Re: Dynamics collision in 2.11.64

2008-12-02 Thread Neil Puttock
2008/12/1 Dmytro O. Redchuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> However... i'd say that default behavour became... strange?..

Well, though there was a temporary blip in behaviour due to a bug in
backwards compatibility code between 'to-barline and hairpinToBarline,
it's actually been the default behaviour since version 2.9.5.

Regards,
Neil


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Dynamics collision in 2.11.64

2008-12-01 Thread Dmytro O. Redchuk
2008/11/29 Neil Puttock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Dmytro,
>
>> As you can see (attached), there is everything ok with 2.11.42.
>
> The Bar_engraver is responsible for aligning the end points of line
> spanners with a barline when 'to-barline = ##t; it pays no attention
> to scripts which directly follow a spanner.
Thank you for explanation.

However... i'd say that default behavour became... strange?..

Wouldn't it better to have 'to-barline = ##f by default -- in this case one
(in this situation -- me,-) shouldn't re-check visually all hairpins?

:-)

Yes, i can believe, that #'self-alignment-X = #RIGHT for DynamicText is
uncommon, but... current settings for 'to-barline actually means
"collide by default",
i'd say. Well, wether i do convert-ly or type a new score -- dynamics
collide by default
with 'to-barline = ##t. *If* i have #'self-alignment-X = #RIGHT for DynamicText.

"Have i missed or messed smth *again*?" (mt) :-)

> Regards,
> Neil

-- 
Dmytro O. Redchuk


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Dynamics collision in 2.11.64

2008-11-28 Thread Neil Puttock
Hi Dmytro,

2008/11/28 Dmytro O. Redchuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello,
>
> i've run into some problem with 2.11.64:
> DynamicsText collide with Hairpins if #'to-barline = ##t.
>
> As you can see (attached), there is everything ok with 2.11.42.

The comparison is invalid since 2.11.42 uses the context property
hairpinToBarline, and it defaults to false.  If you run the snippet
with \set hairpinToBarline = ##t, it's identical to 2.11.64.

The Bar_engraver is responsible for aligning the end points of line
spanners with a barline when 'to-barline = ##t; it pays no attention
to scripts which directly follow a spanner.

Regards,
Neil


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Dynamics collision in 2.11.64

2008-11-28 Thread Dmytro O. Redchuk
Hello,

i've run into some problem with 2.11.64:
DynamicsText collide with Hairpins if #'to-barline = ##t.

As you can see (attached), there is everything ok with 2.11.42.

% \version "2.11.64"

\score {
\new Staff \with {
\remove "Time_signature_engraver"
} {
\new Voice \relative c'' {
% \override Hairpin #'to-barline = ##f
c4 c \< c c
c4 \! \mf c c c
\break
%
c4 c \< c c
\once \override DynamicText #'self-alignment-X = #RIGHT
c4 \! \mf c c c
\break
%
c4 c \< c c
\once \override DynamicText #'X-offset = #-5
c4 \! \mf c c c
}
}
}

\paper {
indent = 0
line-width = 7\cm
}

-- 
Dmytro O. Redchuk
<><>___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: dynamics collision

2005-11-21 Thread andrea valle

Thanks for your kindness.

This is a very useful explanation.


Best

-a-

On 21 Nov 2005, at 10:25, Mats Bengtsson wrote:


The point of the DynamicLineSpanner is to keep all dynamics aligned,
both absolute dynamics like \f and \mp and (de)crescendi (both in the
form of hairpins and as text with a dashed line).

Changing the padding property of DynamicsLineSpanner will therefore
move all dynamic indications up or down.

The extra-offset property is fairly well described in "Common Tweaks".
One important difference between the padding and the extra-offset is 
that
if you increase the padding, LilyPond will notice that the dynamic has 
changed
and will adjust the layout of the rest of the score to take this 
change into account,
for example by increasing the space between two staves or between two 
score
lines, if necessary. If you set extra-offset, on the other hand, you 
can be sure
that nothing else will change, so in general I always recommend to use 
the
padding property if you want to things up or down and extra-offset 
only if
you have to move something left or right and it doesn't help to set 
the alignment.


  /Mats

andrea valle wrote:


Ok Mats,
I read it before writing to the list, but it would have help if the 
manual provided an example.


I'd like to add a snippet on the topic to LSR, so I don't want to be 
imprecise.


If I have:

\version "2.6.4"
{
\once \override Score.DynamicLineSpanner #'padding = #1.5 a'4 \pp
\once \override Score.DynamicLineSpanner #'padding = #3.5 a'4 \mp
\once \override Score.DynamicText #'extra-offset = #'( 3.0 . 1.0 ) 
a'4 \mf
\once \override Score.DynamicText #'extra-offset = #'( -9.0 . 9.0 ) 
a'4 \f

}


what is the difference in using DynamicLineSpanner vs. DynamicText?


Thanks

-a-

On 20 Nov 2005, at 17:10, Mats Bengtsson wrote:


Please read at the bottom of the section on "Dynamics" in the manual:
"Vertical positioning of these symbols is handled by
DynamicLineSpanner."
This means that ... should be replaced by DynamicLineSpanner.

   /Mats

Fairchild wrote:


Andrea -
Just tried DynamicText with padding -- seems not to work.
Tried   \once \override DynamicText #'extra-offset = #'( -9.0 . 9.0 
) e \sfz

-- it does.
- Bruce
Andrea -
Try DynamicText.
   - Bruce
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
Behalf Of

andrea valle
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 7:28 PM
To: lilypond-user
Subject: dynamics collision
Hi,
I know that this is in the manual but I'm getting a little crazy 
with this minimal trouble.

I have to move dynamics mark.
I suppose I have to use something like that
  \once \override ... #'padding = #1.5 \sfz
but I'm not able to determine what should substitute the ...
Could someone provide an example?
Thanks
-a-
Andrea Valle
DAMS - Facoltà di Scienze della Formazione
Università degli Studi di Torino
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org 
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user



--
=
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
Signals, Sensors and Systems
Royal Institute of Technology
SE-100 44  STOCKHOLM
Sweden
Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463   Fax:   (+46) 8 790 
7260

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=



Andrea Valle
DAMS - Facoltà di Scienze della Formazione
Università degli Studi di Torino
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-use
r



--
=
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
Signals, Sensors and Systems
Royal Institute of Technology
SE-100 44  STOCKHOLM
Sweden
Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 
   Fax:   (+46) 8 790 7260
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=



Andrea Valle
DAMS - Facoltà di Scienze della Formazione
Università degli Studi di Torino
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: dynamics collision

2005-11-21 Thread Mats Bengtsson

The point of the DynamicLineSpanner is to keep all dynamics aligned,
both absolute dynamics like \f and \mp and (de)crescendi (both in the
form of hairpins and as text with a dashed line).

Changing the padding property of DynamicsLineSpanner will therefore
move all dynamic indications up or down.

The extra-offset property is fairly well described in "Common Tweaks".
One important difference between the padding and the extra-offset is that
if you increase the padding, LilyPond will notice that the dynamic has 
changed
and will adjust the layout of the rest of the score to take this change 
into account,

for example by increasing the space between two staves or between two score
lines, if necessary. If you set extra-offset, on the other hand, you can 
be sure

that nothing else will change, so in general I always recommend to use the
padding property if you want to things up or down and extra-offset only if
you have to move something left or right and it doesn't help to set the 
alignment.


  /Mats

andrea valle wrote:


Ok Mats,
I read it before writing to the list, but it would have help if the 
manual provided an example.


I'd like to add a snippet on the topic to LSR, so I don't want to be 
imprecise.


If I have:

\version "2.6.4"
{
\once \override Score.DynamicLineSpanner #'padding = #1.5 a'4 \pp
\once \override Score.DynamicLineSpanner #'padding = #3.5 a'4 \mp
\once \override Score.DynamicText #'extra-offset = #'( 3.0 . 1.0 ) a'4 
\mf
\once \override Score.DynamicText #'extra-offset = #'( -9.0 . 9.0 ) 
a'4 \f

}


what is the difference in using DynamicLineSpanner vs. DynamicText?


Thanks

-a-

On 20 Nov 2005, at 17:10, Mats Bengtsson wrote:


Please read at the bottom of the section on "Dynamics" in the manual:
"Vertical positioning of these symbols is handled by
DynamicLineSpanner."
This means that ... should be replaced by DynamicLineSpanner.

   /Mats

Fairchild wrote:


Andrea -
Just tried DynamicText with padding -- seems not to work.
Tried   \once \override DynamicText #'extra-offset = #'( -9.0 . 9.0 
) e \sfz

-- it does.
- Bruce
Andrea -
Try DynamicText.
   - Bruce
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
Behalf Of

andrea valle
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 7:28 PM
To: lilypond-user
Subject: dynamics collision
Hi,
I know that this is in the manual but I'm getting a little crazy 
with this minimal trouble.

I have to move dynamics mark.
I suppose I have to use something like that
  \once \override ... #'padding = #1.5 \sfz
but I'm not able to determine what should substitute the ...
Could someone provide an example?
Thanks
-a-
Andrea Valle
DAMS - Facoltà di Scienze della Formazione
Università degli Studi di Torino
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org 
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user



--
=
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
Signals, Sensors and Systems
Royal Institute of Technology
SE-100 44  STOCKHOLM
Sweden
Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463   
Fax:   (+46) 8 790 7260

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=



Andrea Valle
DAMS - Facoltà di Scienze della Formazione
Università degli Studi di Torino
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-use
r



--
=
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
Signals, Sensors and Systems
Royal Institute of Technology
SE-100 44  STOCKHOLM
Sweden
Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 
   Fax:   (+46) 8 790 7260
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=



___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: dynamics collision

2005-11-20 Thread andrea valle

Ok Mats,
I read it before writing to the list, but it would have help if the 
manual provided an example.


I'd like to add a snippet on the topic to LSR, so I don't want to be 
imprecise.


If I have:

\version "2.6.4"
{
\once \override Score.DynamicLineSpanner #'padding = #1.5 a'4 \pp
\once \override Score.DynamicLineSpanner #'padding = #3.5 a'4 \mp
\once \override Score.DynamicText #'extra-offset = #'( 3.0 . 1.0 ) a'4 
\mf
\once \override Score.DynamicText #'extra-offset = #'( -9.0 . 9.0 ) a'4 
\f

}


what is the difference in using DynamicLineSpanner vs. DynamicText?


Thanks

-a-

On 20 Nov 2005, at 17:10, Mats Bengtsson wrote:


Please read at the bottom of the section on "Dynamics" in the manual:
"Vertical positioning of these symbols is handled by
DynamicLineSpanner."
This means that ... should be replaced by DynamicLineSpanner.

   /Mats

Fairchild wrote:

Andrea -
Just tried DynamicText with padding -- seems not to work.
Tried   \once \override DynamicText #'extra-offset = #'( -9.0 . 9.0 ) 
e \sfz

-- it does.
- Bruce
Andrea -
Try DynamicText.
   - Bruce
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
Behalf Of

andrea valle
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 7:28 PM
To: lilypond-user
Subject: dynamics collision
Hi,
I know that this is in the manual but I'm getting a little crazy with 
this minimal trouble.

I have to move dynamics mark.
I suppose I have to use something like that
  \once \override ... #'padding = #1.5 \sfz
but I'm not able to determine what should substitute the ...
Could someone provide an example?
Thanks
-a-
Andrea Valle
DAMS - Facoltà di Scienze della Formazione
Università degli Studi di Torino
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org 
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


--
=
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
Signals, Sensors and Systems
Royal Institute of Technology
SE-100 44  STOCKHOLM
Sweden
Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 
Fax:   (+46) 8 790 7260
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=



Andrea Valle
DAMS - Facoltà di Scienze della Formazione
Università degli Studi di Torino
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: dynamics collision

2005-11-20 Thread Mats Bengtsson

Please read at the bottom of the section on "Dynamics" in the manual:
"Vertical positioning of these symbols is handled by
DynamicLineSpanner."
This means that ... should be replaced by DynamicLineSpanner.

   /Mats

Fairchild wrote:

Andrea -

Just tried DynamicText with padding -- seems not to work.

Tried   \once \override DynamicText #'extra-offset = #'( -9.0 . 9.0 ) e \sfz
-- it does.

- Bruce

Andrea -

Try DynamicText.

   - Bruce

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
andrea valle
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 7:28 PM
To: lilypond-user
Subject: dynamics collision


Hi,

I know that this is in the manual but I'm getting a little crazy with 
this minimal trouble.

I have to move dynamics mark.
I suppose I have to use something like that

  \once \override ... #'padding = #1.5 \sfz

but I'm not able to determine what should substitute the ...

Could someone provide an example?

Thanks
-a-


Andrea Valle
DAMS - Facoltà di Scienze della Formazione
Università degli Studi di Torino
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user





___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


--
=
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
Signals, Sensors and Systems
Royal Institute of Technology
SE-100 44  STOCKHOLM
Sweden
Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 
Fax:   (+46) 8 790 7260
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


RE: dynamics collision

2005-11-19 Thread Fairchild
Andrea -

Just tried DynamicText with padding -- seems not to work.

Tried   \once \override DynamicText #'extra-offset = #'( -9.0 . 9.0 ) e \sfz
-- it does.

- Bruce

Andrea -

Try DynamicText.

   - Bruce

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
andrea valle
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 7:28 PM
To: lilypond-user
Subject: dynamics collision


Hi,

I know that this is in the manual but I'm getting a little crazy with 
this minimal trouble.
I have to move dynamics mark.
I suppose I have to use something like that

  \once \override ... #'padding = #1.5 \sfz

but I'm not able to determine what should substitute the ...

Could someone provide an example?

Thanks
-a-


Andrea Valle
DAMS - Facoltà di Scienze della Formazione
Università degli Studi di Torino
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user





___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


RE: dynamics collision

2005-11-19 Thread Fairchild
Andrea -

Try DynamicText.

   - Bruce

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
andrea valle
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 7:28 PM
To: lilypond-user
Subject: dynamics collision


Hi,

I know that this is in the manual but I'm getting a little crazy with 
this minimal trouble.
I have to move dynamics mark.
I suppose I have to use something like that

  \once \override ... #'padding = #1.5 \sfz

but I'm not able to determine what should substitute the ...

Could someone provide an example?

Thanks
-a-


Andrea Valle
DAMS - Facoltà di Scienze della Formazione
Università degli Studi di Torino
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user





___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


dynamics collision

2005-11-18 Thread andrea valle

Hi,

I know that this is in the manual but I'm getting a little crazy with 
this minimal trouble.

I have to move dynamics mark.
I suppose I have to use something like that

 \once \override ... #'padding = #1.5 \sfz

but I'm not able to determine what should substitute the ...

Could someone provide an example?

Thanks
-a-


Andrea Valle
DAMS - Facoltà di Scienze della Formazione
Università degli Studi di Torino
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Pedal + dynamics collision

2005-09-03 Thread andrea valle

Hi to all,
after producing automatically some hundreds fragment of lily code with 
very satisfying results simply using default setting (thanks for the 
work, guys), I have this little problem.
In the following code, macosx 10.3.8, lily 2.5.29, Pedal sign collides 
with dynamics.


% start
\version "2.5.29"
{<  f' a' ais' dis'' c''' cis''' > 4 \sustainDown \mp}
% end

How can I solve? I took a look at the docs but I wasn't able to find a 
solution (which I am sure is already there).


Thanks a lot

-a-

Andrea Valle
Laboratorio multimediale "G. Quazza"
Facoltà di Scienze della Formazione
Università degli Studi di Torino
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user