
You can't have searched very thoroughly, this topic has
been discussed several times on the mailing lists.
There are two main solutions for you:
- Update to version 2.11.x where the voltas appear
above the chord names by default. Although 2.11 is an
"unstable development" version, I would still classify it
as at least as good as 2.10 if you want to do serious
typesetting.
- Take a look at the "volta-chord-names.ly" example
in the Tips and Tricks document in the documentation
for version 2.10.
/Mats
eric raeburn wrote:
There was a short thread on this topic in Feb-March 2003 ("Chords
under voltas?"), apparently unresolved, and I could find no more
recent discussion of this topic.
I am using Lilypond to produce jazz leadsheets. Lilypond prints chord
symbols above volta lines. This is most unorthodox and
disconcerting--the symbols should be above the staff but below the
volta. I am using 2.10.29.
Is there a workaround, or should this be reported as a bug?
Thanks,
-Eric
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
=
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
Signals, Sensors and Systems
Royal Institute of Technology
SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM
Sweden
Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463
Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: problem with trills
On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 13:00:55 +0100 Reinhold Kainhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you add \version "2.10.5" to the snippet (yes, I really hate it > that the snippets don't say with which version of lilypond they > work!!!) and let convert-ly run on it, you'll get the hint: LSR uses 2.10.12 at the moment. That info is on the LSR web pages. Cheers, - Graham ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Percussion
Hello. I am an aspiring composer, and I plan to write, among other things, ensemble works that tend to utilise a large percussion section. Now, is it possible to type-set the percussion section shown in perc.jpg in LilyPond? (Yes, I drew that by hand, but without the assistance of a ruler. I aligned it to the lines of note-book paper.) Also, how may I type-set the note-heads for the different durations shown in nh.jpg? (I drew that by hand too.) Thanks! <><>___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: mulitple voices
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Sonntag, 2. März 2008 schrieb James E. Bailey:
> I'm currently having some difficulties with polyphony. I don't
> understand what I've missed in the statement:
hehe, that has nothing to do with polyphony.
> {\time 5/4 <<{\voiceOne
If you look at the error message:
temp2.ly:6:20: Fehler: syntax error, unexpected DIGIT, expecting > or
DRUM_PITCH or MUSIC_FUNCTION or NOTENAME_PITCH
{ \voiceOne < a'
4 fis > fis2 e4}
it says that it does not expect the "4" to be there. And indeed, that's your
problem: In chords the duration is written AFTER the whole chord. In
particular, you should instead write
4
Then everything works...
Cheers,
Reinhold
- --
- --
Reinhold Kainhofer, Vienna University of Technology, Austria
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/
* Financial and Actuarial Mathematics, TU Wien, http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/
* K Desktop Environment, http://www.kde.org, KOrganizer maintainer
* Chorvereinigung "Jung-Wien", http://www.jung-wien.at/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHyuWcTqjEwhXvPN0RAqLYAKCBM9+mpdYfebcb+UdWc/bVnt6EuwCdFuhU
8ieKM+li2DLSLNr+IFRoTfM=
=TMOd
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
mulitple voices
I'm currently having some difficulties with polyphony. I don't
understand what I've missed in the statement:
{\time 5/4 <<{\voiceOne fis2 e4}\\{\voiceTwo s2 e4~
e8[ d] cis4}\\{\voiceThree cis4 h h8[ a] h2}>>}
But it fails, and it fails pretty hard.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Autobeaming with subdivision in 4/4
On 2 Mar 2008, at 17:12, Hugo Flordal wrote:
I have problems getting autobeaming to work together with beam
subdivision in
4/4 timing. I'm typesetting for the scottish snare drum and there
are two
requirements that need to be fulfilled,
* beams should always start and end on even quarters (and nowhere
else), and
* beams should be subdivided on eighths.
Perhaps something like:
\time 8/8
\set beatGrouping = #'(1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1)
\set subdivideBeams = ##t
#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 8 8) 2 8)
#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 8 8) 4 8)
#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 8 8) 6 8)
And then figure out how to draw a 4-time time signature.
Hans Åberg
\version "2.10.33"
% Header
\header {
title = "Quarter beams with subdivision, minimal test"
tagline = ##f
}
myautobeams = {
\set beatGrouping = #'(1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1)
\set subdivideBeams = ##t
#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 8 8) 2 8)
#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 8 8) 4 8)
#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 8 8) 6 8)
}
% Music
{
%% Time
\time 8/8
{
%% Change auto beam behaviour
\myautobeams
%% First measure
\partial 8 {
d8:32(
}
\repeat volta 2 {
d->) \times 2/3 {c16 d c} d8-> c16. d32-> c16. d32-> c d c d c8-> c
}
}
}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Introducing OrchestralLily: A package to easily create complex orchestral scores in lilypond
I'm happy to finally present my latest project: OrchestralLily A package for lilypond to easily create orchestral scores Version 0.01 http://wiki.kainhofer.com/lilypond/orchestallily If you are using Lilypond to write large orchestral scores, with individual scores for each instrument or instrument group, you have certainly run into the problem that the (usually quite complex) structure of each movement with lots of staff groups is the same, and you copy'n'paste Score and Staff definitions of exactly the same structure all over the place. Additionally, you have to manually track which instruments play in a movement and which do not. This is exactly the point, which OrchestralLily tries to solve: You define a staff hierarchy (or multiple staff group hierarchies) once, and OrchestralLily will take care of correctly creating the staves or staff groups. You can concentrate on writing the music instead of the the structure. A very simple example can be found in the documentation: http://wiki.kainhofer.com/lilypond/orchestallily#a_simple_examplesoprano_solo_and_violoncello Currently, this is the very first preview release with probably several bugs (although I have to say that it works really well in my two large scores. For example, it saved me ~7000 lines of manual staff and score definitions in my score of Schubert's Stabat mater with 12 parts, 23 instruments and a total of 35 different scores: full scores, vocal score, choral score, individual instrument scores, scores for groups of instruments...). Proper support for cue notes (with clef and cue instrument name, but unfortunately without lyrics attached) is also included. I hope you'll like it and find it useful! Cheers, Reinhold PS: Two things that are not yet implemented but definitely planned are: -) Staves with multiple voices (using \voiceOne, \voiceTwo), possibly with lyrics attached. Currently, you'll still have to define those staves manually. -) Support for transposing instruments. You'd define the music in sounding pitch, but the displayed staff would be automatically transposed to the defined key. Thus, all cue notes will also be correct automatically. -- -- Reinhold Kainhofer, Vienna University of Technology, Austria email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/ * Financial and Actuarial Mathematics, TU Wien, http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/ * K Desktop Environment, http://www.kde.org, KOrganizer maintainer * Chorvereinigung "Jung-Wien", http://www.jung-wien.at/ ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Autobeaming with subdivision in 4/4
Hi,
I have problems getting autobeaming to work together with beam subdivision in
4/4 timing. I'm typesetting for the scottish snare drum and there are two
requirements that need to be fulfilled,
* beams should always start and end on even quarters (and nowhere else), and
* beams should be subdivided on eighths.
These two seem impossible to achieve simultaneously. As soon as I set
beamLength to 1/8, the beams start to break on eighths as well. Strangely it
appears to work better in other timings.
Below is a small example... if you comment out \set beatLength on line 15, you
see that the auto beaming is working as it should, but with \set beatLength it
breaks. What am I doing wrong?
thanks!
/Hugo
=
\version "2.10.33"
% Header
\header {
title = "Quarter beams with subdivision, minimal test"
tagline = ##f
}
myautobeams = {
#(revert-auto-beam-setting '(end 1 32 4 4) 5 8)
#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 4 4) 1 4 'Voice)
#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 4 4) 1 2 'Voice)
#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 4 4) 3 4 'Voice)
\set subdivideBeams = ##t
\set beatLength = #(ly:make-moment 1 8) % Subdivide beams on eighths
}
% Music
{
%% Time
\time 4/4
{
%% Change auto beam behaviour
\myautobeams
%% First measure
\partial 8 {
d8:32(
}
\repeat volta 2 {
d->) \times 2/3 {c16 d c} d8-> c16. d32-> c16. d32-> c d c d c8-> c
}
}
}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: lilypond-book with multi-dir projects
> "Graham" == Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Graham> Has anybody used lilypond-book for large (100+ pages) documents? Graham> In particular, I'm having trouble with .lytex files in Graham> subdirectories. Yes, that's a major problem. The hack I'm using is to link all the lilypond files into one directory. I have a script that changes the names to include some unique string, usually the directory name. Graham> I could hack up a post-lilypond-book python script to do Graham> such things, but that feels like such a hack. :( Graham> I could also abandon lilypond-book and create/insert .eps files Graham> directly, but that feels like even more of a hack. :) I don't think there's any way to use lilypond-book to do real work without several kinds of hacks. I'm using: A hack to get the margins to correctly line up with the headers. A hack to get the included files to cause recompilation The above mentioned hack to allow input files in multiple directories. I think it's worth it to avoid using the hacks which will undoubtedly change next month that people are adding to let lilypond do some of the work of a real publishing program. I don't expect anyone whose experience of open-source software is limited to lilypond to believe this, but I do have LaTeX files from almost 20 years ago that still work. -- Laura (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] , http://www.laymusic.org/ ) (617) 661-8097 fax: (501) 641-5011 233 Broadway, Cambridge, MA 02139 ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: problem with trills
Dear Reinhold, thanks for Your tip! It works, but I would prefer the solution with the pitched trill. The behavior of the accidentals there is really very strange, as I've read in http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2007-09/msg00465.html Is there solution available for this problem? ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: problem with trills
Am Sonntag, 2. März 2008 schrieb Stefan Thomas:
> Dear lilypondusers,
> is it possible, that the snippet with the trills with extra-accitendals
> http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=304
> don't work on version 2.11.38? When I tried do reproduce it, the
> accidentals where not shown.
Yes.
If you add \version "2.10.5" to the snippet (yes, I really hate it that the
snippets don't say with which version of lilypond they work!!!) and let
convert-ly run on it, you'll get the hint:
Applying conversion: 2.11.2, 2.11.5, 2.11.6, 2.11.10, 2.11.11, 2.11.13, Not
smart enough to convert edge-text settings for TextSpanner.Use
\override TextSpanner #'bound-details #'right #'text =
\override TextSpanner #'bound-details #'left #'text =
2.11.15, 2.11.23, 2.11.35, 2.11.38
Attached is the correct version for 2.11.38.
Cheers,
Reinhold
--
--
Reinhold Kainhofer, Vienna University of Technology, Austria
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/
* Financial and Actuarial Mathematics, TU Wien, http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/
* K Desktop Environment, http://www.kde.org, KOrganizer maintainer
* Chorvereinigung "Jung-Wien", http://www.jung-wien.at/
\version "2.11.38"
\relative c'' {
\once \override TrillSpanner #'bound-details #'left #'text =
#(markup #:line (#:halign -0.5 #:musicglyph "scripts.trill" #:teeny #:raise 0.65 #:sharp ))
b1\startTrillSpan b\stopTrillSpan
\once \override TrillSpanner #'bound-details #'left #'text =
#(markup #:line (#:halign -0.5 #:musicglyph "scripts.trill" #:teeny #:raise 0.5 #:flat ))
c\startTrillSpan c\stopTrillSpan
}
temp2.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
problem with trills
Dear lilypondusers, is it possible, that the snippet with the trills with extra-accitendals http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=304 don't work on version 2.11.38? When I tried do reproduce it, the accidentals where not shown. And I have another, very curious problem. When I use \pitchedTrill sometimes the accidentals are not shown, although I use "!" , trying to enforce them. Is it a bug? ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
