Re: [PATCH] devpts: Make ptmx be owned by the userns owner instead of userns-local 0

2016-03-15 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Mar 14, 2016 1:35 AM, "Serge Hallyn"  wrote:
>
> Quoting Andy Lutomirski (l...@kernel.org):
> > We used to have ptmx be owned by the inner uid and gid 0.  Change
> > this: if the owner and group are both mapped but are not both 0,
> > then use the owner instead.
> >
> > For container-style namespaces (LXC, etc), this should have no
> > effect -- UID 0 is will either be the owner or will be unmapped.
>
> This doesn't seem right - it's often the case that the owner is mapped
> in as non-0 uid, safe or not.  The actual namespace root uid should be
> the owner (so long as it exists).
>
> Why not reverse the cases?  If 0 is not mapped, then check whether the
> current_user_ns()->owner is mapped?

Good point, and less chance of breakage that way as well.

--Andy


Re: [PATCH] devpts: Make ptmx be owned by the userns owner instead of userns-local 0

2016-03-14 Thread Alexander Larsson
On sön, 2016-03-13 at 22:06 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> We used to have ptmx be owned by the inner uid and gid 0.  Change
> this: if the owner and group are both mapped but are not both 0,
> then use the owner instead.
> 
> For container-style namespaces (LXC, etc), this should have no
> effect -- UID 0 is will either be the owner or will be unmapped.
> 
> The important behavior change is for sandboxes: many sandboxes
> intentionally do not create an inner uid 0.  Without this patch,
> mounting devpts in such a sandbox is awkward.  With this patch, it
> will just work and ptmx will be owned by the namespace owner.
> 
> Cc: Alexander Larsson 
> Cc: mcla...@redhat.com
> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" 
> Cc: Linux Containers 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski 

Tested-by: Alexander Larsson 

Seems to work fine for me! Thanks!

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 Alexander LarssonRed Hat, Inc 
   al...@redhat.comalexander.lars...@gmail.com 
He's an uncontrollable voodoo librarian with a robot buddy named Sparky. 
She's a cynical winged journalist from the wrong side of the tracks. They 
fight crime! 




Re: [PATCH] devpts: Make ptmx be owned by the userns owner instead of userns-local 0

2016-03-14 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Andy Lutomirski (l...@kernel.org):
> We used to have ptmx be owned by the inner uid and gid 0.  Change
> this: if the owner and group are both mapped but are not both 0,
> then use the owner instead.
> 
> For container-style namespaces (LXC, etc), this should have no
> effect -- UID 0 is will either be the owner or will be unmapped.

This doesn't seem right - it's often the case that the owner is mapped
in as non-0 uid, safe or not.  The actual namespace root uid should be
the owner (so long as it exists).

Why not reverse the cases?  If 0 is not mapped, then check whether the
current_user_ns()->owner is mapped?

> The important behavior change is for sandboxes: many sandboxes
> intentionally do not create an inner uid 0.  Without this patch,
> mounting devpts in such a sandbox is awkward.  With this patch, it
> will just work and ptmx will be owned by the namespace owner.
> 
> Cc: Alexander Larsson 
> Cc: mcla...@redhat.com
> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" 
> Cc: Linux Containers 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski 
> ---
>  fs/devpts/inode.c | 34 ++
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/devpts/inode.c b/fs/devpts/inode.c
> index 655f21f99160..d6fa2d1beee3 100644
> --- a/fs/devpts/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/devpts/inode.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
>  #include 
>  #include 
>  #include 
> +#include 
>  
>  #define DEVPTS_DEFAULT_MODE 0600
>  /*
> @@ -250,10 +251,35 @@ static int mknod_ptmx(struct super_block *sb)
>   kuid_t root_uid;
>   kgid_t root_gid;
>  
> - root_uid = make_kuid(current_user_ns(), 0);
> - root_gid = make_kgid(current_user_ns(), 0);
> - if (!uid_valid(root_uid) || !gid_valid(root_gid))
> - return -EINVAL;
> + /*
> +  * For a new devpts instance, ptmx is owned by the creating user
> +  * namespace's owner.  Usually, that will be 0 as seen by the
> +  * user namespace, but for unprivileged sandbox namespaces,
> +  * there may not be a uid 0 or gid 0 at all.
> +  */
> + root_uid = current_user_ns()->owner;
> + root_gid = current_user_ns()->group;
> +
> + if (!uid_valid(root_uid) || !gid_valid(root_gid)) {
> + /*
> +  * It's very unlikely for us to get here if the userns
> +  * owner is not mapped, but it's possible -- we'd have
> +  * to be running in the userns with capabilities granted
> +  * by unshare or setns, since there is no inner
> +  * privileged user.  Nonetheless, this could happen, and
> +  * we don't want ptmx to be owned by an unmapped user or
> +  * group.
> +  *
> +  * If this happens fall back to historical behavior:
> +  * try to have ptmx be owned by 0:0.
> +  */
> + root_uid = make_kuid(current_user_ns(), 0);
> + root_gid = make_kgid(current_user_ns(), 0);
> +
> + /* If this still doesn't work, give up. */
> + if (!uid_valid(root_uid) || !gid_valid(root_gid))
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
>  
>   inode_lock(d_inode(root));
>  
> -- 
> 2.5.0
> 
> ___
> Containers mailing list
> contain...@lists.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers


[PATCH] devpts: Make ptmx be owned by the userns owner instead of userns-local 0

2016-03-13 Thread Andy Lutomirski
We used to have ptmx be owned by the inner uid and gid 0.  Change
this: if the owner and group are both mapped but are not both 0,
then use the owner instead.

For container-style namespaces (LXC, etc), this should have no
effect -- UID 0 is will either be the owner or will be unmapped.

The important behavior change is for sandboxes: many sandboxes
intentionally do not create an inner uid 0.  Without this patch,
mounting devpts in such a sandbox is awkward.  With this patch, it
will just work and ptmx will be owned by the namespace owner.

Cc: Alexander Larsson 
Cc: mcla...@redhat.com
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" 
Cc: Linux Containers 
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski 
---
 fs/devpts/inode.c | 34 ++
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/devpts/inode.c b/fs/devpts/inode.c
index 655f21f99160..d6fa2d1beee3 100644
--- a/fs/devpts/inode.c
+++ b/fs/devpts/inode.c
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
 #include 
 #include 
 #include 
+#include 
 
 #define DEVPTS_DEFAULT_MODE 0600
 /*
@@ -250,10 +251,35 @@ static int mknod_ptmx(struct super_block *sb)
kuid_t root_uid;
kgid_t root_gid;
 
-   root_uid = make_kuid(current_user_ns(), 0);
-   root_gid = make_kgid(current_user_ns(), 0);
-   if (!uid_valid(root_uid) || !gid_valid(root_gid))
-   return -EINVAL;
+   /*
+* For a new devpts instance, ptmx is owned by the creating user
+* namespace's owner.  Usually, that will be 0 as seen by the
+* user namespace, but for unprivileged sandbox namespaces,
+* there may not be a uid 0 or gid 0 at all.
+*/
+   root_uid = current_user_ns()->owner;
+   root_gid = current_user_ns()->group;
+
+   if (!uid_valid(root_uid) || !gid_valid(root_gid)) {
+   /*
+* It's very unlikely for us to get here if the userns
+* owner is not mapped, but it's possible -- we'd have
+* to be running in the userns with capabilities granted
+* by unshare or setns, since there is no inner
+* privileged user.  Nonetheless, this could happen, and
+* we don't want ptmx to be owned by an unmapped user or
+* group.
+*
+* If this happens fall back to historical behavior:
+* try to have ptmx be owned by 0:0.
+*/
+   root_uid = make_kuid(current_user_ns(), 0);
+   root_gid = make_kgid(current_user_ns(), 0);
+
+   /* If this still doesn't work, give up. */
+   if (!uid_valid(root_uid) || !gid_valid(root_gid))
+   return -EINVAL;
+   }
 
inode_lock(d_inode(root));
 
-- 
2.5.0