Re: barline at end of staff
Hi David, It sure does!! With Lilypond 2.16.1 it is almost(!) at the outer right side of the staff, there is still a little bit of staff visible after the final barline. Please ignore my ignorance but can I add a value 0.5 or 1.0 somewhere in your code to nudge it a little to the right? ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: barline at end of staff
Arno Rog gmail.com> writes:
>
Below a MWE of what I am trying to achieve (mind the wordwrap)
I hope someone has a solution to automatically place it at the end
of the staff, irrespective of the width of the staff.
I'd like to have the last barline exactly at the end of the last staff
without having to trial and error with the extra offset paramater.
voice = \relative c' {
\clef violin
\key g \major
\time 4/4
g' g a a \bar "|" b b c2 \bar "" \break
b4 g a fis \bar "|" g2 fis2 \bar "|" g1
\override Staff.BarLine #'extra-offset = #'(30 . 0)
\bar "|."
}
\score {
\context Score <<
\context Staff <<
\override Staff.StaffSymbol #'width = #'80
\override Staff.TimeSignature #'space-alist #'first-note =
#'(extra-space . 9.5)
\override Staff.KeySignature #'space-alist #'staff-bar =
#'(extra-space . 12)
\new Voice = "voice" \voice
>>
>>
\layout {
indent = 0.0\mm
ragged-right = ##t
}
}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
barline at end of staff
L.S. I'm trying to figure out a way to place the last bar line exactly at the end of the staff in the score of the Dutch anthem at http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet? id=648 Now it's done manually: \override Staff.BarLine #'extra-offset = #'(23 . 0) \bar "|." Can this be automatically (and correctly)? Arno Rog ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: fighting with lyrics
Hi Benjamin, Have a look at the followining message: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.general/60967 Arno Rog ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: can't understand beaming
Stan Sanderson ameritech.net> writes: > > oops, that should have been 2.13.35. However, I've since installed > 2.13.39 and forcing beams as I suggested > > fis8 ([ e8 )] a8 ([ a8 )] b8\> ( ais8\! ) > > does produce the desired pattern. > > Stan Hi STan, A frightfull idea when typesetting a complete Bach cantata, or, as is the case, a complete orchestral score (not very large happily) I stick with the use of \set Timing.beamExceptions = #'( (end . ( ( (1 . 8) . (2 2 2) ) ) ) ) for now. Pity I have to adapt all relevant parts :-( Arno Rog ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: can't understand beaming (workaround, sort off)
Arno Rog gmail.com> writes:
> I've found some info in ‘scm/time-signature-settings.scm'
> ;; in 3 4 time:
> ;; use defaults, but combine all beats into a unit if possible
> ;;
> ;; set all beams to end on beats, but 1 8 to beam entire measure
> ;; in order to avoid beaming every beat for entier measure, we set
> ;; triplets back to every beat.
> ((3 . 4) .
> ((beamExceptions . ((end . (((1 . 8) . (6))
> ((1 . 12) . (3 3 3
>
> Now I have to figure out to counteract this exception ('but 1 8 to beam entire
> measure') since this is definatly not done in most baroque music.
>
Elaboration on what's mentioned in ‘scm/time-signature-settings.scm' the use of
'beamExceptions' works (sort off)
PartPTwoTwoVoiceOne = \relative fis'' {
\clef "treble"
\key d \major
\time 3/4
\set Timing.beamExceptions = #'( (end . ( ( (1 . 8) . (2 2 2) ) ) ) )
e8 ( d8 ) cis8\> ( b8 ) a8. ( g16\! ) | % <-correct beaming
fis8 ( e8 ) a8 ( a8 ) b8\> ( ais8\! ) | % <-incorrect beaming
}
\score { \PartPTwoTwoVoiceOne }
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: can't understand beaming
Phil Holmes philholmes.net> writes:
>
> Further follow up - this is different from
> 2.12.3. That version beams all six notes in the bar together, for both
> bars. 2.12.36 beams the first bar as 3 groups and the second bar as a
> single group of six notes.
>
I've found some info in ‘scm/time-signature-settings.scm'
;; in 3 4 time:
;; use defaults, but combine all beats into a unit if possible
;;
;; set all beams to end on beats, but 1 8 to beam entire measure
;; in order to avoid beaming every beat for entier measure, we set
;; triplets back to every beat.
((3 . 4) .
((beamExceptions . ((end . (((1 . 8) . (6))
((1 . 12) . (3 3 3
Now I have to figure out to counteract this exception ('but 1 8 to beam entire
measure') since this is definatly not done in most baroque music.
Arno Rog
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: can't understand beaming
Ralph Palmer gmail.com> writes: > > > Sorry - I should have given a more complete answer. You can correct the >problem by completing the first measure with a 1/16 rest, a skip (I think - or >is that not counted at all?), or a 1/16 note. Also, to help find similar >problems in the future, I would strongly recommend bar checking, by adding "|" >( >pipe, but without the quotation marks) at the end of each measure. Then >LilyPond will tell you that you have a time problem. Thus : > e8 ( d8 ) cis8\> ( b8 ) a8. ( g16\! ) | > fis8 ( e8 ) a8 ( a8 ) b8\> ( ais8\! ) Pondly,Ralph| Hi Ralph, Thanks for your reply, but trust me, the measures are complete (you've overlooked the dot after a8. <-dot > e8 ( d8 ) cis8\> ( b8 ) a8. ( g16\! ) % <-correct beaming > fis8 ( e8 ) a8 ( a8 ) b8\> ( ais8\! ) % <-incorrect beaming What else could be the matter? Arno Rog ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
can't understand beaming
L.S.
Since the algorithms for beaming have changed I encounter all sorts of
incomprehensible behavior. I'm using 2.13.39
Yes I've read the manual, I've tried every piece of code,
tried the LSR, etc...
Why is the beaming for the two following measures different??
And how do I correct it?
PartPTwoTwoVoiceOne = \relative fis'' {
\clef "treble"
\key d \major
\time 3/4
e8 ( d8 ) cis8\> ( b8 ) a8. ( g16\! ) % <-correct beaming
fis8 ( e8 ) a8 ( a8 ) b8\> ( ais8\! ) % <-incorrect beaming
}
\score { \PartPTwoTwoVoiceOne }
I hope someone can point me in the right direction, it is driving me
desperate!
Thanks in advance,
Arno Rog
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Prospective Lilypond user looking for others who are setting traditional music.
> > Is there anyone who is working on something like this who could send > me a few files to try out. I would welcome receiving a some lily pond > files of say sets of jigs or reels with the resulting .pdf files. Can > anyone help? > > Philip W > Hi Philip, That should be no problem at all. Are we talking about polyphonic settings or monophonic tunes? Perhaps chord symbols? What platform will you be working on? Do you have experience with other scoring programs? Just some questions to determine te complexity of your project and your experience. I could send you some examples if you like, just let me know. Arno Rog ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Redefine lilypond 'function'
L.S. After every update of lilypond I have to make an adjustment to the size of the accidentals in the figured bass 'function'. The sharp and natural are very small and therefore hardly distinguishable; small, especially if you compare it to the size of the figures:-( To achieve this I adapt .\usr\share\lilypond\current\scm\translation-functions.scm and change row 129 (if (not (= alt DOUBLE-SHARP)) -2 2) into (if (not (= alt DOUBLE-SHARP)) -0 0) <--- changed Is there a way to redefine the function at row 103 (define-public (format-bass-figure figure event context) in my .ly file so that I do not have to change translation-functions.scm? Thanks in advance. AwR ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Presentation: & quot; Publisher-grade LilyPond& quot; in Ottawa
Graham Percival percival-music.ca> writes: > Are you seriously going to submit a paper to CMJ saying "a volunteer > open-source project has limited resources for fixing bugs" ??? > > That's classy. Sometimes I wonder why I bother trying to improve lilypond. > > - Graham Graham, There is a difference between perception and fact! Every participant in a project like this will face incomprehension and ignorance from end-users; considering the complexity of Lilypond this comes as no surprise. I myself have moved away from a commercial scorewriter to Lilypond, impressed as I am about the quality of the output, convinced as I am about it's architecture/design and having confidence in the support and development of Lilypond. Regards, Arno Rog ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Writing Orchestral Parts
> New lilypond user, finally got rid of finale (thank god). My question is kind of dumb but I'm really confused about this. > > I have a large ensemble score finished (Brass Choir, Organ and Chorus) and I need to extract parts from this (can you tell I was a finale user for 7 years?) Did I create the file backwards, as in should I have created the parts first then put them into a larger score file? Or is there a variable I set to tell lilypond to generate a part from that line? Hi Josh, Out of experience, I write seperate parts, which I later combine in all kind of scores. You can download a simple example here (mind the wordwrap): http://www.arnorog.nl/private/downloads/lilypond/arr8ab_staden-cantate-domino.7z.bin Rename the download to staden-cantate-domino.7z and unzip it (retaining the file structure) This should get you going. I'm sure there is als some documentation about this. A.W. Rog ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: scribus-1.3.5 also renders lilypond
>Federico Bruni gmx.com> writes: > > interesting! > other info here: > http://docs.scribus.net/index.php?lang=en&page=renderframes > And with the experimental feature 'Embed PDF & EPS files' while saving to pdf Scribus produces razor-sharp (and tiny) pdf-files. Absolutely fabulous! ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Looking for Testers for next version of OOoLilyPond
> > Hi Arno, > > could you please tell me what path the variable sTemplatePath contains? > Hi Samuel I've got it working now. First I had OOoLilyPond_0.3.3.oxt installed. I removed it via the extnesion-manager and installed OOoLilyPond-0.4rc1.oxt. This installation of rc1 generated an error if I choose 'only for me' I re-installed OOoLilyPond_0.3.3.oxt and let OOoLilyPond-0.4.0.oxt do the removing. Now it works! Thanks again. Arno Rog ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Problems regarding figured bass
Reinhold Kainhofer kainhofer.com> writes: > > Hi all, > I'm running into several problems with figured bass while writing another > large orchestral piece. Attached is a sample file highlighting these issues: > And while we're at it, is it possible to enlarge the figured bass? The figures are quite small and hardly to read in 'real life' situations. Until now I apply the following patch: file: usr\share\lilypond\current\scm\translation-functions.scm change (if (not (= alt DOUBLE-SHARP)) -2 2) (alteration->text-accidental-markup alt)) into (if (not (= alt DOUBLE-SHARP)) -0 0) (alteration->text-accidental-markup alt)) (see: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.general/38403) Thanks in advance. AWRog ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Looking for Testers for next version of OOoLilyPond
Samuel Hartmann gmail.com> writes: > The next version of OOoLilyPond is almost finished now. Before the > official release I would like to have some users testing it. You can > download the release candidate from: > http://www.hartmann-weine.ch/OOoLilyPond-0.4rc1.oxt > Tested in OO 3.1.0 (OOO310m11 Build:9399) on WinXP Pro International SP3 with admin credentials - de-installed previous version via extension manager - installed OOoLilyPond-0.4rc1.oxt (only for me) - restart OO - click on [OLy] button - error: General Error. General Input/Output Error - OO jumps to macro-code: ' Check the destination template path, try to create it. If Not FileExists(sTemplatePath) Then MkDir(sTemplatePath) < this line is highlighted Hope this helps. ps. previous version worked ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: [ANN] Nederlandstalig LilyPond forum / Dutch LilyPond user forum
Grammostola Rosea gmail.com> writes: > > > Ik kan me niet registreren... krijg geen email... > Check even je 'spam-box', bij mij verdween hij linea-recta in de spam. AWRog ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lilypond is amazing! (engraving Reubke)
> Hi, > > Just to learn LilyPond better I've engraved the splendid Organ Sonata "Der > 94ste Psalm" by Julius Reubke (1834-1858) with LilyPond 2.13.1. > The result can be seen here [1]. The 28-page score is based on the IMSLP > score > (first edition 1871) of this piece. [Dutch]Werkelijk meesterlijk Wilbert![/Dutch] Magnificent score, exemplary use of incorporating separate ly-files into one score, makes me realize there is still só much to learn!!! Thanks for sharing this and your other ly-files, they should be promoted to the LilyPond Snippet Repository and incorporated into the Lilypond manuals immediately! Beautiful examples to incorporate into a show-case and to convince (so-called) professional printers to accept lilypond-scores (try to typeset this Reubke with Finale/Sibelius!) Arno Rog ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: \compressFullBarRests does not seem to work in lilypond-2.10.33-1
Arno Rog gmail.com> writes: > > Fresh install of lilypond-2.10.33-1.mingw.exe on WinXP. > > \compressFullBarRests generates error: unknown escaped string: > `\compressFullBarRests' Sorry, please disregard! Downloaded inadvertently the old branch :-( instead of 2.13 branch. Where can I download 2.13 version? AWRog ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
\compressFullBarRests does not seem to work in lilypond-2.10.33-1
L.S. Fresh install of lilypond-2.10.33-1.mingw.exe on WinXP. \compressFullBarRests generates error: unknown escaped string: `\compressFullBarRests' AWRog ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: converting rests with specified vertical position to common rests
David Rogers gmail.com> writes:
>
> The short answer is: Yes. Staying with \relative will certainly
> not be a problem.
>
> However, I think it will be a lot of work to find each and every
> rest and simplify the way it's written. The vertical positioning
> is done by adding some extra code to each one of them - simply
> removing that extra code from each rest should give what you
> want and cause no side-effects.
>
> Ordinary rests are just r1 (for whole rest) r2 (for half rest)
> and so on.
>
> David
David,
Thanks for your reply!
There is a problem though when using \relative mode:
\relative c'' {
c g c g | %1
g' b, \rest f g | %2
}
When I change b, \rest to r4 it produces another result because of the use of
\relative!
\relative c'' {
c g c g | %1
g' r4 f g | %2
}
See what I mean?
I hope it can be done via a scheme or something...
Arno Rog
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
converting rests with specified vertical position to common rests
L.S. In the process of converting an musicXML file (from capella) to lilypond all the rests are converted to rests with a specifed vertical position. Is there a way to convert them to 'ordinary' rests without ruining the score (due to the use of \relative music notation)? I'd like to stick to using \relative notation. Thanks in advance. Arno Rog ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Stem Combining
Daniel Cheramie chosenones.dyndns.org> writes: > > I would like to be able to specify each part individually and > have them combined automatically. Is there some simple way to achieve > this with Lilypond? I can provide an example if needed of one > I have done by hand. > > Thanks, > Daniel > Daniel, An example would help. Arno Rog ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Short-indent does not seem to work
L.S. or a large orchestral score I need to repeat the short instrument names on all but the first page. They print fine, but I need some more space to print. Unfortunately, it looks like short-indent (http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.11/Documentation/user/lilypond/Instrument-names#Instrument-names) does not work! James Bailey has mentioned this before in march 2008 (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.general/35875/match=short+indent), no reply though. Can somebody confirm it has been broken? (using ver. 2.11.52) Thanks in advance. AWRog ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Enlarge the size of the accidentals in figured bass
Carl Sorensen byu.edu> writes: > This is the place. I will make the change, if there is consensus on the > -user list > that this is something we want to do. I'm not an expert on figured bass > (as James has noticed in the past) but I'm doing the GDP section on chords, > so I'm familiar with the figured bass part of LilyPond. > > While we're at it, I'd be willing to change the font of the figures > to something > other than the music font. Several have complained in the past that the > figures are too heavy for the music. > > So, figured bass experts, here's your opportunity to chime in: > > 1. Do you want the accidental size increased? > > 2. Do you want the figure number font changed? > > Carl > Carl, Amazing: 1. Yes please increase the accidental size ( 0 0 ), seems fine to me 2. figure font is fine by me. Thanks in advance, Arno Rog (organist, continuo-player) ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Enlarge the size of the accidentals in figured bass
> The default function, format-bass-figure, is found in the file > scm/translation-functions.scm; the relevant part is the following: > > (alt (ly:event-property event 'alteration)) >(alt-markup > (if (number? alt) > (markup > #:general-align Y DOWN #:fontsize > (if (not (= alt DOUBLE-SHARP)) >;fontsize defaults set here, -2 for all accidentals > except double-sharp > -2 2) > (alteration->text-accidental-markup alt)) > > #f)) > > You can either amend it in situ if you want the changes to be global, > or copy it into a .ly file and rename it, setting the function using > \set figuredBassFormatter = #renamed-bass-formatter-function. > > Regards, > Neil > Neil, This is really great! May I suggest a new default value of 0 (zero). The present value is really too small in comparison to the numbers (and to read). Is there a place where I can make such a siggestion for the upcoming release? Arno Rog ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Enlarge the size of the accidentals in figured bass
L.S., Is there a way to enlarge the accidentals in a figured bass, leaving the size of the numbers unchanged? Thanks in advance Arno Rog ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: GDP: NR 2.2 Keyboard instruments first public draft
Graham Percival gmail.com> writes: > > I'm happy to announce that NR 2.2 Keyboard instruments is ready > for the first public review! Thanks to Andrew for writing and > Carl for reviewing this section. > > Please proofread it carefully; let us know about any mistakes or > omissions. As always, GDP website is here: > http://web.uvic.ca/~gperciva/ > > Cheers, > - Graham > Graham, Where to post suggestions? AWRog ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: include does not find ly's
Mark Knoop opus11.net> writes: > > Unfortunately not, although some people may know of workarounds. > > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=391&q=include > Mark, Thanks for your reply. I surely would love to have \includeRelative Until then I'll include several (sets of) includes, luckily the missing includes are ignored, causes large log-files though ;-) Is there a way to speed up the realization of this? Arno Rog ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
include does not find ly's
L.S. I my everlasting journey to engrave a complete cantata I've stumbled upon the problem of nested includes. The problem has been mentioned before, I was unable to find a solution. I have the following directory-structure (Windows): .\ .\PART1 .\PART1\MUSIC .\PART1\MUSIC\violin.ly The file score-part1.ly in directory .\PART1 contains \include "./MUSIC/violin.ly" This works just fine The file partitur.ly in directory .\ contains \include "./PART1/score-part1.ly" This does not work, it is unable to find violin.ly Is there a way to achieve this without using hardcoded path's? Thanks in advance, Arno Rog ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Figured Bass - vertical position and symbol over rest
> Arno, > > The good news is, yes it can be done, and quite simply. You simply need > to set Staff.ignoreFiguredBassRest = ##f. > Carl, You're a genius (or quite close to it) Arno Rog ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Figured Bass - vertical position and symbol over rest
>
> Carl Sorensen byu.edu> writes:
>
Carl,
Thanks for your help.
I've narrowed down the problem a bit.
Begin code
<<
\new Staff = MyStaff
\figuremode {
\override Staff.BassFigureAlignmentPositioning #'direction = #DOWN
\set Staff.useBassFigureExtenders = ##t
< _! >16 < _! >16 < _! >16 < _! >16
\set Staff.useBassFigureExtenders = ##f
}
\relative c {
\clef bass
\key g \minor
\time 2/2
\set Staff.instrumentName = "Continuo"
r16 g'[ a b]
}
>>
%%% End code
In this example, although there is no note in the bass, the continuo player has
to play one chord, starting at the location of the rest and during the remainder
of the example.
It is customary (and is used frequently) to display a line starting from the
first rest all the way to the last note.
schematically:
r g a b
---
It can also happen that for example a sharp is printed below the rest, and a
line below the notes.
schematically
r g a b
#--
Can this be done in above piece of code?
Hope to hear from you an d thanks in advance,
Arno Rog
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Figured Bass - vertical position and symbol over rest
Reinhold Kainhofer kainhofer.com> writes:
>
> Am Donnerstag, 19. Juni 2008 schrieb Arno Rog:
> > Problem is that using the Staff context the figures/symbols are way to low
> > beneath the notes (it looks like they belong to the notes on the staff
> > below)
>
> Yes, that's also a problem I'm encountering
> (http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2008-05/msg00029.html)
>
> > Using \new FiguredBass I am unable to print figures/symbols/extenders
> > below a rest. This is quite customary in figured bass and is becoming
> > somewhat of a show-stopper.
>
> Huh, the figured bass mode is not even aware of rests or notes in the staff,
> so there is realy no reason why it shouldn't work. See the attached example
> for how well it works...
>
> Cheers,
> Reinhold
>
Reinhold,
Thank you for your reply!
Below (and attached) two pieces of score, which should result in
(approximately) the same figured bass.
A. works great but is far to low positioned
B. is positioned more closely to the notes, but does not print figures
and/or lines below rests.
Hope to hear from you!
Arno Rog
Example A
<<
\new Voice \relative c {
\clef bass
\key g \minor
\time 2/2
#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end 1 16 * *) 1 4 )
#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end 1 16 * *) 2 4 )
#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end 1 16 * *) 3 4 )
#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end 1 16 * *) 4 4 )
\set Staff.instrumentName = "Continuo"
g4 r4 r2 %1
r8 g g a bes g16 a bes8 c %2
d d, r16 d'16 e f g8 g, r16 g' a b %3
}
\new FiguredBass {
\figuremode {
< _ >1
r8 r8 r8 < 6+ >8 < 6 >8 r16 r < 6 >8 <6 5>8 %2
< _+ >8 r8 < _! >16 r16*3 < 7 ! >8 r8 \set
useBassFigureExtenders =
##t < _! >16 < _! >16 < _! >16 < _! >16 \set useBassFigureExtenders =
##f %3
}
}
>>
Example B
<<
\new Staff = MyStaff
\figuremode {
\override Staff.BassFigureAlignmentPositioning #'direction =
#DOWN
< _ >1 %1
< _ >8*3 < 6+ >8 < 6 >8 < _ >16*2 < 6 >8 <6 5>8 %2
< _+ >8 < _ >8 < _! >16 < _ >16*3 < 7 ! >8 < _ >8 \set
useBassFigureExtenders = ##t < _! >16 < _! >16 < _! >16 < _! >16 \set
useBassFigureExtenders = ##f %3
}
\context Staff = MyStaff
\relative c {
\clef bass
\key g \minor
\time 2/2
#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end 1 16 * *) 1 4 )
#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end 1 16 * *) 2 4 )
#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end 1 16 * *) 3 4 )
#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end 1 16 * *) 4 4 )
\set Staff.instrumentName = "Continuo"
g4 r4 r2 %1
r8 g g a bes g16 a bes8 c %2
d d, r16 d'16 e f g8 g, r16 g' a b %3
}
>>
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Figured Bass - vertical position and symbol over rest
L.S. I am trying to engrave a Bach cantata using lilypond (latest devel. version on WinXP) So far no problems I can't handle (except for the sheer magnitude of this 'job') Until now, the figured bass. Problem is that using the Staff context the figures/symbols are way to low beneath the notes (it looks like they belong to the notes on the staff below) Using \new FiguredBass I am unable to print figures/symbols/extenders below a rest. This is quite customary in figured bass and is becoming somewhat of a show-stopper. Digging through the mailing-list archive it looks like this has been mentioned before, but I'm unable to find a solution/workaround? Is there a solution? Thanks in advance, Arno Rog ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Convert relative into absolute
Valentin Villenave gmail.com> writes: > > 2008/6/14 Graham Percival gmail.com>: > > You mean precisely like NR 3.3.4 Displaying LilyPond notation ? > > Oh, so you meant \display_Lily_Music instead of \displayMusic > > Cheers, > Valentin > L.S. \displayLilyMusic did the trick. Is there also a command to convert the implicit notelengths into full notation. e.g. r8 d d e f d16 e f8 g -> r8 d8 d8 e8 f8 d16 e16 f8 g8 Thanks in advance Arno Rog p.s. a more complex question: is there a way to perform an action (e.g. transpose) on notes that meet certain criteria (e.g below C) ? ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Convert relative into absolute
L.S. Is there a way (script/program) to convert a 'relative' lilypond score into an absolute notation? Using lilypond 2.11.48 on WinXP Thanks in advance Arno Rog ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
