RE: markup text height
How about compromising with the "mf" and "con passione" on the same vertical line as the default. Or, stack them in the order presented, as with consecutive \markups. - Bruce -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Han-Wen Nienhuys Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 5:06 PM To: Roman V. Isaev Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: markup text height Roman V. Isaev wrote: > Yep, thanks, it worked. It looks like I'm doomed to live with > development branch -- first was 2.5 because of unicode, now 2.7 > because of this :) > > I found another collision: > > d'8[( ^"a tempo" \mf _"con passione" cis' a b cis' a]) | > > http://www.soprano-recorder.ru/tmp/question5.gif > > \mf and "con passione" got messed up. Will this behavior change? perhaps, but for now you have to intervene manually. I don't think it's unequivocal which one should be on top, so automation will be difficult. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: markup text height
Roman - Please provide enough translation of http://www.soprano-recorder.ru for an English-only person, like me, to find your music postings, especially the Lily code. - Bruce ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: markup text height
Roman V. Isaev wrote: Yep, thanks, it worked. It looks like I'm doomed to live with development branch -- first was 2.5 because of unicode, now 2.7 because of this :) I found another collision: d'8[( ^"a tempo" \mf _"con passione" cis' a b cis' a]) | http://www.soprano-recorder.ru/tmp/question5.gif \mf and "con passione" got messed up. Will this behavior change? perhaps, but for now you have to intervene manually. I don't think it's unequivocal which one should be on top, so automation will be difficult. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: markup text height
On 11/17, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > >but it's a lot to type the same markup syntax many times. Is there any way > >to do this automagically (i.e. if the text crosses slur line, then raise > >the text above slur)? Or at least do that rasing somehow less wordy, like > >^^"text" gets raised by #1.0, ^^^"text" gets raised by #2.0, etc? > this is fixed in 2.7.x Yep, thanks, it worked. It looks like I'm doomed to live with development branch -- first was 2.5 because of unicode, now 2.7 because of this :) I found another collision: d'8[( ^"a tempo" \mf _"con passione" cis' a b cis' a]) | http://www.soprano-recorder.ru/tmp/question5.gif \mf and "con passione" got messed up. Will this behavior change? -- Roman V. Isaev http://www.soprano-recorder.ru Moscow, Russia ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: markup text height
Roman V. Isaev wrote: When I type d'8[( \f ^"Sostenuto" e' f' e' d' e']) | I get somethig horrible: http://www.soprano-recorder.ru/tmp/question4.gif Ugh. I have to enter d'8[( \f ^\markup { " " \raise #1.5 "Sostenuto" } e' f' e' d' e']) | but it's a lot to type the same markup syntax many times. Is there any way to do this automagically (i.e. if the text crosses slur line, then raise the text above slur)? Or at least do that rasing somehow less wordy, like ^^"text" gets raised by #1.0, ^^^"text" gets raised by #2.0, etc? this is fixed in 2.7.x -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: markup text height
The standard method to move objects further away from the stave is to increase the padding, as described in "Common Tweaks" in the manual. For example \override TextScript #'padding = #3.0 to move all text scripts upwards. You can also define a macro like moveup = \once \override TextScript #'padding = #3.0 that you can use \moveup d^"Sostenuto" Another popular trick is d^" "^"Sostenuto" but I find that more ugly. /Mats Roman V. Isaev wrote: When I type d'8[( \f ^"Sostenuto" e' f' e' d' e']) | I get somethig horrible: http://www.soprano-recorder.ru/tmp/question4.gif Ugh. I have to enter d'8[( \f ^\markup { " " \raise #1.5 "Sostenuto" } e' f' e' d' e']) | but it's a lot to type the same markup syntax many times. Is there any way to do this automagically (i.e. if the text crosses slur line, then raise the text above slur)? Or at least do that rasing somehow less wordy, like ^^"text" gets raised by #1.0, ^^^"text" gets raised by #2.0, etc? -- = Mats Bengtsson Signal Processing Signals, Sensors and Systems Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Sweden Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe = ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
markup text height
When I type d'8[( \f ^"Sostenuto" e' f' e' d' e']) | I get somethig horrible: http://www.soprano-recorder.ru/tmp/question4.gif Ugh. I have to enter d'8[( \f ^\markup { " " \raise #1.5 "Sostenuto" } e' f' e' d' e']) | but it's a lot to type the same markup syntax many times. Is there any way to do this automagically (i.e. if the text crosses slur line, then raise the text above slur)? Or at least do that rasing somehow less wordy, like ^^"text" gets raised by #1.0, ^^^"text" gets raised by #2.0, etc? -- Roman V. Isaev http://www.soprano-recorder.ru Moscow, Russia ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user