RE: Modified laissez vibrer ties
Never mind--I found the solution: http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=794
I only just discovered the LSR, so I completely forgot to check there before
bothering everyone here. Oops. :-P
DR
-Original Message-
From: Trevor Daniels [mailto:t.dani...@treda.co.uk]
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2012 12:46 PM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org; David Kastrup; Daniel Rosen
Subject: Re: Modified laissez vibrer ties
David Kastrup wrote Sunday, October 28, 2012 10:07 AM
> Daniel Rosen writes:
>
>> I did consider that; the problem is those ties go _over_ the barline
>> instead of stopping just short, so they'd still need to be adjusted
>> manually.
>
> I tried using normal ties to invisible notes after the barline and
> tweaking to-barline in order to have them stop short. I have not been
> able to make to-barline have any effect, though.
Not very elegant, but this might be a possibility:
\relative c'' {
\override Slur #'to-barline = ##t
a1*3/4( \once \hideNotes a4) a1
}
or, if you prefer,
\relative c'' {
a1*3/4 -\tweak #'to-barline ##t ( \once \hideNotes a4) a1 }
Unlike hairpins, 'to-barline for Slurs seems to extend the slur to the _next_
bar line rather than stopping it short at the previous one.
And the hidden note seems to require a non-zero duration too.
Trevor
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Modified laissez vibrer ties
David Kastrup wrote Sunday, October 28, 2012 10:07 AM
> Daniel Rosen writes:
>
>> I did consider that; the problem is those ties go _over_ the barline
>> instead of stopping just short, so they'd still need to be adjusted
>> manually.
>
> I tried using normal ties to invisible notes after the barline and
> tweaking to-barline in order to have them stop short. I have not been
> able to make to-barline have any effect, though.
Not very elegant, but this might be a possibility:
\relative c'' {
\override Slur #'to-barline = ##t
a1*3/4( \once \hideNotes a4) a1
}
or, if you prefer,
\relative c'' {
a1*3/4 -\tweak #'to-barline ##t ( \once \hideNotes a4) a1
}
Unlike hairpins, 'to-barline for Slurs seems to extend the slur to the
_next_ bar line rather than stopping it short at the previous one.
And the hidden note seems to require a non-zero duration too.
Trevor
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Modified laissez vibrer ties
Daniel Rosen writes: > I did consider that; the problem is those ties go _over_ the barline > instead of stopping just short, so they'd still need to be adjusted > manually. I tried using normal ties to invisible notes after the barline and tweaking to-barline in order to have them stop short. I have not been able to make to-barline have any effect, though. Huh. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Modified laissez vibrer ties
On 28/10/12 17:28, Daniel Rosen wrote:
> Is there a way to extend laissez vibrer ties so that they stop just short of
> the barline, as in the attached example? I can't seem to find a way that
> doesn't involve manually adjusting control points.
You can change the default length of LV ties to make them longer, though
they won't adjust their length to scale to the next barline:
\version "2.16.0"
#(define ((alter-lv-tie-curve offsets) grob)
(let ((coords (ly:semi-tie::calc-control-points grob)))
(define (add-offsets coords offsets)
(if (null? coords)
'()
(cons
(cons (+ (caar coords) (car offsets))
(+ (cdar coords) (cadr offsets)))
(add-offsets (cdr coords) (cddr offsets)
(add-offsets coords offsets)))
xlv = \override LaissezVibrerTie #'before-line-breaking = #(lambda (grob)
(set! (ly:grob-property grob 'control-points)
(if (= UP (ly:grob-property grob 'direction))
((alter-lv-tie-curve '(0 0 0.75 0.7 2.25 0.7 3 0)) grob)
((alter-lv-tie-curve '(0 0 0.75 -0.7 2.25 -0.7 3 0)) grob
\relative c' {
\xlv
c1 \laissezVibrer c
}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Modified laissez vibrer ties
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Daniel Rosen wrote:
> I did consider that; the problem is those ties go _over_ the barline instead
> of stopping just short, so they'd still need to be adjusted manually.
Not if you scale the durations:
{ r2 2*7/8 ~ \hideNotes q2*1/8 \unHideNotes R1 }
but i admit that it doesn't look perfect.
Janek
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: Modified laissez vibrer ties
I did consider that; the problem is those ties go _over_ the barline instead of stopping just short, so they'd still need to be adjusted manually. DR -Original Message- From: Janek Warchoł [mailto:janek.lilyp...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2012 3:31 AM To: Daniel Rosen Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Modified laissez vibrer ties On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Daniel Rosen wrote: > Is there a way to extend laissez vibrer ties so that they stop just > short of the barline, as in the attached example? I can't seem to find a way > that doesn't involve manually adjusting control points. You may consider using a trick: create ties attached to hidden notes. See http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/notation/inside-the-staff#hidden-notes hth, Janek ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Modified laissez vibrer ties
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Daniel Rosen wrote: > Is there a way to extend laissez vibrer ties so that they stop just short of > the barline, > as in the attached example? I can't seem to find a way that doesn't involve > manually adjusting control points. You may consider using a trick: create ties attached to hidden notes. See http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/notation/inside-the-staff#hidden-notes hth, Janek ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
